logo
After FBI Warning, Alaska Airlines Grounded; Salt Typhoon Suspected

After FBI Warning, Alaska Airlines Grounded; Salt Typhoon Suspected

Forbes21-07-2025
Alaska Airlines grounded its jets during a sudden systemwide halt in operations, highlighting ... More growing concerns over aviation cybersecurity and digital infrastructure resilience.
Late Sunday evening on July 21, 2025, Alaska Airlines grounded all of its mainline aircraft due to what it described as a 'technology issue.' Operations halted at approximately 8 p.m. Pacific Time and resumed just before 11 p.m., but delays rippled into Monday morning, a peak travel period across U.S. airports. Horizon Air, its regional partner, was also impacted. The timing, the scale and the abruptness of the incident set off alarm bells across both aviation and cybersecurity communities.
On June 27, 2025, the FBI issued a chilling warning that America's airlines are under active cyber threat. That warning now appears increasingly justified. The Alaska Airlines outage, while not officially confirmed as a cyberattack, bears the hallmarks of the kind of disruption federal agencies have been cautioning against: targeted, sudden and systemwide.
This was not an isolated glitch in airline, aviation or airport systems. It was the latest and most visible example of the growing digital fragility that now defines modern infrastructure. It may also be the clearest signal yet that the airline industry must be treated as critical infrastructure, not just in policy but in cybersecurity investment, threat modeling and coordinated response planning.
The Cracks Are Widening
This is not the first time Alaska Airlines has faced operational turbulence linked to technology. In April, a weight and balance software failure led to a full fleet grounding. In January 2024, a door plug detached mid-flight, exposing deep flaws in inspection protocols. And in August 2024, a major cyber incident at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, Alaska's primary hub, triggered a temporary airport shutdown. Flights were delayed, baggage systems failed and communication networks were severely disrupted. The breach was later attributed to a foreign adversary targeting airport infrastructure, and although no lives were lost, the impact on travel, commerce and public confidence was significant.
These incidents may differ in origin, but they reveal an industry with the same underlying vulnerability, and increasingly dependent on digital systems with limited resilience and redundancy. Airlines today are digital-first operations. Every flight dispatch, crew assignment, maintenance record and gate assignment depends on software. When that software fails or is compromised, the damage is not measured in lost productivity alone. It affects lives, safety and the stability of national infrastructure.
Likely Culprit? Salt Typhoon And The Expanding Cyber Battlefield
Although Alaska Airlines has not formally attributed this latest disruption to a cyberattack, many in the cybersecurity community are watching closely. One name that continues to surface is Salt Typhoon.
Salt Typhoon is a Chinese state-sponsored threat actor linked to the Ministry of State Security. It has built a reputation for targeting telecom networks, government systems, and infrastructure operators across the United States and allied nations. In 2024, the group successfully infiltrated nine major American telecom providers, gaining access to surveillance routers, administrative credentials and internal metadata flows.
Even more alarming was Salt Typhoon's breach of a U.S. Army National Guard unit. That intrusion began in March 2024 and remained undetected until December. The attackers quietly exfiltrated sensitive configuration files, administrator credentials, internal network diagrams and personnel rosters. According to federal briefings, the attackers had access to virtual private network appliances and domain controllers. That level of penetration enabled not just espionage, but the potential for real-world disruption of military readiness.
The Department of Homeland Security responded with a chilling warning: all U.S. military units must now operate under the assumption that their networks are compromised. This is not theoretical. It is a national security posture shift.
Salt Typhoon's specialty lies in stealth and persistence. Its tools are designed for long-term access, manipulation of edge infrastructure, and preparation for future sabotage. They do not need to launch a full-scale attack immediately. They simply need a foothold. And they are increasingly gaining those footholds in the same types of routers, VPNs and network layers that civilian airlines rely on every day.
The fact that Salt Typhoon has demonstrated the ability to compromise military networks for nearly a year without detection should raise serious questions about the aviation sector's preparedness. Because in today's threat landscape, the line between military and civilian infrastructure is thinner than ever.
Airlines Critical Infrastructure Soft Targets
The Alaska Airlines incident may not ultimately be confirmed as a cyberattack. But the conditions are absolutely ripe for one. Commercial aviation checks every box for high-value critical infrastructure and yet remains one of the most exposed sectors.
To make matters worse, support from the federal government is diminishing. Recent cuts at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency have left fewer resources to assist or intervene. That pushes more responsibility onto private carriers without the tools or funding to keep pace.
Airlines are essential. They are everywhere. And they are underprepared. Unless aviation is treated like the critical infrastructure it is, the next outage may not be a warning. It may be a wake-up call too late.
Responsibility Is Shifting To Private Sector
As federal cybersecurity resources tighten, the private sector must step forward. Airlines, airports, maintenance providers and travel technology companies must now act as if they are on the front lines of national defense. Because they are.
We are entering a new era where IT outages can serve as camouflage for cyberattacks. Where a grounded fleet may be the canary in the coal mine. And where securing our skies will require more than airport screenings and reinforced cockpit doors.
This situation is not unprecedented. The defense industrial base has already faced similar vulnerabilities. In response, the Department of Defense created the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification, to establish a scalable and certifiable framework for cybersecurity across contractors.
Airlines would benefit from adopting a similar model. CMMC principles offer a structured path forward:
Cybersecurity in aviation can no longer be viewed as optional. A single weak link in the chain is all it takes to compromise a fleet. The only path forward is a unified industry-wide commitment to resilience, accountability and protection.
A Wake-Up Call At Thirty Thousand Feet
The Alaska Airlines outage is not just another IT incident. It is a warning. A fragile digital backbone. A growing global threat. A clear sign of unpreparedness across one of the nation's most essential industries.
It is time to formally designate airlines as critical infrastructure. It is time to implement cybersecurity frameworks like CMMC across the aviation ecosystem. And it is time to invest in the tools, talent and systems required to protect not just networks but lives.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump, Carney to speak soon, Canadian official says
Trump, Carney to speak soon, Canadian official says

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump, Carney to speak soon, Canadian official says

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -President Donald Trump and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney will likely talk "over the next number of days" after the U.S. imposed a 35% tariff on goods not covered by the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade agreement, a Canadian official said on Sunday. Dominic LeBlanc, the federal cabinet minister in charge of U.S.-Canada trade, told CBS News' "Face the Nation" that he believes there is an option of striking a deal that will bring down tariffs. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Women call the shots across the supply chain at tequila brand 1953
Women call the shots across the supply chain at tequila brand 1953

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Women call the shots across the supply chain at tequila brand 1953

Listen and subscribe to The Big Idea on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you find your favorite podcasts. When Shivam Mallick Shah and Lindsey Davis Stover founded the tequila brand 1953, they wanted to make moves in an industry that was becoming increasingly popular among their own demographic while also opening doors for other women. As the brand proudly states on its website, 1953 is "Founded, Farmed, Distilled, and Led by Women." On Yahoo Finance's The Big Idea podcast, the two entrepreneurs shared how they managed to pull off such a feat in a historically male-dominated industry. (Watch the full episode above; listen-only below.) "I just kind of got down this rabbit hole of where the women in tequila are, unfortunately, really hard to find. So that kind of led us to this idea," Davis Stover, a Texas native, said on the podcast. "We were drinking tequila. Every woman we knew is drinking tequila," she continued. "So we wanted to create a company that was founded, farmed, distilled, and led by women at every single level. Even our name, 1953, is the year women earned the right to vote in Mexico. I think that is just the essence of our company and providing opportunities for women." This embedded content is not available in your region. "People didn't think it was necessary to have a female-led supply chain," Shah said. "They didn't think that it would make a difference in the quality of the product, and they didn't think that, frankly, we could do it. They had a lot of strong opinions on what we could do, and it was different than what we wanted to do." Shah and Davis Stover tackled their mission by completing their search in an "organic way," talking with people who worked at distilleries and farms in Mexico. Eventually, they found Carmen and Adriana, who ran the family-owned distillery that 1953 would eventually use. "Their family has owned this distillery for over a hundred years, and they have trained a female master distiller, Rocio Rodriguez, who signs every bottle," Shah explained. "She had this incredible story of having come to this distillery when she was pregnant. She was trained as a chemical engineer, but she was worried about losing her job. Carmen and Adriana's families decided to build a nursery so she could come to work and bring her whole self, which has, of course, changed her life, but it changed so many people's lives." Though their journey to creating a brand with a strong female focus had its roadblocks, the biggest hurdle was finding a woman-owned agave farm. Traditionally, agave farms in Mexico are passed down from father to son, but Carmen and Adriana helped the entrepreneurs find the farm they partner with today. "We could not find an agave farm owned by women," Shah said. "Carmen and Adriana helped us find a gentleman who only had four daughters. We met with them, and we talked about what we were trying to build. We asked him if he would consider passing his farm down to his daughters if we guaranteed purchase of agave from their farms for 1953." After a family meeting in which the four women discussed the proposition with their husbands and father, they ultimately agreed, deciding to take on the responsibility and risk to help complete 1953's women-led supply chain. "They had grown up on this farm, and they knew it like the back of their hand, but they never saw themselves as CEOs. They never saw themselves as the people in charge of running the farm," Shah explained. "What made them think differently was the high school down the street and all the girls who were in that high school, just like they used to be, and wanting to let those girls know that there was nothing they couldn't do. ... It was a motivation we all shared, and we knew we had an alignment of our values, which told us we were in the right place. And that really completed our supply chain." Every Thursday, Elizabeth Gore discusses real-life stories and smart strategies for launching a small business on The Big Idea podcast. You can find more episodes on our video hub or watch on your preferred streaming service. Sign up for the Mind Your Money newsletter Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Rail customers urge regulators to block Union Pacific-Norfolk Southern deal, FT reports
Rail customers urge regulators to block Union Pacific-Norfolk Southern deal, FT reports

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Rail customers urge regulators to block Union Pacific-Norfolk Southern deal, FT reports

(Reuters) -U.S. railroad customer groups have demanded regulators block or put onerous conditions on the proposed merger of Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern, the Financial Times reported on Sunday. Seven associations of shippers have expressed concern the planned deal would significantly increase the power of the merged railroad to raise prices or reduce service standards, the report said. Last month, Union Pacific said it would buy smaller rival Norfolk Southern in an $85 billion deal to create the first U.S. coast-to-coast freight rail operator and reshape the movement of goods from grains to autos across the country. The two railroads are expected to have a combined enterprise value of $250 billion and would unlock about $2.75 billion in annualized synergies, the companies said. Reuters could not immediately verify the FT report. Norfolk Southern and Union Pacific did not immediately respond to Reuters' requests for comment. Previously, the transportation division of SMART, the International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, said it plans to oppose the merger when it comes before the Surface Transportation Board for review. Major railroad unions have long opposed consolidation, arguing such mergers threaten jobs and risk disrupting rail service. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer also criticized the merger saying the deal would push "us even further down the road of dangerous consolidation and monopoly power ... This is a hostile takeover of America's infrastructure."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store