Harvard researcher charged with smuggling frog embryos is being released from federal custody
Animal storiesFacebookTweetLink
Follow
A judge released a Russian-born scientist and Harvard University researcher charged with smuggling frog embryos into the United States on bail Thursday.
Kseniia Petrova, 30, has been in federal custody since February.
Petrova was returning from a vacation in France, where she had stopped at a lab specializing in splicing superfine sections of frog embryos and obtained a package of samples for research. She was later questioned about the samples while passing through a U.S. Customs and Border Protection checkpoint at Boston Logan International Airport.
She told The Associated Press in an interview in April that she did not realize the items needed to be declared and was not trying to sneak anything into the country. After an interrogation, Petrova was told her visa was being canceled.
Petrova was briefly detained by immigration officials in Vermont, where she filed a petition seeking her release. She was later sent to a US Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in Louisiana.
The Department of Homeland Security had said in a statement on the social media platform X that Petrova was detained after 'lying to federal officers about carrying substances into the country.' They allege that messages on her phone 'revealed she planned to smuggle the materials through customs without declaring them.'
In May, Petrova was charged with smuggling in Massachusetts as a federal judge in Vermont set the hearing date on her petition. That judge later ruled that the immigration officers' actions were unlawful, that Petrova didn't present a danger, and that the embryos were nonliving, nonhazardous and 'posed a threat to no one.'
The judge released Petrova from ICE custody, but she remains in the custody of the U.S. Marshals Service on the smuggling charge.
Colleagues and academics have testified on Petrova's behalf, saying she is doing valuable research to advance cures for cancer.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
18 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Kanye West makes court appearance in Sean Combs's trial
Ye, the controversial rapper formerly known as Kanye West, appeared at Sean 'Diddy' Combs's sex trafficking trial on Friday — causing a brief spectacle inside the courthouse as he continues his public campaign calling for the music mogul's release from jail. Dressed in all white, Ye arrived at the Manhattan courthouse just after 11 a.m. on Friday with Combs's son Christian 'King' Combs and was reportedly directed to the courtroom's overflow room. He left after about 40 minutes.
Fox News
26 minutes ago
- Fox News
SEN CHUCK GRASSLEY: How Senate Republicans are restoring the rule of law and securing border for years to come
America is at a crossroads. During the Biden-Harris administration, over 10 million illegal immigrants – including violent criminals and potential terrorists – poured over our nation's border. After four years of chaos, Americans overwhelmingly elected President Donald Trump, who campaigned on a platform of securing the border, removing dangerous criminals and restoring law and order. Trump is standing on that platform and Senate Republicans are supporting him every step of the way. In Trump's first 100 days, illegal border encounters plummeted by 95%, illegal immigrant "gotaways" fell 99% and violent criminals and suspected terrorists were quickly removed from the country. During those same 100 days, Democrats fought to keep criminals in the country and took taxpayer-funded trips to El Salvador to defend an illegal immigrant who's facing charges of human trafficking, gang-related killing and domestic abuse. In the past week, thousands of rioters have taken to the streets of Los Angeles to violently protest ICE officers who are simply enforcing federal immigration law, as well as court-ordered search warrants. Rioters have lit cars on fire, looted mom-and-pop shops and attacked police officers with concrete slabs and Molotov cocktails. Yet Democrats insist the mob's actions are "peaceful." The nation is keenly aware of what happens when law enforcement is slow to respond to violent protests. During the Los Angeles riots of 1992, 63 people died, thousands were injured and the violence only stopped after the National Guard arrived. Thankfully, Trump isn't repeating the mistakes of the past. His quick decision to mobilize the National Guard protected innocent lives and valuable property. Hardworking and decent Americans know it's wrong to attack law enforcement officers, rob small businesses and break the law. While Democrat allies riot in the streets, Republicans are standing up for what's right. Today, as chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, I released legislative text for my committee's section of the "One Big Beautiful Bill." The Judiciary Committee's provisions provide historic investments to strengthen our nation's border security and immigration system, support local law enforcement and protect American families from violence like we've seen in Los Angeles. It significantly boosts funding for local law enforcement and immigration agencies that were overwhelmed by the Biden-Harris administration's open border. The Department of Homeland Security will receive funding to hire more staff and enhance migrant screening and vetting processes, including background checks. It will also allow for the expedited removal of criminal illegal aliens and coordination with state and local governments to root out cartels and gangs. The costs of the judiciary section are offset by immigration application fees, which inject accountability into the immigration system. The Judiciary Committee's bill also preserves humanitarian protections by including fee exemptions for certain emergency or humanitarian purposes, and it makes fees paid by sponsors of migrant children 100% reimbursable, so long as the child safely appears in court as the law intends. When the Biden-Harris administration turned its back on border security, patriotic states stepped up to protect American communities. The Senate Judiciary Committee is giving these states the thanks they deserve by implementing the Bridging Immigration-related Deficits Experienced Nationwide (BIDEN) Reimbursement Fund. The BIDEN Reimbursement Fund will help states recoup the dollars they spent investigating, locating, apprehending and temporarily detaining criminal illegal aliens. It also helps cover the costs inflicted on local courts for prosecuting crimes committed by illegal aliens, like drug and human trafficking. American taxpayers spent billions covering for Biden's border breakdown. It's time they were compensated for their losses. Despite Democrat efforts to defund the police, Senate Judiciary Committee Republicans are unwavering in our support for local, state and federal law enforcement. That's why our legislation expands resources for these brave men and women in blue. While Democrat allies riot in the streets, Republicans are standing up for what's right. Finally, the Senate Judiciary Committee is advancing solutions in the "One Big Beautiful Bill" to restore the constitutional role of the federal judiciary and ensure courts follow current law when handing down decisions. Our bill will provide funding to the Department of Justice to hire additional attorneys focused on challenging universal injunctions and require courts to track the frequency of universal injunctions. It will also establish judicial training programs on universal injunctions' lack of constitutionality and enforce the existing, lawful requirement that courts impose a bond upfront when attempting to hit the government with a preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order that results in costs and damages ultimately sustained by American taxpayers. The rule of law matters, and Republicans are committed to enforcing it. I look forward to helping turn this legislation into law and deliver on President Trump's promise of a secure border for years to come.
New York Times
26 minutes ago
- New York Times
Ex-New York Assembly Candidate Charged With Campaign Finance Fraud
A former New York State Assembly candidate used fake donations and forged signatures to fraudulently inflate the share of public matching funds he received in last year's election, federal prosecutors said on Friday. The former candidate, Dao Yin, was charged with wire fraud in a federal criminal complaint. He was scheduled to make his initial appearance before a magistrate judge in Federal District Court in Brooklyn on Friday afternoon. The charging of Mr. Yin, a Democrat who ran for a State Assembly seat in Queens, came a year after The New York Times published an investigation that found he appeared to have listed dozens of fake donors to increase his allotment of money under a new state matching-funds program meant to increase the power of donors making small political contributions. Prosecutors said Mr. Yin, 62, had abused the system by using a scheme that The Times found yielded him $162,000 in matching funds. It was one of the largest sums received by an Assembly candidate last year, despite Mr. Yin's relatively unheralded status. He ultimately received just 6 percent of the vote in the Democratic primary, in which he challenged Ronald Kim, an incumbent assemblyman. Federal prosecutors in Brooklyn opened a criminal investigation focused on Mr. Yin in November. A lawyer for Mr. Yin could not immediately be reached for comment. Mr. Yin's campaign filings contained glaring red flags, The Times found. Half of the money he raised directly from individuals came in cash, the least traceable form of donation. It was a much higher proportion than the 5.2 percent average for all other Assembly candidates who participated in the matching program. Only nine of 300 contribution cards he turned in contained the required contact information for the donors, including phone numbers and email addresses. Even so, the state Public Campaign Finance Board granted him matching public funds, records show. Candidates must disclose certain information about their donors. But in Mr. Yin's case, the board permitted waivers via 'good-faith letters' that supposedly documented his efforts to obtain the missing information from donors. After The Times published its investigation into Mr. Yin, the Public Campaign Finance Board unanimously adopted an emergency resolution meant to tighten its rules and prevent future abuses. More than two dozen donors listed as contributors to Mr. Yin's campaign told The Times they had given money to it. Many expressed outrage that their names had been used. This is a developing story and will be updated. William K. Rashbaum contributed reporting.
