Israeli military hits Hamas member in southern Syria
CAIRO: The Israeli military said on Sunday that it struck a member of the Palestinian militant group Hamas in southern Syria's Mazraat Beit Jin, days after Israel carried out its first airstrikes in the country in nearly a month.
Hamas did not immediately comment on the strike.
Israel said on Tuesday it hit weapons belonging to the government in retaliation for the firing of two projectiles toward Israel for the first time under the country's new leadership. Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz held Syria's President Ahmed Al-Sharaa accountable.
Damascus in response said reports of the shelling were unverified, reiterating that Syria does not pose a threat to any regional party.
A little known group named 'Martyr Muhammad Deif Brigades,' an apparent reference to Hamas' military leader who was killed in an Israeli strike in 2024, reportedly claimed responsibility for the shelling. Reuters, however, could not independently verify the claim.
Israel and Syria have recently engaged in direct talks to calm tensions, marking a significant development in ties between states that have been on opposite sides of conflict in the Middle East for decade.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asharq Al-Awsat
24 minutes ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
On the UN Peace Conference in New York
In the lead-up to the UN conference on a two-state solution — scheduled for June 17–20 and co-chaired by Saudi Arabia and France — efforts to ensure its success have been intensifying. Ministerial meetings took place in Paris and Brussels late last month, alongside intensified efforts at the UN, with working groups set up and tasked with developing ideas and proposals that address all aspects of the conflict. These efforts have been met, however, with positions that hinder the conference, which is meant to 'lay the course for real change,' not merely adopt positions whose impact never extends beyond the conference. One such obstructive position is the United States' decision to use its veto power against a resolution that had been supported by the rest of the Security Council and called for an immediate ceasefire in the Gaza Strip and the unrestricted delivery of humanitarian aid. Vetoing the resolution effectively encourages Israel to maintain its position on the current negotiations, which remain open-ended and obstructed by Israel's terms. These negotiations aim to achieve what Israel has failed to achieve militarily on the ground: displacement of Gaza's population and Israel's reassertion of control over the Strip. This goal has been repeatedly stressed by Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, who has called for using extreme violence to take control of the Strip. In the same vein, Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz commented on the upcoming New York conference saying: 'They will recognize a Palestinian state on paper, and we will establish the Jewish Israeli state in the West Bank.' Several Israel watchers have said that a ceasefire would mean the 'collapse of the government.' The biggest loser would be Benjamin Netanyahu. Not only would he lose out politically, but he would also face legal prosecution regarding an array of domestic cases raised against him. All of these factors pose major challenges to launching the peaceful settlement process that the New York conference seeks to achieve. Yet these challenges are neither new nor unexpected for the architects, sponsors, and supporters of the conference. The history of 'conflict diplomacy' is rich with examples, lessons, and insights, even as circumstances evolve. What is primarily expected of the conference is to expand recognition of the State of Palestine, which already enjoys broad international recognition, particularly among European countries that still hesitate on the matter. Such recognition would lend greater credibility to the process that the conference aims to initiate and accompany. Moreover, contrary to the claims of those who oppose it or call for its postponement, this conference also reinforces the credibility of a comprehensive negotiation framework through an 'integrated solution package' that ties all elements together, even if the conflicting parties have divergent priorities. Legally and practically, this package amounts to the ultimate goal of the negotiation process, regardless of the difficulties, which the conference is at least seeking to address by launching the negotiation process. A holistic rather than discretionary approach must be a pillar of the 'roadmap' of the negotiations once they begin. It should be recalled, that there are many roadblocks along this path, particularly from the Israeli side. The conference must lay a 'triangular foundation' for the process: a binding negotiation reference framework, a roadmap (despite the many challenges it faces), and a timeline that strengthens the credibility of the negotiation process. Many observers believe that despite the American veto mentioned earlier, this 'dynamic diplomacy' that approaches issues case-by-case rather than sticking to rigid alliances, which we have seen under the Trump administration, leaves a possibility for shifts in US positions. Even if its movement is limited, there is a possibility that Washington could become convinced such shifts truly serve its interests. The New York conference is also expected to establish an open committee composed of active, influential, and committed parties working on achieving the conference's goals. This committee would supervise, facilitate, and support this effort during the preparatory phase, which is expected to begin the morning after the conference concludes, and eventually during the negotiation phase when the time comes, which is not likely anytime soon. One of the conference's primary responsibilities is to ensure that decisions are not merely statements. It must ensure that they are translated into effective diplomatic action despite the many barriers. That should begin with reinvigorated efforts in the Security Council to secure an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and to prevent Israel's annexation and Judaization efforts, which constitute blatant violations of Security Council Resolutions. Of course, these goals will not be easy to attain, as many episodes from our recent and distant history show. Nonetheless, they are more than necessary for the credibility, and thus the success, of the conference. Despite the many challenges ahead, this track remains the only path that can lead to meaningful security and stability in the region.
Asharq Al-Awsat
2 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Israel Vows to Prevent an Aid Boat Carrying Greta Thunberg, Activists from Reaching Gaza
Israel's defense minister has vowed to prevent an aid boat carrying Greta Thunberg and other activists from reaching the Gaza Strip. Defense Minister Israel Katz said Sunday that Israel wouldn't allow anyone to break its naval blockade of the Palestinian territory, which he said was aimed at preventing Hamas from importing arms. Thunberg, a climate campaigner is among 12 activists aboard the Madleen, which is operated by the Freedom Flotilla Coalition. The vessel departed Sicily last Sunday on a mission that aims to break the sea blockade of Gaza and deliver humanitarian aid, while raising awareness over the growing humanitarian crisis in the Palestinian enclave, The AP news reported. The activists had said they planned to reach Gaza's territorial waters as early as Sunday. Rima Hassan, a French member of the European Parliament who is of Palestinian descent, is among the others onboard. She has been barred from entering Israel because of her opposition to Israeli policies toward the Palestinians. After a three-month total blockade aimed at pressuring Hamas, Israel started allowing some basic aid into Gaza last month, but humanitarian workers have warned of famine unless the blockade and the war end. An attempt last month by Freedom Flotilla to reach Gaza by sea failed after another of the group's vessels was attacked by two drones while sailing in international waters off Malta. The group blamed Israel for the attack, which damaged the front section of the ship.
Asharq Al-Awsat
2 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Sensitive Israeli Documents Obtained by Iran to be Unveiled Soon, Minister Says
Sensitive Israeli documents obtained by Tehran should be unveiled soon, Minister of Intelligence Esmail Khatib told state TV on Sunday, describing them as a "treasure trove" which will strengthen Iran's offensive capabilities. Iranian state media reported on Saturday that Iranian intelligence agencies had obtained a large trove of sensitive Israeli documents. Khatib said these were related to Israel's nuclear facilities and its relations with the United States, Europe and other countries, and to its defensive capabilities, Reuters reported. It was not clear whether the information breach was linked to a reported hacking of an Israeli nuclear research center last year which Tehran is only disclosing now amid heightened tensions over its nuclear program. "The transfer of this treasure trove was time-consuming and required security measures. Naturally, the transfer methods will remain confidential but the documents should be unveiled soon," Khatib said, adding that in terms of volume, "talking of thousands of documents would be an understatement." In 2018, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that Israeli agents had seized a huge "archive" of Iranian documents that showed Tehran had done more nuclear work than previously known. US President Donald Trump has threatened to bomb Iran if Tehran did not come to an agreement with Washington over its nuclear program. But Trump in April reportedly blocked a planned Israeli strike on Iranian nuclear sites in favour of negotiating a deal with Tehran. Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei said on Wednesday that abandoning uranium enrichment was "100%" against Iran's interests, rejecting a central US demand in talks to resolve a decades-long dispute over Tehran's nuclear ambitions. Western powers say Iran is refining uranium to a high degree of fissile purity close to the level suitable for atomic bomb fuel. Iran has long denied seeking nuclear weapons.
