June's full moon isn't just pretty, it's rare. One won't happen like it again until 2043
The moon won't be red in color like it was during the blood moon in March but a gold color. Rather, this full moon coincides with the annual harvest of the favorite berry.
June's Strawberry Moon takes its name from seasonal plant growth, according to the Old Farmer's Almanac. Many ripening strawberries were ready to be harvested around this time in the northeastern United States.
This full moon has the distinction of being the lowest in the sky since 2006, an event that won't happen again until 2043. This is due to a phenomenon known as a "major lunar standstill" or "lunistice," a part of a natural cycle that takes place over 18.6 years that subtly changes where the moon rises and sets, according to BBC Sky at Night Magazine.
Here's what to know about the full moon in June.
It will be on the rise on Wednesday, June 11, at 3:44 a.m.
It will be at its fullest at 3:44 a.m. ET, according to NASA. But because it's so early in the day, the best time to view the moon will be June 10, when it rises at sunset, according to LiveScience.
The June full moon will be a micromoon, which means it will appear smaller and dimmer than it usually does. That's because the moon is currently at its farthest point point from the Earth. The moon also will appear about 14% smaller and 30% dimmer.
The summer solstice marks the longest day of the year in the Northern hemisphere. In 2025, it will fall on Friday, June 20.
Every 20 years or so, the Strawberry Moon falls on the same day at the summer solstice, according to the Time & Date website. This year, won't be one of those times.
According to reports, the Strawberry Moon will coincide with the summer solstice again in 2062.
A full moon can be seen clearly with the naked eye.
But in a past interview with USA Today Network, Tim Brothers, Massachusetts Institute of Technology technical Instructor and observatory manager, said with any case of stargazing, it's much better if you're using a good telescope or a pair of binoculars.
According to Time and Date, they include:
Strawberry Moon: June 11, 2025
Buck Moon: July 10, 2025
Sturgeon Moon: Aug. 9, 2025
Corn Moon: Sept. 7, 2025
Harvest Moon: Oct. 6, 2025
In 2025, there will be several supermoons. The next one will be on Oct. 7.
USA Today contributed to this report.
This article originally appeared on Cape Cod Times: June full moon 2025: How to see the rare, low-hanging Strawberry moon
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
6 minutes ago
- Forbes
Why Friday May See The Perseid Meteor Shower At Its Best
Overnight on Monday, Aug. 12, through Tuesday, Aug. 13, sees the annual peak of the Perseid meteor shower, when up to 75 'shooting stars' per hour can normally be seen in a dark, moonless night sky away from light pollution. However, the presence of the full sturgeon moon in the night sky this year will make faint meteors harder to spot. In this 20-second exposure, a meteor lights up the sky over the top of a mountain ridge near Park City, Utah. NASA/Bill Dunford The Perseid meteor shower will peak around 20:00 UTC (4:00 p.m. EDT) on Monday, Aug. 12. That means the early hours of Sunday, Aug. 11, Monday, Aug. 12, and Tuesday, Aug. 13 are when meteors will be most numerous. Just a handful of the up to 75 'shooting stars' per hour that would normally be visible are expected to be seen by skywatchers this year because of an 84%-lit waning gibbous moon. The moon will be in the night sky for the first half of the week. As the moon rises, so does Saturn, which is approaching its closest and brightest point to Earth for the year. It will reach opposition on Sept. 21. By Friday, Aug. 15, the moon will have decreased in brightness and will rise around midnight, making sky conditions better for viewing what remains of the peak of the Perseid meteor shower. On the night of the peak of the Perseid meteor shower, there will be an 84%-lit waning gibbous moon, the leftovers of the weekend's full moon. Although the advice is always to escape light pollution to see more 'shooting stars,' the full-ish moon this year makes that moot. 'A gibbous moon like on the night of the Perseids peak typically makes a dark sky about as bright as a moonless night sky in a small city or relatively distant suburbs at the edge of major metro areas,' said Dr. Qicheng Zhang, astronomer at Lowell Observatory in Flagstaff, Arizona, in an email. Which Direction Do You Look For Perseids? 'Shooting stars' can appear anywhere in the night sky at any time, so an observing location with as wide a view of the sky is wise. However, what you will notice if you see multiple meteors is where they appear to come from. Trace their trajectory back, and you'll come to the northeastern night sky, where the constellation Perseus is located (it's rising as the night sky darkens). This is the radiant point of the Perseids, hence their name. If you see a 'shooting star' that doesn't trace back to Perseus, it isn't a Perseid. It's probably a sporadic — a random meteor — or one from the Delta Aquariid meteor shower, whose radiant point is the constellation Aquarius in the south. The easiest way to photograph a 'shooting star' is to use a manual DSLR or mirrorless camera and a wide-angle lens on a tripod. The trick is to take a sharp, long-exposure image of the stars and then simply set the camera to take the same image for multiple hours. Manually focus the lens on the stars (or set the lens to infinity focus), use a shutter speed of 30 seconds, then adjust the settings for aperture (from around f/2.8) and ISO (800-1600), and shoot in raw. Take the same shot 200 times — preferably using an intervalometer or a shutter release cable on lock — and you may catch a 'shooting star.' Further Reading Forbes Meet 'Ammonite' — A New World Just Found In The Solar System By Jamie Carter Forbes 20 Best Dark Sky Campsites In The U.S. For Stargazing, From Hipcamp By Jamie Carter Forbes See The Perseid Meteor Shower Now Before It Peaks, Experts Say By Jamie Carter
Scientific American
35 minutes ago
- Scientific American
Rogue Worlds May Not Be So Lonely After All, Europa Clipper Completes Key Test, and RFK, Jr., Pulls $500 Million in mRNA Vaccine Funding
Rachel Feltman: Happy Monday, listeners! For Scientific American 's Science Quickly, I'm Rachel Feltman. Let's kick off the week with our usual science news roundup. Let's start with some space news. Have you ever heard of rogue planets? They sound pretty cool, and they are: the term refers to exoplanets that roam free instead of orbiting a star. Some of them may be objects that formed like stars, coalescing in the wake of a giant gas cloud's collapse but never gaining enough mass to actually start the process of nuclear fusion. Others may get their start in the usual planetary way—forming from the gas and dust around a star—before getting ejected out into open space for some reason or another. According to a preprint study made available last month, the life of a rogue planet might not always be as lonely as it sounds. Some of them may be able to form little planetary systems of their own. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. The researchers behind the new study, which still has to go through peer review, used instruments on the James Webb Space Telescope to gather information about eight different rogue planets, each with a mass around five to 10 times greater than Jupiter's. Based on infrared observations, the scientists say, six of the objects seem to have warm dust around them, indicating the presence of the kinds of disks where planets form. The researchers also saw silicate grains in the disks—evidence that the dust is growing and crystallizing. That's typically a disk's signature move when it's gearing up to make some baby planets. This study didn't actually find any hints of fully grown planets orbiting those giant rogue worlds, but it suggests that such a phenomenon might be possible. As wild as it is to imagine a lonely world roaming space without a star to orbit, it's even more intriguing to picture a whole system of planets spinning in the dark. Speaking of space, NASA's Europa Clipper, which is expected to arrive at the Jupiter system in 2030 so it can study the gas giant's icy moon, has completed an important test. Back in March 2025 the Europa Clipper flew past Mars and conducted a test of its REASON instrument. That's short for Radar for Europa Assessment and Sounding: Ocean to Near-surface. This radar is a crucial component of the clipper's mission because it's designed to peek beneath the icy shell of Europa's surface, perhaps even glimpsing the ocean beneath it. The radar will also help NASA scientists study the ice itself, along with the topography of Europa's surface. The clipper features a huge pair of solar arrays that carry the slender antennas REASON needs to do its work. The antennas span a distance of about 58 feet, while the arrays collectively stretch the length of a basketball court, which is necessary for them to gather enough light—Europa gets just around 1/25th as much sunlight as we do on Earth. The sheer size of all those components made it impossible to fully test REASON on Earth because once the flight hardware was finished, the clipper had to be kept inside a clean room. NASA simply didn't have a sterile chamber big enough to properly assess the radar. When Europa flew by Mars on March 1, REASON sent and received radio waves for about 40 minutes, collecting 60 gigabytes of data. Earlier this month NASA announced that scientists had completed their analysis of the data and deemed the REASON instrument ready for prime time. Let's move on to some public health news—first, vaccines. Last Tuesday, the Guardian reported that COVID cases in the U.S. are on the rise, as has been the case each summer since the start of the pandemic. Though this current surge has seen case numbers growing more slowly than in previous years, experts who spoke to the Guardian voiced concerns about what the coming months could bring. In May, U.S. Food and Drug Administration officials wrote that, come fall, COVID boosters may be limited to older people and individuals at higher risk of getting severely ill. Even if this move doesn't outright prevent people from vaccinating themselves and their kids, public health experts are concerned that confusion around availability and insurance coverage could lead to a worrisome dip in booster administration. Meanwhile, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services head Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced last Tuesday that his department is canceling almost $500 million in funding for the development of mRNA vaccines. While experts say mRNA vaccines are safe, have the potential to curb future pandemics, and have already saved millions of lives, Kennedy has come out against the technology. Mike Osterholm, a University of Minnesota expert on infectious diseases and pandemic preparedness, told the Associated Press that he didn't think he'd witnessed 'a more dangerous decision in public health' in his 50 years in the field. We're hoping to focus on explaining mRNA technology in an upcoming episode, so let us know if you have any questions we can answer. You can send those to ScienceQuickly@ In other public health news, a group of scientists say bird flu could be airborne on some dairy farms. In a preprint paper recently posted online, researchers report finding H5N1 influenza virus in both large and small aerosol particles in air sampled from California farms. The scientists also found viral particles in milk, on milking equipment and in wastewater. While H5N1 isn't currently thought to pose a major health risk to humans, its continued circulation in mammals leaves us open to potentially dangerous mutations of the virus. We'll end this week's roundup with a fun little story about how terrifying humans are. Earlier this month the Wall Street Journal reported that U.S. Department of Agriculture workers are blasting human music and voices from speaker-touting drones to scare wolves away from livestock. Apparently the audio selections for these so-called wolf-hazing attempts include the sounds of fireworks, AC/DC's song 'Thunderstruck' and, perhaps most delightfully, that scene from the movie Marriage Story where Scarlett Johansson and Adam Driver scream at each other. Apparently Driver and ScarJo are doing the trick: the Wall Street Journal reported that noisemaking drones were deployed in southern Oregon after wolves killed 11 cows in the area over the span of 20 days. Once the drones were in hazing mode, there were reportedly just two fatal wolf attacks on cattle in an 85-day period. There's no word yet on how the wolves feel about Laura Dern. That's all for this week's science news roundup. We'll be back on Wednesday to talk about the latest advances in male contraception. Science Quickly is produced by me, Rachel Feltman, along with Fonda Mwangi, Kelso Harper and Jeff DelViscio. This episode was edited by Alex Sugiura. Shayna Posses and Aaron Shattuck fact-check our show. Our theme music was composed by Dominic Smith. Subscribe to Scientific American for more up-to-date and in-depth science news. For Scientific American, this is Rachel Feltman. Have a great week!
CNN
39 minutes ago
- CNN
Tom Hanks, who portrayed Jim Lovell in ‘Apollo 13,' pays tribute to the late astronaut
Tom Hanks is honoring the real-life hero that he once portrayed in a popular, Oscar-winning film. After the death of astronaut Jim Lovell was announced on Friday, Hanks shared a poignant social media post to his Instagram, writing, 'There are people who dare, who dream, and who lead others to places we would not go on our own.' 'Jim Lovell, who for a long while had gone farther into space and for longer than any other person of our planet, was that kind of guy,' Hanks added in the post. The actor portrayed Lovell in the 1995 Ron Howard-directed film 'Apollo 13,' which told the story of Lovell's failed lunar space mission which almost cost him and his crew their lives in 1970. Apollo 13 would have marked NASA's third successful crewed moon landing, but during the ill-fated mission – which carried Lovell as well as astronauts John Swigert Jr. and Fred Haise Jr. on board – an oxygen tank located on the crew's service module exploded when they were about 200,000 miles (322,000 kilometers) away from Earth. Lovell famously delivered the news to mission control, saying 'Houston, we've had a problem.' The exchange was later immortalized by Hanks in the 'Apollo 13' movie, which costarred Gary Sinise, Kevin Bacon, Ed Harris, Kathleen Quinlan and the late Bill Paxton. With the damage effectively taking out their power source and other life support supplies, the Apollo 13 crew had to abruptly abandon their trek to the lunar surface and use several engine burns to swing around the far side of the moon and put themselves on a course back toward Earth. The three-person crew made a high-stakes splashdown return in the South Pacific Ocean about three days after the tank explosion, marking the conclusion of what has come to be known as the 'successful failure' of the Apollo missions. 'His many voyages around Earth and on to so-very-close to the moon were not made for riches or celebrity, but because such challenges as those are what fuels the course of being alive – and who better than Jim Lovell to make those voyages,' Hanks wrote in his tribute on Friday. Lovell died at age 97 on Thursday in Lake Forest, Illinois, according to a NASA news release, CNN previously reported. The cause of death was not immediately clear. He made a brief cameo in the movie as the captain of the USS Iwo Jima, the Navy ship that recovered the Apollo 13 crew after splashdown. 'Apollo 13' was nominated for nine Oscars, including best picture, and won two, for best film editing and best sound.
