
Wrap of Mbenenge tribunal: Judge awaits his fate
In perhaps one of the most contentious hearings against a judge, with witnesses contradicting each other, the Judicial Conduct Tribunal started the year with a hearing that seeks to determine whether Eastern Cape Judge President Selby Mbenenge sexually harassed the secretary for the judges, Andiswa Mengo.
The Tribunal, comprising Judge B M Ngoepe, retired Judge-President of the Gauteng Division of the High Court, Tribunal President, and Judge C Pretorius, retired Judge of the Gauteng Division of the High Court and Advocate G Mashaba SC, as a non-judicial member of the Tribunal, commenced in January and is expected to resume again in October.
Mengo's accusations
Mengo lodged a complaint against Mbenenge, accusing him of sexual harassment after he allegedly persistently asked her to send him explicit images and also sent him his in exchange.
In her testimony, Mengo told the Tribunal she found these requests for pictures 'annoying' and felt that he was forcing her to send them.
She accused him of sexually harassing her through messages on WhatsApp, inappropriate comments, gestures regarding her appearance, and another incident that occurred in his chambers in November 2022.
She also claimed he sent her an image of his penis, which was subsequently deleted on the evening of 17 June 2021.
The complainant told the Tribunal it showed 'his private part with hair the same colour as his hair on his head'.
He also allegedly sent her pornographic pictures.
ALSO READ: 'How will Mbenenge defend himself?' Tribunal chair asks evidence leader during tense proceedings
Mengo has accused the judge of asking her if she was aware of the effect she had on him as he pointed towards the front of his pants. She told the Tribunal that there was a bulge in his pants and that he was fiddling with his zip.
'He asked me if I didn't want to suck it,' she previously told the Tribunal.
This incident is reported to have occurred on 14 November 2022, after he summoned her into his chambers at the Umtata High Court.
Mbenenge's defence
The judge has claimed that the sexual interactions between him and Mengo were consensual.
Mengo, however, told the Tribunal that she reciprocated Mbenenge's sexual messages to 'satisfy him in order for peace at the workplace'.
Mbenenge, the first senior judge in the country to risk impeachment for sexual misconduct, has also denied sending an image of his penis.
'In light of what you are saying, I am saying to you, the persistence in saying I sent K8 [penis] is crystal lies and in the direction of being malicious,' argued Mbenenge.
He argued that he was trying to pursue a romantic relationship, but there was no clear guide on how to do so.
Although he admitted to asking her to remove her jacket, he denied that the request was indecent.
'I wanted her to remove her jacket because I wanted to appreciate her appearance. It was obstructing my view of how she looked,' Mbenenge said, with hand gestures painting her figure.
'Reinforcement'
The witnesses called to testify at the Tribunal muddied the matter, as some seemed to suggest that Mengo was a willing participant in the conversations, while others stated that she was not.
In May, forensic and legal linguist Dr Zakeera Docrat testified that some of the emojis used by Mengo in her conversations with Mbenenge suggested 'agreement' and 'warmth'.
ALSO READ: Did she mean it or not? Analysis of Mengo's WhatsApp messages to Judge Mbenenge questioned
She testified that the exchanges between Mbenenge and Mengo started professionally but slowly degenerated with the use of emojis to 'convey sexual acts'.
Mengo sent a 'monkey's closing its eyes' emoji. Docrat said this emoji represents 'reinforcement'.
'Reinforcement because she's used it more than once, even though there's no text. But based on the text chain that was unravelling, and in that instance, her shyness on her part, embarrassment.'
'Not much mutuality'
In June, gender violence expert Dr Lisa Vetten testified that there was not much mutuality in the WhatsApp message exchanges between Mengo and Mbenenge.
'I looked at who initiated the conversation, how many conversations were sent by the Judge President, and by Mengo. I used that as an indication of who is initiating the conversation and who is more active in the conversation, and it gives you a sense of who is asking more often and engaging more often. It gives you an indication of who is the more interested party. I counted 837 WhatsApp messages, 526 from the Judge, and 311 from Mengo,' said Vetten.
Eastern Cape High Court judge's secretary Andiswa Mengo gives testimony before the Judicial Conduct Tribunal. Picture: X / @OCJ_RSA
Mengo's unclear responses, according to Vetten, were her way of evading Mbenenge's advances.
Vetten said while Mbenenge used emojis to ask for things from Mengo, she used evasion to avoid direct responses to his advances.
Did he send explicit images?
Another witness, Dr Vincent Mello, in July questioned the format of some of the photos allegedly sent by Mbenenge to Mengo.
He was asked to assess the usage of emojis and the disputed pictures allegedly exchanged between the two.
Mello said some of the pictures were inconsistent with the WhatsApp format.
'Based on my analysis, it is clear that the photos are below the typing message area, and they depict as though the message was still being compiled, and possibly, it was a screenshot taken. A message that would have been sent would have had the ticks, but I didn't see them as I expected. The photos are not consistent with the WhatsApp template or indicate that they were sent,' said Mello.
'The photo [of Mbenenge's private part] cannot be confirmed if it was from WhatsApp since it is not consistent with the WhatsApp template or format. You don't see the name, followed by a typing space.'
ALSO READ: Did Judge Mbenenge send Mengo explicit pictures? Expert testifies
'He does it to everyone'
Another witness, Mbenenge's former secretary, Zinhle Nqkayi, in July, told the Tribunal Mbenenge used to comment on everyone's outfits at work, not just Mengo's.
'It was in the morning, I think around teatime. One of the judges' secretaries arrived in my office, and the JP [Mbenenge] was in his office at the time. The JP came out, and he stood by the door that interlinks our offices,' said Nqkayi.
'Mengo was passing by while the JP was having a conversation with Ms Gugushe, asking how she was. Mengo passed by and greeted me, and the JP called her, and she came into my office. The JP then uttered a statement, exclaimed and said, 'What is it, big girl? Why are you wearing a curtain today?' He then went further on to say, 'Do you see how other children are dressed well?' He was referring to Ms Gugushe and me as we were standing by my table.'
ALSO READ: Mbenenge commented on everyone's outfits, not just Mengo's, says former secretary
Advocate Griffiths Madonsela, for Mbenenge, asked Nqkayi: 'Was it usual for the judge to raise such issues?'
'Yes, that is his daily talk. Yes, he is like that; he would even pass this comment to a lawyer who would be coming into his office. The first thing he will notice is how that particular person is dressed, even with me; he will notice when I walk into the office and ask me, 'Haibo, big girl, are you awake? Why do you still seem to be dressed in your sleepwear?' Nkqayi responded.
The Tribunal will reconvene on 21 and 22 October 2025 for oral arguments.
After hearing all the evidence, the Tribunal will decide whether to recommend to the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) that Mbenenge is guilty of gross misconduct.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
7 hours ago
- IOL News
Court hears case on Judge Yvonne Mokgoro's last will and testament
Late Justice Yvonne Mokgoro made an earlier will in 2014, but her children told the Kimberley High Court that the earlier will fell away as she made another will seven years later. Image: File The children of well-known former Constitutional Court Judge Yvonne Mokgoro, who passed away in May last year, turned to court in a bid for the Master of the High Court to accept what they said is the last will and testament of their mother made in 2021. Judge Mokgoro made an earlier will in 2014, but her children told the Kimberley High Court that the earlier will fell away as she made another will seven years later. While both wills are basically the same, the only difference is in clause three of both wills. In the 2014 will in reference to this clause, the late judge left her share in a property to her life partner, Naledi Monyeki. In terms of her 2021 will, she left her share to her children and to a grandchild. Her son Ithatheng Mokgoro is the executor of her estate. None of the respondents, which included the Master, opposed the application, other than her life partner. After the passing of the deceased, Ithatheng contacted the fiduciary services company which handled the affairs of the late judge regarding her will. It was during this meeting that he learned that his mother had two wills. He examined the 2021 will more closely and noted that the place of signature had not been filled in at the appropriate place on the document. He also noted that the signatures on the 2021 will appear to be electronic signatures. This was confirmed by the witnesses. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading Monyeki, meanwhile, did not dispute that the late judge had instructed the 2021 will to be drawn up. He, however, forwarded several points in law as to why he disputed the 2021 will. This includes his argument that the Wills Act does not make provision for electronic signatures on the document. The court was told by counsel for the applicants that the 2021 will was drawn up by the financial company under the express direction of the deceased; and that it was clearly her intention that the 2021 will was to be her last will and testament. In declaring the 2021 document to be the last will and wish of the late judge, Judge Lawrence Lever said the email sent by her was clear. She asked two witnesses to electronically sign the new will, while she said she would also attach her electronic signature to the document. There was direct input from the deceased, and it could only have been on her direct instruction that the change in who was to benefit from her half share in the property could have been made, Judge Lever said. He also referred to the message by the late judge in which she said that she had done all she can to make her last will and testament as fair and uncomplicated as she can. He said Judge Mokgoro's wishes were clear and ordered the Master to accept her 2021 will.


The Citizen
8 hours ago
- The Citizen
One killed in fiery N2 crash near Gingindlovu
One killed in fiery N2 crash near Gingindlovu A devastating crash on the N2 near Gingindlovu on Sunday night claimed one life and left four others, including two young children, injured. According to IPSS Medical Rescue spokesperson, Samantha Meyrick, one of two cars involved in the crash caught alight and trapped the driver, who died from their injuries. The four survivors, a 4-year-old girl, a 2-year-old boy, a 34-year-old man and a 31-year-old woman, were travelling in the second vehicle. They escaped with injuries ranging from moderate to critical and were taken for further care. Stay in the loop with The North Coast Courier on Facebook, X, Instagram & YouTube for the latest news. Mobile users can join our WhatsApp Broadcast Service here, or if you're on desktop, scan the QR code below.

IOL News
11 hours ago
- IOL News
Professor Eldrid Jordaan's powerful new book shines light on tech giant Meta's dominance
The Silicon Empire vs Social Impact is both a narrative of resistance and a roadmap for change. It challenges the reader to reconsider the nature of digital power, the role of civic technology, and the urgent need for policy interventions that centre people over platforms. Image: Supplied Book Title: 'The Silicon Empire vs Social Impact: The David and Goliath Battle' Author: Professor Eldrid Jordaan The global digital economy is increasingly dominated by a small group of powerful technology corporations, whose platforms now act as essential infrastructure for communication, commerce, and governance. In this landscape, access to digital platforms is no longer optional, it is foundational to public service delivery, democratic participation, and economic inclusion. In The Silicon Empire vs Social Impact: The David and Goliath Battle, Prof. Eldrid Jordaan presents a groundbreaking account of how one civic technology startup in South Africa stood up to one of the world's most powerful digital empires. This book documents the legal struggle between GovChat, a mission-driven platform focused on citizen engagement, and Meta, the parent company of Facebook and WhatsApp. Through this case, the author exposes the systemic risks posed by unregulated digital monopolies and makes a compelling case for global reforms in platform governance, data access, and digital competition. The Central Conflict GovChat was developed as a public engagement platform to strengthen the relationship between citizens and the state. Built in partnership with South Africa's government, it enabled millions of citizens to access information, report service issues, and apply for government grants. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the platform became a lifeline for over 15 million South Africans, offering rapid access to social relief, health updates, and essential services through a WhatsApp-based interface. In late 2020, Meta attempted to offboard GovChat from its WhatsApp Business API, claiming policy violations. This action would have effectively shut down the platform's ability to communicate with citizens and deliver public services. The move triggered a landmark legal battle in which GovChat challenged Meta at the South African Competition Commission and Competition Tribunal. The case, unprecedented in its nature, raised global questions about platform dominance, fair access, and the responsibilities of Big Tech companies operating in emerging markets. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Key Themes and Global Implications The book goes beyond legal proceedings to explore five major themes shaping the digital age: Platform gatekeeping Dominant digital platforms are no longer neutral conduits. They serve as powerful gatekeepers that decide who gets access to digital infrastructure and under what terms. The case illustrates how such unchecked control can be used to stifle innovation and suppress public-interest technologies. Digital sovereignty As countries increasingly rely on private technology companies for the delivery of public services, national sovereignty becomes entangled with corporate policy. The book argues that digital sovereignty must become a global priority and that governments need enforceable frameworks to protect their autonomy and citizen rights in the digital space. The role of civic technology GovChat's journey demonstrates that civic tech platforms are not peripheral experiments, they are foundational digital utilities. The book documents how GovChat reached underserved populations, amplified citizen voices, and provided a model for inclusive digital transformation. Legal precedent and regulatory reform The case challenges the adequacy of existing competition laws in addressing digital exclusion. The book proposes the creation of a Global Digital Competition Compact, encouraging cross-border cooperation among regulators and a redefinition of fair access in the platform economy. Human stories and social impact Embedded within the legal and policy analysis are powerful human stories. The book recounts how GovChat helped enable unemployed youth to access social relief, and gave marginalised communities a voice in the public sphere. These narratives remind us that the stakes of digital exclusion are deeply human and immediate.