
BROADCAST BIAS: The networks adored Trump 'tell all' books, but downplay books with Biden scoops
Back in 2018, ABC, CBS, and NBC awarded more than two hours and 20 minutes of breathless coverage to Michael Wolff in one week over his anti-Trump book "Fire and Fury." On NBC's "Today," co-host Savannah Guthrie nudged Wolff on Trump's mental fitness. "One of the overarching themes is that, according to your reporting, everyone around the President – senior advisers, family members, every single one of them – questions his intelligence and fitness for office."
Wolff eagerly underlined it: "Let me put a marker in the sand here: 100 percent of the people around him."
In August of 2018, they broke out the promotion machine again for former "Apprentice" star Omarosa Manigault-Newman and her tell-all book "Unhinged." ABC, CBS, and NBC rolled out 93 minutes of network coverage, as the author claimed from her time with Trump outside and inside the White House that he was a "racist" who had used the "N-word." NBC gave it the most time, perhaps doing penance for making Trump a national star on "The Apprentice." ABC's "Good Morning America" even hyped Omarosa's claim that Trump wanted to "start a race war."
These books came out in Trump's second year in office. The new Biden "tell-all" by Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson came out months after President Biden left the White House. When the first previews of the book emerged in The New Yorker and Axios, where we learned Biden didn't recognize actor George Clooney at a 2024 fundraiser and Biden aides pondered putting him in a wheelchair after the election, only NBC offered a short report summarizing the scoops. ABC, CBS, and PBS ignored it.
The pattern continued. Before the book came out on Tuesday, only NBC spent more than a minute on the book's findings on their morning and evening newscasts. ABC and CBS combined didn't even reach a full minute of coverage. "PBS News Hour" was the worst of the bunch. They aired absolutely no discussion of anything revealed in the book (although they did briefly allude to the existence of "a book.")
Of the Big Three, only CBS aired an interview with the authors. NPR aired interviews starting on Monday, and PBS followed on Thursday. "CBS Mornings" host Gayle King raised the obvious question of timing: "Why didn't you share it before, as soon as you got it, as opposed to gathering all the information then putting it out in a book that you will undoubtedly profit from?"
Tapper claimed they would have broken these scoops if they had found them in real time. But it's also true that Democrats felt freer after they lost the White House to tentatively (mostly anonymously) acknowledge to these authors they covered up or downplayed Biden's failings – despite large numbers of Americans saying Biden was too old to serve a second term.
Sadly, NBC was among the broadcast TV networks in playing a soundbite of audio from the just-released tapes of special counsel Robert Hur's questioning of President Biden from October 2023, a sentence of Biden not remembering when he was vice president. (NPR's "Fresh Air" also ran a Hur snippet in their Tapper interview.)
This matches how the networks avoided Hur before he decided not to indict Biden. From February 1 through November 20 in 2023, the Big Three networks (ABC, CBS, and NBC) could only muster four minutes and 52 seconds of overall coverage of Hur – combined. Almost all of that time was on ABC. By contrast, we counted 2,092 minutes of coverage of Trump and alleged Russian collusion from January 20, 2017 through December, 2018. That's a dramatic contrast.
While Tapper and Thompson expressed regrets in several interviews about how they were too gentle on Biden before this book and that conservative media were "right" to drive this issue during Biden's presidency, the networks weren't anything like Megyn Kelly in pressing that point of media spin. They didn't just engage in neglect of Biden's decline. They aggressively pushed the White House line that it was fringy MAGA talking points to question Biden's fitness.
Some TV journalists might publicly state "gee, we need to do better in the future" after this debacle. Some will use this to enhance the double standard, like they learned to be fierce in questioning President Trump's health disclosures. But they certainly displayed that during Trump's first term.
After the Tapper-Thompson parade ends, the betting money should be placed on the networks returning to their natural method, repeating the Democrat message of the day without seriously questioning it.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
a minute ago
- The Hill
Trump's odds of winning or losing his multitude of battles
In picking fights and waging wars on multiple fronts, President Trump should heed the advice of Britain's greatest sailor and naval hero Lord Horatio Nelson: Only a fool or a stupid ship's captain would ever fight a fort. While immobile, unlike ships, forts were better defended and protected. And forts were more easily reinforced, rearmed and resupplied by land than ships at sea, which then had to find suitable ports. Trump is not at sea except in the minds of his many critics, yet he has joined several simultaneous battles against forts. He has given Russia no more time beyond Monday's 10-day deadline to end the war in Ukraine. Former Russian President and Prime Minister Dimitri Medvedev has threatened nuclear war if Trump is not careful. In that regard, Russia is a formidable fort armed with nuclear weapons equal to America's. Trump started a global trade war with his announcement Friday of new tariffs, having struck a deal with the European Union while still negotiating with China. He seems to have picked a fight with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over relieving extreme starvation in Gaza, after having turned a Nelsonian blind eye toward an estimated 61,000 Palestinian deaths. And he surely is at war at home against so-called woke law firms and universities and, remarkably, a more than significant part of his MAGA base over refusing to come clean about his relationship with the deceased sexual predator Jeffrey Epstein. Whether Trump will prevail or fail in all, some or none of these battles will largely determine his administration's future and will almost certainly impact congressional elections in 2026 and the presidential vote in 2028, for which he is legally prevented from running. For most mere mortals, bookies would set the odds of failing or losing at least one of these battles as very low. Running the deck, however, would recoup a fortune in bets. Yet Trump's history has reversed all the odds against him. This makes any seemingly rational bet to the contrary exceedingly dumb. In this ability to overcome setbacks that would crush most people, Trump made Bill Clinton's reign as the ' The Comeback Kid ' seem both short and trivial. Will that luck hold out? War with Russia will not happen. Putin, however, will not be impressed or moved by the threat to force negotiations by imposing new sanctions or deploying two American nuclear submarines that somehow will annoy or worry Russia sufficiently to abandon its efforts. At the moment, while the war in Ukraine will not be fought to the last Russian, there are no compelling facts or arguments to convince Putin he is losing or needs to withdraw his forces. Quite the contrary. Similarly, in Gaza, Netanyahu's actions will determine America's. The relationship with Israel has grown so close over the decades since the 1956 and 1967 Arab-Israeli wars that the U.S. no longer tries or considers not giving Israel basically what it needs or demands. What could happen in these conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza, as with the Houthis, is that the U.S. withdraws and the situation reverts back to the pre-war days. The global trade war is different. The administration asserts that tariffs will not raise inflation and will generate greater economic growth. This argument is the equivalent of the ship commanded by Nelson's dim witted captain. Other states will react. The World Trade Organization and its agreed upon principles will become cannon fodder. Even though imports comprise only about 11 percent of U.S. total GDP, the effects of tariffs will be much greater. Unlike Gaza and Ukraine, of which Trump can wash his hands, the economy is not something that can be discarded like a used tissue. Trump will have to do something to explain or cover up any misjudgments. The only way for that to happen comes from the Trump playbook: Call the bad data 'fake news,' dissemble and stall — or cling to the belief that tariffs are working, despite all the contradictory evidence. Ironically, Epstein may be the problem that simply will not disappear — the fort that ultimately wins. Trump is trapped by his promise to release all the Epstein files. Suppose there are none and nothing more to release? Or suppose the files contain truly damaging revelations about Trump or his circle? There may be no way out. One conclusion is clear: The fewer fights picked, the better. And the chances of winning many are not odds most people would accept. Harlan Ullman, Ph.D., is UPI's Arnaud deBorchgrave Distinguished Columnist, a senior advisor at the Atlantic Council, the chairman of two private companies and the principal author of the doctrine of shock and awe. He and former United Kingdom Defense Chief David Richards are the authors of a forthcoming book on preventing strategic catastrophe.


Miami Herald
a minute ago
- Miami Herald
Why the surprise over Scots' reaction to Trump? Respect must be earned
Re: Mary Anna Mancuso's Aug. 1 op-ed, 'Scotland's protests should concern every American.' Why is she surprised by the Scots' reaction to President Trump's visit? What does she expect? Respectfully disagreeing with Trump gets one libeled on his online platform. Continuing to disagree gets one taken to court (and paying for that may require filing for bankruptcy). If one continues to strongly disagree, then threats of bodily harm against one and one's family begin. And when one is physically assaulted, Trump and his people laugh! The Scots are only giving Trump what he gave them: insults. His Scottish neighbors protested how he ran roughshod over the environment surrounding his golf courses, his attempts to stop energy-producing windmills from spoiling his view and his superior attitude toward them. They actually have to live with the results of his schemes. To get respect, one has to earn it. Threatening everyone who refuses to bow down to you won't earn you any respect. Corey Mass, Miami Beach Senate's carelessness In early 1972, I accepted an appointment by then-U.S. Sen. Edward J. Gurney of Florida to serve as an attorney to the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee. I traveled to Washington with aspirations of improving the federal judicial system. Then Watergate broke out. During the next two years, while assisting Gurney, who served on the Judiciary and Watergate Committees, I had a worm's eye view of the tumult, including revelations great and terrible. I witnessed young men of great promise and ability go to jail, but I also watched the testimony of Elliott Richardson and Bill Ruckleshouse, who resigned office rather than carry out an order they deemed wrong (if not legally, then morally). It made me realize that principles matter and that our government requires constant loyalty to the Constitution and the rule of law. Today, I see many parallels to the Watergate years, particularly when young lawyers disregard ethical considerations to further political ends, as by counseling defiance of court orders. Yet one distinction glares: during Watergate, the Senate joined the courts in investigating wrongdoing. I have every confidence today's courts will suffice under the doctrine of separation of powers, as federal judges are demonstrating daily, regardless who appointed them. I also have confidence that our military will withstand attempts to politicize it. However, it surely would help if the Senate were as concerned with the Constitution and the usurpation of their powers as they are with just getting reelected. R. Thomas Farrar, Miami Multiple articles have been published about the horrific boating accident last week on Biscayne Bay. Many of them referred to which boat had the 'right of way.' This terminology is misleading. On water, no boat has the 'right of way.' There is the 'give-way vessel,' which must take action to avoid a collision, or yield the right of way. There also is the stand-on vessel, which is supposed to maintain course. However, if it appears that the give-way vessel is not taking appropriate or adequate action to avoid a collision, the stand-on vessel then has the responsibility to maneuver to avoid a collision. While this might seem like semantics, it is important for all individuals operating a boat to know and understand. As has been mentioned in several articles, the determination of the give-way vessel and stand-on vessel varies based on many situations. Boating is a wonderful activity. Over the past few years, there have been many new recreational boat owners on our South Florida waters. Hopefully, they have been thoroughly educated in boating safety and operation and take care to avoid accidents. None of this will bring comfort to the victims and families of the recent tragedy, but education and knowledge will hopefully prevent future incidents. Seth Rosen, Pinecrest As a former high school social studies teacher, I would have to give Gov. Ron DeSantis a failing grade in American history and an A+ in making it up as he goes along. His 'civics excellence' program for Florida teachers is full of flat out lies, delusions, distortions and derangements, which fit very well within the core curriculum of his role model in the White House. Reconstructing the past to fit a delirious present is a slippery slope and depends on the assumption that Floridians are as ignorant as their chief executive. If that is the case, Florida has much larger problems than its residents can possibly comprehend. A search and destroy mission against the truth will have major unintended consequences. Undermining democracy requires the proper combination of fake news and fake history. Good luck with that recipe, Chef Ron. Craig Corsini, San Rafael, CA Last week's departure of ABC from WPLG Channel 10, after seven decades of affiliation, is quite alarming. I am old enough to remember when there was no ABC, but a Blue Network which was part of NBC, before breaking off into two networks. Apparently, Disney, which now owns ABC, offered less programming and higher fees, according to WPLG, hence their breakup. I also remember Disney when it was just happy producing films, then theme parks and now controlling Paramount and a broadcast network. Maybe Mickey is getting too big for his britches. Roger Shatanoff, Coral Gables In the Aug. 1 op-ed, 'Red states lead the charge to healthier living,' a Heritage Foundation analyst asserts that Florida's fluoride ban is an example of states' political and cultural realignments that will 'begin to change the health trajectory for their constituents.' True, but not in a good way. Why would anyone desire a political legacy that includes rotting kids' teeth? Bob Ross, Pinecrest As a high school senior who actively rides the Metrorail, I've been following the Miami Herald's recent stories on the impact of construction delays on local traffic. According to a July 7 report, the Future-Ready Modernization in Action plan to expand Miami International Airport will result in a 20 million passenger increase by 2040. Even though 2,240 additional parking spaces are planned to accommodate this growth, it's unclear that our roads can absorb the increase in rental cars, taxis and Ubers. Projects like the Signature Bridge will increase highway capacity; however, the completion date has been delayed by two years. Short-term solutions should be made available to daily commuters. We should use something like Miami-Dade's 'Better Bus Plan.' I took Metrorail to school using this six-week, fare-free promotion. It was clean, efficient and reduced my commute. Charles Holleman, Miami The detention center dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz,' hosted by Gov. Ron DeSantis, President Trump and their own military with cult followers, mirrors what Argentina experienced during its period of dictatorship. That regime's detention center/prison held in isolation those it snatched from daily life, then deported them. Without human rights, legal process or outside communication, detainees were drugged, abused and tortured. Pregnant women were allowed to live until after giving birth. In some cases, their babies were given to military officers' families wanting a child. View some of the documentaries about Argentina's 'Dirty War' to understand our own political unrest. Our political climate is repeating this history. Are U.S. citizens so blinded with loyalty to this type of leadership, or lack thereof, not to realize the destruction to our Constitution? It's time to take back control of public education, fact-based news and publications and the judicial system. Reel in religious institutions that spew hate and white supremacy in preaching while enjoying a tax-free platform. Jail the real criminals. Kimberly Cole, Kendall


Boston Globe
a minute ago
- Boston Globe
Trump praises Sydney Sweeney ad, attacks Elizabeth Warren in social media posts
In the ad, Sweeney, who has blonde hair and blue eyes, says, 'Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality, and even eye color. My jeans are blue.' American Eagle has Advertisement On Sunday, Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'She's a registered Republican?' Trump said. 'Oh, now I love her ad. Is that right? You'd be surprised at how many people are Republicans. That's one I wouldn't have known, but I'm glad you told me that. If Sydney Sweeney is a registered Republican, I think her ad is fantastic.' American Eagle stock After his post about Sweeney, Trump turned to Warren, attacking her comments during a Advertisement 'Remember, Donald Trump ran for office saying he would lower costs on day one. Cost of groceries are up. Cost of housing is up, cost of health care is up, and where is Donald Trump?' Warren told CNBC. Warren also criticized Trump's economic agenda, saying he's 'passing a signature bill to throw people off their health care so he can do tax cuts for billionaires.' Trump Trump went on to mock her unsuccessful presidential run and revived his longstanding attacks, Trump has Alyssa Vega can be reached at