Tony Blair urged to pay back almost £10,000 for discounts on designer clothes, records show
Papers released to the National Archives show that No 10 officials recommended he should pay back more than £7,600 on items bought from designers Nicole Farhi and Paul Smith.
The discounts were negotiated by his wife Cherie's controversial friend and style adviser, Carole Caplin, who bought clothes for Mrs Blair.
Ms Caplin told officials that because she bought the clothes wholesale she was able to to secure discounts of up to 60 per cent – including on items bought for Mr Blair as well.
However, officials were concerned that such large discounts would not be available to ordinary members of the public.
According to the files, between July 2001 to December 2002 the couple spent £8,021.50 with one designer alone – Nicole Farhi – when the retail price would have been £20,855.
It meant the total discount they received came to £12,8343, more than the total amount they spent.
Initially, officials advised that Mr Blair should repay the discounts he received in full – around £10,000 – and that Mrs Blair should pay back half the benefits she obtained – £28,000.
Clare Sumner, a No 10 official, wrote: 'We are not arguing that anything has been done wrong, indeed nothing has. The issue is one of public perception.'
However, after discussions with the cabinet secretary Sir Andrew Turnbull it was agreed that Mrs Blair did not receive any 'preferential or beneficial treatment' in her role as prime minister's wife.
It was agreed, however, that the suppliers would in future have to sign confidentiality agreements to ensure there was no incentive for them to provide goods cheaply in order to exploit the fact they the prime minister's wife wore their clothes.
But for Mr Blair, however, officials said they believed he still should pay the full amount, advising him to write cheques for to £1,116 to Paul Smith and £6,532 to Nicole Farhi.
Ms Sumner wrote: 'For you, we still think the simplest thing is to pay for your clothes in full and that Carole should be made aware of this for the future.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
a few seconds ago
- The Independent
‘Why we had a revolution': US politician in heated dustup with Farage in London over free speech and Trump
A confrontation between a Maryland congressman and the head of the UK's Reform Party grew heated on Wednesday as the right-wing party leader refused to hear any criticism of Donald Trump uttered in his presence. Rep. Jamie Raskin and other Democrats were in London this week as part of a bipartisan congressional delegation to discuss the Online Safety Act. Members of both major US parties believe the act violates First Amendment protections for US companies and unfairly targets American tech firms by extension. Raskin is one of the Democratic Party's most skilled communicators in the House and was an impeachment manager during the second trial of Donald Trump in 2021. A longtime foe of the US president, Raskin's opening remarks touched on the Trump administration's wide-ranging assault on the First Amendment, which top officials have contended (falsely) does not apply to noncitizens, including legal green card holders. Those remarks drew a furious response to the congressman, according to Raskin, from Nigel Farage — leader of the U.K.'s conservative Reform party who, in 2024, was a vocal supporter of the third Trump campaign as he'd been for the president's two prior runs. 'We're not here to talk about Donald Trump,' Raskin quoted Farage as scolding him. According to the congressman, the conversation devolved further from there, with Farage labeling him 'pig-headed.' The Maryland Democrat said he responded: 'This is why we had a revolution against you guys.' The congressman went on to tell Politico that Democrats believed there were good and bad aspects to the Online Safety Act, and were eager to discuss it with UK lawmakers. 'We thought there were some very good things in the Online Safety Act, and there might be some problematic things,' he told the news outlet. Of Farage, he added: 'I think the intervention of Democrats who don't have a dog in that fight was maybe too much for him to handle.' A handful of other Democratic representatives confirmed the exchange to Politico. Two of them, Reps. Jasmine Crockett and Eric Swalwell, labeled the Reform Party chief a 'manbaby' in their own statements to the outlet. 'This manbaby was not feeling it. … He was gonna pigeonhole the conversation into only things that he wanted to discuss, and anything else was gonna be shut down, because that's what free speech, I guess, looks like to him,' Crockett told Politico. Swalwell added that Farage appeared 'unhinged' in the meeting. Raskin's ties to the Revolutionary War are more direct than those of his colleagues. His district includes Montgomery County, a jurisdiction named after Revolutionary War general Richard Montgomery, who was Irish-American. Maryland, in general, retains a number of town, city and county names closely tied to British monarchs and aristocrats. The congressman even quipped to Politico that one of the Republican members of the delegation told him afterwards he enjoyed Raskin's quip at Farage. Raskin underwent treatment for cancer in 2023 after being diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell Lymphoma. He was one of a successive chain of Democrats who sought in various bids to challenge the party's 'old guard' for leadership in the Trump era; in 2024, he launched a bid for the top-ranking spot on the Judiciary committee against Jerry Nadler. In a sign of the strength of his ties to both party leadership and progressives, the elder Nadler stepped aside and Raskin took over with support of Nancy Pelosi backing his leadership bid. Separately on Wednesday the Maryland congressman announced a lawsuit against the Trump administration for blocking legally-permitted congressional oversight visits of ICE detention facilities, joined by a dozen other House Democrats.
The Independent
a few seconds ago
- The Independent
‘It's time to pay up', says Starmer in late payments crackdown
Firms which persistently pay their suppliers late are set to face fines worth potentially millions of pounds as the Prime Minister warned that 'it's time to pay up'. Sir Keir Starmer has said 'too many hardworking people are being forced to spend precious hours chasing payments' in a process which he described as 'exhausting'. As part of a drive to support small businesses, the Government is set to unveil plans to give the small business commissioner bolstered powers to fine large companies which persistently pay their suppliers late. The commissioner will also receive new powers to enforce a rule that customers must pay their supplier within 30 days of receiving a valid invoice, unless otherwise agreed, with spot checks to help identify breaches. Upcoming legislation will also introduce maximum payment terms of 60 days, reducing to 45 days. 'From builders and electricians to freelance designers and manufacturers — too many hardworking people are being forced to spend precious hours chasing payments instead of doing what they do best – growing their businesses,' Sir Keir said. 'It's unfair, it's exhausting and it's holding Britain back. 'So, our message is clear, it's time to pay up. 'Through our small business plan, we're not only tackling the scourge of late payments once and for all, but we're giving small business owners the backing and stability they need for their business to thrive, driving growth across the country through our plan for change.' The crackdown on late payments is part of a wider Government package and sits alongside a move to pump £4 billion of financial support into small business start-ups and growth. This is set to include £1 billion for new firms, with 69,000 start-up loans and mentoring support. 'This country is home to some of the brightest entrepreneurs and innovative businesses in the world, and we want to unleash their full potential by giving them back time and money to do what they do best – growing our local economies,' Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said. 'Our small business plan – the first in over a decade – is slashing unnecessary admin costs, making it easier for businesses to set up shop and giving SMEs (small and medium-sized enterprises) the financial backing they need.' Andrew Griffith, the Conservative shadow business secretary, said: 'Cracking down on late payments will be welcome for small business but will mean nothing for the 218,000 businesses that have closed under Labour. 'The reality for businesses under Labour is a doubling of business rates, a £25 billion jobs tax and a full-on strangulation of employment red tape. 'Only the Conservatives are on the side of the makers and will support businesses across Britain to create jobs and wealth.'
Sky News
a minute ago
- Sky News
Canada says it will recognise a Palestinian state if certain conditions are met
Canada is planning to recognise a Palestinian state at the United Nations in September, the country's prime minister has said. Mark Carney told reporters that the planned move is dependent on certain conditions - including that the Palestinian Authority commits to fundamentally reforming its governance and to hold general elections in 2026 in which Hamas can play no part. Mr Carney said he spoke with Mahmoud Abbas, the president of the Palestinian Authority, on Wednesday. The Canadian prime minister also said he "condemns the fact Israel has allowed a catastrophe to unfold in Gaza". It comes after the British government said it will officially recognise Palestine as a state in September - unless Israel meets certain conditions. Following an emergency cabinet meeting on Gaza, UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer made the announcement on Tuesday after a meeting with US President Donald Trump the previous day. Sir Keir's announcement also came less than a week after French President Emmanuel Macron said France will recognise a Palestinian state in September, making it the first G7 nation to do so. Please refresh the page for the fullest version.
