Mount Pleasant Town Council discusses plan to protect wetlands
MOUNT PLEASANT, S.C. (WCBD) – The Town of Mount Pleasant is discussing how to protect wetlands at the local level.
The flood resilience committee agenda item comes as the Town of Bluffton has lost nearly 500 of acres of wetlands. Officials are attempting to take a proactive approach on one of the town's most valuable natural resources.
'You cannot wait on resiliency issues until you need it because if you wait until you need it, you're years behind the curve,' said Will Haynie, mayor of Mount Pleasant.
The ordinances the town is considering includes zoning permits, development restriction, enforcement, and staff to facilitate this initiative.
'Two things. One is wetlands are important even quote isolated wetlands because they can hold a million and a half gallons of water. So, they're important one – as part of our ecosystem, but also part of green infrastructure,' Haynie said. 'If that water gets displaced, guess who has to pay for it to be managed, collected, and dispersed – and that's the taxpayers.'
The mayor added he has spoken to his constituents, who prefer these potential ordinances rather than bearing the cost of losing these wetlands. Environmental organization, Charleston Waterkeeper, said this is a step in the right direction.
'This great news, the Town of Mount Pleasant should be commended for this great effort. At the federal level, we're losing protections for wetlands and as everybody knows – the Lowcountry is one big wetland,' Andrew Wunderley, executive director of Charleston Waterkeeper, said. 'So, anything we can being doing at the local level to protect wetlands from being destroyed is going to be wonderful for our community both in terms of water quality and habitat quality. But also in terms of resiliency.'
Additionally, in San Francisco v. EPA, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Clean Water Act applies to continuous connections of bodies of water. This is what states used to protect water quality, but officials said the ruling puts more of the Lowcountry at risk for losing protections.
'I think it's also important for folks to remember what it was like before the Clean Water Act. Before the Clean Water Act, we had no sewage treatment. Raw sewage was discharged straight into the Charleston Harbor. Rivers in the industrial Northeast and Midwest often caught on fire because they were so polluted,' Wunderley said. 'Over the last 50 plus years, the Clean Water Act has done a lot to protect water quality at the local level.'
Haynie believes by moving this initiative forward, it will allow other municipalities to follow suit.
'A lot of things of resiliency are done this way. One municipality takes the lead and others see it and follow. That was the case when we did plastic bags, six-seven years ago,' Haynie said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
US government sparks outrage with controversial decision on massive stretch of public land: 'We won't stay silent'
A sweeping environmental decision is raising major concerns about the future of America's wild spaces. The federal government is moving to roll back protections on a massive stretch of public land in Alaska, potentially opening the door to more dirty energy development in one of the country's most sensitive ecosystems. The U.S. government has announced plans to reverse a major public land safeguard, opening up 23 million acres of the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska (NPR-A) to oil drilling and mining. The move would undo a December 2023 executive order from President Joe Biden that had blocked fossil fuel development in this remote Arctic region. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum announced the change on June 2, arguing that the earlier protections hindered energy independence, according to reporting by the Guardian. Burgum was joined by EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin and Energy Secretary Chris Wright, showing the administration's full-court press in favor of dirty energy expansion. But environmental groups say this shift prioritizes corporate profits over public health and natural heritage. "The Trump administration's move to roll back protections in the most ecologically important areas of the Western Arctic threatens wildlife, local communities, and our climate," Kristen Miller, executive director of the Alaska Wilderness League, explained in a statement. The NPR-A provides essential habitat for caribou, polar bears, and migratory birds, and it's been central to the food, culture, and way of life for Indigenous communities for generations. Opening up this much land to oil and gas drilling could add more pollution to our air and water and disrupt fragile ecosystems. The NPR-A is the largest single stretch of public land in the country and helps keep air clean, protect biodiversity, and support the cultural and economic traditions of local communities. Do you think America does a good job of protecting its natural beauty? Definitely Only in some areas No way I'm not sure Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. More fossil fuel development also adds to the heat-trapping pollution that's warming our planet and straining public health systems. We've already seen backlash to similar Arctic projects, like the Willow Project, a major drilling proposal approved in 2023, which sparked widespread opposition over its long-term risks. Conservation advocates are gearing up to fight back by preparing lawsuits, and grassroots campaigns are gaining traction. "The public fought hard for these protections," Miller said. "We won't stay silent while they're dismantled." At the local level, Utah's push to save the Great Salt Lake is showing what dedicated community action can achieve, and it's inspiring similar efforts nationwide. New York now requires all-electric new buildings, while California is phasing out gas-powered cars. These efforts cut harmful pollution and help speed the shift toward cleaner, healthier energy. You can take part by reducing home energy waste, switching to electric appliances, or choosing a clean electricity plan. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.

Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Taylor introduces bill to connect rural communities with water resource programs
Jun. 9—WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. Rep. Dave Taylor, R-Ohio, introduced the Water Resources Technical Assistance Review Act to ensure the responsible usage of taxpayer dollars in federal programs and help rural communities navigate water funding resource programs available through the Environmental Protection Agency. Taylor serves as the vice chairman of the Water Resources and Environment Subcommittee of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. During the Biden-Harris Administration, the EPA established the Water Technical Assistance (WaterTA) Program, an initiative meant to address gaps in the accessibility of water resource programs. However, Taylor's office said they have received reports that this program has not been implemented correctly, ultimately boxing out rural communities from accessing the water resource funds that should be available to them. "Unfortunately, many rural communities in southern Ohio are left on the outside looking in when it comes to accessing federal funds, including the resources and technical expertise needed for critical water and wastewater projects," Taylor said. "I am leading the charge to reform this Biden-era program so rural communities can access the water assistance they should have been receiving all along." Specifically, the Water Resources Technical Assistance Review Act would: —Direct the U.S. Government Accountability Office to evaluate EPA's clean water technical assistance, authorities, initiatives, and programs from the past five years, with an emphasis on the WaterTA Program; —Require GAO to submit a report to the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee and the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee outlining their findings, with recommendations to improve EPA's clean water technical assistance programs; —Require the EPA to develop and submit a compliance plan to Congress based on GAO's recommendations. You Might Like News 'Trailheads of remembrance' News Man in cape, underwear breaks into West Portsmouth Dollar General News Proctorville woman killed in WV crash News Former local meteorologist arrested

E&E News
10 hours ago
- E&E News
‘Cognitive dissonance': Trump's science policy at odds with MAHA goals
The White House's inaugural 'Make America Healthy Again' report decried industry influence over environmental regulations. President Donald Trump's scientific integrity order, signed one day later, doesn't even refer to political interference. The May 23 executive order spelling out the standards for top-tier science 'doesn't mention the elephant in the room, which is political interference,' said Jennifer Orme-Zavaleta, who recently retired as EPA's head of its research office after nearly 40 years with the agency. 'In fact, they almost seem to be encouraging it,' she continued. Advertisement Absent from the order are any mentions about independence to ensure federal researchers can do their work without political influence. That could be crucial for EPA, where Trump administration officials are planning to dissolve the agency's only office dedicated to independent research.