The best that Bezos' money can buy: A wedding for the ages in timeless Venice
Local flavor? You bet.
Beyond that, the team of the world's fourth-richest man has kept details under wraps. Still, whispers point to events spread across the lagoon city, adding complexity to what would have been a massive logistical undertaking even on dry land.
On Thursday, dozens of private jets touched down at Venice's airport as yachts pulled into the city's famed waterways. Aboard were athletes, celebrities, influencers and business leaders, converging to revel in extravagance that is as much a testament to the couple's love as to their extraordinary wealth.
The heady hoopla recalled the 2014 wedding in Venice of actor George Clooney to human rights lawyer Amal Alamuddin, when adoring crowds lined the canals and hundreds of well-wishers gathered outside City Hall.
Advertisement
Not so for these nuptials, which have become a lightning rod for protests.
Still, any desire to dampen the prevailing fever pitch has yet to materialize. Instead, the glitterati were set to party, and the paparazzi jostling for glimpses of the gilded gala.
Whatever happens, it will be a wedding for the ages.
Logistics and costs
Venice is famed for its network of canals, where gondoliers croon for lovestruck couples and even ambulances are aquatic. But water transport of everything from bouquets to guests makes Venice among the world's most challenging cities for a party, according to Jack Ezon, CEO of luxury travel advisory and event planner Embark Beyond.
Advertisement
'It's a very tight-knit community; everyone there knows everyone, and you need to work with the right people,' said Ezon, whose company has put on a dozen high-end events in Venice. 'There's very tight control, especially on movement there with boats.'
It at least triples the cost versus staging the same soiree in Rome or Florence, he said.
Veneto Gov. Luca Zaia was first to give an estimated tally for the Bezos/Sánchez bash: He told reporters this week the most recent total he saw was between 40 and 48 million euros (up to $56 million).
It's an eye-popping, jaw-dropping figure that's over 1,000 times the $36,000 average cost of American couples' weddings in 2025, according to wedding planning website Zola's annual report.
Bezos' team has been tight-lipped about where these millions are going. When the youngest son of Asia's richest man married last July, performances by pop stars Rihanna and Justin Bieber pushed up the pricetag.
'How do you spend $40 million on a three- or four-day event?' Ezon said. 'You could bring headliners, A-list performers, great DJs from anywhere in the world. You could spend $2 million on an incredible glass tent that's only there for 10 hours, but it takes a month to build," or expand the celebration to local landmarks.
There's no sign Sánchez and Bezos, the former CEO of Amazon, intend to take over any of Venice's tourist-thronged hotspots. Still, intense hand-wringing about the prospect prompted their wedding coordinator, Lanza & Baucina, to issue a rare statement calling those rumors false.
Advertisement
On Thursday, a string of water taxis cut through the lagoon to bring Bezos, Sánchez and guests to the Madonna dell'Orto cloister as some onlookers cheered. Paparazzi followed in their own boats, trying to capture guests on camera — Oprah Winfrey, Kim Kardashian, Ivanka Trump, Tom Brady, Orlando Bloom — as police on jet skis patrolled.
Local media have reported the couple will hold a ceremony Friday on San Giorgio island, across the lagoon basin from St. Mark's Square. Associated Press journalists circling the island Thursday saw workers assembling tents and private security personnel stationed at every pier, including a newly built one.
Media have also reported a reception Saturday in the Arsenale, a former navy base best known as a primary venue for the Venice Bienalle.
'No Space'
There are some who say these two should not be wed in this city.
They characterize the wedding as a decadent display of wealth in a world with growing inequality, and argue it's a shining example of tourism taking precedence over residents' needs, particularly affordable housing and essential services. Venice is also one of the cities most vulnerable to rising sea levels from climate change.
About a dozen Venetian organizations — including housing advocates, anti-cruise ship campaigners and university groups — are protesting under the banner 'No Space for Bezos,' a play on words referring to his space exploration company Blue Origin and the bride's recent space flight.
Greenpeace unfurled a banner in St. Mark's Square denouncing Bezos for paying insufficient taxes. Activists floated a bald-headed Bezos-inspired mannequin down a Venice canal atop an Amazon delivery box, its hands clenching fake cash.
Advertisement
Authorities — from Venice's mayor to the nation's tourism minister — have dismissed the outcry, saying it ignores the visibility and economic boost the wedding brings.
'There will be photos everywhere, social media will go wild over the bride's dress, over the ceremony,' Italy's tourism minister, Daniela Santanchè, told the AP.
'All of this translates into a massive free publicity campaign. In fact, because they will spend a lot of money, they will enrich Venice — our shopkeepers, artisans, restauranteurs, hotels. So it's a great opportunity both for spending and for promoting Italy in the world.'
Philanthropy
As Amazon's CEO, Bezos usually avoided the limelight, frequently delegating announcements and business updates to his executives. Today he has a net worth of $231 billion, according to Forbes.
In 2019, he announced he was divorcing his first wife, MacKenzie Scott, just before the National Enquirer published a story about an affair with Sánchez, a former TV news anchor. Sánchez filed for divorce the day after Bezos' divorce was finalized.
He stepped down as CEO in 2021, saying he wished to spend more time on side projects, including Blue Origin, The Washington Post, which he owns, and his philanthropic initiatives.
Sitting beside Sánchez during an interview with CNN in 2022, he announced plans to give away the majority of his wealth during his lifetime.
Last week, a Venetian environmental research association issued a statement saying Bezos' Earth Fund was supporting its work with an 'important donation.' CORILA, which seeks protection of the Venetian lagoon system, said contact began in April, well before any protests.
Biller reported from Rome. AP reporter Barbara Ortutay in San Francisco contributed to this report.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
16 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Anna Wintour to Step Down as Editor-in-Chief of US Vogue
Anna Wintour, the longtime editor of Vogue magazine, said the Condé Nast publication is seeking a new head of American editorial content. The person filling the newly created position will take over daily editing duties of a magazine that's considered a trendsetter in the fashion industry. Wintour, who serves as chief content officer for Condé Nast and global editorial director of Vogue, took on expanded duties after a company reorganization four years ago, the company said in an email. Other markets, including Japan, the UK and France, already have appointed dedicated heads of editorial content. Bloomberg's Tiwa Adebayo joined Francine Lacqua to discuss Wintour's decision to step down from her role as editor-in-chief of American Vogue after 37 years. (Source: Bloomberg)
Chicago Tribune
29 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Jennifer Hochschild: Chicago's solution to public pension debt is a generational scam
Chicago is drowning in debt that no one alive today created, yet everyone must pay. The city of Chicago owes a staggering $35 billion to $60 billion to public sector pension funds — several times the annual city budget. Chicago is in deeper arrears than almost all other American cities, including New York. This is not new. Back in 1917, just a decade after social worker Jane Addams helped establish the innovative teachers pension fund, the Illinois General Assembly warned that the condition of the pension system was 'one of insolvency' and 'moving toward crisis' because the 'financial provisions (were) entirely inadequate for paying the stipulated pensions when due.' Commissions have repeated the message ever since then. The response? While solemnly promising to pay up, politicians have steadily increased benefits while adding a provision to the state constitution declaring pension recipiency to be an 'enforceable contractual relationship, the benefits of which shall not be diminished or impaired.' Ever-rising pension provisions, even in the face of ever-rising deficits and interest payments, are easy to explain. Although public sector jobs may not pay especially well, the promise of a secure and substantial income after retirement is a strong economic incentive for workers and a morally honorable stance for city residents to uphold. In addition, promises of added pension benefits are politically valuable to all contract negotiators. Union leaders can assure members of a constitutionally guaranteed gain. Mayors can postpone new strains on their overstretched budgets while avoiding strikes by firefighters, police, teachers and garbage collectors. Aldermen need not raise taxes during their terms in office. Existing pension funds can be used as huge credit cards to cover urgent expenses of schooling, policing and health care. Voters are unaware or uninterested. The real mystery isn't why Chicago has this problem — it's why every American city hasn't generated ever-increasing pension deficits. As pension debt ballooned along with the proportion of the city's budget (slowly) dedicated to funding pension systems and as property taxes rose, observers began taking more notice. By the mid-2010s, all three major credit agencies downgraded both Chicago and Illinois with ratings that, as The Economist noted, put the state 'on par with Botswana' — prompting an incensed Tribune editorial to ask what Botswana had done to deserve such an insult. After passing more laws that further increased pension promises without any financial offsetting, Illinois legislators acted in 2010. Their solution was to make future workers — people who couldn't oppose the bill because they weren't yet employed or possibly even adults — absorb the rising costs. In the classic Illinois tradition, the Tier 2 bill was introduced one morning without any notice, debate or analysis; it passed both houses of the legislature that day. Then-House Speaker Michael Madigan noted that 'we don't have actuarial numbers relevant to this Amendment' but nevertheless claimed that it would save 'over a hundred billion dollars' over an unspecified time frame. The speaker's prediction may turn out to be right; those savings are coming entirely at the expense of young workers who took jobs after the tier system was established. Even Chicago's Civic Federation — a longtime advocate for reducing pension deficits — calculated disapprovingly that Tier 2 teachers pay almost 2% of their salaries to subsidize their predecessors' benefits. The teachers pension fund managers calculated, in fact, that on average, Tier 2 recipients would receive a small net negative outcome from their pension contributions. Experts fear that newer workers are receiving pensions so low that they might violate the federal 'safe harbor' law prohibiting payouts less than what Social Security would have paid that worker. But there's an even more troubling dimension that has gone almost unmentioned in public discourse and probably unnoticed by most observers: the racial wealth transfer. From 1940 through 1980, Chicago's non-Hispanic white population declined from about 90% to about 40%. Today, the city is roughly one-third Black, one-third Hispanic and one-third white. These demographic shifts mean that Chicago's increasingly diverse young workforce is financing more and more of the retirements of a generation of predominantly white pensioners. I see no easy resolution to this conjunction of demographic change, financial insouciance and political expediency. But Chicagoans should at least recognize the irony. Once again, white Americans are benefiting from the labor of their nonwhite compatriots — with no controversy, and the blessing of state law and advocates of responsible governance.
Atlantic
32 minutes ago
- Atlantic
Coming Soon: A New Season of ‘Autocracy in America'
The former world chess champion and lifelong democracy activist Garry Kasparov guides a new series of conversations about society's complacency with liberal values and how this carelessness has fueled a democratic retreat—and a new belligerence among dictators. New episodes launch every Friday, starting July 11. The following is a transcript of the trailer: Frank Luntz: I know you're gonna get into some stuff—some pretty heavy stuff—but this is Garry Kasparov. I can't believe it. [ Music ] Garry Kasparov: When I was young, I was lucky because, as a chess prodigy, I could travel outside of the Soviet Union to play tournaments abroad. And I experienced for myself that life felt different in a democracy. The world celebrated in 1991, when the dictatorship of the Soviet Union gave way to new democracies. And I, too, hoped freedom was on the rise. Viktorija Čmilytė-Nielsen: Of course, the empire did not want to let us go easily. Kasparov: But in the decades that followed, we've seen the steady advance of autocratic regimes, a new belligerence from dictators and autocrats worldwide, and democracies in retreat. Masih Alinejad: For dictators, for the Islamic Republic, for Putin, for all the autocratic regime, America is first. Their first target is the destruction of American values. Kasparov: Even America, a beacon of hope to me and for countless millions of others, has shown itself vulnerable to the virus of authoritarianism and corruption. Anne Applebaum: If you lie or your propagandists lie nonstop, then the reaction of the public is to say, Right. You know, politics is a dirty game. I have no idea what is true and what's not true. Gary Marcus: I mean, that's exactly what's happening in the United States right now—is techno fascism. Alinejad: You called it hypocrisy. Kasparov: I'm trying to be diplomatic. I'm the host of the show. Alinejad: I call it absolutely betrayal. Kasparov: So I'm fighting the same battle I fought in Russia. Kasparov: In Russia, we lost the fight. Here, I like our chances, and I like them much more. Bret Stephens: I mean, this country is big, resilient. And we've made big mistakes and recovered from those mistakes in the past. Kasparov: But defenders of the free world can no longer take our liberties for granted. Luntz: You, several times, have tried to get me to tell you, Here's a roadmap to restore our democracy. And you should know, I'm writing that roadmap as we speak. Kasparov: I'm Garry Kasparov, former world chess champion and lifetime activist for democracy. Join me this summer for a new season of Autocracy in America, from The Atlantic. Listen and follow the show wherever you get your podcasts.
