Land Reforms Aim To End Stalled Development In Papua New Guinea
New legislation introduced by the country's Deputy Prime Minister John Rosso would reform six land-related laws.
Rosso says the changes are essential to securing the country's future and safeguarding the rights of landowners.
Prime Minister James Marape commended Rosso for spearheading the reforms.
"Land is our people's greatest inheritance-our playground, our home, our heritage. Every Papua New Guinean is connected to a piece of land somewhere in this country. We must protect it," Marape told parliament.
RNZ Pacific spoke with its PNG correspondent Scott Waide about the government's motivations for the changes.
(This transcript has been edited for brevity and clarity.)
Scott Waide: The Lands Department has been, for want of a better word, terminally ill, for many years. It has had legislation that dates back to the colonial era.
Papua New Guinea has moved on [and] moved forward with a lot of things. But the [land] legislations have been a hindering mechanism for any form of large scale development, like farming [and] real estate development. Those laws have been a hindrance to much of that development, and also the mobilisation of customary land.
Previously, with the old laws, customary landowners could not adequately mobilise and get loans to develop their land, because the laws [and banks] did not recognise customary land ownership, and the accompanying attempts to allow for that development of customary land.
It has posed a lot of complications in terms of mining development, logging [and] farming. The changes that have been introduced allow for both protection of customary landowners and the possibility of them venturing into large scale businesses.
Don Wiseman: It has being brought in by the Deputy Prime Minister John Rosso. What specifically is he going to do? You have outlined the issues that have existed over land for a long time, but are they going to be overcome with this new legislation?
SW: Yes, many of the problems that have existed for many, many years - from a very, very old system, a manual system, when the rest of the world is operating digitally.
We have had instances where they have been dual titles issued, issued titles over land that have gone missing, because people are reproducing those titles manually.
There is an electronic system that has been introduced as well within the Lands Department, and that is meant to reduce the instances of corruption that have long existed.
A lot of the reforms have happened very quietly within the Lands Department. The other reforms that complement the development of housing, which is a big need in Papua New Guinea, support the development of customary land as well.
So customary land owners can partner with government or with private organisations and develop housing, cheap housing for other Papua New Guineans.
DW: Prime Minister James Marape says this will save the land that is still held, but it is clearly not going to undo a lot of the mistakes from the past, and they have been so many of those, particularly to do with the forestry and so on.
SW: Yes, that is a an issue that I have spoken to a few land experts as well around. And that is going to be a huge challenge to undo all of that.
The other side to it is that there are customary landowners who also sell their own land for cash. The legislations that have been put in place, in the some of the policies have actually banned the sale of customary land to individual parties as well. So, it offers some level of protection for customary land owners.
There needs to be a lot of awareness as well for customary landowners to understand how the law benefits them, and that is going to also take a while.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Palau backs Solomon Islands' move to exclude Pacific Islands Forum partner talks until 2026
Palau backs Solomon Islands' decision to defer the Pacific Islands Forum dialogue partners meeting to 2026, when Palau will be hosting the annual gathering. Photo: RNZ Pacific Palau "respects" the Solomon Islands' decision to exclude Pacific Islands Forum (PIF) dialogue partners when it hosts the annual leaders' meeting in Honiara next month. Prime Minister Jeremiah Manele has sent letters to PIF member states suggesting a move to restrict partners , including China, the United States and Taiwan, from the gathering next month. This will not be the first time a host of the Leaders Meeting has wanted external partners excluded . "Palau acknowledges and respects the decision by host, Solomon Islands, to defer the partners' dialogues to 2026," the Palau President's Office said in a statement to RNZ Pacific. "This decision does allow us to focus on the critical intra-regional issues at this year's forum, including the High-Level Political Talanoa, the Ocean of Peace Declaration, and the Pacific Resilience Facility. These were "matters of paramount importance" to the security, wellbeing, and future of the Pacific, the office said. "As the incoming host of the 55th Pacific Islands Forum in 2026, Palau supports this proposal to defer the partners' dialogues. "We believe it will give the Forum and its members the necessary time to fully complete the ongoing review of the new Partnership and Engagement Mechanism, ensuring that our engagement with all partners is strategic, unified, and aligned with the 2050 Strategy for the Blue Pacific Continent." The statement follows President Surangel Whipps Jr doubling down on his position regarding Taiwan's participation at the Honiara meeting. "This is not about Palau's relationship with China or Solomon's Island's relationship with Taiwan," Whipps told RNZ Pacific in May. "It is about the PIF, and the PIF recognises both [China and Taiwan]. Within the PIF, we, of course, have our differences. But we come together as one Pacific." He said there has been some difficulty for Taiwan gaining access to the meeting this year, adding that if the Solomon Islands could not "fulfil the obligations" of hosting the Forum, then it should not host it. "If any participant cannot get to the Solomon Islands, that should be there, and they are denied for any reason then that country - Solomon Islands or Palau - should be denied hosting PIF." Palau President Surangel Whipps Jr Photo: Supplied/ Office of the President However, in its statement on Tuesday, the Palau President's Office said: "Palau remains committed to the spirit of regional unity and looks forward to robust and constructive discussions in Honiara this September. "We are prepared to welcome our partners to Palau in 2026 for a productive and meaningful dialogue, once the new mechanism is fully in place." This week, Marshall Islands President Hilda Heine joined leaders from Tuvalu and Palau - the three Pacific nations with diplomatic ties to Taiwan - in putting the premier regional organisation on notice. They say the future unity and stability of the Forum hangs in the balance , whic has been a concern for some time . "We witnessed at the Forum in Tonga how China, a world superpower, interfered to change the language of the Forum Communique, the communiqué of our Pacific Leaders. "If the practice of interference in the affairs of the Forum becomes the norm, then I question our nation's membership in the organisation," Heine told the Marshall Islands parliament. The Cook Islands Foreign Secretary Tepaeru Herrmann says political instability is a significant factor challenging Pacific unity. Cook Islands was one of the last Pacific Islands Forum (PIF) members to have its say in the final leg of a highly anticipated regional architecture review, which has now concluded. The review is the leaders' response to increasing interest from a growing number of partners wanting a seat - and influence - at the regional decision-making table. The views of all PIF members have been gathered by a High-Level Persons Group travelling the region and are set to be tabled at next week's Forum Foreign Ministers' Meeting in Fiji. The group has already met with the Heine, Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown, French Polynesia President Moetai Brotherson, and Niue Prime Minister Dalton Tagelagi. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone Herrmann said it is the most important regional reform conversation in a generation. "This is where our regional framework, not just our regional organisations, but the way in which we organise ourselves so that we can continue to work on ensuring unity, even where we have differences on issues, becomes really important. "So this process and the political Talanoa is integral to continuing to support unity," Herrmann told RNZ Pacific. Herrmann believes that whatever happens with hosting arrangements, the focus must be on Pacific issues. "For the Cook Islands, what is important when the Forum gathers is that the priority considerations and discussions are very much on the issues at the forefront of leaders of the Pacific, about the Pacific," she said. She added that too often, the interest and reporting is on not so much the priorities as Pacific leaders articulate, but more about geopolitical issues. RNZ Pacific has approached the PIF Secretariat in Suva and the Solomon Islands government for comment. A Solomon Islands government spokesperson said: "We have received numerous media inquiries on this topic and kindly ask for your patience." "To ensure clarity and consistency, we will provide a comprehensive update through a press conference or official press statement, rather than responding individually to each query."
Scoop
17 hours ago
- Scoop
'We'll see': Hu'akavameiliku on becoming Tongan PM again
Lydia Lewis, RNZ Pacific presenter/bulletin editor The former Tongan Prime Minister Hu'akavameiliku Siaosi Sovaleni will not confirm or deny whether returning to the role is on his mind. Tonga goes to the polls in November, and several agenda items must be addressed before the Legislative Assembly (parliament) wraps up this week. Hu'akavameiliku brushed off a question about running for Prime Minister at the end of an interview with RNZ Pacific, which focused on last week's tsunami alert off the coast of Russia. "One step at a time. I'm just focusing on the needs of my constituencies and the election, and then we'll see what happens after," he said. Hu'akavameiliku resigned from his leadership post in December last year, ahead of a no-confidence motion. That motion had been brought by Dr 'Aisake Eke, the man who eventually became prime minister. Dr Eke had made allegations about Hu'akavameiliku, but he has never elaborated or explained to the Tongan public what he was referring to. Tonga's Legislative Assembly is sitting for the final time this week before members disperse and the November election timeline begins next week, Hu'akavameiliku said. "Right now we're trying to complete some of the agenda items, including legislations, annual reports and so forth," he said. He said for the last couple of weeks, MPs were busy visiting their constituency. "I think they're keen to actually table their reports, especially about what the needs of their constituency before the parliament closes." Hu'akavameiliku looks after the Tongatapu 3 constituency. He said common issues being raised include roads, street lights, security issues, drug, support for women's groups and support for sports development. All of these issues, he said, are "pretty common" across all constituencies.
Scoop
3 days ago
- Scoop
Roch Wamytan: Paris Political Agreement For New Caledonia 'Not Enough' For Kanaks
Lydia Lewis, RNZ Pacific presenter/bulletin editor A former New Caledonia Congress president says there are "not enough" benefits for Kanaks in a new "draft" agreement he signed alongside pro and anti-independence stakeholders in France last month. Wamytan said that, after 10 days of deadlock discussions in Paris, he failed to secure the pro-independence mandate. He told RNZ Pacific that he refused to sign a "final agreement". Instead, he said, he opted for a "draft" agreement, which is what he signed. It has been hailed as "historic" by all parties involved. While France maintains its neutrality, Wamytan said that at the negotiating table it was two (France and New Caledonia's pro-France bloc) against one (pro-Kanaky). A main point of tension was the electoral law changes, which are said to have sparked last year's civil unrest. "We call on France to respect the provisions of international law, which remains our main protective shield until the process of decolonisation and emancipation is completed. Hence, our incessant interventions during negotiations on this subject (electoral law changes)," Wamytan told RNZ Pacific. He said it is difficult to understand whether France wants to decolonise New Caledonia or not. "We have a lot of concrete measures in this proposed agreement, but the main question is a political question. Where are you (France) going with this? Independence or integration with France?" The document, signed in the city of Bougival, involves a series of measures and recognition by France of New Caledonia as a "State" as well as a double citizenship - French and New Caledonian - provided future New Caledonian citizens are French nationals in the first place. But this week, New Caledonia's oldest pro-independence party, the Union Calédonienne (UC), officially rejected the political agreement signed in Paris. Wamytan maintains New Caledonia is not France. But the French ambassador to the Pacific has previously told RNZ Pacific New Caledonia is France. However, Sonia Backès, the leader of the Caledonian Republicans Party and the president of the Provincial Assembly of Southern Province, says the agreement signed in France is "final". "Roch Wamytan and the pro-independence delegation signed an agreement in Bougival. Since their return to New Caledonia, their political supports have been fiercely critical of the agreement," her office said via a statement. "As a result, radical pro-independence leaders like Roch Wamytan have chosen to renege on their commitment and withdraw their agreement is final; there is no other viable political balance outside of it." So why did Wamytan sign? When asked why he signed the draft agreement when he does not agree with it, he said: "After the 10 days they obliged us to sign something." "We told them that we [didn't have] the mandate of our parties to sign an agreement, but only a project or draft. "It was important for us to return with a paper and to show, to explain, to present, to debate, for the debate of our political party. This is the stage where we are at now, but for the moment, we do not agree with that. "We [tried] to explain to [France and pro-France bloc] that we have a problem [with electoral law change being included]. "This is our problem. So we signed only for one reason…that we have to return back home and to explain where we are now, after 10 days of negotiation. [Did we] achieve the objectives, the mandate given by our political parties?" He said one thing he wants to make clear is that what he has signed is not definitive and is now up for negotiation. An FLNKS (Kanak and Socialist National Liberation Front) Congress meeting is set down for this weekend with the Union Calédonienne Congress meeting held the weekend prior. Wamytan said that it is now up to the FLNKS members to have their say and decide where to next. "They will decide if we accept this draft agreement or we reject," he said. "We have two options: we accept with certain conditions, for example, on the question of the right to vote on the electoral rule. Or for the question of the trajectory from here to independence. Through a referendum or the framework proposed by President Macron." "This is an important element to discuss with France, but after this round of discussions." He expects further meetings with France after community consultations. Communication problem Wamytan admits the pro-independence negotiators did not communicate clearly about the agreement to their supporters. He said after signing the document, President Macron and the pro-France signatories were quick to communicate to the media and their supporters - and the messages filtered to his supporters resulting in anger and frustrations. He said the anger has mostly been around the signing itself, with people mistaking the draft proposal as final. "The political, pro-Kanaky party were very, very, very angry against us. We did not communicate and this I think is our problem." Bribery allegations Wamytan has also dismissed unconfirmed reports that negotiators were bribed to sign a historic deal in Paris. He said he was aware of people chucking accusations of bribery around, but said they were false. "It has never been in the minds of Kanak independence leaders doing such practice practices," he said. "After the signature of the Matignon Accord, 37 years ago, with [FLNKS leader Emmanuel Tjibaou] and with us after the signature of Noumea accord in 1998, we heard about the same allegation and some rumors like this."
