Viewers left enraged as SNL hints JD Vance KILLED Pope Francis in mocking cold open
Viewers have slammed Saturday Night Live for implying that JD Vance killed Pope Francis because he died shortly after their awkward meeting at the Vatican.
Pope Francis died on April 21, just a day after an uncomfortable meeting with Vance as he attempted to mend his rocky relationship with the leader of the Catholic church.
The 88-year-old Pontiff and the Vice President had an awkward exchange at the Vatican on Easter Sunday after Francis slammed the Trump administration's treatment of illegal migrants.
Pope Francis died the next day of a stroke that put him into a coma and led to heart failure, according to the Vatican.
Conspiracy theories quickly spread online that Vance caused the Pope's death, including by JFK's grandson, Jack Schlossberg, who wrote on X: 'Okay JD killed the pope.'
SNL echoed those outlandish claims during its cold open. James Austin Johnson parodied Donald Trump in the skit, claiming that if the new Pope Leo does not bend to his knee, he'll stick the VP on him.
'We have an American Pope, Chicago-style, no ketchup. But we like Pope Leo. We hope he does what we want. That's what you want the Pope to do,' Johnson's Trump said.
'Otherwise, I'll have to send JD back to do his thing. Remember the last time JD met the pope?
'He's got the Midas touch, but for bad things. He meets the pope? Dead. Goes to India? War! Joins my campaign? Trump wins!'
The sketch doubled down on its attack against Catholicism, likening it to other institutions.
'We love Catholics,' Johnson's Trump said. 'It's one of the stronger Christian organizations, along with Salvation Army, and I want to say Chick-fil-A.'
Outraged viewers slammed SNL online, blasting the show for making light of the late Pontiff's death and spreading conspiracy theories.
'SNL's tasteless jab at Pope Francis' death and JD Vance is a new low for comedy,' one person said.
'That is shameful,' said another. 'Disgusting display of no manners,' a third person said.
A fourth person said, 'That's a new low—mocking death and spreading nonsense. Proper decency's gone out the window, hasn't it?
'SNL's mocking of the Pope's death is crossing a line, but sadly not surprising given their track record of disrespecting Christianity. Guess they think it's funny to poke at sacred institutions...weird,' a fifth added.
Others pointed to the sketch as a reason they no longer watch the program, claiming SNL is not funny and should be ashamed for making a joke out of someone's death.
'Satire is one thing, BUT this is not satire. It's MOCKERY of the Catholic Church!' one person said.
'SNL was brutally UNfunny about The Pope stuff, and terrible to Judge Jeanine …. Way out of line, and not funny,' a second person added.
'I'm actually embarrassed for SNL at this point, because it's not even that they're unfunny. I think for me it's just more that they come off as increasingly desperate? Don't know, but I really do get cringy vibes from a lot of their skits,'; another said.
'I haven't watched SNL for many years for their disgusting, disgraceful, unfunny displays of what they consider humor! To insinuate that our VP Vance had anything to do with the death of the Pope is shameful. A public apology should be given to him and all Catholics immediately,' a fourth person said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
42 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Ivanka Trump blasted for surfing as LA burns after split with Donald over immigration - as celeb pals like Kim Kardashian slam ICE raids
Ivanka Trump is facing sharp criticism for posting surfing snaps on Instagram while Los Angeles was being torn apart by rioting over her father's immigration policies. The First Daughter has been thrust into an awkward position as she juggles loyalty to family and a blossoming alliance with A-list influencers who have slammed her father's efforts to hunt down and deport illegal immigrants. Trump's provocative decision to deploy Marines to help wrangle protesters rioting against his immigration policies in LA prompted a wave of celebrity condemnation, led by Ivanka's close friend Kim Kardashian. The decade-long friendship is well documented and Ivanka is largely credited with helping Kim lobby her father during his first presidency. But Kim's decision to speak out against Trump's immigration policies has left Ivanka in a tough spot and opened her up to vile criticism for failing to address the saga. Her latest two Instagram posts have been inundated with cruel comments condemning her silence. 'Ivanka Antoinette. While America burns, she surfs,' one said on a picture of Ivanka holding a surfboard at the beach. 'How ''let them eat cake'' is this post?,' another said. Trump's provocative decision to send military reinforcements into LA to wrangle protesters who are rioting in the streets against his immigration policies prompted a wave of celebrity condemnation, led by Ivanka's close friend Kim Kardashian 'Ivanka should be mortified, humiliated and embarrassed by her father's heartless actions,' a third wrote, while countless others urged her to 'get her dad under control.' Back in 2018, a year into her father's first term and when she was a crucial player in the administration, Ivanka addressed Trump's tough-on-borders approach. 'That was a low point for me,' she admitted. 'I felt very strongly about that and I am very vehemently against family separation and the separation of parents and children.' But Ivanka was quick to point out that immigration matters were out of her remit. Now that she's got no formal involvement in her father's administration, she appears even less inclined to wade into discussions on the controversial topic. But Kim K's decision to slam the tactics is likely to put Ivanka in an awkward spot. 'When we witness innocent, hardworking people being ripped from their families in inhumane ways, we have to speak up. We have to do what's right,' Kim wrote. The decade-long friendship is well documented and Ivanka is largely credited with helping connect the A-lister with her father during his first presidency 'Growing up in LA, I've seen how deeply immigrants are woven into the fabric of this city. They are our neighbors, friends, classmates, coworkers, and family. 'No matter where you fall politically, it's clear that our communities thrive because of the contributions of immigrants. We can't turn a blind eye when fear and injustice keep people from living their lives freely and safely.' The Department of Homeland Security hit back hours later, with a post on X which read: '@KimKardashian, which one of these convicted child molesters, murderers, drug traffickers and rapists would you like to stay in the country.' The post was accompanied by photos of four individuals ICE arrested in recent days from the City of Angels. Kim is one of many celebrities using their platforms to condemn what they consider the heavy-handed approach to tightening border restrictions. Trump gave the Immigrations and Customs Enforcement agents instructions to ramp up detention activities across the nation as part of his mass deportation agenda. But raids across the nation have sparked furious backlash, most apparent in LA where rioters have spent six days tearing the city apart in protest against the policies. Trump responded by authorizing the deployment of 4,100 National Guard troops and 700 Marines. But Kim appears to be the first celebrity from Ivanka's inner circle to publicly comment on the controversy. Since stepping back from politics, Ivanka has been embraced by Miami socialites and A-listers, seen mingling with the likes of Camila Coelho, Isabela Grutman and Jeff Bezos' fiance Lauren Sanchez. Ivanka has also developed close friendships with her sister-in-law Karlie Kloss and supermodel Gisele Bündchen, both of whom have been vocal in the past about their political affiliations and support of immigrants. In 2020, Kloss told Bravo host Andy Cohen, 'I voted as a Democrat in 2016 and I plan to do the same in 2020', meanwhile Bündchen once replied to a fan's comment on Instagram asking if she was supporting Trump in 2016 with a simple but firm 'NO!' In 2017, shortly after Trump's first foray into nationality-based immigration bans, Bündchen penned an Instagram post celebrating the diversity of immigrants, tagged: 'weareallimmigrants.' And Kloss, who is married to Ivanka's husband Jared's billionaire brother, Joshua Kushner, criticized Trump's immigration policies in 2018, urging her fans to call their local congress member to voice their concerns. 'It's not the time to say 'there are no words', there are many. Politicizing the lives of these defenseless children and ripping them from their parents is heartless,' she wrote. 'We have to be the voices for these kids, and I support anyone standing up to do right by them. No matter what side of the aisle you are on - speak up.' The relationship between the sisters-in-law was initially rumored to be frosty, sources told back in April that relations had thawed since Ivanka took a step back from politics. 'Ivanka's views have changed and after she revealed she hates politics. Since then, her and Karlie have gotten very close and Karlie and Gisele have been close for over a decade,' a source close to Ivanka said. 'They formed a trio and love spending time with each other. Both Karlie and Gisele - who have been friends for years - have revealed that they are not Trump supporters.' 'Karlie has been very vocal about her political beliefs. Gisele revealed to her fans on social media that she does not support Trump.' She famously said in January that she 'hated politics', telling The Skinny Confidential podcast: 'I hate politics. It's very dark, negative. And some people love like the gladiator aspect of it: the fight. That was never me.' From 2016 to 2020 Ivanka was a senior advisor during her father's first term, giving up her life as a socialite and fashion designer and moving her young family from New York City to Washington DC. But when Trump announced he was running again in 2022, Ivanka took a step back. 'I love my father very much,' she said in a statement at the time, 'I am choosing to prioritize my children and the private life we are creating as a family. I do not plan to be involved in politics.'
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
China's imports plunge as trade talks conclude
Through February and March, overall imports to the U.S. hit record highs as traders anticipated rising tariffs. But under the withering tariff rates President Donald Trump announced on April 2, what he called "Liberation Day," that overall import number plunged from more than $340 billion in March to just $273 billion in April. "People were importing in anticipation of the imposition of tariffs. Then, when he made the Liberation Day announcement, everything collapsed," said Marcus Noland, executive vice president and director of studies at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, a think tank based in Washington, D.C. "China is just the best example because when the United States does something, China retaliates. And so that's why we got into the escalatory spiral and ended up with triple-digit tariffs," Noland added. "People couldn't import. Some people literally did not have the money to pay the import tariff." Ocean freight volumes from China to the U.S. fell sharply in April, down 34% from a year earlier, according to Kristy Garcia-Quintela, director of ocean freight at GEODIS, a global logistics company. "34% is pretty big," said Garcia-Quintela, who added the U.S. demand for global ocean shipping saw a 6% decline in April compared to the same month last year. Besides Chinese imports dropping to a post-pandemic low, shipments from the United States' other largest trading partners - the European Union, Mexico, and Canada - also fell in April. Purchases from the European Union, for example, dropped in April to $53 billion after surging to an all-time high just a month earlier at nearly $82 billion. Despite a partial pullback in tariffs and ongoing trade talks, the trade tensions still remain high, and experts expressed concerns about the road ahead. "The truly catastrophic tariffs that were announced on Liberation Day have been avoided, but it's not like everything is looking good right now," said Noland, the economist. (This story has been updated to reflect new events.)
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
GOP student loan overhaul is getting closer to becoming law
Read more: Republicans propose massive overhaul of student loans, Pell Grants The Senate's version of the legislation is less aggressive than the bill that Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives introduced in late April. While it will likely be further watered down due to congressional budget rules, the scope of the legislation indicates big changes will be enacted soon to how Americans pay for college. Student loan caps proposed When President Donald Trump asked Republicans to find billions of dollars in federal spending cuts, GOP lawmakers in the House drew up measures to eliminate or dramatically curb many student loan programs. In April, they proposed cutting subsidized loans altogether for undergraduates. When students take out a federal direct subsidized loan, the government pays the interest while they're in school (and for a short grace period after the students complete their studies). That idea didn't survive in the Senate version of the bill, which was expected to be slightly more moderate than the House proposal. Read more: Could Trump fail on tax bill? Why going 'big' doesn't always work out as planned Other elements of the House version remain, however. Like the House bill, the Senate measure proposes cutting the number of student loan repayment plans to just two. That change would kill President Joe Biden's Saving on a Valuable Education, or SAVE, program, which former Education Secretary Miguel Cardona repeatedly called the "most affordable repayment plan ever." SAVE has been stalled in court for months, placing roughly 8 million people in forbearance. The Senate bill would also dramatically curb lending for graduate students and parents (though at lower caps than House Republicans wanted). Ben Cecil, a senior education policy advisor at Third Way, a center-left think tank, said he was pleased to see the bill appeared to make compromises. "These loan limits are much more reasonable," he said. Melanie Storey, president of the National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators, said she was "relieved" some of the "most harmful" provisions of the House bill had been nixed. "Still, there are several concerning aspects of this bill that would ultimately make college less affordable for students," she said, including changes that "may drive borrowers to riskier private loans, which are not available to all borrowers." Less concern over Pell Grants One of college access groups' biggest criticisms of the initial bill was a significant change to Pell Grants, federal subsidies that help lower-income students pay for college. House Republicans wanted to increase the number of credits students would need to take each semester to be eligible for Pell Grants. The Center for American Progress, a progressive think tank, estimated that two out of three Pell recipients could've lost their grants or received smaller ones if that requirement were enacted. The Senate version takes a softer approach, codifying a provision to more fully exclude higher-income students qualify for Pell funds. At the same time, the bill expands Pell Grants in ways that could waste money, according to critics such as Sameer Gadkaree, president of The Institute for College Access & Success, a college affordability group. "While the Senate nixed most of the House's proposed cuts to the Pell Grant program and averts a looming funding shortfall, it regrettably threatens the program's long-term stability by extending Pell eligibility to unaccredited programs that are unlikely to pay off for students," Gadkaree said in a statement. New accountability rules One of the biggest distinctions between the House and Senate versions of the bill is that they lay out two entirely different sets of new accountability rules for colleges. The House proposal would fine colleges for leaving students on the hook for unpaid student loan debt. The Senate's framework suggests taking federal financial aid away from college programs if they can't prove that students who graduate are earning more than they would have without a degree. Mike Itzkowitz, who served in the Education Department under President Barack Obama, said that concept has bipartisan support. "I don't know anyone who would be willing to fork over their time to take on loans to earn less than a high school graduate," he said. But it's possible that particular provision won't survive special Senate rules. To avoid needing the support of Democrats, Republicans are trying to pass Trump's "Big, Beautiful Bill" using the budget process. That strategy comes with challenges. However, the bill must only make changes that spend money or save money. Significant reforms to college oversight might go too far, said Jon Fansmith, the senior vice president of government relations at the American Council on Education, the main association for colleges and universities. "This process isn't designed to do complicated policymaking," he said. "I really do worry about rushing something through without understanding what we're doing." Zachary Schermele is an education reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach him by email at zschermele@ Follow him on X at @ZachSchermele and Bluesky at @
