Starbucks shreds ‘nonsensical' lawsuit by store manager who claimed he was discriminated against for being straight
Starbucks has fired back at a former store manager who sued the coffeehouse chain over his claim of having faced 'egregious' discrimination because he is straight.
Christopher Thevanesan's lawsuit is 'nonsensical,' 'entirely without merit,' and 'devoid of any facts' to support his allegations, according to the company's motion to dismiss.
In his January 28 suit, which was first reported by The Independent, Thevanesan described himself as a 'heterosexual, gender typical man,' and said higher-ups at the Rochester, New York Starbucks location where he worked treated him 'in a materially different manner' than employees who were 'not heterosexual and/or gender typical men.'
But, while Thevanesan insisted he had suffered 'extreme and outrageous' persecution at the hands of gay team members, his suit does not lay out any 'specific instances of harassment,' Starbucks argues in its motion, which was filed last Friday.
'[Thevanesan] fails to allege the time, place, or manner of even a single instance of supposed 'harassment,'' the motion says.
In his lawsuit, Thevanesan accused Starbucks of neglecting to properly train the employees he supervised in how to properly deal with others. Starbucks says in its motion that this argument is 'nonsensical[,] since as the Store Manager, he would be responsible for training.'
And, as far as Thevanesan's firing goes, which his suit says occurred 'because he is a heterosexual, gender typical man' — it in fact 'does not set forth any facts even remotely connecting his termination to his sex or sexual orientation,' the company's motion continues.
'Plaintiff's allegations read: 'I am a straight male. I believe my subordinates were gay. I was terminated. My termination must have been because I was a straight male,'' the motion asserts. 'These conclusory allegations are insufficient to state a claim in any forum.'
Jacqueline Phipps Polito, the attorney representing Starbucks against Thevanesan, did not respond on Wednesday to a request for comment.
According to Thevanesan's lawsuit, which was filed under New York State's Human Rights Law, he was 'a model employee who performed the essential functions of his employment in an exemplary fashion.'
At the same time, Thevanesan argued, his LGBTQ+ underlings created a 'hostile' work environment for him due to his 'gender typicality and sexual orientation,' contending he was subsequently fired for complaining about it.
Thevanesan's attorney, Neil Flynn, told The Independent earlier this month that his client's heterosexuality had been 'weaponized' against him.
'Management was indifferent to his complaints,' Flynn said, claiming gay Starbucks workers in the store and surrounding area were attempting to drive out their straight colleagues.
Thevanesan was hired to manage Starbucks store #47825 in 2014, according to his LinkedIn profile. The employees who worked there 'were members of the LGBQT+ community,' Thevanesan's complaint states.
It says he was fired in February 2022, and calls the reasons 'pretextual,' without providing additional details.
Thevanesan's grievance is, in some ways, reminiscent of a high-profile suit brought by Marlean Ames, a straight Ohio woman who sued her employer, the state Department of Youth Services, arguing she was demoted and replaced by a gay man. After a decision against Ames by the Sixth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, she took her case to the U.S. Supreme Court. If the high court now rules in favor of Ames, it could open the door for others to sue on the basis of 'reverse discrimination.'
However, Starbucks maintains in its motion to dismiss that Thevanesan's suit is 'entirely without merit, because, even assuming the allegations… are true, [the suit] contains nothing more than legal conclusions and a bare recitation of the elements of each claim, devoid of any facts supporting [his] claims.'
'At best, [Thevanesan] simply claims that he falls within a protected class (heterosexual, gender typical male), and therefore anything that [he] disagrees with that happened to occur at Starbucks, must be because of the same,' the motion states. 'The law does not allow a complaint to be based on such speculation and conclusory allegations without detailed factual support,' dubbing Thevanesan's suit 'woefully deficient.'
'Accordingly,' the motion concludes, 'the Court must dismiss the [suit] in its entirety.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
2 hours ago
- Business Insider
Starbucks price target raised to $95 from $85 at Goldman Sachs
Goldman Sachs raised the firm's price target on Starbucks (SBUX) to $95 from $85 but keeps a Neutral rating on the shares. The firm is encouraged by the increased clarity around the company's turnaround strategy with the faster-than-expected rollout of the Green Apron service model in its U.S. stores, though it also prefers to remain on the sidelines and believes that it will take time for these initiatives to materialize from a profit standpoint, the analyst tells investors in a research note. Confident Investing Starts Here:
USA Today
5 hours ago
- USA Today
Starbucks job offering up to six figures to travel, drink coffee
Starbucks job offering up to six figures to travel, drink coffee The salary range is up to $136,000 for the 12-month, full-time role. Show Caption Hide Caption Watch: Starbucks treats rooster to a 'cluck cup' Starbucks workers were stunned and overjoyed when a rooster named Fluffy made appearance at an Arizona drive-thru. If you love coffee, have the travel bug and are addicted to your phone, Starbucks may have the perfect job for you. Starbucks is hiring two content creators to travel to some of the company's most unique locations around the world, the coffee company announced on May 28. The creators' main responsibility will be to capture their experiences at these locations, which may include a Starbucks coffee farm in Costa Rica, the Starbucks Reserve Roastery in Milan or coffeehouses in Tokyo, the company said in a news release. "The creators will highlight the care and craft that goes into every cup of Starbucks coffee as well as the diverse Starbucks experiences in communities around the world," Starbucks said in the release. With the full-time, yearlong roles comes a salary of up to $136,000, according to the job listing. The end of the hiring window is quickly approaching; here's what to know. Do you work for a great organization? Nominate it as one of America's Top Workplaces. What does a Starbucks content creator do? According to Starbucks' job description, the content creators will travel to 10-15 of the company's locations around the world over a one-year timeframe. In addition to the travel portion, the employees will be tasked with creating "engaging social content highlighting interesting, social-first stories focused on our global brand and product experiences," the description reads. The creative part of the role will include creating and pitching ideas, as well as editing and publishing videos for Starbucks' social channels. How to apply to be a Starbucks content creator Starbucks is hiring two content creators, including one current employee and one external candidate. The application window is open until June 13. Interested candidates can apply on Starbucks' website. The process also includes a video requirement — applicants must post a video on TikTok explaining why they are the right fit for the job. The video must be public and include #StarbucksGlobalCoffeeCreator in the caption. Applicants must be U.S. residents who are at least 18 years old with a valid passport. Outside of the travel associated with the role, it is a remote position. Starbucks content creator salary According to the job posting, the salary range for the content creator role is between $80,100-$136,000. Travel costs and expenses associated with work trips will be covered by Starbucks, the job description reads. Additionally, the role comes with insurance, paid vacation and retirement benefits. Melina Khan is a national trending reporter for USA TODAY. She can be reached at
5 hours ago
An Omaha food plant owner says he followed the rules for hiring immigrants
OMAHA, Neb. -- The owner of an Omaha food packaging company says his business has been unfairly hamstrung by federal immigration officials, who raided the plant and arrested more than half its workforce. The raid took place despite the company meticulously following the government's own system for verifying the workers were in the country legally, owner Gary Rohwer said Wednesday. Glenn Valley Foods now is operating at about 30% of capacity as the business scrambles to hire more workers, Rohwer said as he stood outside the plant. Asked how upsetting the raid was, Rohwer replied, 'I was very upset, ma'am, because we were told to e-verify, and we e-verified all these years, so I was shocked.' 'We did everything we could possibly do," he said. E-Verify is an online U.S. Department of Homeland Security system launched in the late 1990s that allows employers to quickly check if potential employees can work legally in the U.S., often by using Social Security numbers. Some of America's largest employers use it, including Starbucks and Walmart, but the vast majority of employers do not. Critics say the system is fairly easy to cheat, particularly with false documents. Rohwer noted that federal officials have said his company was a victim of those using stolen identities or fake IDs to get around the E-Verify system, which lead agents conducting the raid described as 'broken' and 'flawed' to Glenn Valley executives. But that does nothing to repair the company's bottom line, Rohwer said. 'I'd like to see the United States government ... come up with a program that they can communicate to the companies as to how to hire legitimate help. Period,' he said. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement confirmed that more than 70 people were arrested during the Glenn Valley Foods raid on Tuesday. It also said one of the workers, described as a Honduras national, assaulted federal agents as he was being detained. The Omaha raid comes amid an immigration crackdown under President Donald Trump. The administration has been intensifying its efforts in recent weeks, and Trump deployed more than 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines this week to respond to ongoing protests in Los Angeles over his immigration policies. The raid, in the southeastern section of Omaha where nearly a quarter of residents are foreign born according to the 2020 census, led to hundreds of people turning out to protest Tuesday evening. But it also had a chilling effect on the south Omaha community. The Metropolitan Community College's South Omaha campus and an Omaha library branch in the area closed Tuesday afternoon, and several businesses along south Omaha's normally bustling 24th Street closed as news of the raid spread. Several of them remained closed Wednesday, said Douglas County Board of Commissioners Chairman Roger Garcia, whose district covers south Omaha. 'Everybody's still on alert, waiting to see what happens today and in the coming days,' Garcia said. 'So there's still a lot of anxiety and fear out there.' That fear will show up in the form of a weakened economy in Omaha, he added. 'You know, when products are not being sold, taxes are not being collected, and people are not able to get their goods as well. So it affects all of us,' he said. An aunt of Garcia's wife was among those taken away by ICE during the Omaha raid, he said. They have been unable to determine where she is being held. The raid came on the same day of the inauguration of newly elected Omaha Mayor John Ewing, a Democrat who unseated three-term Republican Jean Stothert last month. During a news conference Wednesday to address the raid, Ewing declined to speculate on whether the timing of it was intended to distract from his swearing-in. But he denounced the action by federal authorities, saying, 'My message to the public is that we are with them.' Omaha Police Chief Todd Schmaderer also declared that his department will play no part in checking immigration or the legal status of residents in the community. 'That is not our mission. Our mission is public safety,' the chief said. 'I need victims to come forward. They will not come forward if they're fearful of Omaha Police Department being immigration officers.'
