&w=3840&q=100)
Trump to be 'very firm' with Netanyahu on Gaza ceasefire in upcoming White House talks
US President Donald Trump meets with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, US, April 7, 2025. File Image/Reuters
US President Donald Trump vowed Tuesday to be 'very firm' in his stance on ending the war in Gaza when he meets next week with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
The remarks by the president, made during a tour of a migrant detention center in Florida, came after he said earlier that he was hoping for a truce in the nearly 21-month conflict by 'sometime next week.'
The Republican leader is set to host Netanyahu at the White House on July 7 and the swift resolution of Israel's 12-day war with Iran has revived hopes for a halt to the Gaza fighting.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Almost relentless combat in the Palestinian territory since Hamas's October 7, 2023 attack on Israel has created dire humanitarian conditions for the population of more than two million.
Trump was asked Tuesday by reporters if a ceasefire could be in place before Netanyahu's visit.
'We hope it's going to happen, and we're looking for it to happen sometime next week,' he said before departing for Florida.
Trump has previously urged Israel to 'make the deal in Gaza,' but on the ground, Israel has continued to pursue its offensive across the Palestinian territory.
The end of Israel's 12-day war with Iran – which followed a US bombing mission on Tehran's nuclear sites – has provided a window of opportunity for a deal, with Trump keen to add another peace agreement to a series of recent deals he has brokered.
Asked at the detention center how firm he will be with Netanyahu on ending the war, Trump replied: 'Very firm.'
'But he wants it too…. He wants to end it too,' Trump added.
The visit next Monday will be Netanyahu's third since Trump returned to power in January, and comes on the heels of the US president making a rare intervention into domestic Israeli politics.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Trump appeared over the weekend to threaten US aid to Israel as he called in a social media post for prosecutors to drop long-running corruption charges against Netanyahu.
Netanyahu became the first foreign leader to visit Trump in his second term in February, when the US president surprised him by suddenly announcing a plan for the United States to 'take over' Gaza.
The Israeli premier visited again in April.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
Wisconsin Supreme Court's liberal majority strikes down 176-year-old abortion ban
The Wisconsin Supreme Court 's liberal majority struck down the state's 176-year-old abortion ban on Wednesday, ruling 4-3 that it was superseded by a newer state law that criminalizes abortions only after a fetus can survive outside the womb. State lawmakers adopted the ban in 1849, making it a felony when anyone other than the mother "intentionally destroys the life of an unborn child." It was in effect until 1973, when the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion nationwide nullified it. Legislators never officially repealed the ban, however, and conservatives argued that the U.S. Supreme Court's 2022 decision to overturn Roe reactivated it. Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul , a Democrat, filed a lawsuit that year arguing that the ban was trumped by abortion restrictions legislators enacted during the nearly half-century that Roe was in effect. Kaul specifically cited a 1985 law that essentially permits abortions until viability. Some babies can survive with medical help after 21 weeks of gestation. Sheboygan County District Attorney Joel Urmanski, a Republican, defended the ban in court, arguing that the 1849 ban could coexist with the newer abortion restrictions, just as different penalties for the same crime coexist. Live Events Dane County Circuit Judge Diane Schlipper ruled in 2023 that the 1849 ban outlaws feticide - which she defined as the killing of a fetus without the mother's consent - but not consensual abortions. Abortions have been available in the state since that ruling but the state Supreme Court decision gives providers and patients more certainty that abortions will remain legal in Wisconsin. Urmanski asked the state Supreme Court to overturn Schlipper's ruling without waiting for a decision from a lower appellate court. It was expected as soon as the justices took the case that they would overturn the ban. Liberals hold a 4-3 majority on the court and one of them, Janet Protasiewicz, openly stated on the campaign trail that she supports abortion rights . Democratic-backed Susan Crawford defeated conservative Brad Schimel for an open seat on the court in April, ensuring liberals will maintain their 4-3 edge until at least 2028. Crawford has not been sworn in yet and was not part of Wednesday's ruling. She'll play pivotal role, though, in a separate Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin lawsuit challenging the 1849 ban's constitutionality. The high court decided last year to take that case. It's still pending.
Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Brother Musk, you've got over a billion…', Support messages from Chinese for Tesla CEO Elon Musk flood Weibo
Several social media users in China have come in support of Tesla CEO Elon Musk amid the ongoing feud with President Donald Trump over the 'One Big Beautiful Bill'. According to a report by The Guardian, hours after the US Senate passed the bill, the hashtag #MuskWantsToBuildAnAmericaParty went viral on Chinese microblogging platform Weibo, garnering over 37 million views. Musk has previously said that if the Senate passed the One Big Beautiful Bill , he will found a new political party. What Chinese social media users are saying about Musk-Trump fight 'If Elon Musk were to found a political party, his tech-driven mindset could inject fresh energy into politics. The potential for change is significant – and worth watching,' wrote one Weibo user as quoted in The Guardian report. Another user wrote: 'Brother Musk, you've got over a billion people on our side backing you.' 'When you've had enough, there's no need to keep putting up with it,' wrote a third. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo While other users commented that Trump and Musk should grow up. One user joked saying 'Every day, Musk is basically live-streaming 'How Billionaires Argue''. 'These two grown men argue nonstop over the smallest things – and the whole world ends up knowing about it,' said another user. Elon Musk-Donald Trump renewed tension Tensions between the two escalated after Musk said that if the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' is passed in the Senate, he will immediately move forward with launching a new political party called the 'America Party.' Trump hit back with 'deport Elon Musk' remarks, accusing Elon Musk of benefiting more from government subsidies than any individual in US history. Trump argued that without this taxpayer-funded support, Musk would be unable to continue manufacturing electric cars, launching rockets, or operating satellite services. Trump wrote, 'Our Country would save a FORTUNE', adding 'Perhaps we should have DOGE take a good, hard, look at this? BIG MONEY TO BE SAVED!!!'. Responding to Trump, Musk wrote on X: 'So tempting to escalate this. So, so tempting. But I will refrain for now'. Apple's "NEW" Features... That Android Had YEARS Ago! (Finally, Apple!)
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
20 minutes ago
- First Post
'President's priorities': Trump administration holds back $7 bn school funds meant for learning, training
The administration offered little explanation for the delay, stating that the funds are under review and emphasising a commitment to ensuring taxpayer money is spent in line with the 'president's priorities', according to a report read more The Trump administration has withheld nearly $7 billion in federal education funding that supports after-school and summer programmes, English language learning, teacher training, and other essential services. According to The New York Times report, the funds were expected to be released by Tuesday. However, in an email sent on Monday, the US Department of Education informed states that the money would not be made available as scheduled, added the report. The administration offered minimal explanation, saying only that the funding is under review. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD No timeline was provided for when, or if, the funds would be released. A brief statement said the administration is 'committed to ensuring taxpayer resources are spent in accordance with the president's priorities,' reported NYT. The frozen funds are not connected to the domestic policy bill that narrowly passed the Senate on Tuesday, which includes separate cuts to various programmes. Move likely to face legal challenges 'It's catastrophic,' NYT quoted Jodi Grant, executive director of the Afterschool Alliance, a group that works to expand after-school services for students, as saying. She estimated that the roughly $1.3 billion in federal funding for after-school and summer programmes each year supports around 1.4 million students, primarily from low-income families, accounting for about 20% of all students enrolled in such programmes nationwide. According to the report, the decision is likely to face legal challenges and has already drawn sharp criticism from Democrats and teachers' unions, who argue it is unlawful. They note that the funds were appropriated by Congress and signed into law by President Trump in March as part of a larger funding package. 'This is lawless,' NYT quoted Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, as saying. The Trump administration has aggressively sought to shrink the federal role in education, even proposing to eliminate the Education Department, though only Congress has the power to do so. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In the meantime, it has slashed staffing and funding across the board. Permanent cut in funds? Officials have hinted at plans to permanently eliminate the nearly $7 billion in frozen education funds, reported NYT. During a Senate hearing last week, White House budget director Russell Vought said the administration is exploring a process called 'rescission' to formally request Congress revoke the funds. Even without a congressional vote, the request would freeze the money until it eventually expires. 'No decision has been made,' Vought was quoted as saying. The freeze on education funds has left school districts scrambling just weeks before classes resume. The uncertainty threatens after-school programmes, support for English learners, teacher training, and mental health services. According to NYT report, in rural Umatilla, Oregon, Superintendent Heidi Sipe warned parents to make backup plans, noting her federally funded after-school programme runs until 5:30 pm but has no local alternatives. In Omaha, Nicole Everingham of Collective for Youth said reduced funding would force cuts in after-school slots and staffing across 42 public schools. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Even a delayed release of funds could disrupt hiring and planning, leaving working families in limbo. 'It completely puts us in flux,' NYT quoted Everingham as saying. Districts like Oxnard, California, also rely on federal dollars to support non-English-speaking families. 'Without this outreach, families… could be cut off from schools,' Superintendent Ana DeGenna told NYT. Many of the affected programmes, like the 21st Century Community Learning Centers and Student Support and Academic Enrichment grants, have enjoyed bipartisan support for decades. Still, most criticism of the freeze has come from Democrats. 'Every day that this funding is held up is a day that school districts are forced to worry about whether they'll have to cut back on after-school programs or lay off teachers instead of worrying about how to make sure our kids can succeed,' Senator Patty Murray, a Democrat who is the vice chairwoman of the Senate Appropriations Committee, said in a statement. With inputs from agencies STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
