Lionesses to stop taking the knee after Jess Carter suffers ‘vile' racist abuse
The Football Association confirmed they are working with UK police and the relevant social media platforms, while Carter said she would be 'taking a step back' from social media as a result of the abuse she has received.
In a statement, the Lionesses said 'we need to find another way to tackle racism' and confirmed they will remain standing before kick-off on Tuesday.
Carter played the first 70 minutes of England's quarter-final win over Sweden on Thursday but struggled during the first half as the Lionesses conceded two goals. The Lionesses launched their comeback after Sarina Wiegman made four changes during the second half, with Morgan replaced by Esme Morgan and forwards Chloe Kelly, Beth Mead and Michelle Agyemang all having an impact in attack.
'From the start of the tournament I have experienced a lot of racial abuse,' Carter said in a statement released by the FA. 'Whilst I feel every fan is entitled to their opinion on performance and result I don't agree or think it's ok to target someone's appearance or race. As a result of this I will be taking a step back from social media and leaving it to a team to deal with.
'As ever I am grateful for all of the support from the genuine fans but I am taking this measure to protect myself in a bid to keep my focus on helping the team anyway I can.
'Hopefully speaking out will make the people writing this abuse think twice so that others won't have to deal with it. We have made some historic changes with this Lionesses squad that I am so proud to be a part of and my hope is that by speaking out about this it will make another positive change for all.
'I'm now looking forward and focusing on putting all of my energy into helping my team.'
The Lionesses have taken the knee before all four matches at the Euros and have performed the anti-racism gesture ever since the murder of George Floyd in 2020.
But the team said it could not continue taking the knee while players suffered racist abuse and called on the authorities to 'come together' and do more to prevent 'online poison'.
'We stand with Jess and all Lionesses players past and present who have suffered racism,' a team statement read. 'No one should have to endure such vile abuse, be that in football or any walk of life.
'Representing our country is the greatest honour. It is not right that while we are doing that, some of us are treated differently simply because of the colour of our skin.
'Until now, we have chosen to take the knee before matches. It is clear we and football need to find another way to tackle racism. We have agreed as a squad to remain standing before kick-off on Tuesday.
'We hope the game can come together to see what more can be done. For now, we will return our total focus to an important semi-final. In the meantime, we know the FA are working with UK police and the appropriate bodies.
'Those behind this online poison must be held accountable.'
'Our priority is Jess and giving her all the support she needs," FA chief executive Mark Bullingham said. 'We strongly condemn those responsible for this disgusting racism.
'As soon as we were made aware of the racist abuse Jess received, we immediately contacted UK police. They are in touch with the relevant social media platform, and we are working with police to ensure those responsible for this hate crime are brought to justice.
'Regrettably, this is not the first time this has happened to an England player, so we had measures in place to allow us to respond quickly and where possible provide information to support any potential police action.
'We will continue to discuss with the relevant authorities and social media companies about what more can and should be done to prevent this abhorrent abuse.'
England manager Sarina Wiegman said: 'I stand with Jess, and all Lionesses players past and present who have suffered racism.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 minutes ago
- The Independent
Max Verstappen confirms he is staying at Red Bull
Max Verstappen has confirmed for the first time that he will stay with Red Bull – after George Russell admitted he is on the brink of a new Mercedes contract. Verstappen's break clause from his Red Bull deal can no longer be activated, after his fourth-placed finish in Belgium last Sunday ensured he will not be lower than third in the world championship at the summer break which follows this weekend's Hungarian Grand Prix. Asked at the Hungaroring if he can say for certain that he will be at Red Bull in 2026, Verstappen replied: 'Yes. I never really said anything about it because I was just focused on talking to the team about improving our performance, future ideas and next year and that is why I had nothing really to add. 'But I think it is time to stop all the rumours. For me, it was always quite clear that I was staying anyway and that was the general feeling in the team because we were always in discussion about what we could do with the car and when you're not interested in staying, you stop talking about these kind of things, and I never did.' Mercedes have made little secret of their desire to sign the four-time world champion. As it stands, Russell – who despite a series of impressive performances this year – is without a deal for 2026. Speaking prior to Verstappen, Russell, who it is understood has received a contract offer from Mercedes in the past week, said: 'Conversations have started. We are now heading into the summer break. 'I have spoken a lot with (Mercedes CEO and team principal) Toto (Wolff) this week, but we have not spoken once about the contract because we are both trying to solve the performance and getting the team in the right place. And that is genuine. 'I want to go into the summer break and enjoy the only two weeks off I have in the year. I don't want to be thinking about contracts. 'And there isn't really a major time pressure now from my side, nor from Mercedes' side, because of the Verstappen situation and I presume he is staying at Red Bull. 'Not that I was ever concerned about that but from the team's perspective I guess that has an impact. 'From my side, I was never concerned I was going to lose my seat. I want to go into this weekend and try and get the team back on track and perform better than we have shown at the past six races. Then I am going to go straight on holiday for two weeks and do a week's training and I want to enjoy that to be honest.' It was then put to Russell, 27, that he will be driving for Mercedes next season, but it is now just a question of how his contract looks. He replied: 'Yes, I guess so.' Despite the continued speculation surrounding suggestions Verstappen could trade Red Bull for Mercedes, those close to the Russell camp have indicated for a number of weeks the 27-year-old is extremely confident of striking a contract extension. Russell has scored 157 points to rookie team-mate Kimi Antonelli's 63 after 13 of the 24 rounds. Mercedes are third in the constructors' standings, 296 points adrift of McLaren.
The Independent
2 minutes ago
- The Independent
Conor McGregor loses appeal against civil jury's finding he sexually assaulted a woman
Mixed martial arts fighter Conor McGregor on Thursday lost his legal appeal against a civil court's finding that he sexually assaulted a woman at a Dublin hotel. In November a jury at the High Court in Dublin found McGregor liable for assaulting Nikita Hand, who says he 'brutally raped and battered' her in a hotel penthouse in 2018. He was ordered to pay Hand almost 250,000 euros ($285,000), as well as about 1.3 million euros ($1.5 million) in legal costs. Hand, 35, successfully sued McGregor in civil court after prosecutors declined to bring charges, saying there was insufficient evidence and a conviction was unlikely. The Associated Press generally does not name alleged victims of sexual violence unless they come forward publicly, as Hand has done. McGregor alleged that Hand fabricated the allegations after the two had consensual sex. He launched an appeal, but at a hearing earlier this month his lawyer unexpectedly withdrew a request to introduce new evidence. Three appeals court judges in Dublin on Thursday dismissed the appeal 'in its entirety.' Hand was in court for the ruling, but McGregor was not. The 37-year-old fighter, once the face of the Ultimate Fighting Championship but now past his prime in the ring, has become known for anti-immigration statements and criticism of Irish politicians. He has flirted with the idea of running for president of Ireland. U.S. President Donald Trump, a UFC fan, invited McGregor to the White House to mark St. Patrick's Day in March. McGregor also faces a lawsuit in Florida for allegedly sexually assaulting a woman in the bathroom of the Kaseya Center, home arena of the Miami Heat, during a 2023 NBA finals game with the Denver Nuggets.
The Independent
2 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘No discussion' on how to prevent future incidents after prisoner death, coroner says
A coroner has raised multiple concerns after a restrained prisoner died, including that there had been 'no discussion' among healthcare and prison leaders on how to prevent similar incidents. Azroy Dawes-Clarke, 28, from Romford, east London, was an inmate at HMP Elmley on the Isle of Sheppey, Kent, when he died after suffering multiple cardiac arrests on November 10 2021. He had tied a ligature around his neck before officers intervened and began a restraint which 'escalated unnecessarily', jurors concluded by majority in an inquest at Kent and Medway Coroner's Court, Maidstone, earlier this month. In the record of inquest, jurors also found that officers showed a 'deeply concerning lack of care and compassion' during the incident. Handcuffs were wrongly applied to the father-of-four which may also have played a contributing factor in his death, the inquest heard. Following the conclusion, Ian Brownhill, assistant coroner for Kent and Medway, raised multiple concerns in three separate prevention of future deaths reports, including that there had been 'no discussion' among 'various parties involved' on learnings or how to prevent a similar incident. In one report, sent to the health and justice secretaries, Mr Brownhill wrote: 'As the jury noted, communication between attending prison staff, healthcare professionals and paramedics was confused. 'There was confusion as to who had command and control of the medical emergency, which public body took primacy and the difference in roles and responsibilities. 'Those attending the scene did not establish any sort of communication strategy or command structure. 'During prevention of future deaths evidence, there remained a lack of clarity and consistency as to how such a situation would be avoided if a critical medical emergency eventuated in a custodial setting again.' The coroner added in another report, that 'despite the severity of the incident', there has been 'little (if any) dialogue between leaders of the various parties involved'. He said: 'Formal complaint processes, safeguarding processes and risk reporting mechanisms had been used, but there was no discussion about how to learn from this specific case or how to avoid a reoccurrence. 'During prevention of future deaths evidence, responses were inconsistent as to how to avoid other difficulties during a major medical emergency in a prison setting.' 'Despite the severity of the incident which occurred in this case, it appeared that there still remains confusion as to which public body would have primacy in an acute medical emergency in a custodial setting,' he added. In a third report, the coroner said that officers present during the incident had 'different training with regard to first aid and basic life support.' 'During the course of the inquest, evidence was heard that whilst all uniformed prison officers would have regular training in respect of control and restraint, not all had recent (if any) training in first aid or basic life support. 'Some of the officers who gave evidence were unclear as to the correct response to a cardio respiratory arrest during physical restraint,' he wrote. The coroner also noted that, during the completion of paperwork, many of the prison officers were 'unclear' what their role would be in conveying a prisoner who lacked capacity to consent to their conveyance to hospital in a medical emergency. He added: 'Answers in respect of handcuffing prisoners for the purpose of conveying them to hospital in a medical emergency varied. 'Answers in respect of the legal framework which applied when prison officers are involved in care and treatment of a prisoner (the particular issue in the present case being the conveyance to hospital and the decision to dress him) were inconsistent or incomplete.' The three reports are being sent to different recipients including the governor of HMP Elmley, the chief executive of South East Coast Ambulance Service, the chief executive of Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust and the director general and chief executive of His Majesty's Prison and Probation Service. In the record of inquest, jurors found: 'The ability of the paramedics to perform their duty of care to Mr Dawes-Clarke during the restraint was limited by their placement and lack of visibility from outside the cell. 'Furthermore, it was inappropriate for the paramedics to approve thehandcuffing of Mr Dawes-Clarke having had no training in mechanical restraint to give such advice.' Bodyworn footage, released to the PA news agency, shows officers singing and joking about the size of the handcuffs they needed for Mr Dawes-Clarke while he groaned on the floor. The inquest heard that a prison officer holding the deceased described him as a 'bucking bronco' in his police interview and had said that he had been making 'loud animal noises'. After the inquest concluded, Azroy Dawes-Clarke's sister said he died 'restrained, neglected, and dehumanised' as officers looked on and 'did nothing'.
