Labour accused of hypocrisy after giving 16 years-olds the vote – while banning them from becoming local party bosses
Sir Keir Starmer's party is introducing a new rule raising the minimum age for constituency association chairs, treasurers and secretaries to 18 years-old.
It was signed off by the party's ruling national executive on Wednesday with several Cabinet Ministers in attendance.
It came just days after the PM announced controversial plans to let 1.5million 16 and 17-year-olds participate in general elections.
He claimed they were responsible enough to pay tax and join the army so should be able to cast ballots.
A Labour Party insider said: 'We just look totally ridiculous now because it has made the entire logic behind the policy incoherent.
'We can't say 16-year-olds are mature enough to decide who is the next prime minister, but in the same breath that they can't take the minutes at a local party meeting. It's just staggering hypocrisy.'
Sir Keir's plan to lower the voting age has widely been seen as a cynical ploy to boost his chances of re-election.
Polling shows they would mop up about a third of all 16 and 17-year-olds if an election were held today.
However social media-savvy Reform is also polling well in that age bracket as are left-wing parties like the Greens.
A Labour spokesman said: 'Electoral law doesn't currently protect under-18s from legal liability. This change to the Party's rules will protect young people.
'That has nothing to do with votes at 16 and is a total false equivalence. It's right that those who pay tax and fight for our country can have a say in its future.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
an hour ago
- South Wales Argus
Comments sought from first minister ahead of Senedd elections
1 Have any informal talks opened with other parties? 2 If, as polls indicate, there may not be a majority will Labour / Plaid form a coalition as they had a partnership previously? 3 I read she speaks to Keir Starmer once a month and perhaps she could describe the priorities discussed going into the election so the voters can judge? 4 Hospital waiting lists increased and education should be a priority and was it really necessary to increase the Senedd to 96 members without a referendum? I think not with the cost. 5 Reference was made to free prescriptions, free buses and is there any evidence these may be under threat? 6 I believe the Welsh public are crying out for change come May and I would welcome your reader's views. Kevin Etheridge Blackwood
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Why I am joining the Palestine Action protesters
Today, I will be in Parliament Square to demand that the UK government uphold our right to freedom of speech, and to denounce the genocide that the Israeli government is perpetrating in Gaza against the Palestinian people. As a human rights defender, a mother, grandmother and great-great grandmother who has denounced genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity and ethnic cleansing throughout the world, I cannot remain silent, witnessing the genocide and the abhorrent starvation of the Palestinian people. I will be holding a sign that will read: 'The UK Government is in flagrant violation of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which states 'Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers.'' Volker Türk, UN human rights chief, stated that '[the proscription of Palestine Action ] appears to constitute an impermissible restriction on those rights that are at odds with the UK's obligations under international human rights law.' Since 5 July, when the order proscribing the Palestine Action protest group under terrorism legislation came into force, hundreds of people have been arrested for holding up peaceful signs motivated by their consternation and horror at the genocide in Gaza. I was shocked to see 83-year-old Reverend Sue Parfitt on television being arrested on the day that Palestine Action was proscribed. Reverend Parfitt was attending a demonstration in Parliament Square, sitting in a camp chair around fellow protesters holding a placard stating her support of the outlawed protest group. While being carried away by police, Reverend Parfitt described the ban as "total nonsense", and went on to add that it symbolised a "loss of civil liberties in this country". Some have had their homes raided by the police. No one arrested seemed to pose any threat to the public. Türk has also said that the UK's counter-terrorism legislation 'misuses the gravity and impact of terrorism to expand it beyond those clear boundaries, to encompass further conduct that is already criminal under the law'. He added: 'The decision also conflates protected expression and other conduct with acts of terrorism and so could readily lead to further chilling effects on the lawful exercise of these rights by many people.' Yesterday, Amnesty International wrote to the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Mark Rowley, stating that arresting protesters would violate international law: 'The arrest of otherwise peaceful protesters solely for expressing the statement 'I Oppose Genocide – I Support Palestine Action' is a violation of the UK's international obligations to protect the rights of freedom of expression and peaceful assembly. 'Further arrests [carried out on the 9 August demonstration] would violate international human rights law. As such, we urge you to instruct your officers to comply with the UK's international obligations and act with restraint in their response to any such protests that occur, by not arresting protesters who are merely carrying placards that state they oppose genocide and support Palestine Action.' The European Association of Lawyers for Democracy & World Human Rights recently wrote a paper, supported by numerous legal advocacy groups, that states: 'Evidence suggests active and sustained cooperation between the UK and Israeli armies. Concerns surround reports that the UK military has carried out over 500 surveillance flights around Gaza since December 2023, sharing intelligence with Israel – including during the ceasefire.' Only yesterday, further evidence emerged of the RAF's ongoing support for Israel: 'Britain continues to run near daily surveillance flights over Gaza with the help of a US contractor at a time of growing questions about how the intelligence obtained is used and shared with the Israeli military. 'Specialist flight trackers estimate that RAF Shadow aircraft have run more than 600 flights over the Palestinian territory from the Akrotiri airbase in Cyprus in an attempt to locate the remaining hostages held by Hamas since December 2023.' Palestine Action is being punished for exposing the crimes of the British government and taking action to uphold international law. We cannot turn a blind eye to the horrific crimes against humanity that are being perpetrated by Israel in Gaza. I will be joining the demonstration in Parliament Square to oppose genocide and defend human rights and freedom of speech. Bianca Jagger is the founder and president of the BIanca Jagger Human Rights Foundation, a Council of Europe goodwill ambassador, and a member of the executive director's leadership council of Amnesty International USA
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Enjoy summer while you can – Rachel Reeves is already planning an autumn income tax rise
Not for the first time, nor the last, the cry goes up: who would be Rachel Reeves? Most inside the Westminster bubble are able to enjoy a summer break. But the chancellor and her Treasury colleagues face weeks of agonising as to what lies ahead. Come autumn, she must attend the Labour conference, make her set-piece speech and do rounds of interviews. There is the IMF gathering at which the world's other financiers opine and mark her homework to date. Then there is the Budget. What Reeves must confront is the knowledge that 'faster and further' economic growth is not yielding immediate dividends, if indeed it is happening at all; she will insist it is, but the figures say different. Meanwhile, the fiscal black hole she pointed to as not her fault is actually getting bigger and she can no longer seriously maintain this is entirely due to the Tories. Not after more than a year in office. A £25bn deficit could rise to near £50bn if the National Institute of Economic and Social Research is to be believed. Significantly, few apart from those in her own team have questioned this figure. Why? Because borrowing has climbed higher than expected and the promised kickstart has not materialised. Britain's economy is sluggish, inflation has not gone away and unemployment is a worry, and the fears are real even in sectors once relatively immune – in retail and hospitality, but also in graduate posts. When parents rise up because their sons and daughters cannot secure jobs, Reeves's headache will get a whole lot worse. A lethal combination of global economic uncertainty, investment decisions on hold, and the looming presence of AI, is having a severely detrimental effect. She has to plug the black hole, but how? In theory, there are three tools she can use, in any combination, but somehow Reeves must reach that £50bn number. In practice, one avenue is already closed; she cannot borrow any more. Neither, as she is Labour, can she slash public services; austerity was what a Tory predecessor did, it is not for her. So, there's only one remaining and that is to raise taxes. Reeves can increase a bit here and chip away there. That's all it will be: tinkering. It won't fill the divide. They all add up, but levies on the ill-health and wellbeing products of tobacco and alcohol (and get ready for the howls from beleaguered pub landlords) and gambling will not make anything like enough difference. She will steer clear of clobbering business; one hit was sufficient (National Insurance Contributions) and she cannot return for more, it would blow apart her growth agenda and send a terrible signal to potential international investors. A wealth tax, advocated by the left, may well be ruled out for the same reason. As will a windfall tax on banking profits that would antagonise a City that Labour went to great lengths to woo. No, it's down to VAT, employees' national insurance, and income tax. Labour has said it will never raise taxes on 'working people' but that is what these are. Reeves herself has said she won't but, realistically, does she have a choice? VAT is regressive; the rate does not increase the wealthier you are. That leaves employees' national insurance and income tax. National insurance is capped so in that sense it is also regressive. The fairest option and the most attractive in terms of how much it will raise, is income tax. It is simply understood, easily collected and applies right across the wealth spectrum; there are few ifs and buts with income tax. It is harder to avoid. But if ever there was a tax on working people, it is this one – billed as such on every payslip. In a strange way, that might make it more appealing. Any other duty is divisive, a section of society can claim with justification they have been singled out, they will be worse off than others. Income tax is definably progressive. But it is also the most direct, the biggest, state charge on a workers' earnings. Making it bigger leaves Reeves and the government open to charges of rank betrayal, of going back on a pledge often and loudly made. It's Labour punishing the workers, the working-class, its bedrock support. Light the touch paper and run. What is likely, therefore, is the almightiest of political spin operations as this unpalatable step – the one they said they would never take, that is guaranteed to inflame their supporters, that will inspire their opponents – is explained. It may be billed as a one-off, aimed at saving public services, not to be repeated, the solution to a national emergency. We will start to know for sure when the holiday season ends, the machine gears up again and the softening up begins for what is coming. Some may be lying on the beach on their towels; if Reeves is at home, with her head inside a towel, no one should be surprised.
