logo
UBC professor played key role in development of mRNA vaccine technology

UBC professor played key role in development of mRNA vaccine technology

CBC12-03-2025
Pieter Cullis remembers giving a talk at Pfizer in March 2020, just days before Canada implemented stay-at-home measures to curb the deadly COVID-19 pandemic. Five years later, and after the mRNA vaccine technology he worked on found its way into billions of shots, he reflects on the role of nanoparticles in vaccines and how the cancer therapeutics he's helping to develop are next.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Albertans can start pre-ordering paid COVID-19 shots after June policy shift
Albertans can start pre-ordering paid COVID-19 shots after June policy shift

Edmonton Journal

time2 hours ago

  • Edmonton Journal

Albertans can start pre-ordering paid COVID-19 shots after June policy shift

A nurse delivers a COVID-19 vaccination shot at the First Nations Vaccination Clinic at the River Cree Resort and Casino, near Edmonton Tuesday April 13, 2021. Photo by David Bloom / Postmedia EDMONTON — Albertans can begin pre-ordering COVID-19 shots for the fall after a recent policy shift. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Exclusive articles by David Staples, Keith Gerein and others, Oilers news from Cult of Hockey, Ask EJ Anything features, the Noon News Roundup and Under the Dome newsletters. Unlimited online access to Edmonton Journal and 15 news sites with one account. Edmonton Journal ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Exclusive articles by David Staples, Keith Gerein and others, Oilers news from Cult of Hockey, Ask EJ Anything features, the Noon News Roundup and Under the Dome newsletters. Unlimited online access to Edmonton Journal and 15 news sites with one account. Edmonton Journal ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Those looking to get vaccinated will still need to book an appointment and most will have to pay more than $100 to get it. Premier Danielle Smith's government announced the policy shift in June. Smith has said $135 million got 'flushed down the drain' last year, with doses wasted in part because Albertans are increasingly choosing to not get them. The premier also has cast doubt on how well the COVID vaccine works, while still covering the costs of it for some, including those with compromised immune systems. Public health experts have said the policy could introduce barriers to getting vaccinated and lead to higher costs for things such as hospitalizations and severe complications. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 11, 2025.

Albertans can start pre-ordering paid COVID-19 shots after June policy shift
Albertans can start pre-ordering paid COVID-19 shots after June policy shift

Winnipeg Free Press

time2 hours ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Albertans can start pre-ordering paid COVID-19 shots after June policy shift

EDMONTON – Albertans can begin pre-ordering COVID-19 shots for the fall after a recent policy shift. Those looking to get vaccinated will still need to book an appointment and most will have to pay more than $100 to get it. Premier Danielle Smith's government announced the policy shift in June. Smith has said $135 million got 'flushed down the drain' last year, with doses wasted in part because Albertans are increasingly choosing to not get them. The premier also has cast doubt on how well the COVID vaccine works, while still covering the costs of it for some, including those with compromised immune systems. Public health experts have said the policy could introduce barriers to getting vaccinated and lead to higher costs for things such as hospitalizations and severe complications. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 11, 2025.

B.C. doctor loses challenge of dismissal for COVID vaccine refusal
B.C. doctor loses challenge of dismissal for COVID vaccine refusal

The Province

time4 hours ago

  • The Province

B.C. doctor loses challenge of dismissal for COVID vaccine refusal

Dr. Theresa Szezepaniak said her Charter rights were violated when she had her hospital privileges revoked for refusing to get vaccinated A B.C. doctor argued her Charter rights were violated when she was dismissed as a hospitalist for refusing the COVID-19 vaccine during a provincial health order. Photo by Getty Images A B.C. judge has rejected a Charter challenge brought by a Kamloops doctor who said her rights were violated when her hospital privileges were revoked for refusing to get the COVID-19 vaccine. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Exclusive articles by top sports columnists Patrick Johnston, Ben Kuzma, J.J. Abrams and others. Plus, Canucks Report, Sports and Headline News newsletters and events. Unlimited online access to The Province and 15 news sites with one account. The Province ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles and comics, including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Exclusive articles by top sports columnists Patrick Johnston, Ben Kuzma, J.J. Abrams and others. Plus, Canucks Report, Sports and Headline News newsletters and events. Unlimited online access to The Province and 15 news sites with one account. The Province ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles and comics, including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Dr. Theresa Szezepaniak brought the action in B.C. Supreme Court in Kelowna against the Interior Health Authority and the Hospital Appeal Board, which upheld the health agency's decision. Judge Steven Wilson said the revocation was an administrative decision, not a matter of Charter rights, and ruled in favour of health officials. Szezepaniak worked as a hospitalist at Royal Inland Hospital in Kamloops during the pandemic. On Oct. 14, 2021, provincial health officer Dr. Bonnie Henry issued an order that all doctors and nurses must be vaccinated. Those who refused were told they must resign their privileges or run the risk of being disciplined. The doctor refused either to get the vaccine or resign, instead launching an appeal with the Hospital Appeal Board, which largely upheld the decision of Interior Health, although it 'concluded that the sanction of termination was too harsh.' Essential reading for hockey fans who eat, sleep, Canucks, repeat. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The appeal board said Szezepaniak should be suspended instead, effectively ending her contract while the health order was in place. Szezepaniak 'argues that her decision not to be vaccinated was one she was entitled to make, and because the provincial health order precluded her from working at the hospital, she ought not to have been disciplined at all.' The doctor argued the discipline meant she has a 'black mark' on her record that will have to be disclosed whenever she applies for new positions. She argued that violates Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms because it 'includes the right to earn an income to support oneself and family.' The judge noted neither the validity of the health order nor the question of the efficacy of the COVID vaccine were at issue in the case. The judge also said it was not a test of the 'procedural fairness' of the appeal board hearing or of Interior Health's procedures and rules for employees. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Szezepaniak has been practising medicine for 23 years and was a clinical instructor at UBC for 15 years. The primary earner in her family, she moved to 100 Mile House and took a position there after the Royal Inland dismissal. Hospital privileges in all B.C. health authorities are reviewed annually by the regional board of directors, and when a medical worker fails to abide by the Hospital Act or any of its bylaws, a disciplinary process is started. Interior Health's board cancelled Szezepaniak's hospital privileges in a resolution dated Aug. 18, 2022. She appealed to the Hospital Appeal Board, which upheld the dismissal and rejected the Charter argument. The appeal board 'acknowledged that the petitioner was free to make the decision to remain unvaccinated, but concluded that discipline was nonetheless the consequence of that decision.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. As for the Charter argument, the appeal board said the health authority was only making a 'routine or regular' application of existing government policy. 'While made in response to the effects of the (provincial health) order, it did not constitute application or implementation of government policy.' The judge also agreed the operational decision to suspend Szezepaniak's hospital privileges was not 'patently unreasonable' in the circumstances, a condition that could trigger a Charter challenge. 'I do not accept that a hospital board's ability to exclude a practitioner from the hospital for failing to comply with the bylaws is a decision that is governmental in nature,' said the judge in the ruling posted online late last week. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. While the vaccination mandate was a provincial health order, 'the decision regarding how to discipline the hospital medical staff for their breach of the PHO (order) was not subject to governmental control under the Hospital Act, as the responsibility for adopting disciplinary measures for governmental policies rests with the Interior Health Authority board. 'It follows that I conclude that the Charter does not apply to the circumstances in this case.' Though acknowledging that Szezepaniak encountered 'stress and hardship' in making her decision to reject the vaccine, the judge said that 'does not make the orders a state interference with their physical or psychological integrity.' The judge referred to an earlier ruling that said 'the right to security of the person does not protect the individual from the ordinary stresses and anxieties that a person of reasonable sensibility would suffer as a result of government action. 'If the right were interpreted with such broad sweep, countless government initiatives could be challenged on the ground that they infringe the right to security of the person, massively expanding the scope of judicial review, and, in the process, trivializing what it means for a right to be constitutionally protected.' jruttle@ Read More Local News University News Real Estate News

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store