
NI chief medical officer rejects claim of ‘air of unreality' at pandemic's start
The exchange came during Sir Michael's final appearance at the UK Covid-19 Inquiry on Thursday.
The long-running inquiry is currently looking at adult and residential care as part of its scrutiny of the response to the pandemic.
It was put to Sir Michael that during a meeting in March 2020, Mr Lynch felt there was an 'an air of unreality', that scenes from Italy of old people dying, 'won't happen here'.
Sir Michael said: 'I fail to understand those comments if I'm really honest.'
He said it related to a meeting on March 13, which he described as 'part of a series of meetings which reflected the seriousness of the impending situation'.
'So in that series of meetings that day, I met with all the trade unions, I met with primary care representatives and secondary care representatives.
'I met with the Department of Communities and Local Government, and explained the evolving situation and the seriousness of this.
'This was about communicating to the system in Northern Ireland, not just health and social care, but right across other government departments as well, what we were about to face into.
'So I really don't understand any sense of unreality or lack of urgency.'
Eddie Lynch, former commissioner for older people for Northern Ireland.
He said he met Health and Social Care on February 11 and asked them to draw up plans for a surge, which he said he was 'fully anticipating', and had been attending meetings of Cobra, with the UK Government and Sage (Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies).
'There was no sense of unreality in terms of what we were facing into at all,' he said.
'Within days, we had introduced, on March 16, social distancing, working from home, advising people not to go to pubs and restaurants.
'So I really don't understand that reflection.'
Sir Michael also spoke about a shortage of Covid tests.
It was put to him that in the first interim protocol for testing, which came out on March 19, frontline clinical workers were included in the priority for being tested, but not care home workers.
He said: 'Frankly, we didn't have enough tests. It was simply that.
'We had just moved from the contain to the delay phase on March 12.
'We had stopped contact tracing because we didn't have enough tests to continue that, and we had to prioritise what tests we had for those people who were in hospital, either requiring ventilation like pneumonia.
'The management tried to protect individuals who may have been in contact with them in hospital, and to ensure that we were able to support those staff who were providing care for them, so it wasn't anything other than the fact we simply did not have the tests that we needed.'
Inquiry chairwoman Baroness Heather Hallett thanked Sir Michael for his evidence.
'Whatever findings I make, I don't think anybody disputes how much pressure you and your colleagues were under and the efforts you went to to try and protect as many people as possible.
'So thank you very much for what you did, and thank you very much for your help with the inquiry.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scotsman
33 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Why having a public inquiry into Sandie Peggie-NHS Fife case would be a terrible idea
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... How we will miss it when it is over. Over the summer, the Sandie Peggie employment tribunal has been as reliable a source of comedy as any end-of-the-pier show. If only the basis for it wasn't so important and serious. We will have to await the outcome but one thing is certain, someone will call for a wider inquiry. It might be into the policy or practice but some sort of investigation will be demanded. That would involve more lawyers and expense, only to produce some recommendations which would be ignored and then forgotten. That's how things work nowadays. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Figures from the Institute for Government show that before 1997, there were never more than three public inquiries running in the UK at the same time. At the moment, there are 21 – the highest number ever. A public inquiry into the case involving nurse Sandie Peggie, seen at the Scottish Parliament, and NHS Fife might prove to be an expensive waste of time (Picture: Andrew Milligan) | PA Trams inquiry lasted nine years From the Scottish Hospitals Inquiry to the Covid-19 Inquiry, on the surface they have become the natural means of establishing the facts in matters of public interest. Alternatively, they are a handy means of kicking the can down the road. Take the long-running Edinburgh Trams Inquiry. Lord Hardie's probe into why the city's tram project was £400m over budget and five years late was started in 2014 and ran longer than the Chilcot Inquiry into the Iraq War. It took nine years to report and cost more than £13m. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The report concluded there had been 'a litany of avoidable failures' and that 'poor management and abdication of responsibility on a large scale have had a significant and lasting impact on the lives and livelihoods of Edinburgh residents, and the reputation of the city'. When the report was finally issued in September 2023, Lord Hardie wasn't available to answer questions from the media but he did issue a 48-minute video statement on YouTube. To date, it's been viewed a grand total of 694 times. Lessons learned? Of course that is no way to measure the success of these things. We should look instead at the changes made, the individuals punished and the lessons learned for the future. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad What are they? The actions of some individuals were heavily criticised but no one lost their job. Instead City of Edinburgh Council said they'd already made changes to ensure the same thing couldn't happen again and the Scottish Government said: 'The inquiry took too long, was too costly and in some instances the evidence heard does not support the conclusion drawn.' So what was the point when the bungling and the hopeless duck and weave out of the way long before a conclusion and the competent have already changed things to avoid a repetition? Let's see where we get to with the Scottish Hospitals and the Covid-19 inquiries but the idea that ineptitude will be punished or processes will change feels like wishful thinking.


Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
State pension age review moves forward after discussion of increase to 69
The state pension age is already set to increase again from next year The possibility of the state pension age rising to 69 has edged closer as Labour announces another review of the state pension age. Legislation is already in place for the access age to gradually increase from the current 66 up to 67, between 2026 and 2028. Labour has now declared that there will be another review of where the state pension age should be set. The last review was conducted by Baroness Neville-Rolfe in 2022. Mark Pemberthy, benefits consulting leader at consultancy group Gallagher, highlighted that this past review made reference to the potential for further increases to the state pension age. He said: "The previous review of the state pension age in 2022 recommended that, on average, people should expect to receive the state pension for 31% of their adult life, and that the total cost of state pension related expenditure should be limited to 6% of GDP. "This review also anticipated a need to increase state pension age to 69 from 2046, although this has not yet been legislated for." The Government has outlined the key factors that the review will consider, which will include the idea of linking the state pension age to life expectancy and the role of the state pension age in keeping the state pension affordable and sustainable. However, Mr Pemberthy expressed doubt that there will be significant changes announced around these issues. He explained: "Life expectancy is a complex issue. For decades, life expectancy rose consistently. "This trend was halted by the COVID-19 pandemic and has stayed lower since – with 2024 life expectancy still lower than in 2019. But the average masks some wide variances based on occupation, gender, geography, and socioeconomics. "There is significant concern that further increases in state pension age could mean that some population groups do not get much opportunity to enjoy their state pension." He pointed out some of the issues around attempting to restrict spending on the state pension relative to GDP. The expert said: "Limiting the cost of state pension as a percentage of GDP is complex and will be dependent on a number of variables including how successful our economy is in the future and also how fast the state pension is increased each year. Currently this is the higher of inflation, earnings or 2.5% [under the triple lock policy] - all of which are significantly higher than our forecast GDP growth over the next few years. ""The triple lock will not be part of the state pension age review, but must be a consideration in the wider pension review if pensions are going to be sustainable for future generations." The full new state pension is now worth £230.25 a week, after payment rates rose 4.1 percent in April in line with the triple lock.


Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Nolans Sister Anne's health update after cancer battle - 'I don't want to die'
The 74-year-old, who has battled breast cancer twice, lost sisters Bernie and Linda to the disease When a letter with an NHS stamp dropped on Anne Nolan 's doormat, she held her breath for a moment. It had been five years since she'd been diagnosed with breast cancer for the second time, then having to undergo surgery before enduring chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Every test since had been clear but fear consumed Anne, 74, and she pushed the letter to one side. She'd tragically lost sisters Bernie and Linda to the disease and the devastation of them no longer being around still cuts deep. 'If it was bad news, I don't know how I was going to handle it,' she admitted. Eventually drumming up the courage and strength to find out her fate, the tears started rolling when Anne read she was officially cancer-free. 'It was great news,' she says. 'It said I was all clear and it hadn't spread anywhere else. I had a little cry. I was very emotional. I was just relieved more than anything and I felt so blessed and so happy.' The happiness was tinged with sadness though, as Anne's thoughts turned to little sisters Linda and Bernie. 'Although I was absolutely thrilled, I did think about them,' she opened up. "I didn't feel guilty because it's nothing to do with me but I did feel sad that they weren't as lucky as I was. It's an emotional thing for me to think about them not surviving and then I did survive. But that's just the luck of the draw.' Linda passed away in January. She was 65. Her initial cancer was in the breast which spread to other parts of her body. Bernie died in 2013 aged 52 of the same disease. Speaking from her Blackpool home, she said: 'I don't really like to hear when people say, 'You've fought your cancer' because it makes people who've died of cancer didn't fight hard enough. I think I've just been lucky. I always consider myself lucky when I look at my two sisters. Linda went through a terrible time and so did Bernie.' Although her chemotherapy was gruelling, Anne says she fared better than those around her also battling the disease. Diagnosed with her first cancer in 2000 and her second 20 years later, both were caught early with treatment starting within two weeks both times. But her 2022 experience has left lasting scars on Anne's mental health. 'It was really awful,' she explained. 'I ended us having anxiety about dying. I've had to have tablets from the doctor for anxiety because of having cancer during COVID. I wasn't allowed to be with my family. I was in hospital for 11 days. And nobody could visit me except my sister-in-law and my brother-in-law both worked at the hospital. It was horrendous. I still have anxiety but it's not as bad. I have anxieties about dying. It is about the cancer coming back as well. That's why I didn't want to open the letter. I don't want to die, I love being alive. I love being here.' Anne has a lot to live for. She beams when she talks about her two daughters - Amy, 44, and Alex, 37, and three grandchildren Vinny, 15, Ryder, 13, and Navaeh, 10. 'I want to see them grow up,' she pleads. 'My granddaughter plays football. I was watching the Lionesses in the Euros because I'm a massive football fan. And I'm thinking, 'God, if I live for another 10 years, Niamh might be playing for the Lionesses by the time.' That's what I keep thinking. Vinny plays football and Ryder plays guitar. Please let me live until they get older and they remember me and I can see what they're going to do with their lives.' As one of the famous Nolan sisters, she's also got her close-knit family to lean on. She rose to fame when their band, made up of her Maureen, Linda, Denise, Bernie and Coleen with hits I'm In The Mood for Dancing and Gotta Pull Myself Together. Anne says her ill health has made her want to live life to the max. 'When you've had a life-threatening disease and you've lost two sisters then it brings it all to the forefront,' she mused. 'It makes you value life. You grab everything with both hands. Whenever I'm asked to do something I say yes straight away. When you come through it and you're at the other end and you think, well I didn't die and I'm alive and I'm gonna live every day.' Taking on that mantra, Anne is determined to tick some life plans off her extensive bucket list. It means for a busy few years, as she spells out her big plans 'I'd love to go and see the Vatican,' she smiles. 'I'd love to go to Nashville. I'd love to learn how to swim. I would love to learn a language, probably French or Spanish. And also learn an instrument. These are all the things I wished I had when I was younger.' She's also planning a trip down to stay with Coleen at her six-acre Staffordshire farm - but says don't expect her to be mucking out the animals. 'Coleen's place is absolutely gorgeous - but it's not for me,' laughes Anne. 'I can clean my whole house in a couple of hours. And although I love animals, I'm not good with them. I'm scared of most animals. I'm scared of dogs and I'm scared of cats. When I go to Coleen's farm, I go and see the horses and the goats but I couldn't be left alone with them.' She says her little sister is in her element there, and it's a joy to see. 'She absolutely loves it,' beams Anne. 'I remember when we were doing a tour with Frank Sinatra. Our opening night was in the Palais de Congress in Paris. She was nine at the time and we said to her, 'You can come with us with my mum and dad and then they can bring you home.' She said 'No I can't. I've got to muck out the horses at stables.' So from an early age she's always loved animals.' Coleen once described the cancer that impacted their family so acutely as a 'curse'. The Loose Women favourite herself was diagnosed with skin cancer in 2023 and brother Brian was told he had prostate cancer three days after Linda's funeral. Anne says she feels 'really well' despite the toll her body has been through over the pass couple of decades. 'I've got no aches and pains," insists Anne. "I don't take any medication at all. Now and again I might take an anxiety tablet but I don't take them regularly. I have neuropathy which I got from my chemotherapy. I have that in my feet and it's more of a sensation rather than a pain. Sometimes it wakes me up in the night. I'm able to do most things. I do my own housework. It's good considering I've had cancer twice.' Despite her all-clear, Anne says cancer will always be at the back of her mind. 'When you have cancer, it's one of those things that you kind of live with it for the rest of your life,' she says. 'You could kind of get a little bruise or a lump somewhere and you think, 'Oh my god, is that cancer?' It can always come back. "I get scared as well, and this is really stupid, but both my cancers I found when I was in the shower. So now in the shower I'm inclined not to be as good at looking for things as I'm frightened of finding something. It's really stupid because the thing is if you've got cancer, it's not going to go away. So the more you leave it, the less chance you've got of curing it.'