Fury as farmers told inheritance tax raid will ‘fund mental health hubs'
Labour has sparked further fury from farmers after confirming its inheritance tax raid will fund 'mental health hubs'.
Steve Reed, the Environment Secretary, told a cross-party committee of MPs that money raised from the death duties will go to several NHS initiatives.
Opposition MPs told the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Efra) hearing that they were 'staggered' by the decision, as they claimed that the Government's own policy has fuelled a mental health crisis among farmers.
Charities have reported a spike in calls from distressed farmers. In November, John Charlesworth, 78, took his own life after his family said he had been 'eaten away' by fear of the tax raid.
Farms worth more than £1m will be saddled with a 20pc inheritance tax bill from next April as part of a controversial plan that could threaten food security and end the tradition of family farms.
Labour hopes the new taxes will raise £500m a year by 2029.
Mr Reed said: 'That money is helping to fund the NHS and the improvements we need in mental health support and the mental health hubs that will be placed in every community'.
'There are particularly high levels of mental ill-health in rural communities,' he said.
'Those who say they don't want to raise revenue to fund these benefits need to tell us which benefits they would cut as a result of changing it.'
The revelation comes two months after ministers quietly shelved a £10m mental health support fund for farmers. Labour resisted calls to extend the Farming Resilience Fund before confirming its planned closure on March 31.
Thousands of farmers have participated in numerous protests since Labour – which did not detail its plans to change agricultural property relief in its manifesto – announced the death duties tax raid.
The National Farmers Union has warned that two thirds of farms will be hit by the tax, compared to government estimates that just 27pc would be forced to pay.
Sarah Bool, South Northamptonshire Conservative MP, told Tuesday's hearing that farmers are struggling with their mental health as a result.
Addressing Mr Reed, she said: 'I'm staggered by what you've said because the mental health strain is unbearable.
'I've heard farmers telling me about family members planning things they shouldn't be doing to get away from this.
'I am really upset to hear you say it like that because you are saying this money will help mental health.'
Alistair Carmichael, the Liberal Democrat MP for Orkney and Shetland, told Mr Reed that 'farmers around the country will be hearing your words and shouting at their TV screens saying we already pay our taxes'.
Farming charity Yellow Wellies recorded a 55pc leap in demand for counselling services and a 13pc increase in calls to its crisis support centre last year.
The Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs was approached for comment.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
19 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Israel appears ready to attack Iran, officials in US and Europe say
Advertisement Trump waved off another plan by Israel several months ago to attack Iran, insisting that he wanted a chance to negotiate a deal with Tehran that would choke off Iran's ability to produce more nuclear fuel for a bomb. Two weeks ago, Trump said he had warned Netanyahu about launching a strike while U.S. negotiations with Iran were underway. It is not clear how much effort Trump made to block Netanyahu again this time, but the president has appeared less optimistic in recent days about the prospects for a diplomatic settlement after Iran's supreme leader rejected an administration proposal that would have effectively phased out Iran's ability to enrich uranium on its soil. Netanyahu has walked up to bombing Iran's nuclear facilities in the past, only to back off at the last minute. Advertisement Word of the U.S. decisions to withdraw personnel from the region, along with a warning from Britain about new threats to Middle East commercial shipping, came hours after Trump told The New York Post in a podcast released Wednesday that he had grown 'less confident' about the prospects for a deal with Iran that would limit its ability to develop nuclear weapons. American and Iranian negotiators have been planning to meet Sunday for another round of talks, although Trump told reporters Monday that Iran had adopted an 'unacceptable' negotiating position. As of Wednesday, Trump's envoy to the talks, Steve Witkoff, was still planning to attend the negotiations in Oman, officials said. Asked about the reason for the departures of U.S. personnel and dependents from the region as he arrived at the Kennedy Center in Washington for a Wednesday evening performance of 'Les Misérables,' Trump told reporters, 'Well, you're going to have to figure that one out yourself.' The British warning came from a maritime trade agency that monitors Middle East shipping and that said in a public advisory that it had 'been made aware of increased tensions within the region which could lead to an escalation of military activity having a direct impact on mariners.' The advisory urged commercial vessels transiting the Persian Gulf, the Gulf of Oman and the Strait of Hormuz to use heightened caution. Iranian military and government officials have already met to discuss their response to a potential Israeli strike, according to a senior Iranian official. The official said that Tehran had devised a response plan that would involve an immediate counterstrike on Israel with hundreds of ballistic missiles. In October 2024, a major Iranian missile assault against Israel related to the war in the Gaza Strip inflicted limited damage, however, in part because of U.S. assistance in intercepting the missiles. Advertisement Trump spoke by phone Monday with Netanyahu, but the White House disclosed few details about the conversation. Trump had met on Sunday evening at Camp David with his national security team. Iran's defense minister, Gen. Aziz Nasirzadeh, raised alarms Wednesday with a warning that, in the event of a conflict following failed nuclear talks, the United States would suffer heavy losses. 'America will have to leave the region because all its military bases are within our reach and we will, without any consideration, target them in the host countries,' he told reporters. Iranian officials also balked at remarks Tuesday by Gen. Michael E. Kurilla, the head of Central Command. Kurilla testified before a House committee that he had presented Trump and Hegseth 'a wide range of options' for a potential strike against Iran. Kurilla had been scheduled to testify again Thursday before the Senate Armed Services Committee, but his testimony was postponed without explanation. Iran's mission to the U.N. denounced Kurilla's comments in a Wednesday social media post as 'militarism' that 'fuels instability.' The tough talk came amid a week of meetings in Vienna by the International Atomic Energy Agency's board of governors. The United States, Britain, France and Germany have submitted a resolution to the agency that would censure Iran for rapidly advancing its nuclear program and violating other commitments under a 2015 nuclear deal brokered with those countries, along with China and Russia. The board is expected to vote on the censure resolution on Thursday morning. Advertisement Censure could be grounds for the U.N. Security Council to restore, or 'snap back,' heavy economic sanctions on Tehran that were lifted as part of the 2015 deal, which was struck by the Obama administration. Trump unilaterally withdrew the United States from that agreement in 2018, a move that Iran says gave it license to abandon its commitments to limit its nuclear activity. The deal's European parties insist that it remains enforceable through restored sanctions. Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, said on social media on Wednesday that censure 'will compel Iran to react STRONGLY.' The State Department did not provide details on how many personnel would be removed from Iraq, or why. The Associated Press reported on Wednesday that nonessential U.S. personnel would be withdrawn from Baghdad, and that nonessential personnel and family members of diplomats had been authorized to depart from U.S. embassies in Bahrain and Kuwait. The military dependents authorized to depart the Middle East are largely from Navy and Marine families in Bahrain, home to a major U.S. naval base, a senior Navy official said. Iran's atomic program has progressed dramatically since Trump abandoned the 2015 deal. Analysts say that Iran is now on the brink of being able to manufacture enough nuclear material to fuel 10 nuclear weapons. Constructing a workable device, if Iran chose to pursue that option, could take several more months. But many top Israeli officials already consider Iran's progress to be unacceptable and have openly threatened military action against its nuclear facilities. Many Israeli officials believe they have a golden opportunity to solve a decades-long problem. Israel has recently decimated Hezbollah and Hamas, Iranian proxy groups that Tehran has long relied on as a deterrent to Israeli action. And Israeli airstrikes last year severely reduced Iran's air defense systems. Advertisement Some analysts warn that Iran has been restoring those defenses, making Israeli action against Iran's nuclear program riskier by the week. It is also unclear whether Israel can inflict decisive damage on Iran's nuclear program without U.S. military assistance. U.S. oil prices climbed above $68 a barrel on Wednesday afternoon, their highest level since early April, when Trump placed tariffs on nearly all U.S. trading partners. Fighting in the region could disrupt oil supplies, as could tougher American sanctions on Iran. The aircraft carrier Carl Vinson has been in the Arabian Sea for several weeks. More than 60 aircraft are aboard the Vinson, including advanced F-35 stealth strike fighters. The senior Navy official said there were currently no plans to change the carrier's position in response to the developing situation. The United States also has several dozen attack and fighter jets deployed in the Middle East. These aircraft were used extensively to defend Israel from Iranian strikes last year. This article originally appeared in
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Miranda Devine: The art of Trump's trade deal with China — how admin got it done
Most of us were blissfully unaware of one of the potentially dire consequences of the recent trade wars with China: a shortage of rare earth magnets, which are a critical component of every car engine, smartphones and military weapons systems. China's April export ban on magnets and six rare earth elements was payback for President Trump's tariff hikes. It threatened to cripple automotive production lines and risk national security. Advertisement China has a near-monopoly on these crucial resources, which is a frightening reality in today's interconnected world. But two can play at that game, and the Trump administration swiftly matched Chinese aggression with some potent weapons from our own trade arsenal after trade talks last month in Geneva failed to resolve the issue. The retaliation measures, cooked up by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, included a ban on critical American aircraft parts, semiconductors and a petrochemical called ethane, which China uses to make plastic. Advertisement Secretary of State Marco Rubio also threatened to 'aggressively revoke' visas for Chinese students. Every couple of days there was new payback from the US, as Trump ratcheted up the pain in stages. The pain was what finally brought the Chinese back to the table this week. In addition to punishing tariffs, the payback measures hit the already sluggish Chinese economy hard. Advertisement Export growth is down more than 30%, and factory activity reportedly is slowing, while domestic demand is weak. 'Planely' in trouble By last week, when Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping had a long, conciliatory phone call, China had 250 planes grounded and another 250 planes a week due to become inoperable. After the call, Trump declared that he wants to 'open up China' and dispatched Bessent, Lutnick and trade envoy Jamieson Greer to London for truce talks with a Chinese delegation led by Vice Premier He Lifeng. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who pulled off the first trade deal under the new Trump tariff regime, provided neutral territory for the negotiations in Lancaster House, an elegant 19th century building in the St. James's district of central London, around the corner from King Charles' residence. Advertisement Trump's presence was acutely felt by the US negotiators, not least because the room in which they worked from early morning to close to midnight Monday and Tuesday features gilt-edged cornices, golden chandeliers, rich red draperies and red and gold carpet, an echo of the newly redecorated Oval Office. At night, the Americans ate British pizza while the Chinese ordered in KFC and McDonald's. The Chinese negotiators incessantly brought up the readout of Trump's call with Xi, periodically losing their cool and growing 'passionate,' as one observer described it. Get Miranda's latest take Sign up for Devine Online, the newsletter from Miranda Devine Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Want even more news? Check out more newsletters But in the end, they did the deal — or at least de-escalated tensions in preparation for a final trade agreement between the world's two biggest economies. China will resume supply of the magnets and critical rare earths 'up front,' and Chinese students will be welcome again at US colleges and universities, the president wrote on Truth Social Wednesday morning. The other pain points will ratchet down over time. 'OUR DEAL WITH CHINA IS DONE, SUBJECT TO FINAL APPROVAL WITH PRESIDENT XI AND ME. FULL MAGNETS, AND ANY NECESSARY RARE EARTHS, WILL BE SUPPLIED, UP FRONT, BY CHINA. LIKEWISE, WE WILL PROVIDE TO CHINA WHAT WAS AGREED TO, INCLUDING CHINESE STUDENTS USING OUR COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES (WHICH HAS ALWAYS BEEN GOOD WITH ME!). WE ARE GETTING A TOTAL OF 55% TARIFFS, CHINA IS GETTING 10%. RELATIONSHIP IS EXCELLENT! THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!' Advertisement Wall Street rallied at the news, although there is still work to flesh out the rest, with tariffs to stay at levels agreed to in Geneva, potentially yielding $250 billion annually. It was an important test for the cohesion of the US side, which Trump has had an eye on lately. Competition between Bessent and Lutnick has been the talk of DC as the billionaire former Wall Street alphas butt heads over their overlapping responsibilities and distinctively different personalities. Trump often praises the reserved patrician Bessent as straight out of 'central casting' and native New Yorker Lutnick as 'a killer.' Tag-team negotiators Advertisement But Lutnick could not have been more complimentary about Bessent in an early morning phone call Wednesday as Lutnick was jetting home from London. 'The combination of Secretary Bessent, Ambassador Greer, and me played incredibly well,' he said. 'Scott was really strong [and] there was a lot of respect . . . The three of us were tight. You couldn't get a wedge between us . . . Advertisement 'When we needed it, Scott played a certain hand . . . when it was right for him to be pissed off, he closed his book [as if he were going to leave] or wagged his finger.' This was a marked change from a report in Nikkei Asia earlier this month that 'open disagreements, competition and confusion' among the three US negotiators had marred tariff talks with Japan. 'At one point, the three Cabinet officials put the talks with the Japanese side on hold and began debating right in front of them,' a source told Nikkei. But according to Lutnick's account, any philosophical differences they may have on trade and economics have been resolved and they presented a united front for the Chinese, to the great benefit of America. While Trump's detractors bemoan his upending of world trade, Bessent describes the president's approach as 'strategic uncertainty,' which can yield surprising benefits. Despite the angst, so far it seems to be paying off.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump to flex muscle with huge military parade
Donald Trump's dream of hosting a grand military parade in Washington will come true on Saturday when tanks, helicopters and thousands of troops rumble through the capital on the US president's 79th birthday. Long fascinated with military pomp, Trump has openly envied the military spectaculars seen in cities from Paris to Moscow and Pyongyang ever since his first term as president. The $45 million parade is officially being held to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the US army, which commander-in-chief Trump this week called the "greatest fighting force ever to walk the face of the Earth." But critics say the parade is more about Trump than the army. Protesters have pledged to rally on Saturday against what they call Trump's growing authoritarianism, at a time when he just ordered troops into Los Angeles after demonstrations against his immigration policy. So-called "No Kings" rallies -- named after the idea that America's Revolutionary War against the British was to free the country from monarchs and autocrats -- are planned in dozens of cities, including just outside Washington. But Trump is unrepentant. The president said on a visit to the Fort Bragg army base on Tuesday that "we want to show off a little bit" with the parade, and vowed "very big force" if protesters try to disrupt it. He made the comments in an extraordinary speech that breached the usual separation of politics and the military and saw Trump goad troops into jeering his opponents. - 'Big birthday party' - Trump's long-cherished parade plans are also rare for a country which has traditionally preferred to avoid displays of military might on its own soil. The parade will be the biggest in Washington since 1991 after the first Gulf War -- and before that for the inauguration of President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1949, the army said. Nearly 7,000 army soldiers will march past historic landmarks including the Lincoln Memorial, the Washington Monument and the White House. Roaring overhead will be a fleet of more than 50 helicopters including Apache gunships, giant twin-rotor Chinook transport choppers and sleek Black Hawks. Around 150 military vehicles -- including 28 M1A1 Abrams battle tanks, 28 Bradley armored vehicles and 28 Stryker vehicles -- will rumble along the route. Following the parade, the army's Golden Knights parachute team will jump in and present Trump with a US flag. Troops have been moving tanks and other hardware into place throughout the week. "I think the reception here is going to be very warm," US army Colonel Kamil Sztalkoper told AFP during a media preview. "Who doesn't like a big birthday party when you're 250 years old?" - 'Believe in democracy' - But the display of American muscle is also a flex of Trump's own strongman image as commander-in-chief, at the start of a second term when he has been pushing US presidential power further than ever before. Trump has been obsessed with having a parade since his first term as president when he attended France's annual Bastille Day parade in Paris at the invitation of Emmanuel Macron in 2017. Back then he was put off by the huge cost, then estimated at $92 million, and warnings that heavy tanks could damage Washington's streets. This time, the army says metal plates will protect the roads. At the time it also sparked comparisons to similar events in autocratic countries like Russia, China and North Korea -- comparisons which have resurfaced in his second term. Peter Loge, director of George Washington University's School of Media, said the American aversion to such displays went back to the earliest days of US independence. "We were founded by a group of merchants and farmers who were tired of a standing army invading their streets in the name of keeping them safe," Loge told AFP. "We've always looked down on grand military parades in Russia across Red Square or in North Korea, because we're not like that. We're Americans, and we believe in democracy, not in military shows of force." Trump's show of US military might does however come at a time of mounting international tensions. Fears of a Middle East conflict are on the rise as talks on Iran's nuclear talks wobble and Israel threatens to strike its facilities. dk/jgc
