July 21 decision on whether Zayn Rayyan's parents to enter defence in child neglect case
PETALING JAYA: The Sessions Court here today set July 21 to deliver the decision on whether Zayn Rayyan Abdul Matin's parents, Zaim Ikhwan Zahari and Ismanira Abdul Manaf, are to enter their defence, or be acquitted of the charge of neglecting the six-year-old autistic child, to the point of causing physical harm to him.
Judge Dr Syahliza Warnoh fixed the date after deputy public prosecutor (DPP) Raja Zaizul Faridah Raja Zaharudin informed the court that the prosecution would be closing its case today, having called 28 witnesses over the course of the 20-day trial, which began on Feb 4.
'The court has set July 21 for the decision, and if the accused are ordered to enter their defence, the defence trial will commence on the same day, and continue until July 24,' said the judge.
The court also fixed May 23 as the deadline for written submissions, with reply submissions by June 6.
Among the witnesses called during the trial were Faizul Najib Abd Munaim, the first person to discover the victim's body; the child's babysitter Auni Afiqah Abas; forensic consultant physician Dr Rohayu Shahar Adnan; three investigating officers; and two 10-year-old child witnesses.
Earlier, Raja Zaizul Faridah announced that all 28 prosecution witnesses had given their statements, and that the prosecution did not intend to call any additional witnesses.
'There are no other witnesses to be called, and with this, we close the prosecution's case. We offer 23 witnesses to the defence, and the list has been provided,' said Raja Zaizul Faridah, who is handling the case alongside DPPs Aqharie Durranie Aziz and Nur Sabrina Zubairi.
When asked about the number of defence witnesses expected to be called, should the accused be ordered to enter their defence, defence counsel Ramzani Idris said that they may call up to seven witnesses.
The two accused are also represented by lawyers, Haresh Mahadevan and Lavanesh Haresh.
On June 13 last year, Zaim Ikhwan and Ismanira, both 30, pleaded not guilty to a charge of neglecting their six-year-old autistic son in a manner likely to cause physical harm.
The offence allegedly occurred along PJU Damansara Damai, between noon on Dec 5 and 9.55 pm on Dec 6, 2023.
They were charged under Section 31(1)(a) of the Child Act 2001, which is punishable by a maximum fine of RM50,000, imprisonment of up to 20 years, or both, upon conviction.
Zayn Rayyan was reported missing on Dec 5, 2023, and his body was discovered in a stream near his home at Apartment Idaman, Damansara Damai, the following day.
He was believed to have been murdered, and an autopsy revealed injuries to his neck and body, consistent with self-defence.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Muhammed Yusoff acquitted
Free at last: Muhammed Yusoff leaving the High Court in Kuala Lumpur after the verdict was announced. — Bernama KUALA LUMPUR: Former research assistant Muhammed Yusoff Rawther walked out a free man after the High Court here acquitted him of two charges of drug trafficking and possession of imitation firearms. Justice Muhammad Jamil Hussin ruled that the prosecution has failed to prove a prima facie case against the 32-year-old. In his judgment, the judge said the prosecution had failed to prove that the accused had control, custody and possession of two imitation pistols and 305g of cannabis. He noted that a car, in which the items were found, belonged to Muhammed Yusoff, and the car keys and remote control were in his possession. 'It is undeniable that he was near the car and opened the door when the police conducted their operation. But that does not mean we can conclude that the accused has exclusive control of the car, nor does he have custody and control over the pistols and the drugs,' he said in his decision at the end of the prosecution's case yesterday. Justice Muhammad Jamil also said the accused's behaviour during the operation was consistent with that of a person with no knowledge of the items found in the car. After he was arrested, Muhammed Yusoff told the police that he was 'a victim who was framed by Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim', the judge said. 'However, the police did not carry out any investigation to verify this claim. The failure to investigate has denied the accused the right to a fair trial. 'Therefore, it is not safe for the court to call the accused to enter his defence. 'I hereby make the order to discharge and acquit the accused without calling for his defence,' the judge added. On Sept 12, 2024, Muhammed Yusoff was charged with trafficking in 305g of cannabis. The drug was found in his vehicle near the surau at the Kuala Lumpur police headquarters at 10.15am on Sept 6, 2024. He was charged under Section 39B(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, which carries a sentence of life imprisonment and at least 12 strokes of the cane, upon conviction. He was also charged with possessing two imitation firearms by the roadside near a condominium in Jalan Bukit Kiara at 9.25am the same day. The charge was framed under Section 36(1) of the Arms Act 1960, which provides for a maximum penalty of one year in prison, a fine of up to RM5,000, or both, upon conviction. Muhammed Yusoff, who wore a striped long-sleeve shirt, was greeted by a large group of people outside of the court complex after his release. He told reporters that he was grateful for the court's decision and thanked his family, lawyers and others who supported him. Throughout the trial, Muhammed Yusoff was detained at the Sungai Buloh prison as the offence he was accused of did not allow for bail.
Borneo Post
11 hours ago
- Borneo Post
Indonesian workers with expired social visit passes jailed 5 months for overstaying in Miri
According to the facts of the case, police and immigration officers conducted a joint raid on an entertainment centre along Jalan Kubu here at around 10pm on May 9, 2025 and detained six men for inspection. – Photo by Jenifer Laeng MIRI (June 12): Six foreign workers were each sentenced to five months in prison by the Sessions Court here today for overstaying here. Judge Afidah Abdul Rahman also ordered Indonesian nationals Andriyanto, 33, Wisnu Zaeni Malik, 21, Udin, 26, Rendi Farizi, 31, Ricky Muhamad Hakim, 22, and Rudi Ramli, 40, to be referred to the Immigration Department upon their release for deportation. The six were charged under Section 15(1)(c) of the Immigration Act 1959/63, punishable under Section 15(4) of the same Act, which provides for a fine not exceeding RM10,000 or imprisonment for up to five years, or both, upon conviction. According to the facts of the case, police and immigration officers conducted a joint raid on an entertainment centre along Jalan Kubu here at around 10pm on May 9, 2025 and detained six men for inspection. Checks revealed they were Indonesian citizens whose social visit passes had expired. In separate proceedings in the same courtroom, Judge Afidah sentenced an Indonesian woman and her two male counterparts to three months' jail each after they pleaded guilty to abusing their social visit passes. Muhammad Mauludin, 30, Mujahidin Adu, 43, and Aliza, 25, were charged under Regulation 11(7) of the Immigration Regulations 1963, punishable under Regulation 39(b) of the same law, which carries imprisonment not exceeding six months or a fine not exceeding RM1,000, or both, upon conviction. They committed the offence at around 4.35pm on May 8, 2025 by working at a restaurant in the Saberkas Commercial Centre here, thus violating their social visit passes. In mitigation, the trio pleaded to the court for a lenient sentence, citing this was their first offence. Immigration Department Miri enforcement officer Abdul Sophian Mohamad prosecuted both cases, while all of the accused were unrepresented by legal counsel. Indonesian workers jail miri overstaying
Borneo Post
11 hours ago
- Borneo Post
Company in Kuching fined RM150,000 for operating unlicensed clinic offering beauty, skincare services
According to the charge, the company was operating a private clinic without a licence under Section 27 of the Private Healthcare Facilities and Services Act 1998. – Photo by Chimon Upon KUCHING (June 12): The Sessions Court here today fined a company providing beauty and skincare services RM150,000 for operating a private clinic without a licence. Judge Musli Ab Hamid imposed the fine after the company's representative pleaded guilty to a charge under Section 4(1) of the Private Healthcare Facilities and Services Act 1998, punishable under Section 5(1)(b) of the same Act, which provides for a fine not exceeding RM500,000 upon conviction. In passing the sentence, the court allowed for the fine to be settled in six monthly instalment payments of RM25,000 each, starting from this month. The judge also fixed Dec 17, 2025 for another mention date for the prosecution to monitor the instalment payments. According to the charge, the company was operating a private clinic without a licence under Section 27 of the Private Healthcare Facilities and Services Act 1998. The offence was committed at the company's premises at Jalan Laksamana Cheng Ho here at around 11am on Aug 23, 2023. Based on the facts of the case, the Private Medical Practice Control Section of the Sarawak Health Department raided the premises on suspicion of operating as an unregistered private medical clinic. During the inspection, a man representing the company, who was also the attending medical practitioner, failed to produce the clinic's certificate of registration when requested by enforcement officers. Several documents and equipment believed to have been used in the clinic's operations were also seized as evidence. The prosecution was conducted by Sarawak Health Department prosecuting officer Norzaizeli Abu Samah, while the company was represented by lawyer Daniel Ling. beauty fine Kuching private clinic skincare
