Virudhunagar Collector warns medical aspirants of middlemen
In a statement he said that the Central Crime Branch of Greater Chennai Police have sent an alert about the prevailing fraudsters who take money on promise of fetching medical seats.
Though no such complaint of cheating has been received in Virudhunagar district, the Collector appealed to the medical aspirants and parents to approach only the Government recognised counselling process to get medical seats.
The parents should not fall for the middlemen and avoid paying money to them, but approach the medical colleges directly.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
3 hours ago
- India Today
US judge rejects Trump administration request to unseal Epstein grand jury records
A federal judge on Wednesday denied the Justice Department's request to release grand jury transcripts and exhibits from the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, citing longstanding legal protections and the limited scope of the materials compared with the vast investigation file already held by the US District Judge Richard Berman noted that the grand jury records contain only a small portion of the information gathered, describing them as 'merely a hearsay snippet of Jeffrey Epstein's alleged conduct.' He added that the government's more than 100,000 pages of investigative materials far outweigh the roughly 70 pages of grand jury Government is a logical party to make comprehensive disclosure to the public of the Epstein files,' Berman wrote, calling the motion to release grand jury material a 'diversion' from the broader trove of information in the Justice Department's possession. He also highlighted potential threats to victims' safety and privacy as a reason to keep the records sealed. The ruling comes amid pressure from President Donald Trump and his political allies to make Epstein-related files public. Trump, who campaigned in 2024 on promises to release the documents, accused Democrats of covering up details of the case. But in July, the Justice Department declined to release further material and said a previously rumoured Epstein client list does not exist, frustrating presented to grand juries is generally kept secret to prevent interference in criminal investigations and cannot be released without judicial approval. In Epstein's case, the grand jury heard testimony from just one FBI agent before Epstein's death by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking is the third federal judge to reject efforts to release Epstein-related grand jury materials. In August, Judge Paul Engelmayer denied a similar request regarding the case of Epstein's longtime associate, Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year sentence for recruiting underage girls for Epstein. A Florida judge also refused to unseal records from earlier federal investigations in 2005 and 2007, which had resulted in a controversial plea General Pam Bondi previously distributed binders of Epstein-related material to conservative influencers, but these failed to reveal new information, and the Justice Department has since scaled back promises of further disclosure.- EndsMust Watch
Hindustan Times
5 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
US judge denies Trump administration's request to release Epstein grand jury transcripts
A federal judge on Wednesday rejected the Trump administration's request to unseal grand jury transcripts from the criminal case against sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Jeffrey Epstein, a wealthy financier with high-level connections, died in a New York jail in 2019 while awaiting trial for sex trafficking of underage girls.(Reuters) District Judge Richard Berman said the government had failed to prove there were any special circumstances that would justify releasing what are normally secret records. The Justice Department has been seeking the release of the grand jury transcripts to help defuse spiraling anger among President Donald Trump's own supporters over what they have long seen as a cover-up of Epstein's crimes. Epstein, a wealthy financier with high-level connections, died in a New York jail in 2019 while awaiting trial for sex trafficking of underage girls. Berman noted that the government holds a trove of Epstein investigation materials that it promised in February it would release to the public before abruptly announcing in July that it would not do so. Trump's supporters have been obsessed with the Epstein case for years and have been up in arms since the FBI and Justice Department said in July that Epstein committed suicide while in jail, did not blackmail any prominent figures, and did not keep a "client list." "The Government's 100,000 pages of Epstein files and materials dwarf the 70 odd pages of Epstein grand jury materials," the judge said. "The Government is the logical party to make comprehensive disclosure to the public of the Epstein Files," the judge said, and its bid to unseal the Epstein grand jury transcripts "appears to be a 'diversion.'" The judge also said unsealing the grand jury proceedings could pose "possible threats" to the safety and privacy of Epstein's more than 1,000 victims. Maxwell Berman's ruling comes a little over a week after another federal judge declined to release the grand jury transcripts in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, the only former Epstein associate to have been convicted of criminal charges in connection with his activities. Maxwell, 63, is serving a 20-year sentence after being convicted in 2021 of recruiting underage girls for Epstein. Her lawyers had opposed releasing the transcripts, saying it could potentially impact her ongoing legal appeals of her conviction. US Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche -- who is also Trump's former personal lawyer -- met recently with Maxwell but has not revealed what was discussed. She was later moved to a minimum security prison. Trump, 79, was once a friend of Epstein and, according to The Wall Street Journal, the president's name was among hundreds found during a Justice Department review of the Epstein files, though there has not been evidence of wrongdoing. A House of Representatives committee has subpoenaed the Epstein files and is to receive a first batch of records on Friday from the Justice Department. A committee spokesperson said the panel would begin publicly releasing some of the records after victim identification and child sexual abuse material has been redacted.
New Indian Express
15 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025: Explained
The central government on Wednesday introduced the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025 in the Lok Sabha. The Bill, aimed at boosting innovation and protecting citizens, seeks to promote e-sports and online social games while banning online money games that pose financial, psychological, and social risks. It also stresses responsible use of technology, stronger consumer safeguards, and protection of national security. Presenting the Bill, the government noted that over the past decade, digital technologies have transformed daily life. Initiatives such as Digital India, digital public infrastructure, the UPI payment system, 5G connectivity, and the growing semiconductor ecosystem have given the country a new global identity. 'It is therefore equally important to ensure that society is protected from the potential harms of technology misuse. With this thought process, the Government has brought forward the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025,' the document stated. The proposed law supports e-sports and online social games but prohibits harmful online money gaming services, their advertisements, and related financial transactions. It also outlaws all forms of online betting and gambling—including fantasy sports, poker, rummy, lotteries, and other real-money games. The Bill highlights that such platforms often lure young people with misleading promises of monetary returns, pushing them into compulsive and addictive play that leaves families in financial distress. The government argued that addiction, financial losses, and even extreme consequences such as suicides linked to online money games can be prevented through prohibition. It further flagged risks of financial fraud, money laundering, terror financing, and misuse of platforms for illegal communications, calling them serious threats to national security. The Bill also seeks to bring national digital laws in line with restrictions that already exist in the physical world, such as those under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and various State legislations regulating betting and gambling. To encourage positive use of technology, the Bill proposes a framework for e-sports under the Ministry of Youth Affairs & Sports. For online social games, the Ministry of Electronics & IT (MeitY) and the Ministry of Information & Broadcasting (MIB) will support platforms that foster education, cultural values, skill development, and social engagement. In sum, the Bill aims to balance innovation and growth in online gaming with safeguards against its harmful effects, encouraging beneficial forms of digital play while protecting society from exploitative money gaming practices. Key Provisions of the Bill 1. Promotion and Recognition of e-ports E-sports recognised as a legitimate form of competitive sport in India. Ministry of Sports to frame guidelines and standards for conduct of E-sports events. Establishment of training academies, research centres, and technology platforms for advancement of e-sports. Incentive schemes, awareness campaigns and integration of e-sports into broader sports policy initiatives. 2. Promotion of Social and Educational Games Central Government empowered to recognise, categorise, and register online social games. Facilitation of platforms for development and distribution of safe, age-appropriate social and educational games. Awareness programmes on the positive role of social games in recreation, skill-development and digital literacy. Support for cultural and educational gaming content aligned with Indian values. 3. Prohibition of Harmful Online Money Games Complete ban on offering, operating, or facilitating online money games, irrespective of whether based on skill, chance, or both. Ban on advertising and promotion of money games across all forms of media. Ban on financial transactions linked to online money games; banks and payment systems barred from processing such payments. Empowerment to block access to unlawful gaming platforms under the Information Technology Act, 2000. 4. Establishment of an Online Gaming Authority Central Government to establish a national-level Authority or designate any existing Authority or Authorities or any agency for oversight. Functions include: Categorisation and registration of online games. Determination of whether a game qualifies as a money game. Handling complaints and grievances related to online games. Authority to issue guidelines, orders, and codes of practice to ensure compliance. 5. Offences and Penalties Offering or facilitating online money gaming: Imprisonment up to 3 years and/or fine up to ₹1 crore. Advertising money games: Imprisonment up to 2 years and/or fine up to ₹50 lakh. Financial transactions related to money games: Imprisonment up to 3 years and/or fine up to ₹1 crore. Repeat offences attract enhanced penalties, including imprisonment of 3–5 years and fines up to ₹2 crore. Offences under key sections to be cognizable and non-bailable. 6. Corporate and Institutional Liability Companies and their officers held liable for offences under the Act, unless they prove due diligence. Independent directors or non-executive directors not involved in decision-making are protected. 7. Powers of Investigation and Enforcement Central Government may authorise officers to investigate, search, and seize digital or physical property linked to offences. Officers empowered to enter, search, and arrest without warrant in certain cases of suspected offences. Provisions of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 apply to investigations under the Act. 8. Rule-Making Powers and Delegated Legislation Central Government empowered to make rules for: Promotion of e-sports and social gaming. Recognition, Categorisation and registration of online games. Powers and functioning of the Authority. any other matter required or permitted to be prescribed under this Act. Positive Impacts According the government the following are the positive impacts of the Bill on the economy, society and and the country's digital environment and global leadership: Boost to Creative Economy: Enhances India's role in global gaming exports, employment and innovation. Empowering Youth: Encourages constructive participation through e-sports and skill-based digital games. Safe Digital Environment: Protects families from predatory online money gaming practices. Global Leadership: Positions India as a leader in responsible gaming innovation and digital policy-making. The government claims that the Bill strikes a balanced path—encouraging innovation and youth engagement through safe and positive online gaming, while firmly prohibiting harmful online money games. It also reflects the government's commitment to a safe, secure, and innovation-driven Digital India that boosts creativity, safeguards citizens, and strengthens national security, the cabinet document said.
