Appeals court blocks Ohio's ban on gender-affirming care for minors
Ohio's ban on gender-affirming care for minors is unconstitutional and must be permanently blocked from being enforced, a three-judge panel of appellate judges ruled Tuesday. The law also banned trans women and girls from participating in female sports.
The state's Republican attorney general vowed an immediate appeal.
On Tuesday, the state's 10th District Court of Appeals reversed a decision made last summer to allow the law to go into effect after a judge found it 'reasonably limits parents' rights.' The law bans counseling, gender-affirming surgery and hormone therapy for minors, unless they are already receiving such therapies and a doctor deems it risky to stop.
The litigation was filed by the American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU of Ohio and the global law firm Goodwin, who argued the law not only denies health care to transgender children and teens, but specifically discriminates against them accessing it.
The court agreed and cited a number of flaws in the lower court's reasoning.
Judge Carly Edelstein wrote in the ruling that the Ohio law does not outlaw identical drugs when they're used for other reasons, only when they're used for gender transitioning, which makes it discriminatory. She also said that a prescription ban is not a reasonable exercise of the state's police power when it is weighed against the rights of parents to care for their children.
Addressing proponents' arguments that minors are not in a position to understand the long-term impacts such procedures could have on their lives, the judge said that, while they may not be, their parents are.
'Thus, in considering whether the H.B. 68 ban is reasonable, it is necessary to keep in mind that the law recognizes the maturity, experience, and capacity of parents to make difficult judgments and act in their children's best interest,' she wrote.
The ACLU called the ruling 'historic.'
'This win restores the right of trans youth in Ohio to choose vitally important health care, with the support of their families and physicians,' Freda Levenson, legal director of the ACLU of Ohio, said in a statement. 'We are gratified by the Court's decision, which soundly rejects this interference of politicians with Ohioans' bodily autonomy.'
Tuesday's ruling marked the second blow for the legislation.
Republican Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine vetoed the law in December 2023, after touring the state to visit children's hospitals and talking to families of children with gender dysphoria. He cast his action as thoughtful, limited and 'pro-life' — citing the suicide risks associated with minors who don't get proper treatment for gender dysphoria.
DeWine simultaneously announced plans to move to administratively ban gender-affirming surgeries until a person is 18, and to position the state to better regulate and track gender-affirming treatments in both children and adults. He hoped the move would allay concerns of fellow Republicans at the Ohio Statehouse, but the administration swiftly backed off that plan after transgender adults raised serious concerns about how state regulations could impact their lives and health.
Ohio lawmakers stood their ground on the bill, easily overriding his veto — making Ohio the 23rd state to ban gender-affirming health care for trans youth.
Republican Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, a candidate to succeed DeWine next year, quickly released a statement saying that he will appeal Tuesday's ruling.
'This is a no-brainer – we are appealing that decision and will seek an immediate stay,' he said. 'There is no way I'll stop fighting to protect these unprotected children.'
Levenson acknowledged Tuesday that it's likely not the end of the legal dispute, but said her organization remained 'fervently committed' to preventing the bill from ever taking effect again.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
700 Marines deployed to L.A. as Trump, Gov. Newsom clash over response
June 9 (UPI) -- President Donald Trump publicly endorsed the arrest of California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Monday during a war of words, as the administration authorized the deployment of 700 Marines to Los Angeles to quell anti-ICE immigration protests that turned violent over the weekend. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced the deployment to help defend federal agents amid protests over immigration raids. "We have an obligation to defend federal law enforcement officers -- even if Gavin Newsom will not," Hegseth said Monday. "Due to increased threats to federal law enforcement officers and federal buildings, approximately 700 active-duty U.S. Marines from Camp Pendleton are being deployed to Los Angeles to restore order," Hegseth added in a post on X. Meanwhile, Trump and Newsom ramped up their rhetoric after the Trump administration called in 2,000 National Guardsmen over the weekend to protect buildings and residents, a move Newsom called inflammatory for the "peaceful" protests as the administration called it "chaos." "While Los Angeles burns -- officers ambushed, city in chaos -- Kamala Harris, Gavin Newsom and Maxine Waters call the riots and insurrection 'peaceful,'" The White House wrote Monday in a post on X, showing video of burning cars and protesters closing Highway 101. "They side with mobs. President Trump stands for law and order." In response to a reporter question Monday, Trump was asked whether he supported Newsom's taunt to "border czar" Tom Homan to "come and arrest him." "I would do it if I were Tom," Trump said Monday. "I think it's great. Gavin likes the publicity, but I think it would be a great thing," Trump said, as he called Newsom a "nice guy," but "grossly incompetent." Newsom responded on social media saying, "The president of the United States just called for the arrest of a sitting governor. This is a day I hoped I would never see in America." "I don't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican this is a line we cannot cross as a nation -- this is an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism," Newsom wrote in a post on X. By Monday evening, Newsom said he would send 800 more state and local officers to Los Angeles. "Chaos is exactly what Trump wanted, and now California is left to clean up the mess," Newsom wrote in a new post on X. "We're working with local partners to surge over 800 additional state and local law enforcement officers to ensure the safety of our L.A. communities." Newsom and California Attorney General Rob Bonta also announced Monday that they have filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration over its activation of the state's National Guard without getting state and local approval first. "California's governor and I are suing to put a stop to President Trump's unlawful, unprecedented order calling federalized National Guard forces into Los Angeles," Bonta said. "The president is trying to manufacture chaos and crisis on the ground for his own political ends. This is an abuse of power -- and not one we take lightly." During Friday's raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement, demonstrators flooded the streets and freeways to protest their actions. The fire department said it responded to "multiple vehicle fires" during the unrest. Waymo autonomous electric vehicles were among those targeted, according to Los Angeles Fire Department public information officer Erik Scott. "Due to the design of EV battery systems, it's often difficult to apply the water directly to the burning cells, especially in a chaotic environment, and in some cases, allowing the fire to burn is the safest tactic," Scott said. Over the weekend, demonstrators spilled out onto the 101 freeway that runs through downtown L.A. Approximately 70 people have been arrested after being ordered to leave the downtown area. Some were also seen throwing objects at officers. "I just met with L.A. immigrant rights community leaders as we respond to this chaotic escalation by the administration," L.A. Mayor Karen Bass wrote Monday evening in a post on X. "Let me be absolutely clear -- as a united city, we are demanding the end to these lawless attacks on our communities. Los Angeles will always stand with everyone who calls our city home."
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
La. legislative session nears end, here's a recap
BATON ROUGE, La. (Louisiana First) — The Louisiana legislative session is nearing the have tackled insurance reform, election security, and even the state's $45 billion spending budget. While some bills have been signed into law by the governor, a lot of bills are still making their way through the legislature. Governor Jeff Landry has signed into law six bills from his Tort and insurance reform effort, which he says will lower insurance rates. One of the laws requires people who claim they have been hurt in a car accident to prove their injuries were caused by it. 'This points to a cultural problem of frivolous litigation, driven by lawyer advertising,' said Governor Landry during a news conference and bill signing. Even before the session, Landry called for major reform with what he calls a balanced approach, addressing both trial lawyers and the insurance companies. State elections were also a priority in this session. A package of bills pushed by Louisiana's Secretary of State, Nancy Landry, promises election security in the state. Out of the six election bills presented, a few are hung up in committees, one has been sent to the governor, and another has been signed by the governor. As for the bills Louisiana First News has followed: The abortion exceptions bill never made it out of committee last week. It would have allowed victims of rape under the age of 17 to get an abortion. The bill failed 3-9, with two Democrats siding with Republicans. A bill that promised to address homelessness also failed in committee. HB 619 would have allowed local governments to designate certain areas as homeless encampments if beds at homeless shelters are not available. That bill was narrowly defeated by one vote in the Committee on Appropriations. And finally, the bill that funds the government, House Bill 1 by Representative Jack McFarland, has been on a fast track to the governor's desk with lots of bipartisan support. McFarland says the 45 billion dollar budget does more with less, adds no new taxes, and still funds the legislature's priorities, like education, teacher pay raises, and crucial government services. 'I have an open dialogue with every member. If you will remember when the session started, I told every member publicly I'm going to fund the priorities of the legislature,' said McFarland after his bill passed out of the Committee on Appropriations. Since that time, HB 1 has also passed out of the House, and on Monday it passed out of the Senate with no opposition. Out of the hundreds of bills filed, 83 have passed, with a lot more being considered. The Governor has only vetoed one bill so far. The session must end by Thursday. 81 Years After D-Day: Honoring the courage that changed history Date, game time announced for LSU Baseball in 2025 NCAA Men's College World Series Trump hails $1K-per-child 'Trump Accounts' during White House roundtable La. legislative session nears end, here's a recap Inmate accused of attacking Assumption Parish corrections officer facing additional charges Collins calls Kennedy's firing of vaccine experts 'excessive' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Debate within the debate: Should Pennsylvania's tipped minimum wage rise too?
HARRISBURG, Pa. (WHTM) — The overall debate is not new. Neither are the arguments: All surrounding states — even West Virginia, supporters of raising Pennsylvania's base pay from $7.25 are always sure to note — have higher minimum wages than Pennsylvania. But raising it could cause consumer prices to rise and cost jobs, opponents always say. But within that familiar debate — this time over House Bill 1549, which would raise minimum wage to $15 (and eventually beyond) for most Pennsylvanians at different rates depend on which counties they call home — is the question of whether if that happens, employers of tipped workers (like restaurants who employ servers) should have to pay more than the $2.83 per hour, before tips, they're currently required to pay. Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now What's already true, and wouldn't change under any plan, is: For tipped workers who don't earn much, employers have to make up the difference between tipped minimum wage and full minimum wage. But under the proposed bill, tipped minimum wage would rise to 60 percent of regular minimum wage — or, for example, $9.00 when minimum wage in a given county rises to $15. The problem with that, according to restaurant industry leaders? 'What this tripling of the base wage would mean, is restaurants would need to recoup those additional expenses somehow,' said Joe Massaro of the Pennsylvania Restaurant & Lodging Association (PRLA). New Rite Aid locations listed for closure in Pennsylvania: court docs Massaro cited the experience of Washington, D.C., where years ago, the city's Democratic mayor and city council previously overturned a law — backed by other Democrats and approved by voter referendum — that would have required restaurants to pay employees full minimum wage before tips. Now leaders there have paused a minimum wage hike, under a subsequently passed referendum, due to go into effect July 1. D.C. restaurants recouped the higher wages 'mostly by adding service charges to the bill,' Massaro said. 'And when that service charge is added, then consumers customers pay less in tips, so servers were reporting making less money after the change.' Massaro said the average tipped Pennsylvania employee earns $27 per hour. PRLA backs a proposed amendment by State Rep. Robert Leadbeter (R-Columbia) to House Bill 1549, which would exclude employers of tipped workers from the proposed minimum wage hike. The overall legislation enjoys strong support by Democrats, who narrowly control the commonwealth's House of Representatives, but faces tougher odds in the Republican-controlled Senate, which would need to pass the bill before it could go to Governor Josh Shapiro, a Democrat, who supports raising Pennsylvania's minimum wage. Including Pennsylvania, 20 states have minimum wages equal to the federal minimum of $7.25 per hour. But most are in the south or mountain west; New Hampshire is the only northeastern state aside from Pennsylvania with a $7.25 hourly minimum wage. Minimum wages among states bordering Pennsylvania range from $8.75 in West Virginia to $15.50 in New York. Among all states and territories, Washington, D.C.'s $17.50 hourly minimum is highest, followed by California's $16.50. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
