logo
'Class war': outsiders moving to Puerto Rico trigger displacement

'Class war': outsiders moving to Puerto Rico trigger displacement

Yahoo6 days ago
Gloria Cuevas thought she would live forever in her pink, century-old house on Puerto Rico's west coast -- but then her landlord decided to transform the home into an Airbnb.
Cuevas left her home -- now purple and split in two -- and her beloved city for another further south, forced out by the rising cost of living and an explosion of short-term rentals on the US Caribbean island territory.
Puerto Rico -- long a draw for sun-worshipping tourists -- is also a hotspot for foreign investment and offers tax incentives to attract outsiders.
"At first, I couldn't come back here," Cuevas, 68, told AFP, gazing at the home she once made her own. "It made me feel sad and angry at the same time."
Cuevas's experience is becoming an all too familiar tale across the island, where signs promote mansions for sale, and the Airbnb logo is plastered on homes where locals once lived.
Intensifying Puerto Rico's gentrification are laws that encourage primarily wealthy mainland Americans to move there in exchange for preferential tax treatment.
The program originally enacted in 2012 was meant to spur economic growth and attract investment on the island, an unincorporated territory under US control since 1898.
Those relocating must acquire residency and buy property to keep the significant incentives -- but many Puerto Ricans as well as some US lawmakers say this is driving up housing prices and encouraging tax evasion.
"Colonialism kills us, it suffocates us," Cuevas said. "It's a global theme. It's a class war."
- 'Unfair' -
Ricki Rebeiro, 30, moved to San Juan more than a year ago, bringing his packaging and marketing business that services cannabis companies with him.
He told AFP that basing his work in Puerto Rico saves his company millions of dollars annually, and that he pays zero personal income tax -- what amounts to the equivalent of "a whole second income" that he says he tries to reinvest locally.
"I believe that the locals are probably upset that they're not reaping the same benefits of somebody like me," said the entrepreneur, whose family is based in Pennsylvania and Oklahoma.
The system is "unfair," Rebeiro said, "but I also don't believe that I should be the one to blame for that. I didn't structure the program."
Puerto Ricans in recent years have slammed their government for what they say is a hyperfocus on outsiders at the expense of locals, as the rich -- including people like the famous content creator-turned-boxer Jake Paul -- move in.
- 'This is ours' -
In Cabo Rojo, a seaside city about an hour's drive south of Rincon on the island's western coast, some residents are taking the matter into their own hands.
During a recent canvassing effort, a group of activists urged their neighbors to protest a massive development project called Esencia, which would transform more than 2,000 acres (810 hectares) of recreational land and more than three miles of beaches into a $2 billion luxury resort and residential development.
Dafne Javier's family goes back generations in this area -- her great-grandfather was the last mayor in the municipality under Spanish occupation, and the first under US rule.
The 77-year-old said the Esencia project would "totally change the landscape," creating a gated town within a town.
Protesters say it would destroy the natural habitat of some endangered species, while exacerbating problems with potable water, electricity supply and trash pick-up.
Project investors have called Puerto Rico "one of the most promising growth markets in the world" and vowed Esencia would create "thousands of jobs."
But those jobs will be minimum wage, Javier predicted, and the wealthy newcomers "won't mix with us."
Christopher Powers is married to a Puerto Rican with whom he has children, and has lived in Cabo Rojo for 20 years.
"They have no idea what they're destroying, and if they do have an idea what they're destroying, then they should be ashamed," he told AFP of the developers.
"Not only is it ecologically destructive, not only will it be an economic disaster for those of us who live here, but it's also against the sort of spirit or values of the Caborojinos."
Cuevas is hopeful her story and others like it will crystallize for her fellow Puerto Ricans what they stand to lose.
"We have to keep fighting. We have to educate our youth. Have you heard of Bad Bunny?" she said, referring to the Puerto Rican global superstar whose music and current residency in San Juan has amplified discussion of gentrification and cultural dilution, on the island and beyond.
"This is ours," Cuevas said. "We're not going to leave."
mdo/sst
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Woman Backs Out of Group Trip. Now, Her Friends Want Her to Cover Everyone's Financial Loss
Woman Backs Out of Group Trip. Now, Her Friends Want Her to Cover Everyone's Financial Loss

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Woman Backs Out of Group Trip. Now, Her Friends Want Her to Cover Everyone's Financial Loss

After pulling out of a group trip for personal reasons, a woman finds herself at odds with friends who now expect her to take on the entire financial loss A woman seeks advice from the Reddit community following a dispute with two friends over a canceled Airbnb trip. The original plan was simple: three friends would be splitting a $600 rental, each contributing $200, with one friend, referred to as Friend A, paying the full amount upfront. "Friend A was the one who made the reservation and paid in full so that me and friend B would give A our share ($200.00 each) later," the woman writes in her post. But plans changed when she decided not to go anymore, citing "personal and safety reasons." Although the rental host "would only give a 50% refund" if they canceled, "both friend A and friend B still wanted to go." Even though she backed out, the poster told her friends that she'd honor her part of the agreement. 'I said if they still wanted to go I would give my share ($200.00) since I took the responsibility of being part of it before,' she explains. However, things took a turn when Friend A demanded more than just her original share. "Friend A said that I should pay $300.00 because I was the one who didn't want to go, not them, and if they were to cancel it that would be the total loss," she explains. The poster didn't agree that she should be paying more than her portion, especially since the trip was still scheduled to move forward without her. 'Why would I pay for half of the trip when is not even canceled yet?' she questions, pushing back on what she saw as an unfair request. Friend A then mentioned they would try to invite someone else to take her spot. But they made it clear that if that person declined, the poster would be expected to cover the full $300 shortfall. The next day, Friend A messaged again with an update. 'They informed me that the other person they invited did not want to go and that they had cancelled the house,' the woman writes, adding that Friend A also sent proof of a refund. Now, with the Airbnb officially canceled, Friend A insisted she should be held fully responsible for the loss. 'They expected that I paid the full amount of $300.00 because I backed out first,' she explains, even though both friends ultimately decided not to go. What made the situation even more frustrating was Friend A's refusal to ask Friend B for their share "because they too wanted to go." "I told them that if they ask for person's B share or not is not my problem, my only responsibility now is paying my part," the woman replied. To her, the fair thing would be for everyone to pay based on the final outcome. 'Now that the refund was made I believe that the correct amount for each person to pay is $100.00,' she argues, since the Airbnb host only refunded 50% of the $600 total. She reiterates that she never asked the group to cancel. 'I never forced them to not go but actually said I would still pay MY part in full and they chose not to go,' she writes. From her perspective, she upheld her end of the plan, and what they did afterward was out of her hands. Despite the pushback from Friend A, she decided to settle what she believed was fair. 'I refused and sent $105.00 for my share and told them that was my share and that it would be all I was going to pay,' she shares, sticking firmly to her decision. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. In an edit to the post, the woman shared that Friend A's "reasoning for not going through with the trip was because they didn't want to split food and gas into 2, but 3." Adding yet another layer of tension to the story, the poster revealed that the friend initially "wanted a bigger and prettier house that could fit 4-5 people, but I didn't want that one because it was too expensive (about $850)." The situation left her feeling stuck, unsure if setting boundaries over what she owes makes her selfish or simply fair. But one thing she's certain of is this: 'My only responsibility now is paying my part.' Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword

Grant Cardone Just Called Out A Common Net Worth Myth – And Homeowners Won't Like It
Grant Cardone Just Called Out A Common Net Worth Myth – And Homeowners Won't Like It

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Grant Cardone Just Called Out A Common Net Worth Myth – And Homeowners Won't Like It

Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. Real estate investor Grant Cardone encourages people to rent where they live. While it may sound counterintuitive to aspiring homeowners who view rent as throwing money away, Cardone lays out a strong argument for renting instead of buying. He also believes that homeowners should not include their house when calculating their net worth. He views a house as a liability if you're living in it instead of having a tenant. Not every homeowner may like this assessment, but Cardone presents key details worth considering. Don't Miss: Be part of the breakthrough that could replace plastic as we know it— $100k+ in investable assets? – no cost, no obligation. Primary Homes Do Not Produce Income A primary home does not produce any income. While that's not the function of a primary home, it's worth keeping in mind when you are calculating your net worth. Cardone only views real estate as an investment if it's generating passive income. You need a tenant to make money with a single-family home. Some people can list an extra room on Airbnb, while other investors buy duplexes and rent out the vacant unit. Cardone used to invest in single-family homes, but he now prefers apartments since they have many units in the same location. Ambitious real estate investors who are getting started with single-family homes can benefit from keeping that long-term vision in mind. However, if your home is a primary residence, it's not able to provide any cash flow that covers expenses. While you can build equity and benefit from appreciation, it's better for real estate properties that generate positive cash flow from rent. That way, the property is profitable right away, and any capital gains are bonus money. Trending: This AI-Powered Trading Platform Has 5,000+ Users, 27 Pending Patents, and a $43.97M Valuation — Homes Are Liabilities Cardone also mentioned that homes are liabilities. He presented costs like property taxes and maintenance. Both of these expenses make up 1% of your home's value, which comes to a combined 2% per year, according to Cardone. However, that's not where the expenses stop. You have to pay closing costs both ways. You'll pay these costs when you buy the home and when you decide to sell it. These costs will wipe out some of the profits that your primary residence will make. However, it's even worse if the property doesn't appreciate much. While real estate has a history of gaining value over time, low fertility rates can lead to long-term population declines that put pressure on real estate. This trend doesn't bode well for someone who buys a primary residence now and hopes to earn a positive return on their 'investment' over the next 30-50 Miss Out On Higher Returns With Other Investments Even if you break even with a primary residence after you buy and sell it, you'll still lose a lot of money. When you invest any dollar, it is important to consider several options to maximize the return of that dollar. Every dollar you put into your down payment, mortgage, property taxes, maintenance, and other housing costs is another dollar that you cannot put into an index fund or another asset. These assets can outperform real estate, but by stuffing your money into your house, you are missing out on those opportunities. That's how we get the concept of being house poor. It's when someone spends most of their money on housing costs and doesn't have any money left over to invest in assets. Some people can benefit from renting instead of owning and using that opportunity to build up their investments. Housing makes sense for people who want to establish themselves in a neighborhood and not have to worry about a landlord. However, it's not an investment, and you shouldn't include it in your net worth. That's the way Cardone views primary residences. Read Next: If there was a new fund backed by Jeff Bezos offering a ? Image: Shutterstock This article Grant Cardone Just Called Out A Common Net Worth Myth – And Homeowners Won't Like It originally appeared on Sign in to access your portfolio

Airbnb's Cash Cow Can Thrive Despite Its Challenges
Airbnb's Cash Cow Can Thrive Despite Its Challenges

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Airbnb's Cash Cow Can Thrive Despite Its Challenges

Key Points Airbnb faces regulatory hurdles that management must attempt to overcome. The company benefits from significant demographic tailwinds. Airbnb is a cash-flow machine and a great stock to own. 10 stocks we like better than Airbnb › The travel industry is a lucrative but tricky realm in which to do business. This is especially true when it comes to short-term rentals. Navigating local regulations and international expansion while satisfying thousands of hosts and even more guests are a few of the daunting challenges faced by Airbnb (NASDAQ: ABNB), one of the leaders in the space. Its management is working to increase its cooperation with localities and promote what it views as commonsense regulations while maintaining its ability to operate freely. Still, in some major markets, such as Hawaii, New York City, and Paris, local and state governments have imposed stringent restrictions on how short-term rentals can be operated. Many homeowners' associations also have rules that are unfriendly to owners who want to turn their properties into short-term rentals. However, the news isn't all bad for Airbnb. The market it operates in is massive and continues to grow. There are also demographic tailwinds, as younger generations tend to gravitate toward Airbnbs more than their parents. Short-term rentals (labelled vacation rentals on the chart below) make up a significant portion of a market that is forecast to exceed $1.1 trillion by 2029. What does this mean for Airbnb? Cash, and lots of it. Terrific business model Airbnb is just a software platform at its core. There is also a customer service element. However, companies in this industry lack the factories, expensive equipment, and other major infrastructure that many other industries have. Property and equipment purchases are often referred to as capex (short for capital expenditures) and reduce the amount of cash a company can keep. Free cash flow is one reason why software companies, such as CrowdStrike (NASDAQ: CRWD) and Palantir (NASDAQ: PLTR), often trade at higher valuations than companies in other industries. For instance, Intel (NASDAQ: INTC), a semiconductor designer and manufacturer, spent $5.2 billion on capex in its most recent quarter, a whopping 40% of its revenue. Airbnb spent just $14 million last quarter on capex, less than 1% of its revenue. Meanwhile, its free cash flow -- the amount that's left over after operating expenses and capital expenditures -- has soared. The $4.4 billion shown above is 40% of revenue over the same period. A 40% free cash flow margin is an incredible figure and bodes well for shareholders. Airbnb uses its cash to fund growth initiatives and reward shareholders through stock buybacks, which reduce the number of shares available, thereby increasing the value of each remaining share. Think of a company like a giant pizza, and every share is a slice. If the number of slices decreases, each of the remaining slices represents a larger portion of the pizza. Airbnb has repurchased $3.5 billion worth of its stock over the last 12 months, accounting for approximately 4% of its total market capitalization. It's likely to continue in this pattern for a long time, given its fantastic cash-producing business model. Is Airbnb a buy? Since free cash flow is what attracts me to Airbnb, the price-to-free-cash-flow ratio is my preferred metric for valuing the company. Airbnb currently trades for around 20 times free cash flow. This is well under its 2024 high of 29, and slightly below its 3-year average of 22. It is also lower than rival Booking Holdings, which trades for 23 times its own excellent free cash flow. In short, Airbnb is a better value based on cold, hard cash. Booking Holdings is also a fantastic company and is worth having in a portfolio. However, its market cap is more than twice that of Airbnb's, which means that Airbnb could have an easier time growing faster from here. At this valuation, it is an excellent buy-and-hold stock. Should you buy stock in Airbnb right now? Before you buy stock in Airbnb, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Airbnb wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 Bradley Guichard has positions in Airbnb and CrowdStrike. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Airbnb, CrowdStrike, Intel, and Palantir Technologies. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: short August 2025 $24 calls on Intel. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Airbnb's Cash Cow Can Thrive Despite Its Challenges was originally published by The Motley Fool

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store