July 21 decision on whether Zayn Rayyan's parents to enter defence in child neglect case
PETALING JAYA: The Sessions Court here today set July 21 to deliver the decision on whether Zayn Rayyan Abdul Matin's parents, Zaim Ikhwan Zahari and Ismanira Abdul Manaf, are to enter their defence, or be acquitted of the charge of neglecting the six-year-old autistic child, to the point of causing physical harm to him.
Judge Dr Syahliza Warnoh fixed the date after deputy public prosecutor (DPP) Raja Zaizul Faridah Raja Zaharudin informed the court that the prosecution would be closing its case today, having called 28 witnesses over the course of the 20-day trial, which began on Feb 4.
'The court has set July 21 for the decision, and if the accused are ordered to enter their defence, the defence trial will commence on the same day, and continue until July 24,' said the judge.
The court also fixed May 23 as the deadline for written submissions, with reply submissions by June 6.
Among the witnesses called during the trial were Faizul Najib Abd Munaim, the first person to discover the victim's body; the child's babysitter Auni Afiqah Abas; forensic consultant physician Dr Rohayu Shahar Adnan; three investigating officers; and two 10-year-old child witnesses.
Earlier, Raja Zaizul Faridah announced that all 28 prosecution witnesses had given their statements, and that the prosecution did not intend to call any additional witnesses.
'There are no other witnesses to be called, and with this, we close the prosecution's case. We offer 23 witnesses to the defence, and the list has been provided,' said Raja Zaizul Faridah, who is handling the case alongside DPPs Aqharie Durranie Aziz and Nur Sabrina Zubairi.
When asked about the number of defence witnesses expected to be called, should the accused be ordered to enter their defence, defence counsel Ramzani Idris said that they may call up to seven witnesses.
The two accused are also represented by lawyers, Haresh Mahadevan and Lavanesh Haresh.
On June 13 last year, Zaim Ikhwan and Ismanira, both 30, pleaded not guilty to a charge of neglecting their six-year-old autistic son in a manner likely to cause physical harm.
The offence allegedly occurred along PJU Damansara Damai, between noon on Dec 5 and 9.55 pm on Dec 6, 2023.
They were charged under Section 31(1)(a) of the Child Act 2001, which is punishable by a maximum fine of RM50,000, imprisonment of up to 20 years, or both, upon conviction.
Zayn Rayyan was reported missing on Dec 5, 2023, and his body was discovered in a stream near his home at Apartment Idaman, Damansara Damai, the following day.
He was believed to have been murdered, and an autopsy revealed injuries to his neck and body, consistent with self-defence.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
22 minutes ago
- The Star
Contractor fined RM50,000 for falsifying documents on MMEA vessel repairs
SHAH ALAM: A contractor was fined RM50,000 by the Sessions Court here after he pleaded guilty to forging documents related to repair works on a Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency (MMEA) patrol vessel five years ago. Judge Datuk Mohd Nasir Nordin handed down the sentence on Zulham Shah Mohammad, 44, on Thursday (June 12) and ordered him to serve six months in jail if he failed to pay the fine. The accused was charged with submitting false documents certifying that Subturbo Sdn Bhd had completed the repairs and tested the Remote Control System and Monitoring Control System on KM Sugut when, in fact, the work had not been carried out. He was accused of committing the offence at the MMEA Engineering Division, Home Ministry, Levels 4 to 11, One IOI Square, IOI Resort, Putrajaya, on Nov 6, 2020. The charge was framed under Section 471 of the Penal Code for fraudulently using as genuine a forged document, punishable under Section 465 of the same Code, which provides for a maximum sentence of two years' imprisonment, a fine, or both, upon conviction. Earlier, during mitigation, the accused's counsel, Aiman Abdul Rahman, requested that the court impose the agreed fine of RM50,000. "I believe the early guilty plea has saved the time of many parties, was made with a sense of remorse, and the accused will not repeat the offence,' he said. However, Deputy Public Prosecutor from the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC), Ahmad Fariz Abdul Hamid, requested that the court impose an appropriate sentence as a deterrent to the accused and the public. In the same court, senior MMEA officer Muhamad Izuar Zainudin, aged 42, claimed trial to a charge of abetting Zulham Shah in forging the documents at the same location and date. He was charged under Section 471 of the Penal Code, punishable under Section 465 of the same Code, which provides for a maximum sentence of two years' imprisonment, a fine, or both, if convicted. Ahmad Fariz requested the court to set bail at RM30,000. However, counsel Shahidah Muslimah Roslan, representing Muhamad Izuar, appealed for a lower amount, citing her client's cooperation throughout the investigation. The court then allowed the accused bail of RM10,000 with one surety and fixed July 16 for mention. – Bernama
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Report: Online shoppers hit by increasing number of parcel scams, more than 3,500 cases in Q1 2025
For COD scams, Faris explained that perpetrators often pose as delivery personnel and persuade victims to pay for a parcel by claiming it was ordered by their pouse or another family member. — Freepik PETALING JAYA: Online shoppers are urged to stay vigilant as Ninja Van Malaysia said it has received over 3,500 parcel scam reports in the first quarter of 2025 – the highest number recorded by the company compared to any previous quarter. In 2024, the company recorded more than 17,000 parcel scam cases with 40% of incidents concentrated in the Klang Valley. The majority of such cases involve cash-on-delivery (COD) schemes, where consumers end up paying for items they never ordered. Other common tactics include "ghost scams", in which victims are tricked into purchasing non-existent products or services advertised online, and phishing attempts via text messages or SMS where the sender impersonated the company. "At Ninja Van Malaysia, our responsibilities go beyond logistics. As a key player in the industry, we have a duty to educate the public against the rising scam threats," said chief executive officer Lin Zheng in a ScamMinar panel discussion held today (June 12). Chief sales officer Faris Maswan said victims were mostly from the older generation, who got duped into purchasing items like herbal products and amulets that were promoted on social media. They either end up not receiving the item at all or received products that were different from what was advertised. It's always a case of items being offered at a price that is just too good to be true, he said, adding that victims could end up losing up to RM1,000 in some cases. "Most of the time, it hovers around RM200," he added. For COD scams, Faris explained that perpetrators often pose as delivery personnel and persuade victims to pay for a parcel by claiming it was ordered by the victim's spouse or another family member. "Scammers would exploit the sense of familiarity that victims have for the person they think the parcel is for," said Raymon Ram, a fraud risk management specialist and president of NGO Transparency International-Malaysia. Faris explained that in phishing cases, victims would receive an SMS claiming they had an undelivered Ninja Van parcel: "Victims are then directed to a fraudulent website designed to steal money from their bank accounts." When these incidents were reported, Faris said an internal investigation was launched to determine whether there had been a data breach involving its customers. "Our infosec team found out that scammers were obtaining personal data from a website hosting leaked information from various sources. We also found that customers of other courier services were targeted by similar scams," he said. Raymon added that scammers can obtain users' personal data from forums on the dark web and use the information to carry out various schemes. "The newly enforced Cyber Security Act 2024 requires organisations in critical sectors to report any breaches to the National Cyber Security Agency. We'll have to see what kind of impact this will have. I hope companies will start taking cybersecurity more seriously," he said. Faris said cases would also be investigated based on customer service complaint rate. "If it's a critical case with directive from the authorities, we would block accounts (on their platform related to fraudulent complaints). In the last quarter, we have blocked more accounts than before," Faris said, adding that he also urged victims to come forward and make reports to the right channels as part of a measure to protect other users. The Selangor deputy head of Commercial Crime Investigation Department (Intelligence/Operation) Yap Huat Tian said it's also crucial for more people to be vigilant about their online safety and privacy. Don't assume that it's only older generation that can get scammed. As long as you have a smartphone, you can be a victim, he said.
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Court to hear Najib's bid for committal proceedings against ex-A-G on Aug 19
KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court will hear Datuk Seri Najib Razak's leave application to initiate committal proceedings against former Attorney-General Tan Sri Ahmad Terrirudin Mohd Salleh. Judge K. Muniandy made the decision after ruling that the committal application was not subject to an earlier High Court order that stayed all proceedings related to Najib's judicial review over his house arrest claim. On April 28, judge Hayatul Akmal Abdul Aziz, who has since been elevated to the Court of Appeal, granted a stay order pending Najib's final attempt to reinstate his judicial review application at the Federal Court. The court has fixed Aug 19 to hear the leave application. The former prime minister filed the application against Terrirudin, now a Federal Court judge, alleging that he misled the court during proceedings involving an alleged addendum order by the former Yang di-Pertuan Agong, which purportedly allowed Najib to serve the remainder of his sentence under house arrest. Earlier, senior federal counsel Shamsul Bolhassan submitted that the committal application should not proceed, arguing that the stay order applied to all related applications. However, Najib's lead counsel, Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah, contended that the committal proceedings were clearly separate and independent, and that the stay applied only to the original applications that remained pending in court. He said the judge had specifically referred to "all proceedings before the court", whereas the committal leave application had not yet been brought before the court at the time the stay was issued. Najib is currently serving a six-year sentence after being convicted of misappropriating RM42 million from SRC International Sdn Bhd. The High Court had initially sentenced him to 12 years in prison and fined him RM210 million, a decision upheld by both the Court of Appeal and the Federal Court. However, following a petition for royal clemency on Sept 2, 2022, his sentence was commuted to six years and the fine was reduced to RM50 million.
