logo
Maine lawmaker wants to open intraparty meetings to public

Maine lawmaker wants to open intraparty meetings to public

Yahoo06-02-2025

Feb. 6—A bill before the Maine Legislature would make private intraparty meetings of lawmakers open to the public, which its sponsor says will increase transparency and provide more insight into how lawmakers arrive at decisions.
The proposal would give the public access to gatherings of three or more lawmakers of the same party by adding legislative caucuses to the list of meetings subject to Maine's Freedom of Access Act.
The act already protects public access to meetings of the full Legislature and its bipartisan committees, as well as to local school board and city council meetings. The same law also mandates that records belonging to public agencies and officials are public.
"LD 12 will add a new level of transparency to the legislative process," Sen. Rick Bennett, R-Oxford, the bill's sponsor, said during a public hearing Wednesday. "It will ensure the public can see how decisions are made, who is influencing those decisions and the reasoning behind our policies or laws."
It's common for lawmakers to meet in closed-door caucuses to discuss strategy or hold negotiations, but such meetings also have been criticized as a tool for subverting public access laws to conduct legislative business.
In one instance last year, Democrats came under fire for a private caucus in which committee members were briefed by an official from the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives while considering several firearms measures. Republicans criticized the move, saying the meeting shouldn't have been held in private.
The Maine Press Association submitted written testimony in support of Bennett's bill, and no one testified against it. But changing the law could be complicated, and it's unclear how much support the proposal will have among lawmakers. The bill does not list any co-sponsors.
Lawmakers on the Judiciary Committee asked Bennett how the bill could affect legislative working papers that are now confidential under state law, and whether discussions around a party's political strategy would be open to the public.
Bennett said his intent is not to disturb the ability of lawmakers to solicit input under the working papers exemption as they develop a bill, but he said that legislative decisions should not be made in private.
"People making real decisions behind closed doors, that ought not to be done and there doesn't seem to be a means of addressing that through social or cultural change," he said.
Bennett said he understands that political strategy is "not, strictly speaking, the public's business."
"(But) if we're doing policy work and making decisions, sharing information like three selectmen sitting around a diner table having a conversation about a public matter, which is against the law, I'd like to see those kinds of conversations not rendered unless there is public access," he said.
The Maine Press Association, which includes 44 newspapers and digital news sites across the state, said negotiations and conversations that take place behind closed doors violate the principles of transparency.
"Private caucus meetings prevent freedom of access, and constituents are left out of the process," the association said in its written testimony. "That subverts the very nature of our participatory democracy."
Bennett, who has served on and off in either the Senate or House of Representatives since 1990, said he sees more and more work and decision-making being done in caucuses. "I know there are reasons for that and we all can surmise what they are with growing levels of partisanship and toxicity," he said. "I believe we need an antidote to this."
The committee on Wednesday also heard a proposal from Rep. Laurel Libby, R-Auburn, that would require agencies and officials to fulfill Freedom of Access Act requests for public records within 30 days. The bill, LD 152, would update current law, which requires agencies to fulfill requests "within a reasonable time."
Libby has two Democratic co-sponsors on the bill, but it has also been met with opposition from numerous municipalities, schools and state agencies that say they don't have the resources to work within a 30-day time constraint when fulfilling records requests, many of which can be broad and complicated.
Libby, meanwhile, said she has heard from constituents who are frustrated by the amount of time it can take to fulfill a request. In one example, the Maine Prisoner Advocacy Coalition said in written testimony that it is still waiting for data requested from the state medical examiner's office in 2023 to better understand a rise in deaths among people on probation.
"This bill is essential," said Jan Collins, the coalition's assistant director. "Lifesaving public policy decisions are wholly dependent on information government offices collect. We should be able to access it in a timely manner."
Copy the Story Link

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Speaker Johnson: Newsom ‘ought to be tarred and feathered'
Speaker Johnson: Newsom ‘ought to be tarred and feathered'

The Hill

time27 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Speaker Johnson: Newsom ‘ought to be tarred and feathered'

Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said that California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) should be 'tarred and feathered' for how he has responded to the violent protests in Los Angeles, while declining to say whether he agreed that the governor should face legal consequences. His comment came in response to a question at a press conference about President Trump endorsing the idea of his border czar Tom Homan coming to arrest Newsom. 'I'm not going to give you legal analysis on whether Gavin Newsom should be arrested, but he ought to be tarred and feathered, I'll say that,' Johnson responded. He went on to criticize Newsom's objection to Trump deploying the National Guard to quell the anti-immigration enforcement protests. Newsom said he is suing the Trump administration, arguing he illegally federalized the National Guard to respond to the protesters. 'He's standing in the way of the administration and the carrying out of federal law. He is applauding the bad guys and standing in the way of the good guys,' Johnson said of Newsom. 'He's a participant, an accomplice, in our federal law enforcement agents being not just disrespected, but assaulted. This is a serious problem.' Johnson said of the lawsuit: 'What a joke. Do your job, man, that's what I tell Gavin Newsom. Do your job. Stop working on your rebranding, and be a governor.' Trump had endorsed the idea of Homan arresting the sitting governor on Monday. 'Gavin Newsom is daring Tom Homan to come and arrest him,' Fox News reporter Peter Doocy asked Trump. 'Should he do it?' Trump responded: 'I would do it if I were Tom.' Newsroom called the comment an 'unmistakable step toward authoritarianism' in response to Trump in a post on X. In Washington, though, Republicans are largely rallying around the administration's actions and confrontation with local Democratic leaders over protest response. Johnson played video of the violence and destruction in pockets of Los Angeles in a closed-door meeting with House Republicans on Tuesday morning, according to a source. White House Press Secretary Karolina Leavitt was a guest speaker at that morning meeting and also pushed the administration's posture on the protest response.

Troops deployed to LA will cost $134M, Pentagon official says
Troops deployed to LA will cost $134M, Pentagon official says

Politico

time37 minutes ago

  • Politico

Troops deployed to LA will cost $134M, Pentagon official says

President Donald Trump's decision to deploy troops to Los Angeles amid mass deportation protests will likely cost $134 million, the Pentagon's budget chief told lawmakers. Acting Pentagon comptroller Bryn MacDonnell, testifying at a House budget hearing on Tuesday alongside Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, said the estimate covers costs such as travel, housing and food. Trump has ordered 4,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines to Los Angeles to assist law enforcement with the protests, although California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass have said they are not needed. Hegseth sparred with Democrats during the hearing in defense of the deployment, arguing Newsom and Bass, both Democrats, mishandled the situation.

Democrats scrambling to convince GOP to save green credits
Democrats scrambling to convince GOP to save green credits

E&E News

time41 minutes ago

  • E&E News

Democrats scrambling to convince GOP to save green credits

Senate Democrats are ramping up pressure on Republicans to try to protect swaths of their 2022 climate law as the GOP races to advance their party-line megabill. The situation has Democrats trying to influence legislation they have no intention of supporting. Whether they succeed is another question altogether. 'I have been talking nonstop with [Republicans] and companies,' said Senate Finance Committee ranking member Ron Wyden (D-Ore.). 'I believe we are picking up support. … We have a lot of executives weighing in. We have a lot of senators starting to get concerned about the fact energy prices are starting to rise and the consequence of walking away [from clean energy tax credits] will reduce choices and reduce competition.' Advertisement Wyden said he's zeroing in on Southern senators because of the interest in renewable energy sources. Texas, for example, is a leader in renewable energy production. 'They made a lot of headway under the law I wrote in 2022,' Wyden said of renewables, expressing confidence Republicans understood the importance of preserving the 'technology neutral' credits. It's part of an effort by Democrats as they try to find their footing in the current political landscape, balancing fighting President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans on cuts to Medicaid while trying to find common ground elsewhere. There may be an opening. Some Republicans have indicated their discomfort with accelerating the demise of some green energy subsidies, though one Southern Republican vocal about protecting some climate law credits, Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, said Monday he hadn't heard a word from Democrats. The House-passed budget reconciliation bill included a sharp phase down of federal incentives for wind, solar, hydrogen and other energy sources — while sparing biofuels and nuclear power. It also added strict requirements barring companies associated with China from accessing tax credits, a provision which many consider unworkable. Wyden called changing that provision 'hugely important.' In recent weeks, Senate tax writers have been trying to hash out their portion of the legislation, with the self-imposed July 4 deadline fast approaching. The Finance text could be released later this week or early next. That means it's crunch time for Inflation Reduction Act defenders to make their case. Several Senate Democrats told POLITICO's E&E News on Monday they felt encouraged by the conversations they've had in recent weeks. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) planned a breakfast about the topic for Tuesday morning, Punchbowl News reported Monday, saying he's enlisted utility companies in the effort. The outlet said Schumer was focusing on 16 Senate Republicans whose states would be disproportionately targeted if the credits disappeared. 'There's such a vulnerability — the impacts are so deep and devastating — and that's one of the reasons I'm pushing it,' Schumer told the outlet. 'A lot of conversations' Schumer has said he wants to apply pressure to his Republican colleagues, understanding that peeling away just a few votes might sink the whole effort. 'There are a whole number of Republicans, particularly those that have a lot of clean-energy investments in their states, who really didn't like what the House did,' Schumer told POLITICO last month. 'And the question is: Will they be able to put enough pressure on [Majority Leader John] Thune, or even vote [with us] on some amendments?' Michigan Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin, who was in the House during the last Congress, said the wooing of Republicans has been front and center. 'We certainly have had a lot of conversations with the auto industry and a lot of conversations with our Republican colleagues who care about the auto industry,' she said Monday. Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) also said he was involved in conversations with Republicans. Asked how the conversations were going, he said, 'I don't know yet.' Asked who he was talking to, he said, 'Why would I say that?' Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) said he was 'hopeful' about the future of the climate law credits' fate, given Republicans are big believers in producing more energy. 'I don't know what the White House is thinking, but if you kill these tax credits, you are not going to be able to grow the economy the way they want to grow the economy. … You need energy,' he said. 'They seem to understand that part.' 'We're besieged' Utah Sen. John Curtis, who has been among the Republicans pushing for changes, said there's been considerable pressure from industry for about a month. 'I think it's fair to say we're besieged by people wanting to talk to us about the tax credits … more than we can possibly see,' he said. Curtis said he's been hearing from Democrats, too. Tillis was unmoved by any pleas from Democrats. 'I have not heard a bit from them,' he said. 'I don't know why they would think it's relevant. They have no interest in voting with it.' But Tillis did seem to think the utilities would have an interest in weighing in. 'They are in the mix in some of these, too,' he said, specifically pointing to 'investor-owned utilities in particular.' Several groups — including the American Critical Minerals Association, the Battery Materials & Technology Coalition, Clean Energy for America, the Conservative Energy Network, Impact Capital Managers, Securing America's Future Energy and the Solar Energy Industries Association — fired off a new letter to Senate Republicans Monday. SAFE is also running an ad campaign. And even though nuclear and biofuels fared much better in the House bill compared to other energy sources, boosters are pushing for more flexibility. Last week, a group of House Republicans led by Rep. Jen Kiggans (R-Va.) sent a letter to Senate GOP leaders urging them to make major changes to the bill they had voted for. But House GOP hard-liners want the IRA repeals to go even further. A new House Freedom Caucus missive Monday urged the Senate to 'hold the line' on the tax credits. 'The House is very different from the Senate. Senators spend a lot of time talking to their major employers,' Wyden said. 'There was a lot of awareness that we avoided mandates,' Wyden said about the 2022 climate law. 'We created opportunities to encourage innovation. The more you reduce carbon, the bigger your tax savings. We did a lot of groundwork.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store