logo
HK unis accept over 60 students affected by US policy

HK unis accept over 60 students affected by US policy

RTHK3 days ago
HK unis accept over 60 students affected by US policy
Education chief Christine Choi says local universities have been very active when it comes to attracting top talents from around the world. File photo: RTHK
Education minister Christine Choi on Sunday said dozens of people affected by US policy changes on international university students, have been admitted to Hong Kong universities.
Choi said the SAR's eight publicly-funded universities received more than 1,000 enquiries on transfer of studies, after authorities earlier announced that Hong Kong welcomes any students who are being discriminated by the US policy.
"More than 60 offers have been given out so far, and students are originally from different US universities," Choi told a TVB programme.
When asked if more American scholars have come to Hong Kong as well, she said that local universities have been very active when it comes to attracting top talents from around the world.
Meanwhile, the minister reiterated that the impact of the government's decision to tighten eligibility for subsidised university places for children of non-local talent is small.
Choi said such children are still deemed as local students, but it is necessary for them to meet the requirements before applying for different subsidies.
"We have a two-year transitional period, so there is enough time for talent scheme applicants and their dependants to prepare and meet the eligibility [for local student subsidies]. If they do not fit the criteria...all they have to do is just pay the non-subsidised tuition fees," she said.
The government on Thursday announced that from the 2028-29 academic year, students with dependant visas or entry permits obtained before the age of 18 will need to live in Hong Kong for the two years prior to the start of their courses, if they want to be qualified for subsidised education.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Trump shouldn't attend Xi's 'Victory Day' parade
Why Trump shouldn't attend Xi's 'Victory Day' parade

AllAfrica

time18 hours ago

  • AllAfrica

Why Trump shouldn't attend Xi's 'Victory Day' parade

As rumors swirl about President Donald Trump possibly attending China's 'Victory Day' parade this September, it's worth sounding an alarm. Such a visit to Beijing would be a strategic blunder that undermines Washington's Indo-Pacific posture, undercuts American allies and sends a troubling message to the wider world. On its face, this kind of diplomatic invitation may be tempting at this delicate juncture in bilateral relations. Trump has long shown an affinity for grand displays of military prowess, high-stakes diplomacy and face-to-face theatrics. A handshake with Chinese leader Xi Jinping in front of goose-stepping soldiers might make for dramatic television. If Beijing officials dangle the promise of a new trade agreement, it might even be a transactional win. But the costs would far outweigh the optics. First, there is the history and symbolism of Victory Day itself. China's September 3 commemoration is not merely a celebration of the end of World War II. It's a well-worn anti-Japanese ritual. While framed as a tribute to China's role in defeating fascism, the parade often serves as a thinly veiled nationalist spectacle aimed at disparaging modern Japan and legitimizing the Communist Party's historical narrative. This is not to suggest that Japan's actions during World War II were innocent or justified — far from it. But China's Victory Day parade is more about nationalist messaging and historical revisionism than sober remembrance, and ultimately aims to serve Beijing's current strategic goals. The irony is that most of the conventional resistance to Japan came not from Mao Zedong's Communist forces, but from Chiang Kai-shek's Nationalist army — the same Nationalists who later fled to Taiwan. By standing alongside Xi and possibly even Russian President Vladimir Putin, Trump would risk endorsing this misleading version of history. That, in turn, would alienate two of America's strategic partners in East Asia, namely Japan and Taiwan. Taiwan, in particular, would have reason to feel betrayed. Its very identity is rooted in the struggle against the same Chinese Communist Party that now seeks to erase its role, and seemingly its existence, from the annals of history. South Korea, too, would draw the wrong conclusions. Lee Jae-myung, the left-leaning president, has reportedly decided not to attend the same ceremony as a quiet signal of the importance of maintaining his country's alignment with Washington. Trump's presence could undercut this calculation, emboldening voices within Seoul that favor a tilt toward Beijing. It would surely sow confusion among American allies in East Asia at a time when Washington is demanding their deeper support for its Indo-Pacific strategy to counter China. There is also precedent to consider. In 2015, then-President Park Geun-hye of South Korea attended the same parade as the only US ally to do so. While she sought to strike a delicate diplomatic balance, the visit spectacularly backfired. Her decision raised significant eyebrows in Washington and Tokyo, and the political backlash at home was even greater. To this day, her appearance standing between Putin and Xi atop Tiananmen Tower is remembered not as a diplomatic gambit but as a major miscalculation. The stakes in 2025 are even higher. The world is witnessing the most dangerous moment for the global order since the end of the Cold War. China is waging an economic war against the West and flirting with military adventurism in the Taiwan Strait. Russia, meanwhile, remains entrenched in a war of aggression in Ukraine. For Trump to attend a parade that implicitly legitimizes both of these regimes would hand Beijing and Moscow a propaganda victory. Even more troubling is the message it would send about America's military posture in the Indo-Pacific. Chinese military parades prominently feature missiles and weapons systems explicitly designed to threaten US bases, forces and partners, including in Guam, Japan and Taiwan. Trump's attendance at the celebration could be interpreted as tacit approval of Beijing's growing ambitions and invite serious doubt about Washington's security resolve. There is also the potential domestic political cost. Trump built his election campaign on confronting China, restoring American strength, and putting 'America First.' Attending a parade that glorifies communist China's military might would hand his critics a damning visual contradiction. To national security conservatives and China hawks, it could look like a compromise of the very principles Trump claims to represent and defend. It would likewise undercut the recent efforts of Republican foreign policy voices such as Elbridge Colby and Brian Mast, who have been urging America's East Asian allies to take on a more assertive role in Washington's broader efforts to counterbalance China. Trump would thus be well advised to stay home on September 3. Kenji Yoshida is a Seoul-based correspondent for JAPAN Forward

China fears Nvidia chips could track, trace and shut down its AIs
China fears Nvidia chips could track, trace and shut down its AIs

AllAfrica

time21 hours ago

  • AllAfrica

China fears Nvidia chips could track, trace and shut down its AIs

Beijing has asked Nvidia to explain whether its H20 artificial intelligence chips have backdoors that could allow the United States to position and remotely shut them down. Chinese pundits said similar probes could be extended to other American-made chips. The Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) stated on July 31 that it summoned US tech giant Nvidia over security risks related to its H20 AI chip, which had been sold to China. 'Nvidia's AI chips have been alleged to pose serious security risks, and some US lawmakers have called for advanced chips exported abroad to be equipped with 'tracking and positioning' functions,' said the CAC. The CAC said in a press release that American AI experts have confirmed that the 'tracking and positioning' and 'remote shutdown' technologies of Nvidia chips have matured. It requested that Nvidia explain and submit relevant proof materials regarding this issue. On the same day, Nvidia said its chips do not contain backdoors that would allow anyone to access or remotely control them. It said cybersecurity is critically important to the company. Beijing's summoning of Nvidia came after Reuters reported on July 29 that Nvidia had placed orders for 300,000 H20 chipsets (worth about US$3.6 billion) with the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) a week earlier. It also followed the trade talks between US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng in Sweden on July 28-29. In April, the US government stopped Nvidia from shipping its H20 products to China. When Republican US Senator Tom Cotton introduced the 'Chip Security Act' on May 9, the bill received little to no significant media attention at the time. The bill requires AI chips to be subject to export regulations and mandates that products containing these chips be equipped with location-tracking systems to aid in detecting diversion, smuggling or other unauthorized use. It received support from bipartisan lawmakers in the House of Representatives. 'As Congress's chip designer, AI programmer and PhD physicist, I know we have the technical tools to prevent powerful AI technology from getting into the wrong hands,' said Congressman Bill Foster. 'With advanced AI chips being smuggled into China and posing a national security risk, Congress must act.' Following meetings between US and Chinese officials in London on June 9, China agreed to resume shipments of rare earth minerals to the US. In return, the US agreed to allow Chinese firms to use its electronic design automation (EDA) software and resume the shipment of H20 chips and C919 flight engine parts to China. Some commentators said the strong demand for H20 from Chinese firms may hurt Huawei Technologies' Ascend AI chips' market share. Wang Xinxi, a columnist specializing in the technology, media and telecommunications (TMT) sector, says in an article that the Ascend 910B has already surpassed H20 in terms of computing power. He says Chinese technology firms still use the H20 only because of its higher bandwidth and software support on the CUDA platform. 'Although the US Congress has not yet passed the Chip Security Act, Nvidia may have already added location-tracking functions in its chips,' he writes. 'All Nvidia computing chips have private data areas where the data is encrypted, so it is technically possible to add a backdoor.' Citing Qihoo 360 Chairperson Zhou Hongyi's recent comments, Chen claims that malicious code can be implanted in a chip during the wafer manufacturing, packaging and testing processes. He says it's difficult for Chinese end-users to identify these unsafe products within the global supply chain, which involves numerous suppliers and distributors. 'If there is any security loophole, Chinese firms must stop using H20,' he adds. 'In the end, companies that use Chinese AI chips will win.' 'Imagine if such 'backdoor' probes were expanded to other major American chip manufacturers in China like Micron, Wall Street investors would quickly sell their semiconductor stocks,' Chen Kai, a Fujian-based writer, says in an article. 'The H20 under probes is a 'freak' from the beginning as it is the downgraded version of the H100,' he writes. 'The Trump administration thought China would thank the US for relaxing its chip export control, and it would easily obtain the Chinese rare earth. It did not expect Nvidia to face security probes.' In 2019, the US banned Huawei routers due to concerns about backdoors. The US Department of Commerce added Huawei to its Entity List in May 2019. In May, Nvidia's Chief Executive Jensen Huang said that tracking massive AI servers or accelerators weighing several tons should not be difficult. However, he said, finding the AI chips after they are sold is impossible. Joseph Hoefer, a Washington, D.C.-based government relations strategist focused on AI, said the intent behind the Chip Security Act is understandable, but its approach creates more problems than it solves. 'First, real-time location tracking of chips is simply not feasible at scale,' Hoefer said. 'Attempting to derive meaningful national security insights from hardware geolocation data would require vast infrastructure, reliable international cooperation, and intensive verification protocols. That level of control does not exist in today's global tech ecosystem.' Secondly, he said, any system tracking chip locations would become an immediate cybersecurity vulnerability. Lastly, he said the compliance burden would fall on responsible US chip makers, which would have to spend time and money implementing unproven tracking systems, navigating regulatory ambiguity, and reporting false positives. Some IT experts have said that, technically, Nvidia can utilize its ecosystem of software and tools, such as the Nvidia Management Library (NVML) and Data Center GPU Manager (DCGM), to identify the locations of its AI chips, each of which has a unique serial number. It would be similar to what Google does to track and manage its AI chips. Google has centralized inventory and asset management systems that track every component, including custom chips such as Tensor Processing Units (TPUs), from manufacturing to deployment. Google's datacenter orchestration and resource management (Borg) can track the real-time performance of every chip. Others argue that even if a chip management software can determine the location of a suspicious AI chip cluster, it will be too late, as it means Chinese firms have already obtained and deployed the chips. Alphabet's Google has already started tracking the location of its in-house AI chips and others in its vast network of data centers for security purposes, Reuters reported on May 6, citing two sources familiar with the matter. Read: Chinese worry Nvidia H20 chips are poisoned wine for AI industry

HK and mainland markets rally after bad week
HK and mainland markets rally after bad week

RTHK

time2 days ago

  • RTHK

HK and mainland markets rally after bad week

HK and mainland markets rally after bad week The Hang Seng Index ended trading on Monday up 225 points, or 0.92 percent, at 24,733. File photo: RTHK Mainland and Hong Kong stocks gained on Monday, recovering from last week's sharp declines, as defence and tech stocks led gains. The benchmark Hang Seng Index ended trading for the day up 225 points, or 0.92 percent, at 24,733. The Hang Seng China Enterprises Index climbed 1.01 percent to 8,893 while the Hang Seng Tech Index jumped 1.55 percent to 5,481. Up north, the benchmark Shanghai Composite Index closed up 0.66 percent at 3,583 while the Shenzhen Component Index closed 0.46 percent higher at 11,041. The combined turnover of these two indexes stood at about 1.5 trillion yuan, down from 1.6 trillion yuan on Friday. Sectors such as military equipment and gold led gains while stocks related to photovoltaic equipment suffered major losses. The ChiNext Index, tracking China's Nasdaq-style board of growth enterprises, gained 0.5 percent to close at 2,334 The rebound on Monday came after markets last week booked their steepest losses since April. The bullish trend for Chinese equities has started to show signs of slowing as the much anticipated Politburo meeting and tariff negotiations with the United States both failed to deliver positive surprises. "Market sentiment is becoming more volatile as positive catalysts are losing momentum," Citic Securities said in a note, adding that investors might shift focus to defensive sectors for shelter or industries with clear growth trajectories. The tech sector jumped 1.6 percent and AI-related shares added 1.7 percent, leading markets higher. Domestic chip stocks continued to rally on Monday after Beijing raised concerns over potential security risks in Nvidia's H20 chip. Looking ahead, markets are awaiting new developments on the trade truce between China and the United States that expires on August 12. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Washington has the makings of a deal and was "optimistic" about the path forward. "Given rising uncertainties in the foreign market, especially in the US where Trump's intervention in economic reporting undermines the efficacy of policies, both on- and off-shore Chinese markets will likely be under pressure in the near term," Hong Hao, chief investment officer at Lotus Asset Management, said in a note. (Reuters/Xinhua)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store