This Advice From Economics Might Be The Answer To Your Parenting Burnout. Here's Why.
Almost immediately, however, we ran into trouble. Our baby stopped peeing. He was dehydrated and hungry, somehow, although he spent pretty much all day at my breast. So we feed him some infant formula using a medicine dropper, which he lapped up hungrily, sending me into a shame spiral that took months of therapy to crawl out of. But at least with the supplementary formula we were able to keep him happily fed.
Related:
The second problem sent us into a territory that was even more mortifying. In spite of the fact that my breasts were only partially functional, the baby was extremely attached to them. As in, he would only sleep if they were right there, right beside him, skin to skin with his tiny cheek. Every time he feel asleep while nursing and unlatched his little rosebud lips, I moved as stealthily as possible to try to get him into the bassinet. But more often than not, he woke and started crying. And even if I could get him to lie in the bassinet, it often didn't last long. The end result was that I spent a lot of time nursing him in the chair, and, in my desperation and exhaustion, I often fell asleep.
My wife could tell, just by looking at us, that this was not a safe situation. Since it wasn't possible to get him into the bassinet, we just cleared our bed of blankets and pillows and let him sleep where he wanted to, right next to my body. We didn't tell anyone. We had been taught that bed-sharing with a baby was deadly, so we certainly weren't going to admit to doing it.
This was all back in 2009, before economist Emily Oster began publishing her bestselling books, in which she brings a unique, data-driven perspective to the art of parenting. In her second book, 'Cribsheet,' she explains how holding up the ideal infant sleeping arrangement as the only permissible option can actually lead parents to put their babies in more danger. Because although it is safest to have baby sleep on a separate surface, it is much more dangerous to sleep with a baby on a sofa or armchair. Sixty-seven times more dangerous. Though it wasn't a best-case scenario that the baby wasn't in the bassinet, he was a lot safer sleeping next to me on the mattress instead of in the recliner.
Infant sleep, Oster writes, is one example of a scenario in which we might benefit from considering what she calls 'second best' parenting. It is a term she borrows from economics.
'When we are giving advice in parenting, we tend to be absolutist: There is the best option and then everything else,' Oster told HuffPost, She has used the term 'outer darkness' to refer to everything else — as in, if it's not the best option, it's all equally bad and scary.
But this all-or-nothing approach doesn't apply well to infant sleep, where we clearly have a first best option (bassinet/crib in same room as parent) followed by a second best option (on a clear, flat sleeping surface next to the nursing parent) and then, way, way down, the 67th best option of a desperate mother accidentally falling asleep in an armchair while holding the baby because she has been told that under no circumstances should she consider bringing the baby into her bed.
'The idea of 'second best' is to recognize that within the category of 'other options,' some are better than others. The second best is the best option that we can achieve,' Oster said.
She thinks that this can be a useful framework for other parenting choices, too, such as what to feed our children.
'We're told the best snack for our kids is, say, a whole apple and a glass of water. But what if your kid doesn't eat that? We don't help people pick well among the options their child will eat. You'd be forgiven for thinking that once you're going to applesauce, you might as well give a pile of cookies. But actually those aren't the same.'
Believing that there is only one right way and the rest are wrong sets us up to see only black and white when actually there are so many shades of gray.
'When we tell people that it's the 'best or the rest,' we do not allow for them to choose smartly among the rest,' Oster said. In addition to not choosing well, this thinking makes people feel badly about how they're parenting.
'When we tell people they aren't doing their best, that disempowers them. And no one parents well from a place of shame,' Oster added.
Finding Other Good Options Beyond Perfect
The advantage of referring to 'second best' is that, with the word 'best,' parents are left with space to take pride in their parenting. A silver or bronze medal is still a win, after all.
The argument that Oster is making is similar to that of 'good enough parenting,' an idea popularized in the 1950s by Donald Winnicott. Parenting coach Kristene Geering told HuffPost that this is the framework she uses with parents.
'It's based on the notion that there is no such thing as perfect,' Geering explained. 'Part of being human is that there are challenges, there are times when there's no clear or easy path (which is also how we learn). There is no 'best.' You take what information you have, make a decision based on that and then you learn as you go along.'
Geering thinks this dovetails nicely with Carol Dweck's 'growth mindset,' in which as we learn more, we do better.
Geering said she often tells families that 'we're all doing the best we can with what we have' and advises, 'Learn from your mistakes, repair as you go, and show your children how to hold compassion for yourself and those around you.'
She likes the 'good enough' phrasing because it makes room for the idea that there are many different options that might be 'bests' for different families dealing with different circumstances.
Geering agrees with Oster that it's important to move parents out the space of 'all is lost,' where they may get trapped in their shame. She said that where she works in Silicon Valley, 'I see a lot of parents fall into this trap of trying to be 'perfect' ... and then researching themselves into a state where they're almost frozen with indecision.'
With an endless amount of information readily available, this isn't an uncommon place for parents to land. 'I've fallen into this trap as well,' Geering admitted. 'Things like which school to attend, which activity to sign up for... it's really overwhelming.'
Make Peace With Your 'Good Enough'
Using a 'second best' or 'good enough' mindset doesn't come naturally to people raised in a culture of competition. But sooner or later, all parents are faced with a scenario that challenges expectations of perfection.
For Geering, a clear example of this in her own family was pandemic schooling. 'I watched my own kids struggle on 'Zoom school,' to the point where it was clear this would never work for them. So I pulled them, and we did homeschool for a year... while my husband and I both worked full time. Was it perfect? Nope. Was it 'second best'? I have no idea.'
Her kids are 'still catching up on math,' she said, although they also 'gained a lot of skills in independence.'
'Instead of beating myself up on all the math they missed out on, I looked at it from the point of view that I was doing the best I could in really awful circumstances. And I looked at all the moms in my friend groups and the parents I was working with, and I saw everyone making different decisions, based on their specific circumstances. Absolutely no one did the 'best' thing... because there was no 'best' thing.'
Whether you think of it as 'second best' or 'good enough,' parenting within this framework, as opposed to one in which there is only one right option for all families, makes room for you to give yourself some grace.
An added benefit of letting go of a perfection-or-nothing mindset is the weight that this takes off of our kids.
If we 'show them how to repair the relationship when we mess up and share our learning process with them,' Geering said, 'it lets them be compassionate with themselves, learn from their mistakes, create authentic and meaningful relationships with others, and have a growth mindset as their default throughout life. That's pretty powerful stuff.'
Related...
Parents Are Lying About Where Their Babies Sleep At Night. Here's Why That's A Problem.
What Second-Time Parents Wish They Didn't Stress About The First Time Around
This 1 Thing May Be Wearing Parents Out Everywhere

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Veradigm Amends and Extends Stockholder Rights Plan
CHICAGO, August 20, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Veradigm® (OTCMKTS: MDRX), a leading provider of healthcare data and technology solutions, today announced that its Board of Directors (the "Board") has approved an amendment to extend the Company's existing Stockholder Rights Plan for an additional six months (the "Rights Plan"). The Rights Plan, adopted on February 26, 2024, was due to expire at 5:00PM New York City time on August 20, 2025. Under the terms of the amendment to the Rights Plan, the scheduled expiration date of the Rights Plan has been extended to February 20, 2026. In addition, the amendment to the Rights Plan changes the triggering threshold such that the rights would become exercisable only if a person or group acquires beneficial ownership of 20% or more of the outstanding shares of Company common stock (including in the form of synthetic ownership through derivative positions) in a transaction not approved by the Board, whether or not such person or group is an eligible passive investor. The Board's decision to extend the Rights Plan is based on its determination that many of the underlying risks and conditions that existed upon the initial adoption of the Rights Plan continue to be present. Accordingly, the Rights Plan is being extended to continue to ensure that all Veradigm stockholders have the opportunity to realize the full potential value of their investment. The Rights Plan does not prevent the Company from pursuing any offer that is fair and otherwise in the best interests of stockholders. The Board currently intends to terminate the Rights Plan no later than the time that the Company becomes current in its financial reporting and has applied for relisting of its shares of common stock on a national stock exchange, which is expected to occur in 2026. Further details about the Rights Plan, as amended, will be contained in a Current Report on Form 8-K to be filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. About Veradigm® Veradigm is a healthcare technology company that drives value through its unique combination of platforms, data, expertise, connectivity, and scale. The Veradigm Network features a dynamic community of solutions and partners providing advanced insights, technology, and data-driven solutions for the healthcare provider, payer, and biopharma markets. For more information about how Veradigm is fulfilling its mission of Transforming Health, Insightfully, visit or find Veradigm on LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube. © 2025 Veradigm LLC and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cited marks are the property of Veradigm LLC and/or its affiliates. All other product or Company names are the property of their respective holders, all rights reserved. Disclaimer and Forward-Looking Statement Information This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the Company's expectations with respect to the timing of the relisting of its common stock on a national securities exchange. These forward-looking statements are based on the current beliefs and expectations of the Company's management with respect to future events, only speak as of the date that they are made, and are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Such statements can be identified by the use of words such as "future," "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "expects," "intends," "plans," "predicts," "will," "would," "could," "continue," "can," "may," "look forward," "aims," "hopes," and "seeks" and similar terms, although not all forward-looking statements contain such words or expressions. Actual results could differ significantly from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. Important factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include, among others: a further material delay in the Company's financial reporting or ability to hold an annual meeting of stockholders; an inability of the Company to timely prepare its delinquent financial statements; unanticipated factors or factors that the Company currently believes will not cause further delay; the Company's remediation efforts and preparation of financial statements or other factors that could cause additional delay or adjustments; the possibility that ongoing remediation work or the audit of the Company's financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 or the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 may identify additional errors and material weaknesses or other deficiencies in the Company's accounting practices; the likelihood that the control deficiencies identified or that may be identified in the future will result in additional material weaknesses in the Company's internal control over financial reporting; risks relating to the Company's voluntary disclosure to the SEC of certain information relating to the investigation by the Audit Committee of the Company's Board of Directors, the SEC's investigation, and the additional information the Company has continued to provide to the SEC based on discussions with the SEC; changes in the financial condition of the markets that the Company serves; the Company's ability to hire qualified individuals to serve in senior leadership roles on a permanent basis, including a chief financial officer; and other factors contained in the "Risk Factors" section and elsewhere in the Company's filings with the SEC from time to time, including, but not limited to, the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022. The Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the impact of circumstances or events that may arise after the date of the forward-looking statements, or other changes over time, except as required by law. View source version on Contacts For more information contact: Investors:Jenny Media:Rick Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Top 5 jobs safe from AI
AI is likely coming for millions of jobs, but Microsoft says these 5 are basically robot-proof: Phlebotomists, nursing assistants, Hazardous Materials Removal Workers, Helpers, Painters, Plasterers, Embalmers Video produced by Yahoo Finance Video Transcript AI is likely coming for millions of jobs, but Microsoft says that these five are likely robot proof. Number one, phlebotomists. That's the medical professional who draws your blood. AI might be booking your appointments, but it's not picking up a needle. Number two, nursing assistants. These workers provide hands-on care, bedpans, bathing, feeding. These are not exactly tasks you're gonna outsource to ChatGPT. Number three, hazardous material removal workers, removing asbestos, lead, or radioactive waste. It is dangerous work and right now something that only humans can be trusted with. Number four is helpers, painters, plasters. This is anything that's hands-on work. So a robot might be able to design your color palette, but picking up a paintbrush, that's not happening, not yet. And finally, the last of the top five jobs, safe from AI embalmers. Preparing bodies for a funeral is personal and delicate work, and right now it is still human only. So if you're in one of these jobs, you might just have more security than the rest of us in this age of AI.

Associated Press
6 minutes ago
- Associated Press
At least 600 CDC employees are getting final termination notices, union says
NEW YORK (AP) — At least 600 employees of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are receiving permanent termination notices in the wake of a recent court decision that protected some CDC employees from layoffs but not others. The notices went out this week and many people have not yet received them, according to the American Federation of Government Employees, which represents more than 2,000 dues-paying members at CDC. Officials with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services did not immediately respond to a request for comment. AFGE officials said they are aware of at least 600 employees being cut. But 'due to a staggering lack of transparency from HHS,' the union hasn't received formal notices of who is being laid off,' the federation said in a statement on Wednesday. The permanent cuts include about 100 people who worked in violence prevention. Some employees noted those cuts come less than two weeks after a man fired at least 180 bullets into the CDC's campus and killed a police officer. 'The irony is devastating: The very experts trained to understand, interrupt and prevent this kind of violence were among those whose jobs were eliminated,' some of the affected employees wrote in a blog post last week. On April 1, the HHS officials sent layoff notices to thousands of employees at the CDC and other federal health agencies, part of a sweeping overhaul designed to vastly shrink the agencies responsible for protecting and promoting Americans' health. Many have been on administrative leave since then — paid but not allowed to work — as lawsuits played out. A federal judge in Rhode Island last week issued a preliminary ruling that protected employees in several parts of the CDC, including groups dealing with smoking, reproductive health, environmental health, workplace safety, birth defects and sexually transmitted diseases. But the ruling did not protect other CDC employees, and layoffs are being finalized across other parts of the agency, including in the freedom of information office. The terminations were effective as of Monday, employees were told. Affected projects included work to prevent rape, child abuse and teen dating violence. The laid-off staff included people who have helped other countries to track violence against children — an effort that helped give rise to an international conference in November at which countries talked about setting violence-reduction goals. 'There are nationally and internationally recognized experts that will be impossible to replace,' said Tom Simon, the retired senior director for scientific programs at the CDC's Division of Violence Prevention. ___ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Science and Educational Media Group and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.