logo
A cardiologist explains how to tell if your heart is aging too fast, and 4 tips to keep it young

A cardiologist explains how to tell if your heart is aging too fast, and 4 tips to keep it young

Your heart could be older than you think, limiting your potential lifespan by up to a decade. But a cardiologist says a few simple lifestyle changes could help.
New research from Northwestern University School of Medicine shows the average American's heart health makes them four to seven years older than their calendar age.
That's because of risk factors like high cholesterol, high blood pressure, and sedentary routines, driving up their risk of heart disease, the leading cause of death in the US.
You can check your own heart age for free online using a test developed by Northwestern researchers.
If you don't like what you see, incorporating daily habits like regular exercise can improve your heart age, said Dr. Sadiya Khan, a preventive cardiologist and professor of cardiovascular epidemiology who led the team that developed the calculator.
"As we think about our growing, aging population, some people age faster than others, and slowing that down can have a lot of impact for health," Khan told Business Insider.
How to tell if your heart is healthy
Usually, doctors measure heart health in percentages using your vital signs. For instance, a patient with a 7.5% risk of heart disease is considered intermediate risk.
But that doesn't translate well for the average person.
"It's a challenging piece of information to communicate and grasp. What does it mean to have a risk of 7.5%?" Khan said.
That's why Khan's team made an age predictor. It's easier to come up with a plan for your heart health if you understand in real terms what it means for your life expectancy.
The researchers studied 14,000 adults in the US aged 30 to 79, with no prior history of heart disease. They found that, on average, women's heart health age was about four years older than their chronological age, and men's heart age was about seven years older than their chronological age.
The gap widened for people with a lower income and education level; their heart age was as much as 10 years older than their chronological age.
Khan added a caveat: it's important to note that the calculator is meant to be a more accurate predictor of heart health risk, but it's not designed to be used alone to manage your health. Talk to your doctor about your risk.
"There's no exact number that means people should be alarmed or be concerned, but provide some context for what it means to have a heart age that's five years older or 10 years older," she said.
Simple ways to boost heart health
Knowing your heart health age can help you find simple, actionable steps to potentially boost longevity, Khan said.
"We wanted to be sure it was a tool to motivate heart-healthy behavior," she said. "There are things we already know that can help with your heart age and improve it."
To boost your heart health:
Stop smoking: If you're a smoker, quitting is the number one change you can make to improve your heart health, Khan said. That's not just tobacco — marijuana has been linked to worse heart health, even in edible form.
Optimize your workout: Regular physical activity, including low-intensity movement like walking, helps to strengthen your heart, and every added minute counts.
Get the right macros: Whole foods rich in fiber and healthy fats like omega-3s help support your heart. Avoid processed foods and added sugars.
Manage your stress: prevent strain on your heart.
If you're already young at heart, following the above tips can help you stay that way for years to come.
"If your heart age is a good spot, it's about strategies to maintain it," Khan said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's drug price ultimatum sets pharma firms scrambling
Trump's drug price ultimatum sets pharma firms scrambling

CNBC

time32 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Trump's drug price ultimatum sets pharma firms scrambling

Pharmaceutical firms are scrambling to respond to a fresh ultimatum from U.S. President Donald Trump demanding "binding commitments" to lower their drug prices stateside . The White House said Thursday that President Trump had sent letters to 17 major pharmaceutical firms outlining the steps they must take to lower the price of U.S. prescription drugs to "most favored nation" (MFN) levels by Sept. 29. They were told that if they "refuse to step up," the government will deploy every tool in its "arsenal to protect American families from continued abusive drug pricing practices," without stating what those measures could be. The companies to receive letters were AbbVie , Amgen , AstraZeneca , Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb , Eli Lilly , EMD Serono, Roche' s subsidiary Genentech, Gilead , GSK , Johnson & Johnson , Merck , Novartis , Novo Nordisk , Pfizer , Regeneron and Sanofi . Healthcare stocks tumbled Friday, following broader market losses as investors digested Trump's amended trade tariffs. Shares of Wegovy-maker Novo Nordisk dropped 5% in early morning trade before paring losses to trade 1.3% lower at 11:15 a.m. London time (6:15 a.m. ET). Companies were informed that they must provide MFN prices to all Medicaid patients, the U.S. health program for low-income patients. They were also told not to offer medicines to other developed markets at better prices than those offered in the U.S., and that they should sell drugs directly to U.S. patients, thereby cutting out pharmacy middlemen known as pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs). Trump has long lambasted pharmaceutical firms for what he dubs are unfair pricing practices, previously saying that he planned to bring down U.S. prices by 80%. In May, the president signed an executive order to lower drug costs by tying the prices of some medicines in the U.S. to the significantly lower ones abroad under the MFN policy. The U.S. consistently pays the most in the world for many prescription drugs, due in part to the U.S.′ highly complex and fragmented reimbursement system and lack of national pricing control. The latest announcement comes as the pharmaceutical industry is also calling for clarity on potential industry-wide tariffs. Trump previously warned these could run as high as 200%. Many companies have nevertheless shared that they agree with some of Trump's concerns. AstraZeneca CEO Pascal Soriot said Tuesday that the Anglo-Swedish firm had been liaising closely with the U.S. administration over the MFN policy and investment in U.S. manufacturing more broadly. Last week, it announced plans to invest $50 billion in the U.S., following a slew of other pharma firms. "There are issues around prices. I personally believe the president is right to say price equalization should happen," Soriot told reporters on an earnings call. Vas Narasimhan, CEO of Swiss-headquartered Novartis, also said last month that the firm was pursuing an MFN policy to lower U.S. drug prices. JPMorgan analysts said in a note Friday that while the latest announcement was intended to serve as a stark warning, ongoing talks between with the U.S. administration could buy pharma firms some time to respond. "While the government's latest announcement may appear harsh, we think it is likely that the matter is being discussed to some extent between the companies and the government, and we believe no changes that would have a significant negative impact on pharmaceutical companies will occur in the short term," analysts led by Seiji Wakao said in a note to clients.

Woman Leaves US Due to Severe Allergies—Shock at What She Can Eat in Europe
Woman Leaves US Due to Severe Allergies—Shock at What She Can Eat in Europe

Newsweek

time32 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Woman Leaves US Due to Severe Allergies—Shock at What She Can Eat in Europe

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. "I didn't want to leave behind my entire life in the U.S., but I didn't feel like I had a choice," Bee told Newsweek, after allergic reactions meant she was only able to eat three foods. Previously, Bee, who doesn't wish to disclose her full name, could eat anything without concern. But in recent years, her body began to reject different foods, starting with gluten, dairy, coffee, certain vegetables, and then various types of berries. Every week it seemed like she developed a new allergy, and she couldn't fathom why. By 2024, she was only able to eat broccoli, coconut, and some chicken. It became "quite depressing" to stick to these three ingredients for every single meal. "I break out in hives, or a red rash or flushing that covers my chest and face," Bee said. "The rash is also hot and itchy. I'd have difficulty breathing, stabbing pain in my abdomen, migraines, tinnitus, joint pain, brain fog, congestion, and heard my heartbeat in my head." Bee with a rash on her neck and chest after eating in the US, compared to no rash in Europe. Bee with a rash on her neck and chest after eating in the US, compared to no rash in Europe. @bee70654 / TikTok Bee had to ensure she had an EpiPen, inhaler, Benadryl (and oddly enough, baking soda) on hand at all times in case she suffered a reaction. She couldn't take it any longer, and in November 2024, she left the U.S. and moved to Europe for a fresh start. (She doesn't wish to name the country publicly due to safety reasons.) "I had to, I felt like my body was slowly shutting down from lack of nutrition because my diet was so limited," she said. The first time Bee tried eating something that she's normally allergic to was purely by accident. She'd ordered a broccoli dish (of course) and discovered that it was cooked in a tomato sauce—one of her biggest triggers. She braced for a reaction, only for nothing to happen and no symptoms to arise. After that, she gradually expanded her reach and sampled other foods that would normally cause her an array of symptoms. To her amazement, she hasn't had a single reaction since leaving the U.S. Bee said: "I started with gluten, dairy, then moved onto fruits and vegetables. I was always safe about it—never doing it alone, knowing where the closest hospital was, having my meds on hand. After dozens of trials, I just kept getting the same results. "I almost didn't believe it at first and was pretty shocked. I knew that there was just something different about American food that I couldn't explain." Bee tested the limits of her allergies under the guidance of a doctor and doesn't encourage anyone to try this without seeking medical advice. After doing tests with her doctor, Bee learned that she has high levels of the mycotoxins Ochratoxin A, Trichothecenes, Aflatoxins, Gliotoxin, and Zearalenone. These are toxic substances produced by molds which can contaminate certain agricultural products. She was also diagnosed with a gene that impacts how efficiently her body can process mold-related toxins. Bee eating shrimp for the first time in years and not experiencing a reaction. Bee eating shrimp for the first time in years and not experiencing a reaction. @bee70654 / TikTok As Bee puts it, it's not the food she's allergic to, but the mold instead. "Over time, my body couldn't handle it because of my genetic factors. My doctor also thinks that preservatives and additives could have also been contributing to the histamine reactions because my body had such high levels of mold, so it was more sensitive," Bee told Newsweek. The EU and U.S. have different regulations when it comes to mycotoxins in food. The EU tends to be stricter and allows lower limits of toxins, while the maximum limits are often higher in the U.S. Aflatoxin M1 can be found in milk, and the U.S. allows a maximum of 500 nanograms per kilogram, in contrast to the EU which permits a limit of 50 nanograms per kilogram. Dr. Saira Q. Zafar, a board-certified allergist and immunologist at Schweiger Dermatology and Allergy, told Newsweek that Bee's experience is "not entirely surprising" since certain artificial dyes, preservatives, and pesticide residues that are banned or tightly regulated in the EU are allowed in the U.S. In some cases, what may seem like an allergy may in fact be a sensitivity to additives or contaminants, including pesticides or mycotoxins. Zafar said: "Histamine intolerance—where the body reacts to histamine-rich or histamine-releasing foods like shellfish, aged cheese, or fermented products—can cause symptoms like rashes, flushing, or gastrointestinal upset. These may mimic an allergy but stem from impaired histamine breakdown. "If U.S. food production and storage methods lead to higher histamine or mold byproducts, it's conceivable that moving to a country with stricter regulations and fresher, less processed food could reduce symptoms." However, Bee's experience is anecdotal and it's important to stress the difference between that and a confirmed food allergy. Some food reactions may not be true allergies, but could relate to environmental exposures, microbiome changes, or chemical sensitivity, Zafar noted. After relocating, Bee started documenting her experiences of trying foods that once gave her allergic reactions on TikTok (@bee70654). The videos have captured plenty of attention online, with one even amassing over 1.8 million views and 188,000 likes at the time of writing. Bee can eat everything now in Europe, much to her delight. She's missed bread and dairy the most, and she cannot get enough of being able to eat them without fear. When she's returned to the U.S., the "food makes [her] sick" and she develops histamine reactions once more. "People shouldn't have to uproot their entire lives just to eat. I was disappointed to discover that the U.S. allows higher levels (or has no limits) mycotoxins in food," Bee said. "It's a relief to learn that my allergies were related to Mast Cell Activation Syndrome, which was triggered by mycotoxins and mold. I know there are people with real food allergies who don't have the privilege of eating foods abroad, or the privilege of uprooting their lives the way I did." Is there a health issue that's worrying you? Let us know via health@ We can ask experts for advice, and your story could be featured on Newsweek.

OB-GYN group won't take federal funds over Trump policies
OB-GYN group won't take federal funds over Trump policies

Axios

time2 hours ago

  • Axios

OB-GYN group won't take federal funds over Trump policies

The leading professional association for gynecologists is cutting financial ties with the federal government, citing Trump administration policies it says prevent it from providing evidence-based guidance. Why it matters: The decision by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists appears to be the first time a medical society has divested itself over conditions the administration has placed on government contractors and grant recipients. Professional medical groups routinely contract with the federal health agencies to administer or contribute to public health initiatives. ACOG has about 60,000 members and lists diversity and equity among its core values. State of play: ACOG sent an email to members last week notifying them that it will stop accepting federal funding for current contracts. "After careful deliberation, ACOG has made an organization-wide decision to stop accepting federal funding for all ACOG programs and activities for current contracts," the organization said in a statement shared with Axios. "Recent changes in federal funding laws and regulations significantly impact ACOG's program goals, policy positions, and ability to provide timely and evidence-based guidance and recommendations for care." "We remain fully committed to this critical work and will allocate our own resources to continue it in a way that is centered on patient needs and grounded in evidence." The organization will continue to engage with the federal government on policy advocacy, ACOG said. By the numbers: The ACOG Foundation — the group's 501(c)(3) affiliate — has received $950,000 from Health and Human Services this year to oversee reviews and updates of preventive services guidelines for women, according to an HHS grant-tracking website. ACOG wouldn't elaborate on what aspects of the work its decision will affect. Other medical societies that contract with the federal government include the American Medical Association, which has received $750,000 from HHS this year, per federal records. What they're saying: "This is great news for the American taxpayer," HHS communications director Andrew Nixon wrote in an email to Axios. "ACOG taking itself off the federal payroll might be the most responsible budgeting decision they've made." HHS will make sure the preventive services guidelines "reflect gold-standard, evidence-based science and in partnership with those who can deliver this guidance in accordance with the law," he said. Zoom out: ACOG is one of a few medical associations vocally pushing back against President Trump and HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s health policy shifts. Health care during pregnancy has become a flashpoint. Kennedy has removed the recommendation that pregnant people get COVID-19 vaccines, and a recent advisory panel to the Food and Drug Administration cast doubt on the safety of antidepressants during pregnancy. ACOG said afterward that the composition of the panel was "alarmingly unbalanced" and that there's robust evidence showing the medications are safe during pregnancy. The American Academy of Pediatrics has also publicly opposed recent HHS actions. The group boycotted a June meeting of Kennedy's handpicked vaccine advisory committee, saying a June purge of the panel's 17 advisers compromised its credibility. What to watch: ACOG left the door open to resuming federal contracting work in the future.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store