
Appellate Court dismisses final review bid by Bung, wife over graft case
Bung Moktar at the Court of Appeal in Putrajaya on Thursday. – Bernama photo
PUTRAJAYA (May 22): Kinabatangan Member of Parliament Datuk Seri Bung Moktar Radin and his wife Datin Seri Zizie Izette Abdul Samad failed in their final attempt to challenge the Court of Appeal's decision ordering them to enter their defence on three corruption charges involving RM2.8 million.
This followed a decision by a three-member panel of the Court of Appeal, led by Justice Datuk Che Mohd Ruzima Ghazali, which unanimously dismissed the couple's application for leave to review the decision.
Justice Che Mohd Ruzima, who sat with Court of Appeal judges Datuk Azizul Azmi Adnan and Datuk Ahmad Kamal Md Shahid, said the couple failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances or a miscarriage of justice that would justify a review of the ruling.
On Nov 18 last year, a Court of Appeal panel led by Justice Datuk Ahmad Zaidi Ibrahim allowed the prosecution's appeal and overturned the High Court's decision to acquit Bung Moktar and Zizie Izette, ordering both to enter their defence.
The couple filed the leave applications in March this year under Rule 105 of the Rules of the Court of Appeal 1994, contending that the previous Court of Appeal panel lacked jurisdiction to hear the prosecution's appeal and wanted the review panel to reinstate the High Court ruling.
In delivering the court's decision, Justice Che Mohd Ruzima said the Court of Appeal had always exercised caution when invoking its power to review earlier decisions, as such a review, on the face of it, runs contrary to the principle of finality.
The judge said that when counsel for Bung Moktar and Zizie Izette submitted that there had been an injustice in the case, the court observed that the couple were not without an alternative remedy.
'The point raised before us can be canvassed in an appeal from the Sessions Court, should a conviction subsequently be recorded. We are of the view that the threshold requirements for leave to review the prior decision of this court have not been met.
'We are also of the view that this is a point that may validly be raised at the end of the defence case. For these reasons, we find that the threshold requirement for leave to review this court's previous decision has not been fulfilled. Therefore, this application is dismissed,' he said.
In Thursday's proceedings, the prosecution was represented by deputy public prosecutors Law Chin How, Mohd Fadhly Mohd Zamry and Maziah Mohaide, while lawyers Datuk Seri K. Kumaraendran and M. Athimulan appeared for Bung Moktar and Zizie Izette, respectively.
Following this ruling Thursday, Bung Moktar and Zizie Izette are scheduled to enter their defence on corruption charges before Sessions Court Judge Rosli Ahmad on Aug 18.
In September 2022, the Sessions Court ordered the couple to enter their defence. The couple succeeded in overturning the ruling through revision applications they had filed at the High Court. This prompted the prosecution to appeal to the Court of Appeal.
Bung Moktar, 65, who was then the non-executive chairman of Felcra Berhad, was charged on May 3, 2019, with two charges of accepting bribes of RM2.2 million and RM262,500 as an inducement to obtain Felcra's approval to invest RM150 million in Public Mutual unit trusts.
He was alleged to have accepted the bribes from Public Mutual Berhad's investment agent Madhi Abdul Hamid through Zizie Izette, 46, at Public Bank Taman Melawati Branch, Kuala Lumpur between 12.30 pm and 5 pm on June 12, 2015.
Bung Moktar was also charged with receiving RM337,500 in cash from Unit Amanah consultant, Norhaili Ahmad Mokhtar, under the name of Zizie Izette for the same reason and place on June 19, 2015, while Zizie Izette was charged with three counts of abetting her husband over the matter at the same place, date and time.
On April 9, this year, the Sessions Court allowed the couple's application to stay the defence proceeding pending the outcome of the review application. – Bernama

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Straits Times
24 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Court of Appeal allows govt's appeal in armed forces pension adjustment case
PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal today allowed the appeal by the government and three others to overturn a High Court's ruling that had previously favoured 50 retired Malaysian Armed Forces (MAF) personnel in a pension adjustment dispute. In a unanimous decision, the three-member panel chaired by Justice Datuk Hashim Hamzah ruled that the military personnel failed to prove that the Malaysian government, the prime minister, the defence minister and the Malaysian Armed Forces Council had breached the provisions under the Federal Constitution. "We find there is merit in the defendants' appeal that warranted appellate intervention," said Hashim, who sat with Justices Datuk Wong Kian Kheong and Datuk Ismail Brahim. The judge said the defendants cannot be said to be breaching Article 147 of the Federal Constitution as they have not placed the plaintiffs in a less favourable position. The court allowed the appeal with no orders as to legal costs. Wong, who wrote a supporting judgment, said two documents, namely, Garis Panduan Pelaksanaan Pindaan Syarat-Syarat Perkhidmatan ATM dated Jan 17, 2013, and Surat Pelaksanaan Kesetaraan Pangkat dan Penambahbaikan Jadual Gaji Minimum Maksimum bagi Perkhidmatan ATM di bawah SSM dated March 14, 2013, were not salary adjustment but were amendments to the terms of service for serving members of the MAF. He said that the objective is to improve the salary scheme for serving members and not to discriminate against retirees who retired before Jan 1, 2013. Wong also said that there was no unequal treatment between pensioners who retired before Jan 1 and those who retired after Jan 1, 2013, as pension adjustments were not made for retirees after Jan 1 that year. On Feb 5 last year, the High Court ruled that all military personnel who retired before Jan 1, 2013, are entitled to have their pensions adjusted to the rates and methods applied to the retirees who retired after Jan 1, 2013. The 50 military personnel of various ranks filed an originating summons in the High Court on Nov 17, 2022, seeking a declaration that the government had violated the provisions in Federal Constitution read together with Section 187 of the MAF Act 1972 for their respective failures to implement new pension adjustments for the MAF retirees who retired before Jan 1, 2013. They claimed that the government's failures to implement the pension adjustments had caused a significant pension gap between the MAF retirees who retired before Jan 1 and those who retired after Jan 1, 2013. In today's proceedings, Federal Counsel M. Kogilambigai appeared for the government while lawyer Mohamed Haniff Khatri Abdulla represented the retired personnel. After the court proceeding, Haniff Khatri told reporters that he would study the court's grounds of judgment before deciding whether to bring the matter up to the Federal Court. – Bernama


The Star
34 minutes ago
- The Star
Court allows govt appeal in Armed Forces pension adjustment case
PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal has allowed the appeal by the government and three others to overturn a High Court ruling that favoured 50 retired Malaysian Armed Forces (MAF) personnel in a pension adjustment dispute. In a unanimous decision on Wednesday (June 4), the three-member panel chaired by Justice Datuk Hashim Hamzah ruled that the military personnel failed to prove that the government, prime minister, defence minister and MAF Council had breached provisions under the Federal Constitution. "We find there is merit in the defendants' appeal that warranted appellate intervention,' said Justice Hashim, who sat with Justices Datuk Wong Kian Kheong and Datuk Ismail Brahim. ALSO READ: May 6 decision on govt's appeal against Armed Forces pension adjustment The judge said the defendants cannot be said to have breached Article 147 of the Federal Constitution as they had not placed the plaintiffs in a less favourable position. The court allowed the appeal with no orders as to legal costs. Justice Wong, who wrote a supporting judgment, said two documents namely "Garis Panduan Pelaksanaan Pindaan Syarat-Syarat Perkhidmatan ATM" dated Jan 17, 2013, and "Surat Pelaksanaan Kesetaraan Pangkat dan Penambahbaikan Jadual Gaji Minimum Maksimum bagi Perkhidmatan ATM di bawah SSM" dated March 14, 2013, were not on salary adjustment but amendments to the terms of service for serving members of the MAF. He said that the objective was to improve the salary scheme for serving members and not to discriminate against retirees who left service before Jan 1, 2013. Wong also said there was no unequal treatment between pensioners who retired before and those who retired after Jan 1, 2013, as pension adjustments were not made for retirees after that date that year. ALSO READ: Khaled: We will wait for court's decision on pension On Feb 5 last year, the High Court ruled that all military personnel who retired before Jan 1, 2013, are entitled to have their pensions adjusted to the rates and methods applied to the retirees who retired after that date. The 50 personnel of various ranks filed an originating summons in the High Court on Nov 17, 2022, seeking a declaration that the government had violated provisions in the Constitution read together with Section 187 of the MAF Act 1972 for their respective failures to implement new pension adjustments for those who retired before Jan 1, 2013. They claimed that the government's failures to implement the pension adjustments had caused a significant pension gap between the MAF retirees who retired before Jan 1 and those who retired after Jan 1, 2013. In Wednesday's proceedings, Federal Counsel M. Kogilambigai appeared for the government while lawyer Mohamed Haniff Khatri Abdulla represented the retired personnel. After the court proceeding, Haniff Khatri told reporters that he would study the court's grounds of judgment before deciding whether or not to bring the matter to the Federal Court. – Bernama


The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Jobless man in Pontian faces four drug charges, including trafficking
PONTIAN: An unemployed man has been slapped with four drug charges here, including trafficking more than 6kg of MDMA. Lau Keat Lim, 35, nodded after the charges were read out to him in front of Magistrate Arina Azmin Ahmad Marzuki on Wednesday (June 4). According to the charge sheet, he allegedly trafficked 6.4kg of MDMA at a house along Jalan Mutiara 7 in Taman Mutiara here at 6.10pm on May 21. The offence under Section 39B(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drug Act 1952 carries the death penalty, or up to 40 years' jail and a maximum of 12 strokes of the cane, upon conviction. No plea was recorded on the first charge as the case falls under the jurisdiction of the High Court. On the second charge, Lau was accused of possessing some 20g of methamphetamine at the same time and location. The offence, under Section 12(2) of the Act and punishable under Section 39A(1), provides for up to five years' jail and a maximum of nine strokes of the cane if convicted. For the third charge, he was alleged to have been in possession of 5.6g of ketamine at the same place and time. On the fourth charge, he was accused of possessing 1.06g of methamphetamine at the same time and location. The third and fourth charges, under Section 12(2) of the same Act and punishable under Section 12(3), each carry a fine of up to RM100,000 or jail for up to five years, or both, upon conviction. The accused, who was not represented, then pleaded not guilty to the three drug possession charges. Arina Azmin then did not grant bail and set Aug 5 for next mention and submission of the chemist's report. DPP Anis Sahira Rosley prosecuted.