
The shuttering of Voice of America hurts our ability to explain ourselves
I understand the impetus behind DOGE. The U.S. is in peril of financial collapse due to decades of deficit spending. Something radical needed to be done. Some indiscriminate damage was unavoidable.
However, the Declaration of Independence, the first public diplomacy document of the U.S., was addressed out of ' a decent respect to the opinions of mankind ' to the entire world. That decent respect is what VOA was designed to show.
VOA is a creature born of war. It began in 1942 broadcasting in German, to explain to the German people what we were fighting for and against. It also gave Germans an accurate version of what was really happening in their totalitarian country.
Having lived and worked overseas, I am familiar with the distorted views of the U.S. that many people have formed, not only from foreign propaganda and disinformation, but from some American popular entertainment and the almost constant self-criticism in which the American people are engaged.
The latter is a sign of a healthy democracy and a source of our strength, but foreign audiences need to understand the broader framework within which this takes place. That is why the VOA Charter requires VOA to represent America in a balanced and comprehensive way. It is vitally important that VOA fosters an understanding of American institutions and the principles behind them. No less important is its essential charter obligation to ' present the policies of the United States clearly and effectively.'
I firmly believe that VOA should not be an echo chamber for American domestic media, which is already largely available overseas on the internet. This is the fault into which the newsroom fell. It has a different job. It should have been offering to audiences what was otherwise unavailable to them. Not operating under the constraints of commercial media, VOA can afford to tell the truth. That is its advantage.
The heart of VOA is not the newsroom, which has deserved the scathing criticism it has received from President Trump, but its 40 language services — the largest part of VOA that most people know nothing about.
Let me provide a small example of its hidden treasures. Harun Maruf is a member of VOA's Somali service. He has more than 170,000 followers on Twitter in Somalia. He co-authored the popular and powerful book, 'Inside Al Shabaab, the Secret History of Al-Qaeda's Most Powerful Ally.' This is the kind of expertise the VOA language services employ — or rather employed. Harun was sent home. The Farsi service to Iran has also been shut, just as the nuclear crisis heats up and as media censorship in that country increases. Isn't now exactly when we most need to reach the Iranian people?
My earliest stint as VOA director was in 2001-2002, a time when the agency was alive with a sense of purpose after the attacks of 9/11. Just as in 1942, we all knew how to support our country in a time of peril. It was an exciting place to work. It hummed.
Does anyone suppose that that was the last war for the United States? How will we reach our Chinese adversaries and our Asian allies when conflict breaks out there, as it is almost certain to do?
VOA's mission is to give voice to America, explain our purposes in the world and the justifications for our actions. 'VOA's job should be to advance the justice of the American cause, while simultaneously undermining our opponents',' I wrote in a 2017 Wall Street Journal essay.
The difference now, I'm sorry to say, is a loss of a sense of mission by certain elements of the agency, who have been led to believe that VOA is solely a news organization. It's not, though news is an integral and essential part of it. It also has the obligation to disclose the character of the American people and their institutions in such a way as the underlying principles guiding American life are revealed. News is a means but not an end.
Reliable news was always a part of U.S. broadcasting, but the mission has never been reduced to just that until recently. When the Dalai Lama called the VOA Tibet service 'the bread of the Tibetan people,' and when Aun San Suu Kyi called the Burmese service 'the hope of the Burmese people,' they were not just talking about the 'news.' Hope is a theological virtue; it is not engendered by news alone. The Declaration of Independence was not a news bulletin.
VOA's foreign audiences must be puzzled as to why the VOA is no longer broadcasting to them. Some African listeners take national radio shutdowns as a telltale sign there has been a coup. Or perhaps, they might think, the U.S. no longer considers them worth reaching, or that it no longer has anything to say. Either answer is a self-inflicted public diplomacy disaster. What has happened to our 'decent respect to the opinions of mankind'?
The U.S. has enduring interests in the world. We need to explain ourselves in the most persuasive way we can, and by the most effective means, particularly to those peoples and countries whose future is going to most affect ours. Destroying the Voice of America is not the way to do this.
Robert R. Reilly served as Voice of America director from (2001 to 2002) and from (2020-2021).
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

38 minutes ago
Justice Department files misconduct complaint against federal judge handling deportation case
WASHINGTON -- The Justice Department on Monday filed a misconduct complaint against the federal judge who has clashed with President Donald Trump 's administration over deportations to a notorious prison in El Salvador. Escalating the administration's conflict with U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg, Attorney General Pam Bondi said on social media that she directed the filing of the complaint against Boasberg 'for making improper public comments about President Trump and his administration.' The complaint stems from remarks Boasberg allegedly made in March to Chief Justice John Roberts and other federal judges saying the administration would trigger a constitutional crisis by disregarding federal court rulings, according to a copy of the complaint obtained by The Associated Press. The comments 'have undermined the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary,' the complaint says, adding that the administration has 'always complied with all court orders.' Boasberg is among several judges who have questioned whether the administration has complied with their orders. The meeting took place days before Boasberg issued an order blocking deportation flights that Trump was carrying out by invoking wartime authorities from an 18th century law. The judge's verbal order to turn around planes that were on the way to El Salvador was ignored. Boasberg has since found probable cause that the administration committed contempt of court. The comments were supposedly made during a meeting of the Judicial Conference, the federal judiciary's governing body. The remarks were first reported by the conservative website The Federalist, which said it obtained a memo summarizing the meeting. Boasberg, the chief judge in the district court in the nation's capital, is a member of the Judicial Conference. Its meetings are not public. The complaint calls for an investigation, the reassignment of the deportations case to another judge while the inquiry is ongoing and sanctions, including the possible recommendation of impeachment, if the investigation substantiates the allegations. Trump himself already has called for Boasberg's impeachment, which in turn prompted a rare response from Roberts rejecting the call. The complaint was filed with Judge Sri Srinivasan, chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. More than 250 Venezuelans who were deported to a Salvadoran mega-prison known as the Terrorism Confinement Center, or CECOT, were sent home to Venezuela earlier this month in a deal that also free 10 U.S. citizens and permanent residents who had been held by Venezuela.


UPI
an hour ago
- UPI
N. Korea says Trump-Kim relationship 'not bad' but rejects nuclear talks
SEOUL, July 29 (UPI) -- The powerful sister of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un said Tuesday that her brother's relationship with U.S. President Donald Trump was "not bad," but dismissed the notion of resuming denuclearization talks with Washington. "I do not want to deny the fact that the personal relationship between the head of our state and the U.S. president is not bad," Kim Yo Jong said in a statement carried by the official Korean Central News Agency. "However, if the personal relations between the top leaders of the DPRK and the U.S. are to serve the purpose of denuclearization, it can be interpreted as nothing but a mockery of the other party," she said. The Democratic People's Republic of Korea is the official name of North Korea. "Shortly ago, a person in authority of the White House said ... that [Trump] is still open to dialogue with the DPRK leader for achieving the complete denuclearization of the DPRK," Kim said. "Any attempt to deny the position of the DPRK as a nuclear weapons state ... will be thoroughly rejected." Kim appeared to be responding to a Yonhap news agency report Saturday that quoted an unnamed White House official as saying Trump "remains open to engaging with Leader Kim to achieve a fully denuclearized North Korea." During Trump's first term, the two leaders held a pair of high-profile summits and met briefly a third time at the DMZ. The diplomatic outreach failed to result in a nuclear deal, however, and Pyongyang has accelerated the development of its weapons programs in the intervening years. In April, Trump told reporters in the Oval Office that there had been communication with North Korea and that the two sides would "probably do something at some point." "I have a very good relationship with [Kim]," Trump said. "I think it's very important. He's a big nuclear nation and he's a very smart guy." In September 2022, the North passed a law declaring itself a nuclear weapons state and giving it the right to conduct a preemptive nuclear strike in self-defense. Kim called the decision "irreversible" and later amended the country's constitution to enshrine the permanent growth of Pyongyang's nuclear arsenal. In her statement Tuesday, Kim Yo Jong said any efforts to engage with North Korea would require acknowledging "the hard fact that its capabilities and geopolitical environment have radically changed." "The recognition of the irreversible position of the DPRK as a nuclear weapons state ... should be a prerequisite for predicting and thinking everything in the future," she said. "It would be advisable to seek another way of contact on the basis of such new thinking." Kim's remarks came one day after she released a statement condemning Seoul's military alliance with Washington and saying that Pyongyang had "no interest" in efforts by the administration of South Korean President Lee Jae Myung to improve relations.

2 hours ago
North Korea says Kim-Trump ties are 'not bad' but it's not giving up its nuclear weapons
SEOUL, South Korea -- The powerful sister of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un dismissed the U.S.'s intent to resume diplomacy on North Korea's denuclearization, as she urged Washington to accept her country as a nuclear weapons state and find a new approach to restart talks. Kim Yo Jong's statement suggested North Korea would only return to talks if the U.S. rewards it for a partial surrender of its nuclear capability. Some experts say U.S. President Donald Trump could still pursue talks with North Korea to make a diplomatic achievement. Trump has recently bragged of his personal ties with Kim Jong Un and expressed hopes of restarting nuclear diplomacy between them. Their high-stakes diplomacy in 2018-19 that occurred during Trump's first term unraveled after Trump rejected Kim's calls for extensive sanctions relief in return for dismantling his main nuclear complex, a limited denuclearization step. Kim has since executed weapons tests to modernize and expand his nuclear arsenal. In a statement carried by state media, Kim Yo Jong said she doesn't deny the personal relationship between her brother and Trump 'is not bad.' But she said if their personal relations are to serve the purpose of North Korea's denuclearization, North Korea would view it as 'nothing but a mockery.' She said North Korea's nuclear capability has sharply increased since the first round of the Kim-Trump diplomacy and that any attempt to deny North Korea as a nuclear weapons state would be rejected. 'If the U.S. fails to accept the changed reality and persists in the failed past, the DPRK- U.S. meeting will remain as a 'hope' of the U.S. side,' Kim Yo Jong said, referring to her country by its official name, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. She said it would be 'advisable to seek another way of contact." Kim Yo Jong is a key official on the Central Committee of the North's ruling Workers' Party. She handles the country's relations with South Korea and the United States, and South Korean officials and experts believe she is the North's second-most powerful person after her brother. Kim Yo Jong said she was responding to reported comments by a U.S. official that Trump is open to talks on denuclearization. She likely was referring to a Saturday article by Yonhap news agency that cited an unidentified White House official as saying Trump 'remains open to engaging with Leader Kim to achieve a fully denuclearized North Korea.' 'North Korea wants to say it's not interested in talks on denuclearization and the U.S. must determine what benefits it can give to the North first,' said Nam Sung-wook, a former head of the Institute for National Security Strategy, a think tank run by South Korea's spy agency. Nam said Trump's likely desire to win a Nobel Peace Prize would prompt him to seek talks with Kim Jong Un and give him corresponding benefits for taking phased denuclearization steps. Nam said North Korea would want broad sanctions relief, a suspension of U.S.-South Korea military drills that it regards as invasion rehearsals and other economic incentives. Kim Yeol Soo, an analyst at South Korea's Korea Institute for Military Affairs, said U.S. and North Korean officials could meet if they narrow some differences on terms for restoring talks. But he said Trump's unpredictability would make it extremely difficult to predict what concessions the Americans would offer. Other experts have earlier said that North Korea — now preoccupied with its expanding cooperation with Russia — sees no urgent need to resume diplomacy with the U.S. and South Korea. On Monday, Kim Yo Jong rebuffed overtures by South Korea's new liberal government, saying its 'blind trust' in the country's alliance with the U.S. and hostility toward North Korea make it no different from its conservative predecessor. Nam said prospects for an early resumption of U.S.-North Korea diplomacy would depend on whether the Russia-Ukraine war ends soon and U.S. tariff negotiations with other countries are proceeded in a direction that Trump wants. Kim, the analyst, said Trump may use his likely attendance of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in South Korea this autumn as a chance to travel on to North Korea or a Korean border village to meet Kim Jong Un. Kim Yo Jong on Monday described as 'a daydream' a reported South Korean idea of inviting her brother to the regional summit.