'Opens new wounds': White South African man whose parents' memorial was called 'burial site' by Trump
Donald Trump's meeting with Cyril Ramaphosa
A video played by US President
Donald Trump
during his White House meeting with South Africa counterpart Cyril Ramaphosa has opened "several new wounds" for a white South African man.
Also Read: Donald Trump shows Cyril Ramaphosa evidence of 'white genocide' in South Africa during explosive Oval Office meeting
Nathan Rafferty, who now lives in Brisbane, Australia, has said he was "shocked" when the clip, taken in South Africa's KwaZulu-Natal province, was played during the Trump-Ramaphosa meeting.
"The last thing you expect to see are some of the most traumatic parts of your life shown on international TV. So it was totally unexpected. It obviously opened several new wounds," Rafferty told US news outlet
NPR
.
The US president used the video to support his allegation of a "genocide" of white South Africans. However, what he alleged to be a "burial site," turned out to be a memorial for Rafferty's murdered parents.
Also Read: Is 'white genocide' real in South Africa? Unpacking Donald Trump's Oval Office claim
"My parents Glen and Vida were gunned down by six assailants, by six men on their farm in 2020, so those crosses were erected as a memorial on the day of their funeral.
The local community used it as a means of protest and to pay tribute," Rafferty stated.
He also rejected the Republican leader's "genocide" charge. However, he admitted "much more needs to be done" to prevent such "brutal attacks."
Also Read: White House's Karoline Leavitt spars with reporter over video of white South African farmers' 'burial sites'
"Do I think that there's a targeted genocide program of some sort? No, I don't. But I never went farming because I was fearful of the tinderbox that it is, despite having four generations of farmers in my family," Rafferty said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
18 minutes ago
- Business Standard
US hiring slowed to 130K new jobs amid uncertainty over Trump's policies
The American job market likely continued to slow last month, hobbled by worries over President Donald Trump's trade wars, deportations and purges of the federal workforce. The Labour Department's numbers on May hiring Friday are expected to show that businesses, government agencies and nonprofits added 1,30,000 jobs last month. That would be down from 1,77,000 in April but enough to stay ahead of people entering the workforce and keep the unemployment rate at a low 4.2 per cent, according to a survey of forecasters by the data firm FactSet. Mainstream economists expect Trump's policies to take a toll on America's economy, the world's largest. His massive taxes on imports tariffs are expected to raise costs for US companies that buy raw materials, equipment and components from overseas and force them to cut back hiring or even lay workers off. Billionaire Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has slashed federal workers and cancelled government contracts. Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration is expected to make it harder for businesses to find enough workers. For the most part, though, any damage has yet to show up in the government's economic data. The US economy and job market have proven surprisingly resilient in recent years. When the inflation fighters at the Federal Reserve raised their benchmark interest rate 11 times in 2022 and 2023, the higher borrowing costs were widely expected to tip the United States into a recession. Instead, the economy kept growing and employers kept hiring. But former Fed economist Claudia Sahm warns that the job market of 2025 isn't nearly as durable as the two or three years ago when immigrants were pouring into the US job market and employers were posting record job openings. Any signs of weakness in the data this week would stoke fears of a recession again, Sahm, now chief economist at New Century Advisors, wrote in a Substack post this week. It's too soon to see the full effects of tariffs, DOGE, or other policies on the labour market; softening now would suggest less resilience to those later effects, raising the odds of a recession. Recent economic reports have sent mixed signals. The Labour Department reported Tuesday that US job openings rose unexpectedly to 7.4 million in April seemingly a good sign. But the same report showed that layoffs ticked up and the number of Americans quitting their jobs fell, a sign they were less confident they could find something better elsewhere. Surveys by the Institute for Supply Management, a trade group of purchasing managers, found that both American manufacturing and services businesses were contracting last month. And the number of Americans applying for unemployment benefits rose last week to the highest level in eight months. Jobless claims a proxy for layoffs still remain low by historical standards, suggesting that employers are reluctant to cut staff despite uncertainty over Trump's policies. They likely remember how hard it was to bring people back from the massive but short-lived layoffs of the 2020 COVID-19 recession as the US economy bounced back with unexpected strength. Still, the job market has clearly decelerated. So far this year, American employers have added an average 1,44,000 jobs a month. That is down from 1,68,000 last year; 2,16,000 in 2023; 3,80,000 in 2022, and a record 6,03,000 in 2021 in the rebound from COVID-19 layoffs. Trump's tariffs and the erratic way he rolls them out, suspends them and conjures up new ones have already buffeted the economy. America's gross domestic product the nation's output of goods and services fell at a 0.2 per cent annual pace from January through March this year. A surge of imports shaved 5 percentage points off growth during the first quarter as companies rushed to bring in foreign products ahead of Trump's tariffs. Imports plunged by a record 16 per cent in April as Trump's levies took effect. The drop in foreign goods could mean fewer jobs at the warehouses that store them and the trucking companies that haul them around, wrote Michael Madowitz, an economist at the left-leaning Roosevelt Institute.
Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Elon Musk's threat to withdraw Dragon capsule would leave NASA with 1 option: Russia
As President Donald Trump and Elon Musk argued on social media on Thursday, the world's richest man threatened to decommission a space capsule used to take astronauts and supplies to the International Space Station. After Trump threatened to cut government contracts given to Musk's SpaceX rocket company and his Starlink internet satellite services, Musk responded via X that SpaceX "will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately'. It's unclear how serious Musk's threat was. But the capsule, developed with the help of government contracts, is an important part of keeping the space station running. NASA also relies heavily on SpaceX for other programmes, including launching science missions and, later this decade, returning astronauts to the surface of the moon. SpaceX is the only US company capable right now of transporting crews to and from the space station, using its four-person Dragon capsules. Boeing's Starliner capsule has flown astronauts only once; last year's test flight went so badly that the two NASA astronauts had to hitch a ride back to Earth via SpaceX in March, more than nine months after launching last June. Starliner remains grounded as NASA decides whether to go with another test flight with cargo, rather than a crew. SpaceX also uses a Dragon capsule for its own privately run missions. The next one of those is due to fly next week on a trip chartered by Axiom Space, a Houston company. Cargo versions of the Dragon capsule are also used to ferry food and other supplies to the orbiting lab. Russia's Soyuz capsules are the only other means of getting crews to the space station right now. The Soyuz capsules hold three people at a time. For now, each Soyuz launch carries two Russians and one NASA astronaut, and each SpaceX launch has one Russian on board under a barter system. That way, in an emergency requiring a capsule to return, there is always someone from the US and Russian on board. With its first crew launch for NASA in 2020, the first orbital flight of a crew by a private company, SpaceX enabled NASA to reduce its reliance on Russia for crew transport. The Russian flights had been costing the US tens of millions of dollars per seat, for years. NASA has also used Russian spacecraft for cargo, along with US contractor Northrup Grumman. The company has used its rockets to launch several science missions for NASA as well as military equipment. Last year, SpaceX also won a NASA contract to help bring the space station out of orbit when it is no longer usable. SpaceX's Starship mega rocket is what NASA has picked to get astronauts from lunar orbit to the surface of the moon, at least for the first two landing missions. Starship made its ninth test flight last week from Texas, but tumbled out of control and broke apart.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
28 minutes ago
- First Post
One reason Elon Musk shouldn't mind being called 'crazy' by Trump
Being called 'crazy' by Trump might be less an insult and more an acknowledgement of Musk's unconventional and unpredictable influence read more Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk (left) and Republican presidential nominee former President Donald Trump attend a campaign event at the Butler Farm Show, Oct. 5, 2024, in Butler, Pennsylvania (Source: AP) US President Donald Trump publicly called Elon Musk 'crazy' on Thursday, intensifying a bitter feud between the two billionaires — one holds the top constitutional post in America, arguably the most powerful office in the world, and the other the richest man on the planet. Their feud is now the talk of the town, though there are signs of thaw, with the White House contextualising their public spat with each preferring their own social media platforms to fire salvos at the other — Musk on X and Trump on Truth Social. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Speaking at the White House on Thursday, Trump said , 'I asked him to step down. I rescinded his EV Mandate that compelled everyone to purchase Electric Vehicles that nobody else desired (which he was aware I would do for months!), and he simply went CRAZY!' He further threatened to terminate government contracts for Musk's companies, saying, 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' Musk, who had recently stepped down from leading the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge), fired back on social media, accusing Trump of 'such ingratitude' and claiming, 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House, and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate.' Musk also alleged that Trump's name appears in the sealed Jeffrey Epstein files, suggesting this was the 'real reason they have not been made public'. This came as the 'real big bomb' that Musk dropped on Trump, signalling an end to their alliance had crumbled under the weight of their respective ambitions and ideas. The Putin parallel: 'Absolutely crazy' yet indispensable Trump's use of 'crazy' to describe Musk echoes his earlier description of Russian President Vladimir Putin as 'absolutely crazy'. Despite this harsh outburst, Trump's dealings with Putin have often been soft marked by caution and a reluctance to impose strong penalties. This contradiction is telling. This conveys that Trump calling someone 'crazy' in political rhetoric does not necessarily preclude cooperation or strategic accommodation. Similarly, Musk's stance on Russia and the Ukraine conflict reveals a complex balancing act. While Musk's SpaceX provides Starlink satellite internet to Ukraine, he has also been criticised for being soft on Russia and for threatening to cut services to Ukraine under certain conditions. This ambivalence mirrors the pragmatic, sometimes contradictory approach Trump took with Putin — publicly critical yet privately conciliatory. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Why Musk need not bother Being called 'crazy' by Trump, therefore, might be less an insult and more an acknowledgement of Musk's unconventional and unpredictable influence. Trump himself has used the term to describe powerful figures whose actions disrupt norms and expectations, yet remain central to geopolitical dynamics. Musk's ability to operate in grey zones — continuing his engagements in contentious circumstances, such as his dealings with Russia amid growing pressure to isolate Moscow and Putin, engaging with US political rivals including China, and wielding technological power — positions that make him a key player in a complex global landscape. His 'crazy' label can be seen as recognition of his disruptive role rather than mere disparagement. A badge of unconventional power Musk can wear Trump's 'crazy' tag as a badge of unconventional power. High-stakes politics and business go hand in hand. This is why Trump's labelling someone as 'crazy' actually masks deeper strategic realities. Putin and Musk may go down as quotable examples. Just as Putin's 'craziness' has not diminished his geopolitical importance, Musk's real global influence is likely to remain unchanged despite his streak of controversial actions and statements for quite long. Trump's insult, therefore, could actually be less as a personal attack and more as a reflection of Musk's unique position at the intersection of technology, politics, and global power. The White House statement saying that Musk has every right to speak for his company and that Trump can continue to fight for the country sums up this complex setting quite well. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
