The broken Liberals have a dilemma: was Angus Taylor the problem, or is he the solution?
'I don't see any scenario where someone who has failed to prosecute the case against the government on the economy turns out to have the secret economic agenda for the future,' says one Liberal. 'The incompetence is clear.'
Liberals now acknowledge in public the weakness of their economic agenda. 'I feel that we had zero economic policy to sell,' NSW senator Hollie Hughes told ABC Radio National on Monday. She blamed Taylor for failing to land a blow on Treasurer Jim Chalmers. 'I have concerns about his capability. I don't know what he's been doing for three years.'
Hughes has an axe to grind: Taylor marshalled the numbers on the right to have her dropped from the Senate ticket, which means she is out of parliament on June 30. Even so, other Liberals agree that the economic plan was too thin and that Taylor has to take responsibility. Can he be the solution if he was such a big part of the problem?
No less than former treasurer Peter Costello warned that the opposition failed to do enough about falling living standards and heavy federal spending. 'The Coalition presented no coherent policy about how to deal with these issues,' he told The Australian Financial Review.
The leadership contest is close for one big reason: Ley also shares responsibility for the election outcome. As the deputy leader, she was part of the team that oversaw the agenda for the past three years. No candidate for the leadership is a fresh face who offers a clean break from the past.
The numbers are difficult to predict because the party room is in flux. The strategic failure under Dutton, who tried to appeal to 'battlers' in the outer suburbs without doing enough to win back 'teal' voters in wealthier suburbs, has reduced the Liberal ranks by at least 13 seats.
This could weaken the support for Ley. The cruel twist for the moderates is that they lost so many MPs under an agenda set by the conservatives. The frustration about this is obvious when moderates such as Andrew Bragg and Dave Sharma, both senators from NSW, say that 'culture wars' turned away voters.
The moderates have lost former minister David Coleman, Jenny Ware, James Stevens, Keith Wolahan and Bridget Archer. The conservatives have lost former minister Michael Sukkar, Ross Vasta and Luke Howarth.
The Liberals paid the price every time Dutton copied US President Donald Trump by promising to cut government services or stop 'woke' agendas. They paid the price when he complained about working from home.
This is also a problem for Hume because some of her colleagues blame her for the perception that the Liberals wanted to curb working from home, given she fuelled the complaints about it with a speech on March 3.
Hume has been a good addition to the senior ranks over the past three years, but she is caught up in the recriminations over the campaign. Some colleagues are furious with her for a television appearance in which she suggested 'Chinese spies' were handing out how-to-vote leaflets for Labor. The Labor team turned this into a social media campaign that hurt the Liberals in Chinese communities.
The Liberals are in a crisis that will take years to address. Their branches are getting older and smaller, while they struggle to finder younger and more diverse candidates for parliament. Dutton allowed these structural problems to remain, while getting glowing feedback from the late-night hosts on Sky News.
A leadership battle that pits conservatives against moderates will not fix the structural flaws, either. The conservative MPs who love a 'culture war' will be permanently exiled from government if they refuse to share power with moderates who can win urban electorates.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
7NEWS
an hour ago
- 7NEWS
Hyundai expects an exodus of brands due to new Australian emissions regulations
Australia's stringent new vehicle emissions regulations are set to send a host of auto brands running from these shores, according to local Hyundai chief Don Romano. The ink officially dried on the federal government's New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES) at the start of this year, bringing with it legislation designed to reduce the carbon footprint of the Australian car market. While the NVES came into effect on January 1, 2025, penalties won't start being accrued until July 1. The recent federal election brought with it some uncertainty about the NVES, with former Liberal leader Peter Dutton promising to scrap the legislation. However, in the wake of Labor's win led by Anthony Albanese, there's no longer any doubt about whether it will be enforced. Speaking to CarExpert at the launch of the pint-size Hyundai Inster electric SUV, Mr Romano said that many automakers will be caught off guard by the punitive new regulations. Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. 'When it comes down to NVES, there's going to be a lot of brands that are going to start falling apart because they're burying their heads in the sand,' said Mr Romano. 'They're not doing the math, they're not looking at just how much this is going to cost them to stay in business in Australia. 'I think you're going to see an exodus. You're going to see a number of brands that finally say 'I can't do it', unless the government that we just re-elected makes the decision to go in a different direction, which I think is unlikely given the election results.' Hyundai has backed the NVES from early in the piece, expressing confidence in meeting the Australian Government's tightening CO2 targets between 2025 and 2029. However, some of its rivals have been less supportive and others including Toyota have indicated that fines would ultimately be passed onto consumers in the form of price hikes. Having taken over as Hyundai Australia CEO just a few months ago, Mr Romano will lead the brand in its response to NVES with a focus on electric vehicles (EVs) and other 'future energy' initiatives. 'Let's do it like Europe, [where] they're just going, 'okay, we've got to live with it, let's deal with it'. And guess what we're seeing right now in Europe? A resurgence in EVs,' he said. While Hyundai is prepared to tackle tightening emissions regulations, Mr Romano still sees significant room for improvement in how policy is used to accelerate the transition towards greener forms of transport. 'What the government is doing is half-baked,' he concluded. 'They're pushing us to move to BEVs, only us. What they're missing, not just in Australia but everywhere, is the fact that the gas [petroleum] companies aren't being pushed to put in the charging infrastructure. 'If you were to do that, I think that resurgence would push even higher. Right now we're at 20 per cent BEVs in Europe, with a much more robust charging infrastructure. 'Once you start doing that, then you start getting economies of scale, and then all the costs start to come down. At that point you're going to see all the advantages of BEVs, and they'll be less expensive ultimately than an ICE vehicle. 'The only way to get there… is to have a more robust charging infrastructure that engenders a lot of confidence in buyers to buy.' Less than one in 10 vehicles sold in Australia last year were EVs (91,292 of more than 1.22 million), although that number was up 4.7 per cent on the previous year.
Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
Hyundai expects an exodus of brands due to new Australian emissions regulations
Australia's stringent new vehicle emissions regulations are set to send a host of auto brands running from these shores, according to local Hyundai chief Don Romano. The ink officially dried on the federal government's New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES) at the start of this year, bringing with it legislation designed to reduce the carbon footprint of the Australian car market. While the NVES came into effect on January 1, 2025, penalties won't start being accrued until July 1. The recent federal election brought with it some uncertainty about the NVES, with former Liberal leader Peter Dutton promising to scrap the legislation. However, in the wake of Labor's win led by Anthony Albanese, there's no longer any doubt about whether it will be enforced. Speaking to CarExpert at the launch of the pint-size Hyundai Inster electric SUV, Mr Romano said that many automakers will be caught off guard by the punitive new regulations. Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. Supplied Credit: CarExpert 'When it comes down to NVES, there's going to be a lot of brands that are going to start falling apart because they're burying their heads in the sand,' said Mr Romano. 'They're not doing the math, they're not looking at just how much this is going to cost them to stay in business in Australia. 'I think you're going to see an exodus. You're going to see a number of brands that finally say 'I can't do it', unless the government that we just re-elected makes the decision to go in a different direction, which I think is unlikely given the election results.' Hyundai has backed the NVES from early in the piece, expressing confidence in meeting the Australian Government's tightening CO2 targets between 2025 and 2029. However, some of its rivals have been less supportive and others including Toyota have indicated that fines would ultimately be passed onto consumers in the form of price hikes. Having taken over as Hyundai Australia CEO just a few months ago, Mr Romano will lead the brand in its response to NVES with a focus on electric vehicles (EVs) and other 'future energy' initiatives. Supplied Credit: CarExpert 'Let's do it like Europe, [where] they're just going, 'okay, we've got to live with it, let's deal with it'. And guess what we're seeing right now in Europe? A resurgence in EVs,' he said. While Hyundai is prepared to tackle tightening emissions regulations, Mr Romano still sees significant room for improvement in how policy is used to accelerate the transition towards greener forms of transport. 'What the government is doing is half-baked,' he concluded. 'They're pushing us to move to BEVs, only us. What they're missing, not just in Australia but everywhere, is the fact that the gas [petroleum] companies aren't being pushed to put in the charging infrastructure. 'If you were to do that, I think that resurgence would push even higher. Right now we're at 20 per cent BEVs in Europe, with a much more robust charging infrastructure. Supplied Credit: CarExpert 'Once you start doing that, then you start getting economies of scale, and then all the costs start to come down. At that point you're going to see all the advantages of BEVs, and they'll be less expensive ultimately than an ICE vehicle. 'The only way to get there… is to have a more robust charging infrastructure that engenders a lot of confidence in buyers to buy.' Less than one in 10 vehicles sold in Australia last year were EVs (91,292 of more than 1.22 million), although that number was up 4.7 per cent on the previous year. MORE: Everything Hyundai MORE: How Hyundai Australia's new boss plans to reverse Korean brand's sales slide
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
G7 Summit set to test Albanese-Trump ties as military and trade disputes loom following Washington's demands of Canberra
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has yet to schedule his meeting with US President Donald Trump at the G7 summit amid pressure from Washington for Canberra to boost military spending. Mr Albanese and President Trump will likely meet for the first time in Kananaskis, Canada between June 15 and 17—either a formal meeting or a discussion on the summit sidelines. President Trump's attendance at the G7 summit itself remains unconfirmed, but preparations are underway on the assumption that the meeting will occur. It comes after the request from US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth for Australia to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, up from the 2.33 per cent projected by 2033. Trade Minister Don Farrell told Sky News Sunday Agenda that the government had "walked the talk" on existing defence investments. "We are committed to the defence of this country. We are committed to a significant uplift in the amount of spending," he said. Mr Albanese has not ruled out further defence investment, but maintains any additional spending must be aligned with specific needs—not what he calls 'arbitrary targets'. However, Defence Chief Admiral David Johnston told a defence summit on Wednesday that his department would likely ask for a funding boost in the next biennial review. 'The opportunity we have with the biennial cycle now is to keep coming back and reviewing the strategy,' he said. 'Looking at the opportunities or where the investments are required, putting the case to government to increase the defence expenditure where we believe it is needed.' Admiral Johnston also expressed concern about the possibility of Australia waging war in the future on home soil, rather than overseas. However, inside the government there has been a belief that they do not expect a direct military invasion of Australia by China. Rather, insiders view strategic assets like submarines and long-range missiles as tools to protect critical trade routes, not to repel a land invasion. The clash over defence spending follows a week of escalating tension between the government and the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, which hosted Admiral Johnston. Mr Albanese publicly dismissed the think tank's recent report warning of a 'hollow' Australian Defence Force, calling ASPI's criticisms 'predictable'. ASPI Executive Director Justin Bassi defended the institute's work, saying the public deserves transparency on the country's strategic vulnerabilities. 'Unfortunately, the world has these threats that do impact Australia and to counter these threats we need to, unfortunately, spend more money in the area,' he told Sky News. Adding another layer of complexity to the Albanese-Trump meeting will be growing trade tensions. The White House has moved to double steel tariffs from 25 to 50 per cent, imposed a blanket 10 per cent tariff on all foreign goods, and signalled further barriers on Chinese imports. Sources have said that a proposal to exempt Australia from some of those tariffs in exchange for expanded access to Australian critical minerals was rejected. The suspicion was that the deal was scuttled by President Trump's trade advisor Peter Navarro. Australia has begun considering relaxing biosecurity restrictions to allow US beef imports, a sensitive negotiation being handled by Trade Minister Don Farrell. Despite these flashpoints, senior government figures believe trade, not defence, will dominate the Prime Minister's first engagement with Mr Trump.
