
Woman buys mystery bag of 'unsellable' charity shop items and takes look inside
A bargain hunting Brit has taken to social media to challenge a charity shop's verdict on a hoard of "unsellable" donations. Danielle, who regularly documents her thrifting exploits online, couldn't resist snapping up 266 items of clothing that the shop in question had given up on trying to sell.
She began her video by loading numerous hefty bags into the back of her car, as she mused: "Are they really unsellable or can I make a profit?" Meanwhile, bracing for potential backlash for reselling charity shop items, Danielle pointed out that these garments had languished unsold "for months" even after being marked down to £1 each.
"Nobody has bought them, and this charity shop doesn't have the time, space or resources to list these items online," she justified, explaining her rationale behind taking on the task herself.
She elaborated: "What's happened for years is charity shops have bagged up these unsellable donations and sold them to clothing recycling companies. But, the value of 'rags' has plummeted - charity shops used to get about £20 for a big bag [of clothing] - now they're lucky to get 50p."
Danielle highlighted that as a result, charity shops are now passing these bags onto private individuals who are at liberty to use the contents as they see fit – including turning a profit by selling them on.
"This charity shop actually reached out to me for help selling their unsold stock - so I bought nine bags of clothing as a bit of a test," she continued.
Showcasing the best of the goods, Danielle gushed that "pretty much everything" was in excellent condition with some items still bearing their original tags.
"There was even some pieces I would wear myself," she confessed, brandishing ASOS and H&M summer dresses as a couple of standout examples.
Danielle added: "There's also a lot of 'fast-fashion' goods such as Primark and Shein, as well as a couple of kids' pieces including an M&S set."
And after examining all 266 items, Danielle revealed that 175 of them were unlikely to shift online, despite 99% of it being in excellent nick.
"I think it'd be good for a car boot though at say 50p or £1 per item," she said. Naturally, that left 91 items ready for her to attempt to sell on.
Writing in response, one TikTok user claimed: "Quite often charity shops put their prices up too high and no one buys the items. Instead of reducing them they just declare them as unsellable."
To which Danielle clarified: "Yeah I've heard from managers who aren't even able to run sales! Crazy. Pretty much everything out of this bag was priced under £6 (and then reduced and not sold) so this one isn't like that!".
A second person advised Danielle: "With the right photos and some work you'll sell a lot of that stuff." And she replied: "Agree! I'll do an update shortly with how I got on."
While a third queried: "Why don't they send clothing abroad any more?" To which Danielle responded: "They do. But it's getting more difficult as lots end up in landfill - some countries have even banned the importation of secondhand clothes as we are using them as our bins!"

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Wales Online
4 hours ago
- Wales Online
The 20 most irritating habits that make you the worst TV companion
The 20 most irritating habits that make you the worst TV companion A new study of 2,000 Brits has found the top 20 most annoying habits for people to have while watching TV If you've ever found yourself at your wit's end as someone chats away to you or hogs the remote while you're watching TV, you're definitely not the only one. A study of 2,000 British adults has revealed the country's most irritating TV viewing behaviours. These included people who ask constant questions throughout a show, perpetually flicking between channels, and accidentally revealing crucial plot twists. The research was commissioned by M&M'S to mark the debut of its "It's More Fun Together" campaign. It discovered that 24 per cent of Britons become frustrated when the person they're watching TV with munches their snacks too noisily, while another 21 per cent grow irritated with people who keep the volume too low. Sam Thompson and Scarlett Moffatt host M&M'S Couch Confessions pop up at Battersea Power Station (Image: PinPep) However, it appears many of us are guilty of doing the same. A quarter of adults acknowledged they're dreadful viewing partners, owning up to continuously bombarding others with questions during programmes. For nearly half, asking its mainly about understanding what is happening but 31 per cent confessed they simply weren't concentrating on what was happening. Despite these annoying habits, watching television together continues to be a strong way of bonding. A third (33 per cent) of those polled said an evening in front of the telly with mates is just as enjoyable as doing an activity together. To honour these peculiar habits, MandM'S launched a "Couch Confessions" pop-up experience in London, featuring telly-obsessed celebrities Sam Thompson and Scarlett Moffatt. Reality TV favourite Scarlett Moffatt revealed: "TV nights at home are my love language, chaotic, full of theme-tune singalongs and subtitle debates." She continued: "But hunkering down on the couch with Scott and Jude is what makes it so special. "I love the little quirks that turn ordinary nights into unforgettable family moments, because watching together is always more fun, even if Jude is the remote-control-king nowadays." The study also revealed what Britons believe would enhance their television-viewing experiences. A fifth (20 per cent) expressed a desire for snack bowls that perfectly distribute portions amongst viewers, whilst 19 per cent fantasised about a family-sized footstool allowing everyone to elevate their feet. Meanwhile, 15 per cent wished there was a device that automatically set the television to the 'perfect' volume. Guests at the M&M'S pop-up encountered some of these innovations directly, alongside treasure hunts for TV treats. The experience also celebrated the nation's preferred methods of communal television viewing, featuring themed spaces modelled on the contemporary British lounge. Regarding ideal TV viewing partners, Britons would most relish settling in with David Attenborough, Ant and Dec, and Olivia Colman. TV Personality and Radio Host, Sam Thompson, added: "I'm all about turning TV nights into a proper event with bean bags, onesies, volume up and a stash of snacks. Article continues below "It's my favourite time to just hang out with mates, even if it takes us an hour to agree on what to watch and someone always falls asleep halfway through." Brits shared their weird and wonderful TV rituals (Image: PinPep) TOP ANNOYING TELLY HABITS BRITS ADMIT TO:


Scottish Sun
8 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
As 2 high street giants are rapped for using ‘unhealthily thin' models… are fat jabs to blame for return of heroin chic?
Only four of the top 20 brands featured during fashion week for Spring/Summer this year used curvy models WEIGHTY ISSUE As 2 high street giants are rapped for using 'unhealthily thin' models… are fat jabs to blame for return of heroin chic? Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) AN unwelcome fashion trend has reared its ugly head again this season – heroin chic. With weight-loss drugs such as Ozempic becoming more popular, two major high street retailers have recently had images of models banned for being 'unhealthily thin'. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 8 The Advertising Standards Authority ruled Zara's images are 'socially irresponsible' Credit: PA 8 Zara was rapped for using this model in a white silk top and trousers who appeared to be 'gaunt' and showing 'protruding' collarbones Credit: ZARA 8 The model in the axed M&S advert is 'unhealthily thin', according to complaints Credit: M&S This week Zara was rapped by the Advertising Standards Authority for using a model in a white silk top and trousers who appeared to be 'gaunt' and showing 'protruding' collarbones. It came after Marks & Spencer was branded 'irresponsible' by the regulator for photographing a model in a white top and black jeans, emphasising the 'slenderness of her legs'. In fairness to M&S, and in my professional opinion, the model was shot at a bizarre angle from above, giving her alien-like skinny pins and a big head. But where are the bigwigs at Marks & Spencer who should be saying, 'Erm, she looks a bit thin — let's ditch that pic'? Retailers, their owners and employers have a responsibility to make sure their models are not being misrepresented and seen to be promoting aspirational fashion in a bad way. Sadly, models' figures that were once out of reach for us normal folk are now more attainable than ever, thanks to Ozempic and other fat jab treatments. For me, it is sickening to recall the Nineties and Noughties era of skeletal celebrities, such as that god-awful image of Nicole Richie running down the beach looking emaciated, or even a young Kate Moss with her hip bones barely holding up her Calvin Klein underwear. But the tide turned around 2012 when the stick-thin look was no longer considered ideal — and one woman who doesn't get enough praise for that is Kim Kardashian. With her thighs, boobs and bum, Kim alongside her sisters brought a new body image to the forefront of popular culture which embraced curves. Her extreme dieting to fit into Marilyn Monroe's clothes may have landed her in hot water for setting a bad example, but she did a lot for making a curvy body sexy and aspirational. We are facing a worrying return to using extremely thin models Vogue magazine Lizzo shows off her amazing Ozempic weight loss as she poses in swimsuit after finally revealing truth Fast forward to today and its bye-bye booty, with Kim, Khloe and Kylie Jenner wasting away before our very eyes with their ultra-toned arms and tiny waists. The body positivity movement peaked around 2015 when curvy models Felicity Hayward, Ashley Graham and Paloma Elsesser graced catwalks and ad campaigns to represent the majority of women (for context, the UK's average dress size is 16). But the box-ticking and virtue-signalling didn't last long. 8 Kim Kardashian, seen here at a Super Bowl bash in 2009, made fuller figures aspirational Credit: AP:Associated Press 8 The Zara and M&S campaigns echo the sickening thinness of '90s and '00s skeletal celebrities, such as this photo of Nicole Richie Credit: Pacific Coast News 8 Another blast from an unpleasant past sees supermodel Kate Moss with her hip bones barely holding up her Calvin Klein underwear Credit: Getty According to fashion data analysts TagWalk, only four of the top 20 brands featured during fashion week for Spring/Summer this year used curvy models. Even fashion bible Vogue is becoming wary of how slim catwalk stars are looking, stating: 'We are facing a worrying return to using extremely thin models.' Since the fat jab boom began, celebrities and influencers have been glamourising the need to be thin. 'It is a widespread shift and it is depressing' A-list celebrities that were the first lot to get their mitts on Ozempic and Mounjaro suddenly shrank and conveniently put it down to that age-old line 'a healthy lifestyle'. Even singer Lizzo, who was known for embracing her curves, has been discussing her weight loss with Women's Health magazine this week. Body positivity is the radical act of daring to exist loudly and proudly. I like how I look now Lizzo on her Ozempic use The 37-year-old Juice hitmaker has previously admitted she tried Ozempic but now credits working out to being the reason for dropping a few dress sizes. She says: 'Body positivity is the radical act of daring to exist loudly and proudly' but adds, 'I like how I look now.' Fair enough. You do whatever you want to do, Lizzo. But it is ironic that despite being proud of her curvier self before, she prefers how she looks now. In 2023, US actress Mindy Kaling dramatically slimmed down, saying she had a new commitment to health and fitness. Pull the other one Mindy. We're not stupid. But at least she isn't a loud and proud spokesperson for body positivity — curvy influencers are. Women who have built an entire following, reputation and career around not being stick thin and celebrating loving every part of themselves — whilst insisting that you should do so too — are now turning their backs on all the female fans who have built them up. The same famous women who claimed that their curvy body was normal and have maintained a healthy lifestyle their whole career are now putting their slim new look down to — you guessed it — a balanced diet and an extra-long dog walk. And those of us who are committed to following these women then look at themselves and think, am I not good enough anymore? It sort of feels like a betrayal or abandonment. Jameela Jamil agrees. She revealed on Instagram that she had unfollowed many body positive ambassadors who 'are now going full diet culture'. The podcaster added: 'Don't perpetuate the culture that you rose to prominence trying to take down. It is a widespread shift we are all seeing everywhere and it's depressing.' The hashtag #thinspo, which promotes extreme thinness and disordered eating, has been banned on TikTok and Instagram. But it still exists elsewhere on social media, and the similar tag #SkinnyTok surpassed 2.4billion views in June. The terrifying amount of views reflects how women are scouring the internet looking for ways to get thin. From celebs to influencers to fashion, the whole situation is a low-fat recipe for disaster — but sadly women and young girls are falling for it. As someone who grew up and lived through the trend the first time around, I know it should not be repeated. We've already said goodbye to low-slung jeans, pedal pushers, Uggs and other unlamented fashions of that era. Like them, heroin chic should also remain firmly in the past. 8 Even singer Lizzo, who was known for embracing her curves, has been discussing her weight loss with Women's Health magazine Credit: Getty


The Sun
11 hours ago
- The Sun
I looked older at 26 than I do now as I loved tanning my face so much – a 20p secret banished my forehead wrinkles
A WOMAN has shared the secret she swears by to reverse ageing. Laura Elle took to social media to share her before and after pictures and people were left stunned by the results. 2 2 She revealed that by the age of 26, she already had deep lines on her forehead due to tanning and not looking after her skin. In the clip, Laura said: "Tans face every day with no sunscreen ever. She also said she rarely took her makeup off, and if she did, she just used wipes. Laura also said she never used skincare and relied on the sun to sort her skin out. But the results of that were clear to see in the before image. Laura's skin looked severely dehydrated and she had texture on her skin as well. Her forehead was also covered in deep wrinkles and her undereyes and jowl were also showing clear signs of ageing. But three years on, Laura looked like a totally different person and had managed to reverse the ageing process. Her skin was now glowing and her wrinkles were nowhere to be seen, and she said it wasn't down to Botox or filler. Now 29, she revealed the changes she made to improve her skin which of course included not tanning on sunbeds anymore. I found the best summer body glow in Primark - it's only £3.50 & isn't oily She also said she was consistent with her skincare routine, using sunscreen twice a day. She also used products with collagen and retinol to increase skin cell reproduction. But to get rid of her forehead lines, Laura swore by Frownies, which work by limiting face movement and smoothing out wrinkles. A pack of 144 cost £28.95, meaning each patch costs just 20p. Laura recommends applying them at night after applying your skincare. The clip went viral on her TikTok account @ lauraelle111 with over 300k views and people were quick to comment on her transformation. One person wrote: "You are beautiful - I'm off to order some frownies (you need commission) lol." Another commented: "Frownies have been added to cart because I've had forehead wrinkles since I was 17." "You definitely aged backwards," penned a third. Meanwhile a fourth said: "We gained a baddie, let go of the tanning beds people!"