Suspended RAF CEO Letsoalo says he helped save R50 million
Letsoalo was speaking at a media briefing in Pretoria on Saturday, alongside suspended chief investment officer, Sefotle Modiba.
ALSO READ:
• 'Do you want us to die in silence?' Suspended RAF execs claim they're receiving death threats
• Modiba and Letsoalo say their suspension from the RAF is 'baseless'
• RAF rescinds decision to place CEO Letsoalo on special leave, replaces it with suspension
• SIU probing RAF CEO Collins Letsoalo over R79m lease
• Suspended RAF CEO Letsoalo will still receive his full pay & benefits
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
43 minutes ago
- IOL News
How the SIU is battling funding challenges and whistle-blower protection
The Special Investigating Unit (SIU) and the Institute for Security Studies (ISS) officials discuss challenges facing the SIU in fighting corruption and some of the unit's successes as highlighted in the recent research by the ISS. Image: Oupa Mokoena / Independent Newspapers The Special Investigating Unit (SIU) is grappling with serious challenges that threaten its effectiveness in combating corruption. These challenges include ensuring the safety of its personnel and whistle-blowers, a financial squeeze due to an increasing caseload, an inadequate funding model, and an ineffectual debt collection process. The issues are highlighted in a new research by the Institute for Security Studies (ISS), conducted in partnership with the SIU, examining the unit's successes and its challenges in combating crime. At a seminar hosted by the ISS in Pretoria on Wednesday, SIU head, Advocate Andy Mothibi, talked about the unit's funding woes, citing an unsustainable model due to state institutions owing over R1 billion. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading The SIU's funding consists of a 47% grant from Parliament and 53% from fees for services rendered. However, Mothibi noted that some state institutions are reluctant to settle the resulting invoices, often because senior officials are implicated in investigations. 'As we sit today, the debt from state institutions is well over R1 billion. It is really not acceptable.' He said that occasionally, the institution would arrange for ministers to intervene, resulting in some payments being made, but this approach 'is not sustainable'. He insisted, however, that the unit is currently financially sound. Mothibi emphasised the importance of whistle-blower protection, citing an incident during the Life Esidimeni investigation, where a witness received death threats and was subsequently protected under the National Prosecuting Authority's witness protection programme. He said from a whistle-blower protection standpoint, there is an opportunity for improvement, and the Department of Justice and Development is leading a project to enhance the legislation. He mentioned that the current legislation primarily focuses on employment-related protections, but they aim to broaden it to provide comprehensive whistle-blower protection, including witness protection. David Bruce, a researcher on policing and corruption, suggested a system is needed to prevent government officials implicated in wrongdoing from resigning and landing jobs in other institutions. 'To me, the important thing is that people who are implicated in corruption should not be permitted to continue working for the government,' he said. Colette Ashton, an anti-corruption lawyer, noted that corruption cases are often challenging to prosecute due to witnesses' reluctance to testify and alleged perpetrators using legal and financial secrecy, aided by professional enablers, to conceal evidence. David Lewis from the National Anti-Corruption Advisory Commission stated that the burden of proof in corruption cases can be a significant hurdle, rendering prosecution challenging. 'People weigh up the risk and the potential benefits of engaging in corruption, and eight times out of 10, they conclude that the risk is worth taking because the incidence of successful prosecution is low in every jurisdiction of the world, and that is just a fact we have to face up to,' he said. The ISS investigation into the SIU's work highlighted other key findings, including inadequate systems to enforce recommendations and unnecessary delays in the administrative processing of Presidential proclamations.
IOL News
43 minutes ago
- IOL News
Reactions to Minister Creecy's dissolution of the Road Accident Fund board
Transport Minister Barbara Creecy has dissolved the RAF Board. Image: File Minister of Transport Barbara Creecy's decision to dissolve the board of the Road Accident Fund (RAF) has been met with varied reactions from stakeholders, including the Association for the Protection of Road Accident Victims, the Parliament's Standing Committee on Public Accounts (Scopa), and ActionSA. The RAF has faced financial and administrative instability in recent years, including the suspension of its CEO, Collins Letsoalo, due to alleged corruption and his failure to appear before Scopa. The entity, funded entirely by South African motorists through the fuel levy, has over R50 billion in annual revenue. According to Creecy, the dissolution was necessitated by persistent governance and operational challenges at the RAF, which included protracted and costly litigation pursued by the RAF on accounting standards and the inconsistent handling of the suspension of the CEO. Other reasons include the frequent incurrence of default judgments against the RAF, deep divisions within the board, and failure to fill critical executive positions like Chief Claims Officer and Head of Legal. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Deputy President of the Association for the Protection of Road Accident Victims, Ngoako Mohlaloga, said that his organisation was aligned by Creecy's decision. "We are hoping that the minister's decision will be in the best interest of the victims because ours is for the victims. We are in alignment with the minister's decision and we are hoping that her decision will fulfil its core mandate, which is to investigate administration within the RAF, which will result in compensating victims," said Mohlaloga. He stated that the board must ensure the organisation runs smoothly and that systems are in place for the RAF to function optimally. Chairperson of Scopa, Songezo Zibi, warned that the dissolved board had to be replaced with one that is capable. "The dissolution of the board came as no surprise. We've noted as a committee a number of underperformances by the board in overseeing the Road Accident Fund... It's important that whoever steps in on an interim basis is capable, experienced, and strong-willed because it doesn't help to replace one weak and problematic board with another,' Zibi said. Earlier this year, Scopa heard that the head of legal lacked a law degree, a revelation made during the board's appearance before the committee. An inquiry was launched by the oversight committee to investigate allegations of maladministration, financial impropriety, and the misuse of public funds at the embattled entity. The board's dissolution, according to Zibi, was not unexpected. "We've noted as a committee a number of underperformances by the board in overseeing the Road Accident Fund. We've highlighted the numerous vacancies in critical posts. The accumulation of default judgments that the Road Accident Fund does not defend amounts to R5 billion at the moment, at a rate of up to 100 million per week. We had said in our committee that this board is failing, so the decision is not surprising." ActionSA welcomed the decision to dissolve the RAF board, citing the entity's history of mismanagement, corruption, and state failure. "The RAF has become a cesspool of mismanagement, corruption, and a symbol of state failure." The party had formally demanded the dissolution of the board after the RAF's appearance before Scopa and findings from the Special Investigating Unit (SIU). Creecy has requested the National Treasury to appoint an interim Accounting Authority and initiated a recruitment process for a new board. Other steps include establishing an expert advisory committee to review the RAF's business processes and have requested the SIU to consider expanding the scope of their investigation into the RAF.
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
The connection deception
South Africa's call centre industry is increasingly using mobile numbers for outbound calls, despite it being against ICASA regulations. Call centres are increasingly using mobile numbers for outbound calls which is effective but against regulations, making it a costly tactic in terms of reputation and brand perceptions. The ICASA 2016 Numbering Plan Regulations prohibit the use of mobile phone number ranges such as 082, 083, or 072, for example, for fixed-location services such as call centres. The cost of contravention is as high as R3 million per infringement. Yet, South Africans are enduring a radically increased volume of spam calls and a large percentage of these are from mobile numbers. These call centres are using prepaid SIM cards which have unlimited calling bundles or they're spoofing mobile numbers to increase their answer rates. Calling back is impossible and reporting them pointless – the numbers are swapped when they're flagged for abuse. This practice is effective. Call centres adopting these tactics have a 69% connect rate compared with the 29% for landlines. This is an important metric because every connection has an impact on the number of leads generated and each lead rolls through to potentially successful sales. At a time when the economic situation is challenging, it's understandable that companies are opting in despite the reputational and financial risks. Currently, the fine is the only real ramification faced by these companies, and a R3 million fine after generating potentially R50 million in revenue is just a drop in the proverbial ocean. While regulations and rulings must change to become even more onerous and rigorous, particularly to protect consumers from the onslaught of spam calls, companies have a choice to opt into a more ethical approach. An approach that minimises the impact of spam on their customers and stands in line with the work that organisations like the Internet Service Providers' Association (ISPA) and Vox are doing. In April, ISPA asked the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (ICASA) to take 'firm action to prevent the unlawful use of mobile numbers by call centres operating from fixed premises'. The company is advocating for the use of legitimate, assigned geographic numbers, supported by ISPs that have a vested interest in protecting consumers and the industry. This is not good practice. Not only does it place an additional burden on the consumer, but it is affecting those who adhere to good practice standards. Companies playing by the rules are not just falling behind but are being tarnished by the same brush – irritated consumers refusing to engage because they're on their tenth spam call of the day. Change must come from the brands. Adopting ethical best practices with service providers that align with regulations and prioritise brand reputation is the right way forward. It is also the way forward that ensures brands will be on the right side of change when the ramifications of going against regulations become increasingly onerous. They won't need to adapt their systems or find new ways of managing their contact centre processes because they'll already be ahead of the curve. For industry leaders, like Vox, taking a stand now is essential. Trusted service providers ensure companies are not exposed to any contravention of numbering or calling practices, offering value for money and contact centre support services that are designed to enhance success rates without compromising on reputation or risk. Choosing to work within a contact centre environment that's aligned with the law means your business is safeguarding your brand and sustainability. While the mobile numbers do a lot of talking, so do customers, and as word of mouth about poor practices spread, companies that stay on this side of the thin blue line are the ones that will thrive. Natalie van der Merwe, Head of Telephony and Andrew King Head Voice of Visual Comms and Microsoft at Vox.
