logo
Does my child have an anxiety disorder? Here are the signs parents should look out for

Does my child have an anxiety disorder? Here are the signs parents should look out for

CNN05-02-2025
It may have been monsters under the bed, robbers breaking into the house or ghosts lurking in the darkness sending shivers down your spine when you were young.
Many people might vividly remember their most troubling childhood fears, but they tend to outgrow the worries that once caused sleepless nights. For some children and their parents, however, it can be difficult to determine when fears are typical and when they are developing into more serious phobias or anxiety disorders.
Fears are a normal part of human development and serve as survival mechanisms, helping prevent children and adults from engaging in risky behavior. But once fears become debilitating or impair daily function, they can be classified as a phobia or anxiety disorder, said Thomas Ollendick, University Distinguished Professor Emeritus of Psychology at Virginia Tech, who is known for his work with children and adolescents.
If anxiety disorders and phobias are left untreated, children are at risk of additional psychiatric or medical problems, which could follow them into adulthood, according to Wendy Silverman, director of the Yale Child Study Center's Anxiety and Mood Disorders Program, Alfred A. Messer Professor of Child Psychiatry, and professor of psychology at the Yale School of Medicine.
Common fears at different developmental stages
Children may develop phobias or anxiety disorders for a variety of reasons, including genetics, direct negative experiences with an event or object, observation of others or overhearing frightening information, Silverman said.
Phobic and anxiety disorders are also relatively common in children. As many as 1 in 3 children and adolescents are affected by these disorders, and these rates have increased substantially since the start of the Covid-19 pandemic, according to 'The Parents' Guide of Psychological First Aid: Helping Children and Adolescents Cope With Predictable Life Crises.' (Silverman contributed to this book.)
New fears and anxieties tend to develop and vary as children and adolescents grow and adapt to new environments, Silverman said.
Infants and toddlers often show fears of loud noises, unfamiliar people and separation from their parents. By the time children start engaging in more imaginative play once they reach preschool age, they may develop fears pertaining to ghosts, monsters and small animals.
When children reach adolescence and start having more real-world experiences, it's common for them to develop fears around social anxiety, particularly when facing the scrutiny of others.
Distinguishing fear from anxiety disorders or phobias
The first step in addressing an anxiety disorder or phobia is recognizing symptoms that fall outside the boundaries of a common fear.
Parents may struggle to detect certain anxieties, especially if a child doesn't display classic symptoms — rejecting food, nausea or refusing to leave the house — or has reservations about sharing their fears, Ollendick noted.
To help parents distinguish whether a fear may develop into a more serious disorder, experts such as Ollendick and Silverman look at the frequency, intensity and duration of a fear.
Frequency helps determine how often a fear is occurring. Parents and children can note whether the fear is something that's popping up once a year compared with a daily struggle.
It's also important to assess the intensity of a fear, which parents can judge based on how their child responds when a situation isn't handled in the way that they want. Ranking your child's reactions on a scale of one to 10 can help parents and psychologists better understand the severity of these instances.
Finally, duration is crucial in knowing when it might be time to seek professional support. Psychologists recommend giving your child's fears some time to settle to see if such worries are more of a phase or long-lasting issue.
Citing the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Ollendick and Silverman noted that fears should last for at least six months before they are considered a clinically significant phobia or anxiety disorder.
However, if a fear is preventing a child from developing or functioning properly, impairing family function or negatively affecting academic performance, it's possible the fear has developed into a clinically significant problem, and it may feel unreasonable for parents to wait to seek professional support, Silverman said.
How parents can provide support
When managing children's fears, many parents instinctively want to intervene to shield their distress. However, Silverman warns against this approach, referred to as parent protection or accommodation, which provides temporary relief for the child but reinforces the fear instead of helping overcome the root of the concern.
If parents have specific anxieties that cause them to spiral and act inappropriately, it's essential to admit that they can demonstrate healthier reactions, which could help their child model better behavior in the future.
Additionally, parents should attempt to find a balance between acknowledging their child's concerns and discussing safety precautions and emphasizing the possible harms and negative outcomes of an event or object, Ollendick said.
It can be especially tough to navigate children's fears of real-world threats such as school shootings or natural disasters. However, Ollendick and Silverman highly recommend fostering open dialogue to help reduce worries or feelings of isolation and shame.
Parents can also share their emotions, in an age-appropriate manner, to show that it's healthy to talk about heavy topics and be vulnerable with others.
In some cases, explaining that certain fears are linked to low-probability events or creating a plan can provide reassurance, Silverman said.
For those who live in coastal areas more susceptible to hurricanes, your child may find comfort in discussing the actions family members would need to take if they were in danger.
Parents should encourage children to face their fears instead of falling into avoidant behaviors. Especially for younger ones, positive reinforcement can help children feel motivated to confront their fear. Small gifts or privileges such as playing a game or spontaneously getting ice cream should be offered as soon as possible after children have engaged in such behavior to build their confidence, according to Silverman.
Seeking professional help
If your child's anxieties persist beyond six months, despite your efforts at home, it's vital that parents seek qualified professionals for help, Silverman said.
When pursuing professional support, younger children may struggle to recognize and articulate their emotions. Parents can provide helpful insights to psychologists by tracking behaviors and gathering feedback from teachers or other caregivers, Ollendick said.
Silverman added that cognitive behavioral therapy, particularly exposure therapy, has proven highly effective in treating anxiety and phobias.
Exposure therapy gradually introduces the feared object or situation in a controlled way, starting small and increasing over time.
If there's a fear of dogs, for example, the child might begin by looking at pictures of the animals, then observing one through a window, before eventually interacting with a small, gentle dog, Silverman said.
Over time, you might consider taking your child to a park to be around dogs while they're restrained by their owners.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

FDA may pull authorization for Pfizer COVID shot for kids under 5
FDA may pull authorization for Pfizer COVID shot for kids under 5

The Hill

time16 minutes ago

  • The Hill

FDA may pull authorization for Pfizer COVID shot for kids under 5

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is considering revoking the authorization of Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine for healthy children under 5 years old, the company confirmed Wednesday. The move would add another barrier for parents who want to vaccinate healthy children, as shots from Moderna and Novavax were approved for more limited populations. In May, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) would no longer recommend COVID-19 vaccines for healthy children or pregnant women. The CDC then updated its immunization schedule to reflect that children with no underlying health condition 'may receive' COVID-19 vaccines after consulting with a health care provider — what's known as 'shared decision-making.' If FDA pulls its emergency use authorization, Pfizer's vaccine would no longer be available to any children younger than 5. Right now, Moderna and Novavax shots could be administered 'off label' to healthy children. 'We are currently in discussions with the agency on potential paths forward and have requested that the EUA for this age group remain in place for the 2025-2026 season,' a Pfizer spokesman told The Hill. 'It is important to note that these deliberations are not related to the safety and efficacy of the vaccine which continues to demonstrate a favorable profile,' the company added. The Guardian first reported on the FDA's potential move. In a statement to The Hill, HHS said it wouldn't comment on potential changes. 'The COVID-19 pandemic ended with the expiration of the federal public health emergency in May 2023. We do not comment on potential, future regulatory changes. Unless officially announced by HHS, discussion about future agency action should be regarded as pure speculation,' HHS spokesman Andrew Nixon said. Pfizer has had full FDA approval for its COVID-19 vaccine for individuals age 12 and older since 2022.

CDC shooter Patrick Joseph White's dad repeatedly called 911 fearing he was gunman
CDC shooter Patrick Joseph White's dad repeatedly called 911 fearing he was gunman

New York Post

time16 minutes ago

  • New York Post

CDC shooter Patrick Joseph White's dad repeatedly called 911 fearing he was gunman

The father of the anti-vaxxer gunman who killed a cop when he fired more than 180 shots at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention repeatedly called 911 fearing that his son was responsible for the attack, newly released 911 calls show. Kenneth White had begged authorities for help as his son, Patrick Joseph White, was unleashing his reign of terror on the CDC's Atlanta headquarters last Friday, according to transcripts obtained by 11Alive. 'I'm very worried that he might have been involved in this shooting today,' the dad said in one call. Advertisement 3 Documents found in a search of the home where CDC shooter Patrick Joseph Smith lived with his parents revealed his discontent with the COVID-19 vaccinations. AP 'I can't get any information from anybody. I've called the DeKalb County 911 number three times and left detailed information, and no one ever called us back. I don't know if he was involved. I need some help.' In another call, the dad specifically asked for one officer to call back given he'd helped with his son in the past. Advertisement 'He has been involved last summer with some problems we had with my adult son,' the elder White said of the cop. '[The officer] had left me his name and number and said if you guys need anything with Patrick, give me a call.' Records show there had been at least 10 emergency calls made from the White family home over the last two years, including for suicide threats and domestic disturbances. 3 Patrick Joseph Smith fired more than 180 shots into the CDC campus in Atlanta and broke 150 windows on Friday. AP It wasn't immediately clear if authorities returned the calls from White's dad during Friday's incident. Advertisement The shooter, who authorities said blamed the COVID-19 vaccine for making him depressed and suicidal, was found dead from a self-inflicted gunshot wound shortly after his rampage. Investigators said White had broken into a locked safe to get his father's weapons before he stormed the CDC's headquarters. CDC security guards had initially stopped White from driving into the campus Friday — so he parked near a pharmacy across the street and opened fire from the sidewalk, authorities said. 3 Police vehicles near Emory University and the CDC campus in Atlanta after the shooting on Aug. 8, 2025. Getty Images Advertisement His bullets broke about 150 'blast-resistant' windows across the campus. DeKalb County Police Officer David Rose was fatally shot while responding to the rampage, according to investigators. No one inside the CDC building was injured. In the aftermath, a search warrant at White's home uncovered a slew of written documents and electronic devices that are still being analyzed. Some of the materials 'expressed the shooter's discontent with the COVID-19 vaccinations' and his desire to make 'the public aware of his discontent with the vaccine,' Georgia Bureau of Investigation Director Chris Hosey said. With Post wires

B.C. doctor fired for refusing COVID-19 vaccine loses appeal
B.C. doctor fired for refusing COVID-19 vaccine loses appeal

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

B.C. doctor fired for refusing COVID-19 vaccine loses appeal

The B.C. Supreme Court has dismissed an appeal from a doctor who was fired for refusing the COVID-19 vaccine in 2021. Dr. Theresa Szezepaniak was appealing a 2023 decision from the B.C. Hospital Appeal Board (HAB), which largely upheld the Interior Health authority's decision to suspend her hospitalist privileges at Royal Inland Hospital in Kamloops, B.C. The appeal board had ruled that Szezepaniak's refusal of the shot in 2021 amounted to neglect of her obligations as a hospitalist. Szezepaniak, who had to sell her home and move to a different town to find work after the decision, said that her Charter rights were breached by the HAB decision and asked a Supreme Court justice to set it aside. However, Justice Steven Wilson said the Charter did not apply to Interior Health's decision to suspend Szezepaniak's privileges, as it was an operational decision and not one that was directly controlled by government. "I do not accept that a hospital board's ability to exclude a practitioner from the hospital for failing to comply with the [bylaws] is a decision that is governmental in nature," his decision, published Thursday, read. Szezepaniak had argued that the HAB was upholding discipline based on government legislation, in which case her Charter-protected rights to life, liberty and security of the person — and specifically her right to earn an income to support her family — would have been breached. But the court disagreed, and said that even if the Charter were to apply to the HAB's decision, Szezepaniak's rights were not breached in this instance. That was because, the court noted, the Charter does not protect the right to work in a particular job or position, and Szezepaniak's firing was a result of her decision to not get vaccinated. Contract terminated Szezepaniak's contract with Interior Health was terminated on Nov. 16, 2021, after she declined the vaccine, which was required to continue working in B.C. hospitals under an order from Provincial Health Officer Dr. Bonnie Henry. Her privileges, which granted her the right to provide care at Royal Inland Hospital in Kamloops, were officially cancelled by the health authority in August 2022, and Szezepaniak cited the Charter in an appeal to the HAB shortly thereafter. In both the current Supreme Court case and that HAB decision, the issue was not whether the doctor would be forced to get the vaccine — but rather, the consequences that arose from her decision to decline it. In a Nov. 20, 2023, decision, a HAB panel concluded that Interior Health didn't challenge Szezekpaniak's right to refuse the vaccine, but it did hold her accountable for the fact that that choice left her unable to work under provincial law. "Having the right to make a decision, and your right to do so acknowledged, or respected, is not the same as being held responsible for the consequences," the panel's decision reads. Although the appeal board did not reinstate Szezepaniak's hospitalist privileges, it found the health authority should have suspended rather than cancelled them in August 2022, saying Interior Health should have waited to cancel them if she wasn't vaccinated in time for her next annual review. 'Black mark' Szezepaniak, who is now based in 100 Mile House as a family physician, worked in B.C. hospitals for 21 years before she was fired. She said there was a "black mark" against her name due to the discipline that she received, and that she suffered significant emotional and financial consequences after the firing. Ultimately, however, the court found that the loss of income and her subsequent relocation to find work were not related to the discipline she received — but rather a consequence of her decision to not get the vaccine following the provincial order. Notice of liability A few days after Szezepaniak was barred from working, Royal Inland Hospital's chief of staff emailed to say there were three options for unvaccinated staff: obtain an exemption, resign, or face cancellation of their privileges. Szezepaniak replied with an email saying she would not be "blackmailed or coerced into receiving an experimental injection," the HAB panel decision says. On Nov. 12, a few days before she was fired, she sent an 18-page letter to a health authority manager titled, "NOTICE OF LIABILITY regarding the B.C. Government's Mandatory Testing/Vaccination Policy." Legal experts have previously told CBC News that these documents, favoured by groups opposed to COVID-related public health measures, have no legal value.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store