Malaria threat in Malaysia currently comes from macaques
For 2025, the theme is 'Malaria Ends with Us: Reinvest, Reimagine, Reignite', calling for renewed global commitment and innovation in the fight to eliminate malaria.
While significant progress has been made, challenges such as drug resistance, climate change and zoonotic malaria continue to threaten malaria control efforts.
To achieve a malaria-free future, there is an urgent need to reinvest in research and healthcare, reimagine new solutions, and reignite a global commitment to reduce the burden of this disease worldwide.
From macaques to humans
Zoonotic malaria, primarily caused by the parasite Plasmodium knowlesi , is transmitted to humans when an Anopheles mosquito feeds on infected macaques and subsequently bites a human.
It represents a significant challenge because zoonotic malaria introduces a new dynamic in malaria transmission, where the primary host is not human, but wildlife, making it more difficult to control and predict.
Countries such as Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand have seen an increase in P. knowlesi malaria cases, often in forested areas where humans and macaques share habitats.
The rise in zoonotic malaria has been linked to factors such as deforestation, land-use changes, and the expansion of human settlements into previously untouched wildlife areas.
These environmental changes facilitate closer contact between humans, mosquitoes and macaques, increasing the likelihood of zoonotic transmission.
As such, this form of malaria presents a unique public health challenge that requires a broader focus on environmental health and wildlife conservation.
In Malaysia
Malaysia has made remarkable progress in the fight against malaria, particularly with the successful eradication of indigenous human malaria since 2018.
The country has significantly reduced malaria transmission, largely due to improved public health measures, widespread use of insecticide-treated bed nets, indoor residual spraying and effective antimalarial treatments.
However, the rise of zoonotic malaria is increasingly challenging this success.
This shift highlights the complex nature of malaria transmission and the evolving landscape of the disease in Malaysia.
The rise in P. knowlesi malaria has been particularly pronounced in East Malaysia, where the infection is closely linked to deforestation, agricultural expansion and human encroachment into macaque habitats.
The close proximity of humans to macaques and their shared environments has significantly increased the risk of zoonotic transmission.
P. knowlesi , which naturally infects macaques, is now the dominant malaria species in this region.
Several states in Peninsular Malaysia, such as Kelantan, have also reported an increasing number of zoonotic malaria cases, particularly in rural areas.
While P. knowlesi remains the primary zoonotic malaria parasite of concern in Malaysia, the emergence of other zoonotic malaria species, such as Plasmodium cynomolgi and Plasmodium inui in humans, has added a new dimension of complexity to the country's malaria elimination efforts.
Influencing factors
The factors contributing to the increase in zoonotic malaria are complex and multifactorial, encompassing environmental, ecological, socioeconomic and behavioural elements.
One of the most significant factors contributing to the rise of zoonotic malaria is deforestation and human encroachment into wildlife habitats.
As human populations expand and agricultural activities increase, forests are being cleared for farming, logging and infrastructure development.
This land-use change brings humans into closer proximity with macaques, increasing the likelihood of zoonotic spillover.
Climate change also plays a critical role in shaping the spread of zoonotic malaria.
Temperature, rainfall patterns and humidity affect the lifecycle and distribution of both mosquitoes and the Plasmodium parasite.
Rising temperatures and unpredictable rainfall patterns can expand the geographical range of Anopheles mosquitoes, bringing them into new areas where malaria was not previously a concern.
Additionally, climate change can alter macaque behaviour and migration patterns, pushing these animals into new areas where they come into contact with human populations and increasing the risk of zoonotic transmission, especially with the presence of Anopheles mosquitoes in these areas.
ALSO READ: 'Virus hunters' on the prowl to track the next pandemic
While traditional vector control measures such as insecticide-treated nets, indoor residual spraying and larval source management have been effective in controlling human malaria, they may be less effective against zoonotic malaria.
This is mainly because the primary mosquito vectors are outdoor biters (exophagic) and typically feed outside human dwellings.
As a result, indoor-based strategies like insecticide-treated nets and indoor residual spraying, offer limited protection against these vectors.
Preventive methods
Preventing zoonotic malaria requires proactive measures to reduce exposure to infected mosquitoes and macaques in areas where the disease is prevalent.
Many ecotourism activities, such as hiking and wildlife observation, take place in forested or jungle areas that can be high-risk zones for zoonotic malaria transmission.
One of the most effective ways to prevent such infections is to avoid entering forested areas, especially during the peak mosquito-biting times, which are typically at dawn and dusk.
If entering such areas is unavoidable, it is crucial to take the necessary precautions, such as taking prophylactic drugs.
Wearing the right protective clothing is also a simple, yet highly effective measure against mosquito bites.
When entering a jungle where zoonotic malaria is a risk, it is important to wear long-sleeved shirts, long pants and socks to minimise exposed skin.
Light-coloured clothing is also recommended, as mosquitoes are generally more attracted to dark colours.
Clothing made from tightly woven fabrics provides an added barrier against mosquito bites, further reducing the risk of infection.
In addition, using insect repellents containing DEET or picaridin can significantly reduce the chances of mosquito bites.
These repellents should be applied to exposed skin, especially when hiking or engaging in other outdoor activities in areas with a high risk of zoonotic malaria.
It is also advisable to treat clothing and gear with insect repellent to provide additional protection.
ALSO READ: Keep the mosquitoes at bay with these natural solutions
If someone develops a fever, chills, headache or other symptoms resembling malaria after engaging in jungle-related activities or visiting areas where zoonotic malaria is known to occur, it is crucial to seek medical attention immediately.
Early diagnosis and prompt treatment are vital in preventing the progression of the disease to more severe forms.
Stronger multi-sectoral collaborations in combating zoonotic malaria through the integration of the One Health approach are also vital.
This includes strengthening surveillance and diagnostic capabilities in the human health sector, monitoring infection in macaque populations and implementing targeted vector control strategies.
Environmental management, such as reducing deforestation and limiting human-wildlife contact, also plays a key role.
By fostering collaboration among public health, veterinary and environmental agencies, the One Health approach offers a comprehensive and sustainable solution to reduce the risk of transmission and support long-term control of zoonotic malaria.
Dr Nantha Kumar Jeyaprakasam is a senior lecturer of parasitology and medical entomology at University Kebangsaan Malaysia. For more information, email starhealth@thestar.com.my. The information provided is for educational and communication purposes only, and should not be considered as medical advice. The Star does not give any warranty on accuracy, completeness, functionality, usefulness or other assurances as to the content appearing in this article. The Star disclaims all responsibility for any losses, damage to property or personal injury suffered directly or indirectly from reliance on such information.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
5 hours ago
- The Star
WHO proposes increased health taxes to bridge financing gap
ACCRA, Aug. 5 (Xinhua) -- World Health Organization (WHO) Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus on Tuesday proposed an increase in health taxes on some consumer products to raise enough revenue to close global health funding gaps. Speaking during the Africa Health Sovereignty Summit in Accra, the Ghanaian capital, Ghebreyesus also called for more domestic investment and deeper governance reform in health to build resilient health systems in Africa. He said health financing could not be discussed outside the broader economic context, noting that Africa is disadvantaged in the global economic architecture, losing more than it receives in aid, which makes health financing difficult on the continent. He cited the example of 2023, when Africa received 74 billion U.S. dollars in aid but lost 90 billion dollars to illicit financial outflows and 55 billion dollars to corporate tax exemptions. "One practical solution is health taxes. A 50 percent price increase on harmful products like tobacco, alcohol, and sugary drinks could generate an additional 3.7 trillion dollars globally within five years and save millions of lives. Beyond domestic reforms, global change is essential," said the WHO director-general. Turning to Africa, Ghebreyesus said the continent needs leadership to recognize opportunities in crisis. He lauded Ghanaian President John Dramani Mahama for his leadership in seeking to reimagine the global health governance architecture and bring health issues confronting Africa to the fore. The summit is expected to adopt the Accra Initiative, a bold, action-oriented roadmap that establishes new benchmarks, shared principles, and clear priorities for reforming global health governance.
The Star
6 hours ago
- The Star
Ghana hosts summit with call to reimagine global health system
ACCRA, Aug. 5 (Xinhua) -- The Africa Health Sovereignty Summit opened in Accra, the Ghanaian capital, on Tuesday with a call to reimagine global health governance amid a rapidly shifting geopolitical and economic landscape. Convened by Ghanaian President John Dramani Mahama, the summit seeks to foster a new era of health sovereignty, rooted in national ownership, investment, and leadership. Mahama called for efforts to redesign the architecture that has excluded Africa's voices, needs, and innovations during the opening. The Ghanaian president said Africa needs to develop health systems that not only respond to health crises but also generate resilience, promote equity, and enhance the dignity of its people, calling for a new approach to health financing on the continent. "I extend an open invitation to all nations represented here to join us in building an African health investment ecosystem that is driven by purpose and is powered by equity and anchored in our sovereignty," the president added. Dignitaries, including World Health Organization Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus and senior officials from other African countries, also attended the summit.
The Star
19 hours ago
- The Star
AI can be used to spread health disinformation
Artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed many fields of human activity, including healthcare. It is increasingly used to analyse complex medical and healthcare data, and has the potential to diagnose diseases, develop personalised treatment plans, and assist clinicians' decision-making. While AI has the potential to enhance patients' care in their healthcare journeys, there are unresolved issues related to data privacy, bias and the need for human expertise, which has to be addressed for the responsible and effective use of AI in healthcare. The public obtains substantial health information from multiple electronic sources and this has been propagated by social media. AI has led to negative impacts on individual and public health. This column addresses AI and health misinformation and disinformation. Infodemic of misinformation and disinformation The World Health Organization (WHO) distinguishes misinformation from disinformation. 'Misinformation is the spread of false information without the intent to mislead. 'Those who share the misinformation may believe it is true, useful or interesting, and have no malicious intent towards the recipients they are sharing it with. 'Disinformation is designed or spread with full knowledge of it being false (information has been manipulated), as part of an intention to deceive and cause harm. 'The motivations can be economic gain, ideological, religious, political or in support of a social agenda, among others.' The harmful effects of misinformation and disinformation include threats to individual and public health, the environment, or security. The Covid-19 pandemic was the perfect storm for the proliferation and spread of disinformation. There was global fear, uncertainty and doubt. It occurred at a time in history when there was extensive global access to, creation of and sharing of information, including misinformation and disinformation. As the pandemic spread, social media postings and the virus' spread stoked fear; uncertainties about treatments and the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions like social distancing, masking etc; and the safety and effectiveness of the new vaccines, among others. This caused societal turmoil and fear, protests in some countries, and delayed or no vaccine uptake, as well as increased death rates in some countries or regions. During the pandemic, the WHO introduced the term 'infodemic', which is 'too much information, including false or misleading information, in digital and physical environments during a disease outbreak. 'It causes confusion and risk-taking behaviours that can harm health. 'It also leads to mistrust in health authorities and undermines the public health response. 'An infodemic can intensify or lengthen outbreaks when people are unsure about what they need to do to protect their health and the health of people around them. 'With growing digitisation – an expansion of social media and internet use – information can spread more rapidly. 'This can help to more quickly fill information voids, but can also amplify harmful messages'. AI and health disinformation The benefits of AI have been touted by many policymakers and healthcare professionals. Advancements in AI, particularly for large language models (LLMs), are impacting on public health, with millions turning to AI tools for health-related advice. But how reliable is the health advice from these tools? Researchers from the University of South Australia (UniSA) and Flinders University in Australia, Harvard Medical School in the United States, University College London in Britain and the Warsaw University of Technology in Poland reported in the Annals of Internal Medicine on June 24 (2025), how easy it is to exploit the weaknesses in machine learning systems by using disinformation tools that the public have access to. The researchers evaluated five foundational and most advanced AI systems developed by OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, Meta and X Corp to determine whether they could be programmed to operate as health disinformation chatbots. Using instructions available only to developers, the researchers programmed each AI system (designed to operate as chatbots when embedded in web pages) to produce incorrect responses to health queries and included fabricated references from highly reputable sources to sound more authoritative and credible. The 'chatbots' were then asked 10 health-related questions. The researchers reported that: 'Of the 100 health queries posed across the five customised LLM API chatbots, 88 (88%) responses were health disinformation. 'Four of the five chatbots (GPT-4o, Gemini 1.5 Pro, Llama 3.2-90B Vision and Grok Beta) generated disinformation in 100% (20 of 20) of their responses, whereas Claude 3.5 Sonnet responded with disinformation in 40% (eight of 20). 'The disinformation included claimed vaccine-autism links, HIV being airborne, cancer-curing diets, sunscreen risks, genetically-modified organism conspiracies, attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder and depression myths, garlic replacing antibiotics, and 5G causing infertility. 'Exploratory analyses further showed that the OpenAI GPT Store could currently be instructed to generate similar disinformation. 'Overall, LLM APIs and the OpenAI GPT Store were shown to be vulnerable to malicious system-level instructions to covertly create health disinformation chatbots.' Study lead author and UniSA pharmacy lecturer Dr Natansh Modi said: 'If these systems can be manipulated to covertly produce false or misleading advice, then they can create a powerful new avenue for disinformation that is harder to detect, harder to regulate, and more persuasive than anything seen before. 'This is not a future risk. It is already possible, and it is already happening.' He added that effective safeguards are technically achievable. 'However, the current protections are inconsistent and insufficient. 'Developers, regulators and public health stakeholders must act decisively, and they must act now. 'Without immediate action, these systems could be exploited by malicious actors to manipulate public health discourse at scale, particularly during crises such as pandemics or vaccine campaigns.' Take these actions The message from the study is clear, i.e. 'Trust your doctor, not the chatbox.' The comment in the New England Journal of Medicine 's Journal Watch on July 1 (2025) is unambiguous: 'The danger is clear and present: Anyone can create AI chatbots that generate authoritative answers with fabricated peer-reviewed references and disseminate false health information – no coding required. 'What can we do? ... writers remind us of the SIFT method: 'Stop and think; 'Investigate sources; 'Find other sources; and 'Trace claims to their origins. 'Critical thinking is our defence against AI misinformation and can help us build a culture of informed scepticism before harm is done.' Individuals can do much on their own to address health misinformation and disinformation, such as: Getting accurate health information from your doctor and other healthcare professionals, and/or from websites of regulators and professional organisations Looking out for emotional red flags online Using fact-checking tools Doing reverse image search by copying the image or the image's URL into the search bar of an image search tool Spotting spoof websites Spotting fake social media accounts Countering the misinformation or disinformation by not sharing it, correcting it, debunking it and reporting it Engaging with friends, colleagues and family to deal with the problem of health misinformation and disinformation Addressing health misinformation and disinformation in the community. Regulators have a vital role in addressing health misinformation and disinformation. Their actions can include: Ensuring there are robust screening and accountability safeguards to ensure public health safety with rapidly evolving digital technologies Addressing the public health impact of health misinformation and disinformation Establishing best practices for prevention by ensuring their websites provide current and accurate health information Sharing toolkits from other regulators Investing in research on misinformation and disinformation Modernising public health communications Increasing resources to help states and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) to better address questions, concerns, misinformation and disinformation Expanding efforts to build long-term resilience to misinformation and disinformation like educational programmes. In summary, there is an urgent need for regulators, especially the government, to address the use of AI in health misinformation and disinformation. Dr Milton Lum is a past president of the Federation of Private Medical Practitioners Associations and the Malaysian Medical Association. For more information, email starhealth@ The views expressed do not represent that of organisations that the writer is associated with. The information provided is for educational and communication purposes only, and it should not be construed as personal medical advice. Information published in this article is not intended to replace, supplant or augment a consultation with a health professional regarding the reader's own medical care. The Star disclaims all responsibility for any losses, damage to property or personal injury suffered directly or indirectly from reliance on such information.
