logo
Waqf law rules drafted, may be approved in 15-20 days: Officials

Waqf law rules drafted, may be approved in 15-20 days: Officials

Hindustan Times6 hours ago

New Delhi The Union minority affairs ministry has drafted rules to operationalise the controversial Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 and sent it to the Union law ministry, officials told HT on Thursday, adding that the rules could be approved within 15-20 days, paving the way for their presentation in the upcoming monsoon session from July 21.
The contentious amendments to the central waqf law, which aims to make sweeping changes in the regulation and management of Islamic charitable endowments, was cleared by Parliament in April. The Supreme Court has reserved its judgment on a raft of petitions asking for a stay on some of the law's controversial provisions.
A senior minority affairs ministry official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said the rules were drafted in 'record time' following the law's passage on April 4.
'We have recently sent it to the law ministry and solicitor general Tushar Mehta for final approval and finishing touches,' the official said. 'Once approved there, it goes to the Centre for final sign-off, then notification in the public gazette.'
Former secretary general PDT Achary told HT that there is 'absolutely no rule and requirement for the government to first notify the parliament about the rules and then notify.' 'As soon as the rules are approved, they can be uploaded and publicly notified through the gazette and come into effect. The government has to table it in the Parliament but there is no rule about the rules being notified to the parliament first,' he said.
Union Minister for minority affairs Kiren Rijiju separately confirmed that the rules are with the law ministry for finishing touches.
A waqf is a Muslim religious endowment, usually in the form of landed property, made for purposes of charity and community welfare. The draft bill, introduced by the government last year and amended after recommendations by a joint parliamentary committee, proposed major changes in the regulation and governance of India's waqf boards.
The law accords more power to the government and allows for the appointment of non-Muslims and women to waqf boards, but the Opposition alleged it is unconstitutional.
The rules are crucial because they will not only operationalise the changes but also clarify key procedures in registration of waqf properties, working of the central portal, and norms guiding the picking of members in the council.
The law scraps the waqf by user provision – where a property is acknowledged as waqf because it has been used for religious activities for some time, despite there being no official declaration or registration as waqf – with prospective effect, permits women, Shia sects and government officials to be members of waqf bodies, and gives overriding power to senior officials to determine if a government property belongs to a waqf.
The law also allows only a person 'showing or demonstrating that he is practising Islam for at least five years' to donate properties to waqf and stipulates that women and other rightful heirs can't be denied their inheritance due to the creation of a waqf.
The official cited above expressed confidence that the government will be able to push through the rules before the next session of Parliament. 'The process should take a few days. We hope the rules will be published within 15-20 days, in time for tabling in the monsoon session,' the official cited above said. 'It is a huge achievement... we did not think the process would be this seamless. We had good support from the states and completed the final rules drafting in record time.'
Approximately 15-20 stakeholder consultations with states, other ministries, and groups occurred during the drafting process, the official said. 'Every single updated draft, no matter how minor the changes, was shared with the states for their views. Each state participated without exceptions,' the official added, requesting anonymity.
In India, rules under a newly enacted law are notified by the relevant ministry through publication in the official gazette, exercising authority granted by specific provisions within the parent Act itself. The Waqf act also states it. While this core notification process isn't detailed in the Constitution, the crucial requirement for subsequent parliamentary scrutiny flows from it. Mandated by the Rules of Procedure of the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha – framed under Articles 118(1) and 208(1) of the Constitution respectively, and reinforced by the Delegated Legislation Provisions (Amendment) Act, 1983 – these notified rules must be laid before both Houses of Parliament within 30 days, where they can be modified or annulled.
The act states, 'Every rule made by the Central Government under this Act shall be laid, as soon as may be after it is made, before each House of Parliament, while it is in session, for a total period of thirty days which may be comprised in one session or in two or more successive sessions, and if, before the expiry of the session immediately following the session or the successive sessions aforesaid, both Houses agree in making any modification in the rule or both Houses agree that the rule should not be made, the rule shall thereafter have effect only in such modified form or be of no effect, as the case may be; so, however, that any such modification or annulment shall be without prejudice to the validity of anything previously done under that rule.'
Activists, opposition parties and bodies such as the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) have already challenged key provisions of the new law. On May 22, the top court reserved judgment on petitions challenging the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, after hearing arguments on an interim stay.
The official quoted above clarified that the rules will provide 'finer operational details', particularly concerning the newly launched UMEED (Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development) portal. The portal aims to create a centralised digital inventory with geo-tagging of all Waqf properties, establish an online grievance redressal system, enable transparent leasing and usage tracking, integrate with GIS mapping, and provide public access to verified records. Rules governing this portal will form a significant part of the final notified rules, the official said.
This official said that incorporating the recommendations of the joint parliamentary committee, which examined an earlier iteration of the bill, received special attention during the drafting of rules. 'We want an all inclusive approach to it,' the official said.
'Even if the Supreme Court says something, we will just make the changes in the rules but since the act has been passed and received the President's assent, we will notify rules,' the official stated.
Groundwork for implementing the new law has already commenced. The minority affairs ministry wrote to all chief secretaries last week, directing them to train district-level officers. These officers will subsequently train mutawallis (waqf property managers) and other officials involved. 'The biggest task for implementing the rules is capacity building so we have already started with the same,' the official explained. 'As a Union ministry, we can train state level officers but the states will in turn have to train district level officers... so they can be in a good position to implement the rules once notified.'
Once the central rules are notified, the ministry's next task involves formulating model rules for states. A 4-5 member committee comprising retired law ministry officers and other experts has been tasked with creating these model rules, which states can then adapt according to their specific contexts.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kalanithi bought 12 lakh shares for Rs 1.2 crore when value was Rs 3,500 crore: Former Union minister Dayanidhi Maran big allegation against elder brother
Kalanithi bought 12 lakh shares for Rs 1.2 crore when value was Rs 3,500 crore: Former Union minister Dayanidhi Maran big allegation against elder brother

Time of India

time42 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Kalanithi bought 12 lakh shares for Rs 1.2 crore when value was Rs 3,500 crore: Former Union minister Dayanidhi Maran big allegation against elder brother

CHENNAI: Former Union minister Dayanidhi Maran has accused his elder brother and media baron Kalanithi Maran of acquiring 12 lakh shares of Sun TV Private Limited in 2003 for just Rs 1.2 crore, despite their actual value being around Rs 3,500 crore at the time. In a legal notice, Dayanidhi alleged that Kalanithi did so without proper valuation, consent from other shareholders, or any fair consideration — thereby unlawfully becoming the majority shareholder overnight. According to the notice, till September 15, 2003, Kalanithi did not hold a single share in the company. However, during the critical illness of their uncle Murasoli Maran in September that year, Kalanithi allegedly allotted the shares to himself at a face value of Rs 10 each, diluting the original promoters' holdings. Dayanidhi claims this act was fraudulent and a breach of fiduciary duty. The notice states that shares were transmitted from group companies just three days after Murasoli Maran's death on November 23, 2003 — even before his death certificate was issued. 'There could not have been any legitimate death certificate or legal heirship certificate available to any party on November 26, 2003,' the notice said, calling the transfer void and fraudulent. Dayanidhi has accused Kalanithi of using this control to divert company funds, including purchasing shares from their aunt Dayalu Ammal for Rs 100 crore using Sun TV's own funds. He alleges that the company's first-ever dividend was declared fraudulently in 2005 to finance this deal. If Dayalu had retained her shares, she would have earned the same amount through dividends, the notice states. He has also questioned a 2005 transaction in which 1,14,999 shares were transferred from Mallika Maran to Kalanithi at Rs 10 per share, despite Kalanithi having bought shares from Dayalu just weeks earlier at Rs 3,173.04 apiece. The notice further points to an earlier legal notice issued by Dayanidhi on October 7, 2024, which allegedly led to a Rs 500 crore payment to their sister Anbukkarasi, another legal heir of Murasoli Maran. He described the payment as an attempt to suppress the truth and prevent her from exposing 'illegal acts'. Calling for restoration of the shareholding to its original structure as on September 15, 2003, Dayanidhi warned that he would approach the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO), SEBI, Enforcement Directorate and other authorities if corrective steps were not taken within a week. He also threatened to seek cancellation of Sun TV's media licences, the Sunrisers Hyderabad IPL franchise, and SpiceJet's aviation licence. The legal notice has been sent to eight individuals, including Kalanithi Maran, his wife Kavery Kalanithi — who is accused of drawing an annual salary of Rs 87.5 crore — and several financial advisors allegedly involved in the transactions.

HT Explainer: Why are Haryana agri varsity students up in arms
HT Explainer: Why are Haryana agri varsity students up in arms

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

HT Explainer: Why are Haryana agri varsity students up in arms

Students at Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University (CCSHAU), Hisar, have been protesting since June 10 following a violent clash with university staff. The protest has drawn widespread attention due to allegations of assault, administrative inaction, and political interference. HT's Staff Correspondent Sunil Rahar explains. --- Why the CCSHAU protest began The agitation started on June 10 when students were protesting outside vice-chancellor BR Kamboj's residence against recent changes to the university's stipend structure and the rollback of seat reservations for Land Donation Villages (LDV). Tensions escalated when security guards and university officials allegedly resorted to a lathi-charge, injuring at least 20 students. Among them, BSc (Agriculture) student Deepanshu Kadian sustained a head injury requiring six stitches, while final-year student Chakshu needed 30 stitches. --- What changes to the stipend policy triggered the unrest Until recently, MSc and PhD scholars were eligible for stipends if they scored above 70% or maintained a 7 OGPA. The new policy increased the eligibility threshold to 75% or 7.5 OGPA and limited stipends to just 25% of students. Students argue this new system is exclusionary and unfair, especially as it deviates from the norms of the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR). They are demanding a complete rollback and restoration of the previous eligibility criteria. --- What steps have the police and university taken so far Hisar police have booked eight university officials and staff, including registrar Pawan Kumar, assistant professor Radhe Shyam Manju, chief security officer Sukhbir Singh, and five guards. Charges under the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita include rioting, criminal intimidation, and attempt to commit culpable homicide. Radhe Shyam, seen in a video chasing students with a stick, was arrested and sent to judicial custody for 14 days. The university, meanwhile, has formed a three-member committee to engage with students and has suspended Radhe Shyam along with four security guards allegedly involved in the alleged lathi charge. The administration has also agreed to reverse the recent changes in scholarship and LDV policies. --- Why students are continuing their protest despite these actions Students insist that the protest will continue until vice-chancellor Kamboj resigns, as they hold him responsible for allowing the violence to happen and for not addressing their concerns in person. They are also demanding the arrest of the remaining accused named in the FIR, termination of key officials, and protection from disciplinary action for those involved in the protest. Allegations have also emerged that police, including male personnel, were sent to girls' hostels to pressure students into appearing for exams—claims that have further angered the student community. --- What the response from political parties and the public has been The protest has drawn strong support from opposition parties including Congress, the Indian National Lok Dal (INLD), and the Jannayak Janata Party (JJP). Senior Congress leaders such as Deepender Hooda, Randeep Surjewala, and Kumari Selja have visited the protest site, while national president Mallikarjun Kharge has promised to raise the issue in Parliament. BJP MP Dharambir Singh has also condemned the lathi-charge and expressed support for the students' right to protest. Meanwhile, INLD's Abhay Chautala has accused the VC of holding fake degrees and being unfit to lead the university. Alumni have also raised concerns about corruption and nepotism under Kamboj's tenure.

Himachal Pradesh: Prohibitory orders over communal tension in Paonta villages extended till June 26
Himachal Pradesh: Prohibitory orders over communal tension in Paonta villages extended till June 26

New Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • New Indian Express

Himachal Pradesh: Prohibitory orders over communal tension in Paonta villages extended till June 26

NAHAN (HP): Prohibitory orders imposed in the villages of Paonta Sahib area of Himachal Pradesh's Sirmaur district due to apprehensions of a communal flare-up has been extended till June 26, officials said on Friday. Two groups had clashed on June 13 over elopement of a Hindu-Muslim couple. Due to "prevailing communal tension and volatile law and order situation" prohibitory orders already in force since June 13 in five villages -- Kiratpur, Malion, Fatehpur, Missarwala and Majra -- under the Majra police station in Poanta subdivision, has been extended till June 26 by District Magistrate Priyanka Verma, an order issued on Thursday night said. According to the order issued under Section 163 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, there will be a complete ban on the assembly of five or more persons, carrying lethal weapons, public rally, procession or hunger strike, carrying any kind of inflammable material, pelting stones or any objectionable material in public places and delivering inflammatory speeches or communal or anti-state speeches within the boundaries of these villages.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store