
Maoists admit to losses, 350 cadres killed last year
The admission, contained in a 22-page document dated June 23 and circulated by the party's Central Committee, offers a rare official acknowledgment of massive losses and strategic failure from a left-wing extremist movement that the government has vowed to uproot by April, 2026.
The most significant setback was the death of Nambala Kesava Rao, the general secretary of the outfit, on May 21.
Police officials confirmed the document was distributed among cadres and sympathisers following strategic discussions after the killing of Rao, who was known as Basvaraju.
The Maoist leadership attributed their setbacks to 'improper implementation of secret methods of functioning, rules of guerrilla war and tactics formulated by the Central Committee.'
The internal document, seen by Hindustan Times, provides a detailed breakdown of casualties that the party itself acknowledges. Of the 357 dead, the document states 136 were women, with losses spread across their operational zones: Dandakaranya/Bastar in Chhattisgarh (281), Telangana (23), Odisha (20), Bihar-Jharkhand (14), Maharashtra-Madhya Pradesh-north Chhattisgarh region (8), Andhra-Odisha Special Zone (9), Western Ghats (1), and Punjab (1).
The document categorises these admitted deaths with unusual specificity: 269 in encirclement attacks, 80 in what they term 'fake encounters,' four from ill health and improper treatment, and one in an accident.
The impact was spread over organisational hierarchy too: four Central Committee members including Kesava Rao, 16 state committee leaders, 23 district committee leaders, 83 area committee members, 138 party members, 17 People's Liberation Guerrilla Army (PLGA) members, and six from organisational wings too were killed.
Police records, however, suggest even higher casualties than what the Maoists admit, with officials claiming 217 Maoists were killed in 2024 alone and approximately 460 by mid-2025.
The setbacks have prompted the rebels to take to a pivot, adopting what they call 'flexible guerrilla war' tactics that emphasise constant mobility and avoiding direct confrontation with superior forces.
The Maoist document explicitly calls for abandoning previous approaches, referencing circulars from the Central Committee and Politburo from February and August 2004. The document states: 'We must be decentralised, class struggle must be made in coordination of legal-illegal, open-secret forms of struggle and organisation.'
The document outlines new tactics using metaphors, stating: 'The guerrilla war goes as per the tactics like 'breeze' and 'flowing water.'' It explains that like a breeze, cadres must maintain 'constant mobility instead of staying in one place,' while the flowing water approach means avoiding 'decisive wars with the enemy that is many times stronger.'
The document asserts that the government's attempts 'to eliminate the revolutionary movement before March 31, 2026 should be defeated by strictly following the tactics formulated by the central committee and politburo.'
While the document claims PLGA forces 'eliminated 75 enemy armed forces and injured 130 and seized few weapons in the past one year' through booby traps, IEDs and ambushes, police officials describe a very different reality.
Vivekanand Sinha, additional director general for Anti-Naxal Operations in Chhattisgarh, said: 'Facing a financial crisis, they've been pushed onto the back foot. Their formations have weakened, and they're now blending in with local villagers. They've become highly suspicious of everyone, which has unfortunately led to a rise in the killing of civilians.'
Intelligence officers report that battalions in Bastar have been broken into smaller units and pushed into inaccessible areas around Indravati National Park, with many rebels abandoning military attire to live among villagers, a person aware of the matter said, asking not to be named. Security forces estimate Maoist cadre strength in Bastar has dropped from several thousand to just a few hundred.
A senior intelligence officer said a separate Politburo circular issued approximately a month ago stated 'the time was not favourable for rebellion,' instructing all cadres to go underground and break large formations into small units to avoid detection.
The shift was confirmed in an interview by Rupesh, a senior CPI (Maoist) cadre, with local journalist Vikas Tiwari, according to police officials aware of the matter. Rupesh reportedly admitted that senior leaders 'have been moved to isolated areas and placed alone, disguised in rural attire, blending in with villagers to avoid detection.' Tiwari confirmed the interview to Hindustan Times.
Close to 20,000 security forces have been deployed across Chhattisgarh and Maharashtra for anti-Naxal operations, according to police officials.
The intelligence official quoted above said that to compensate for reduced numbers, Maoists have enhanced perimeter vigilance and are using villagers as spotters and information carriers, though this tactical shift is not explicitly acknowledged in the June document.
Security officials also report an increase in attacks on suspected police informers, with six villagers killed in June alone by Maoists. Intelligence inputs indicate this tactic is being used to conduct reconnaissance and identify suspected informers, though the document does not directly address civilian targeting.
A security official said: 'The political operatives are openly mingling with villagers, often disguised as common civilians, participating in meetings and even staying in villages for extended periods to avoid detection.'
Despite acknowledging massive casualties and strategic failures, the document maintains defiance. It asserts that central and state governments cannot eliminate the revolutionary movement by March 31, 2026, and calls for mounting pressure through civil society groups across 9-10 states to halt Operation Kagar.
The party has called for observing 'martyrs' week' from July 28 to August 3 across their areas of influence.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
3 hours ago
- India.com
Officers Associated With Ex-Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar Sent Back To Parent Cadre
New Delhi: Just three days after Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar stepped down from his post, his secretariat has been shut down and a majority of the government officers working with him have been repatriated to their respective parent cadres, two officials confirmed on Thursday. However, no rooms within the Vice Presidential enclave have been sealed, they added. A report by Hindustan Times noted that 'hardly a few government officers are remaining and they too are waiting for the orders to go back to their parent cadre,' according to an official familiar with the situation, who spoke on condition of anonymity. The newly built Vice President's enclave includes a dedicated wing for the secretariat. Officers have gradually vacated the premises, and it has now been locked. 'The keys were handed over to the two under-secretaries,' said another official, also speaking anonymously. Among those who have exited are Dhankhar's secretary, officer on special duty, and principal private secretary, all of whom are Indian Administrative Service (IAS) officers. 'It is nothing unusual as their appointment at the VP office was co-terminus with Dhankhar's tenure. Usually, officials are given 15 days to wrap up their work and report to their parent cadre. Some officials are still there, but soon, they too will go,' a government functionary explained, according to the report. As per protocol for former Vice Presidents, Dhankhar is now entitled to retain five personal staff members, whose salaries will be covered by the government, as well as a Type VIII bungalow or its equivalent anywhere in India. Being the first person to occupy the newly constructed Vice Presidential enclave, Dhankhar now has one month to vacate and move out. Sources said he began packing soon after submitting his resignation to President Droupadi Murmu on Monday evening. While the repatriation of officers after a constitutional authority vacates office is standard procedure, the rapid pace at which the staff exited and the secretariat was shut down has added weight to ongoing speculation that Dhankhar's resignation stemmed from growing tensions with the government. The 74-year-old cited medical reasons when he unexpectedly resigned on Monday, shortly after presiding over the opening day of the Monsoon Session in the Rajya Sabha. He had assumed the role of Vice President on 11 August 2022, succeeding M. Venkaiah Naidu. 'To prioritise health care and abide by medical advice, I hereby resign as Vice President of India, effective immediately, in accordance with Article 67(a) of the Constitution,' Dhankhar stated in his resignation letter to President Murmu. The report also highlighted possible friction between Dhankhar and the government, particularly surrounding the decision to admit an Opposition-backed motion in the Rajya Sabha for the impeachment of Justice Yashwant Varma, even as a similar notice, endorsed by multiple parties, was introduced in the Lok Sabha. Following his resignation, Dhankhar has not granted meetings to political leaders wishing to see him, three senior political figures said. Those reportedly seeking an audience with him included Leader of the Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Mallikarjun Kharge, NCP (Sharadchandra Pawar) veteran Sharad Pawar, and some leaders from the Aam Aadmi Party, they added.


Indian Express
3 hours ago
- Indian Express
Suhas Palshikar writes: Left Wing Extremism is a smokescreen. Maharashtra's new law could criminalise dissent
What you require is a dictionary, the Supreme Court is reported to have told the SIT in the Ali Khan Mahmudabad case recently. Very soon, the courts may have to say, what you need is a set of Political Science books. The need to read Political Science literature may be necessitated by the mention of Left Wing Extremism (LWE) in a bill passed by the Maharashtra legislature in the name of protecting public security. Indeed, there is a separate section under the Ministry of Home Affairs that deals with LWE but one is not sure that there is a clear legal definition of LWE. The MHA portal says that LWE refers to organisations that are banned and listed as an appendix to the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. But that hardly satisfies the test of what conceptually constitutes LWE. Broad innuendos making the rounds in the public domain refer to Maoism. In operational terms, the provisions refer to the use of violence for the overthrow of the state. But since the Maharashtra government now intends to incriminate Left Wing ideology, the onus is on the government to specify what it means by it. In the absence of clarity, anyone can be accused of subscribing to Left Wing ideology, and then the police will be running from one library to another for material on what constitutes Left Wing ideas. The current dispensation in Maharashtra and nationally is allergic to the idea of the 'Left'. Therefore, it will do well to come forward and define for legal purposes which ideas are construed as Left and are hence liable to be proscribed. Maoist violence in many parts of the country has invited a reaction of repulsion even among those who may have a leftward leaning. That repulsion is tactically utilised intellectually and cinematically by some who employ the term 'urban Naxal'. Even the Maharashtra Chief Minister has repeatedly referred to urban Maoism. What is overlooked is the distinction between those who actively mobilise Maoist violence against the state, those who sympathise with such organisations and those who do not endorse such violence but subscribe to the idea that the stranglehold of capital over state authority needs to be removed. The other problem with the Maharashtra law is that it incriminates a number of activities that are already proscribed by various laws and thus there is a vicious duplication of legal instruments giving the executive and the police unseemly discretionary powers on whether to book someone under this law, under UAPA or a more routine law penalising crime and violence. We regularly witness instances of how executive discretion results in overenthusiasm and even partisan vendetta. The new law will be an additional instrument to harass civil society. Given that it precludes the bail provision and recourse to lower courts, one can only imagine its likely draconian effects. Perhaps the most worrisome provisions in this law pertain to freedom of speech and expression. True, we routinely get a dose of pontification from the judiciary that freedom — and freedom of expression, in particular — is not absolute. It is nobody's case that in the Indian context, this freedom is absolute or without constraints. But the central question that law-makers and the judiciary must answer is not whether freedom of expression is or should be absolute. The question is whether restraints on freedom of expression can be random and arbitrary. Scholars of the Indian Constitution have argued that writing down the restrictions on the freedom of expression produces a concrete limiting effect on the executive and legislature. The written restrictions guarantee that governments or state authorities will not have unlimited powers to curb the freedom of expression. Also, the constitutional scheme of things requires the test of reasonableness. Restrictions have to be reasonable. Courts are therefore not to tell a citizen what she should reasonably express but to examine if the enforced limitations are reasonable. In the backdrop of the judiciary's abdication of this sacrosanct duty, the provisions in Maharashtra's bill could be dangerous and ill-intended. Under this new law, 'unlawful' activities are defined as activities 'by act or words… or by sign or by visible representation'. In other words, freedom of expression, besides actual acts, is intended to be criminalised. As a member of the legislature publicly stated after the passage of the bill, holding seminars (purportedly on objectionable matters, in that lawmaker's view) will be punished by the new law. Therein exists a dual danger. One, any dog-whistling can easily activate the police machinery, and there is no mechanism to first examine such random complaints emanating from ideological or political rivals before action is taken; the Advisory Board comes into the picture only after action is taken by the police. Two, any intellectual activity can easily be brought under the purview of unlawful activity. What constitutes incitement to violence will always be a ticklish issue legally, morally and politically. For the sake of argument, let us admit that 'incitement' may be legitimately criminalised. In that case, incitement against minorities — indulged in even by some members of the state government — should also be criminalised. But since such perpetrators are not Left Wing, this law would turn a blind eye towards that incitement. As the new law says, any acts through words that 'constitute danger to peace and tranquility', 'acts of generating fear and apprehension in the public', 'preaching disobedience of law and its institutions' are construed as unlawful. A plain reading of these phrases should alert any citizen. Because, while the law mentions LWE, these political acts are the common language of democratic mobilisation and as such practically any social worker can be booked for extending a verbal criticism of authorities and appealing to citizens to protest. Any stringent criticism can be construed as endangering tranquility. Thus, the language of 'urban Naxal' is a smokescreen. The tameness and intellectual laziness of the Opposition in Maharashtra is such that it is content with limiting the powers under this law to LWE. In its abject muteness, the Opposition in Maharashtra has shown that it is following in the footsteps of the loyal Opposition in Gujarat. Following legislation in Chhattisgarh, Odisha etc, this law raises wider issues beyond being Left or non-Left. It is about the idea of the state and protests: Whether the state can be critiqued in a democracy and whether a self-proclaimed democratic state should be criminalising protest, dissent and difference of opinion. The writer, based in Pune, taught Political Science


Indian Express
4 hours ago
- Indian Express
66 Maoists, Rs 2.54 crore bounty, 5 districts and a single-day surrender in Bastar
As many as 66 Maoists, including 49 with a combined bounty of Rs 2.54 crore, surrendered before the police in five districts of Chhattisgarh's Bastar region on Thursday. With this, the total number of surrendered Maoists in the last 18 months, which saw an unprecedented number of anti-Maoist operations, rose to 1,570 — a significant increase when compared to the 2022-2023 period, when 813 had surrendered. Thursday's surrenders come amid a new initiative from the security forces, called 'Poona Margham', a Gondi term that means 'new path'. Under this initiative, the security forces will focus more on reaching out to families of Maoists for help in persuading them to surrender. The seniormost Maoist cadre to surrender on Thursday was 37-year-old Ramanna Irpa, alias Jagdish, alias Vikesh, who was a Dandakaranya Special Zonal Committee (DKSZC) member carrying a reward of Rs 25 lakh. A resident of Basaguda in Bijapur district, Ramanna had been active for two decades and has at least 30 cases against him, including murders. On the effort that went into getting him to surrender, a police source said, 'We were trying to get him to surrender for three months. We had contacted his family and were persuading them to get him to surrender, and finally, he surrendered with his family's help.' Giving credit to the Poona Margham initiative for the large number of surrenders on Thursday, Inspector General of Police for Bastar range, Sundarraj P, said, 'Our repeated appeals to Maoist cadres to give up violence and return to the mainstream are showing encouraging results. The surrender of 66 cadres, including a state-level committee member, across five districts in a single day is a strong indication that the Naxal outfit is approaching its end.' Bijapur SP Jitendra Yadav said, 'With the establishment of new security camps in interior regions and improved access to roads, transport, drinking water, electricity, and other public welfare schemes, development is now reaching the remotest villages. Widespread disillusionment with Maoist ideology, increasing internal conflicts within the outfit, and a strong desire to live a peaceful and secure family life are among the primary reasons behind these surrenders.' While surrendering with weapons makes the cadres eligible for cash rewards, a senior officer said none of the 66 had done so. 'None of them surrendered with weapons. They never surrender with weapons as they fear their families will be targeted by Maoists, which has happened in the past,' the officer said. The surrendered cadres include one DKSZC member, four divisional committee members, 10 People's Liberation Guerilla Army (PLGA) cadres, 15 area committee members, seven local organisation squad members, and 29 other rank cadres.