Reform UK's new justice adviser calls for bolstered ‘rehabilitation' in prisons
Nigel Farage, Reform UK's leader, has promised 'the most significant event' of his party's crime campaign later on Monday.
Speaking on Times Radio, Ms Frake said: 'I read every week negative press about our prison service and drugs, mobiles, violence, suicide, self-harm, etcetera, etcetera.
'And you know, the time is now for somebody to do something about it. Successive governments have failed and failed miserably and, you know, that's why our prison service now is on its knees.'
The former prison governor said: 'I'm not naive in the fact that people don't want to spend money on prisons – they'd rather it went to the NHS, to education – I'm not naive at all about that.
'But actually, if you think about the whole picture, at the moment we're warehousing prisoners and we're turning out better criminals into our society.
'I'd like to see it where we actually do some rehabilitation and make our society safer for our children, and that is going to cost money but at least somebody is listening to others.'
Ms Frake, who wrote about her previous work in her book The Governor, also referred to a Government scheme which cut temporarily the proportion of sentences certain inmates must serve behind bars from 50% to 40%.
'In a prison, now they do 40% of a sentence,' she said.
'There's very little you can do with somebody who is addicted to drugs, alcohol, has mental health issues. There is very little you can do within a prison at that time.
'And when people are sentenced to short sentences, they lose their support systems on the outside.
'They lose their home if they had one, they lose family support and we let them out with nothing so their only alternative is to commit crime and get on that crime ladder, and that needs to be addressed.
'What I would like to see is much better community services, much better community and substance misuse services outside of prisons, and much better management of prisoners on the outside.'
Asked whether she was willing to have a 'difficult conversation' with party leader Nigel Farage, Ms Frake replied: 'He might have his own views but he will listen far more than any other party has listened in the past.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
43 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump Media to broadcast GB News on US streaming platform Truth+
The Trump family media company has partnered with GB News to broadcast the channel on its US streaming platform, Truth+. Trump Media and Technology Group (TMTG), which operates social media app Truth Social, the streaming platform Truth+, and the FinTech brand announced on Friday that it will add GB News to its list of available channels – making the UK broadcaster accessible to most countries globally, including the US. GB News, which has hosted rightwing commentators such as Nigel Farage, will be offered with the free basic package on Truth+, and can be accessed through multiple devices and platforms including iOS, Android, Web, Apple TV, Android TV, and Amazon Fire. This new alliance between TMTG and GB News comes as the US president continues to criticise the mainstream media, filing lawsuits against giants such as Rupert Murdoch, as well as broadcasters and smaller newspapers. Earlier this year, Trump claimed that the US media was full of 'radical-left monsters', who are guilty of 'illegal' reporting. More recently, White House communications director, Steven Cheung, has said that 'liberal media' is spreading 'fake news' in relation to reports claiming that Trump's name appears in US justice department files about Jeffrey Epstein. Trump Media's chief executive and chairperson, Devin Nunes, said in a statement: 'GB News is a terrific source for news, facts, and commentary. 'By expanding its global reach, we aim to connect an enormous new, international audience to the network's unique reporting and opinion, while putting another dent in the global woke news monopoly.' Sign up to First Thing Our US morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Angelos Frangopoulos, GB News chief executive, said: 'As the fearless champion of freedom of speech in Britain, it is important that we launch across the United States of America and globally on the Truth+ streaming platform.'
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Britain isn't broken, but people believe it is, and that is a big problem for Keir Starmer
Fraser Nelson, the former editor of The Spectator, the Conservative weekly, is having a remarkable afterlife as a great defender of the Labour government. He has gone head to head with Nigel Farage over the Reform leader's claim that we are living in 'lawless Britain'. There is less crime in Britain today than there has been for decades, Nelson pointed out at one of Farage's media conferences this week. This reduction in crime is nothing to do with people not bothering to report crime to the police any more, because the figures come from the Crime Survey for England and Wales, a large survey of a representative sample of the population that asks people if they have been the victim of a crime in the previous 12 months. The number of crimes has fallen by four-fifths since 1995. Farage waved the Crime Survey aside, saying it was 'discredited' because it does not include shoplifting. It doesn't, because it asks people about crimes of which they have personally been the victim, and it is true that shoplifting has increased. But that does not mean the Crime Survey is discredited. On the contrary, it is the best and most reliable evidence, and it is especially useful for measuring trends over time, because it is not affected by changes in the way police record crime. What did Farage say to that? 'We all know that crime has risen significantly over the course of the last few years.' A big welcome back, please, to that dread phrase, 'we all know'. For years I would point out that four public inquiries had found that Tony Blair told the truth about Iraq, only to be told that 'we all know' he didn't. As Nelson comments: 'This is the politics of perception.' As he points out in an excellent article in The Times today, it is the same with road safety, air pollution, sewage, and living standards. 'We all know' they are getting worse – when in actual fact they are getting better. So it does not matter to most people what the Crime Survey says. Most people believe that crime is rising, and the numbers who believe that have not changed over the years that crime has been falling. People are influenced by reports of terrible things happening to other people, and misremember their own experience. Anything more than five or 10 years ago was a golden age when there was some decent music in the charts and Mars bars weren't behind perspex screens. Why, though, has what 'we all know' become so much worse in the past year? Probably because some highly visible crimes have increased: shoplifting, phone thefts and graffiti. These are crimes that make people feel threatened by disorder, even as more of us than ever report feeling safe walking alone in their local area at night. What is corrosive is the perception – 'we all know' – that the authorities are not securely in control. Behind that perception lies the reality of asylum-seeker hotels and a government that is powerless to stop the boats. What has changed since the election is that Farage is more active, at the head of a social-media movement and a TV channel, GB News, dedicated to portraying the country as a hellhole. The intensity of this campaign to spread fear and insecurity seems to have reached a critical mass that is dangerous to Keir Starmer. He cannot fight it with facts – or not only with facts – because the answer will always be that 'we all know' that the facts are wrong. As Ian Leslie, the advertising executive turned social commentator says, 'Instead of asking, 'Why are people angry?' we should ask, 'What are we missing?'' What the government needs is to take visible and forceful action on the things that people care about, the shoplifting, phone snatching and graffiti, but above all on asylum hotels and stopping the boats. So far, Starmer has tried to do all these things, but limply. There have been roundtables at No 10 with the police and representatives of the retail industry and phone companies. Even these feeble initiatives have been undermined by people in authority doing foolish things, such as the police in Wales telling off a shopkeeper for calling thieves 'scumbags' and Andy Lord, the London Underground boss who accused citizen graffiti-removers of defacing trains themselves so that they could pose as heroes for cleaning it up. Most importantly, Starmer now has a treaty with France to return some of the cross-Channel migrants, but it will take a long time to build up to returning all or nearly all those who arrive – at which point the crossings would stop – and it is not clear that the French are in it for the long haul. One thing that Tony Blair understood, as he faced spikes of street crime, anti-social behaviour and asylum-seeker numbers, was the importance of 'grip'. It may sound like annoying spin-speak, but it was critical to communicating that he understood how people felt and he was doing something about it. Starmer should be grateful to Fraser Nelson, formerly of The Spectator, for pointing out that we are safer, richer and healthier than ever before – but if the perception is that we are not, the government has to get a grip on what 'we all know'.
The Independent
5 hours ago
- The Independent
Mapped: Where 16 and 17-year-olds could sway the vote in next general election
Leading pollsters have suggested Labour 's plan to lower the voting age to 16 could 'backfire' as Reform UK and Jeremy Corbyn 's new party could end up gaining the most from the policy instead. The 'seismic' move announced by the government as part of a raft of measures last month would allow around 1.5 million more teenagers to cast a ballot, bringing UK-wide elections in line with Scotland and Wales by the time the country next goes to the polls, due by the summer of 2029 at the latest. Keir Starmer encouraged 16 and 17 year olds to use their vote at the next election, with No 10 saying the prime minister would 'absolutely encourage them to be as engaged as they can be in the future of their country'. But top pollsters have warned the rewards Labour may have been hoping to reap from their plans might not come to fruition, with Nigel Farage 's Reform and Mr Corbyn's party the potential real winners. Respected pollster and Conservative peer Robert Hayward told The Independent: 'I just don't think the policy will be as beneficial as the Labour Party thought when they first proposed it. 'My expectation, in the multi-party political field that we have at the moment, is that the non-mainstream, non-legacy parties – such as Reform, the Green Party and Corbyn's party – will be the beneficiaries of younger people's willingness to vote away from the traditional parties.' Martin Baxter, director at pollster Electoral Calculus, added: 'It could be that Labour's plan for votes for 16 and 17 year olds – which did look a bit like semi-naked tilting the scales in Labour's own favour – might backfire a little bit, if Reform and Corbyn attract those new voters.' Louis O'Geran, research and communications associate at pollsters More in Common UK, agreed. 'It would be a mistake to see the lower voting age as an easy win for Labour,' he said. The numbers behind the 16 and 17 year old voters mapped out The Independent has mapped out the numbers behind the new 16 and 17 year old voters, showing how many are living in each constituency across the UK. Mr O'Geran pointed to the gender divide among young people. 'In general, we know that young people are more likely than the public as a whole to vote for Labour or the Greens,' he said. 'But there is a notable gender divide: Gen Z men are more likely to back Labour and Reform, while the Green Party often leads among Gen Z women.' With Mr Corbyn's party likely to focus on green issues, Lord Hayward suggested young girls could therefore also support the former Labour leader's party 'if it gets fully off the ground'. He described a key attraction of the new party to younger people as the mere fact that it is 'none of the above' – an example of what he described as the evidenced phenomenon that 'young people enjoy the opportunity of voting by voting not for mainstream parties'. However, he cautioned that the impact of the party, which Mr Corbyn launched alongside Zarah Sultana only last month, and is yet to be officially named, is yet to be truly known. Mr Baxter added that data on the new party's voting potential is hard to establish yet, with the next general election not for another four years. He said: 'The younger generations of 18 to 24 cohort is quite pro-Labour. 'It's also slightly surprisingly more pro-Reform than you might think. 'At the moment, I'm not seeing hard data on the 16 and 17-year-old vote – or really, the people who will be 16 or 17 in 2029. It's slightly weird because these people are currently 12 and 13, so their political views are perhaps not fully developed yet. 'But is there the potential, when they do grow up to be 16 and 17, for Jeremy Corbyn to get votes? Yes.' Policy could ' subtly reshape political map' Lord Hayward explained that the impact of the new teenage voters is expected to be 'fairly consistent' across the UK because their distribution is 'fairly flat' around the country. Most constituencies will see a 'reasonably average impact', he predicted. The exceptions will be the south coast and the south west as well as inner London – the former because these are known as the 'retirement belts', areas with high proportions of older people, and the latter because these can be described as the 'ultra expensive zones', places most young people cannot afford. Mr O'Geran agreed, predicting that, with 16 and 17-year-olds only making up around 2 per cent of the electorate, 'in most constituencies they won't make a difference to the outcome'. However, he does believe the young voters might still make an important difference overall. He said: 'In an increasingly fragmented political landscape, their votes could help determine the outcome of a handful of tight races across the country.' He suggested Gaza could be a deciding issue for this younger group – which, in turn, could be a deciding factor for tight races. He explained: 'In urban seats where Labour faces strong independent challengers, 16 and 17-year-olds could help tip the balance. All of the youngest constituencies in the country are also places where Labour is under pressure from a 'Gaza Independent'. In fact, there are seven constituencies where Labour's majority over an independent candidate is smaller than the number of 16 and 17-year-olds in the seat. 'With politics looking increasingly volatile, even numerically small changes in the electorate can have outsized local effects, and could subtly reshape the political map over time.' Key trends from split votes to not voting Lord Hayward also outlined some of the key trends the UK is likely to see when this new cohort votes, notably 'voting going all over the place and also not voting'. Describing 16 and 17 year olds as of 'enormous fluidity', he said the first will be the likelihood that the group's votes will be scattered. He explained: 'All indications is that Labour will not be a big beneficiary of that age group of those who vote, because polling indications are that they are much more likely to split their votes all over the place.' Secondly, Lord Hayward predicted a low turnout from 16 and 17-year-olds based on the figures from the 2024 election. 'Turnout was down across the board by just short of 10 per cent at the last election,' he said. 'But turnout was lowest among the youngest. Therefore, there is no reason for believing an even younger age group will not follow the trends of those immediately above them, by being actually a very low turnout demographic cohort.' Declining birth rates also have the potential to further minimise the impact of new teenage voters, simply because that age group is expected to shrink in the coming years, he said.
