A mum tried to shame a restaurant for kicking her family out... the response from Aussies was not what she was expecting
A single mother has sparked debate after complaining about a restaurant that kicked her out because her toddler wouldn't stay in his seat.
Adelaide woman Renèe Barendregt went to Lemongrass Thai on Main Beach with her son, Ziggy, and her mother while on holidays on the Gold Coast last week.
She claimed staff warned her she would have to ensure her child stayed in his seat despite no high chair being available.
However, during the first round of drinks, her son left the table to visit a nearby couple eating with their young baby.
'He started playing with the pot plant – a fake pot plant,' she said in a TikTok video.
'He wasn't doing anything wrong; he was just minding his own business, not pulling it apart or anything.'
Ms Barendregt said there were only about six other people in the venue as they had gone to eat at 5.30pm.
'(Staff) came over to me, and they said, "Could you please put your child in the seat? If he can't sit down the whole time, I'm going to have to ask you to leave",' she said.
'I said, "Well, you haven't given us a high chair. He is not doing anything wrong. He is not harming anything. He will sit and eat dinner when it comes."
'The staff said, "Sorry. If he's not going to sit there the whole time, I'm not going to serve you here".'
The mother returned to her hotel room and ordered food via a delivery app instead.
'Maybe (the staff) would have thought twice if he knew I had been waiting for (Ziggy) to wake up so we could go out for dinner as a family, just us two and my mum,' Ms Barendregt said through tears.
Social media users were divided with many saying they agreed with restaurant staff.
'(Some parents) really think that "it takes a village" means "everyone must keep an eye on my kid except me while I have a drink",' one said.
'Parents like this make the rest of us look so bad,' another added.
'Kids are allowed to exist in public spaces, but we as parents need to show them how to respect public spaces. She can have him sit down or leave,' another said.
Others defended the mother, arguing the restaurant should have been more patient.
'These comments are wild. Children have the right to exist in the world and parents have the right to eat out just like every other paying customer,' one argued.
The video has raked in more than 1million views since it was uploaded last Monday.
The daughter of the restaurant owners, who released a statement on behalf of her parents because 'English is not their first language' said on Instagram they had been 'overwhelmed' by both negative and positive reviews.
'Our restaurant typically does not have toddlers dining there,' the post read.
'Whilst (the adults were) consuming their drinks the child had wandered out of their seat and started to play with the plant, which was in arms reach, yes, however, it is also located near the entrance of the restaurant.
'During this time we started getting busy with takeaways and customers walking in and out of the restaurant. Because of the location, it was a safety hazard.'
The restaurant claimed Ms Barendregt couldn't control her son and elected to leave.
'They stood up, drank their alcohol and left without paying,' the post read.
Addressing the claim in a separate comment section Ms Barendregt asked: 'Why would I pay for a drink I had one sip of?'
Ms Barendregt shared another TikTok video revealing she had been the target of 'hate and harassment' as a result.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Do we hate our children? Why else would we do them this much damage?
There are changes being wrought on children today that are more like mutations in the human soul. This should scare us, shame us. Indeed, what's happening should render vast swathes of the adult population unfit for parenthood. The World Health Organisation felt compelled to issue recommendations that under-fives spend no more than one hour daily online. Pause and consider that. Read more by Neil Mackay When I see children in pushchairs with iPads in their hands, I feel visceral contempt for the adult in charge. Why don't you just blow cigarette smoke in your baby's face? is the thought that enters my mind. Head teachers in Belfast primary schools have issued a joint statement begging parents to delay giving children smartphones. Ofcom has found that nearly 25% of five-to-seven-year-olds have their own device. Five-year-olds with smartphones. Pause and consider that. What's happening is an act of mutilation. The Scottish criminologist Professor David Wilson told me not that long ago that his new intake of 450 first year students had all watched beheading videos. We're creating monsters. Social media is awash with hardcore pornography that's easily accessed without age verification. Brutality and sadism saturate the online world. You don't need to hear this from me, you know it. You've seen it. Even the most innocent can't help but stumble upon this relentless horror and degradation. How can exposing youngsters – wilfully, knowingly – to hardcore pornography and snuff movies be considered anything other than the murder of childhood? Children are being physically changed, and not simply through their sedentary existence. I listened in bewilderment recently to linguists describing the rise of the "TikTok" accent. Currently, the voices of kids in Britain – a land rich in regional dialects – are merging into a digital blur. You can hear it among the young if you listen. The two main traits are "uptalk" – their intonation rising at the end of a sentence – and what's called "vocal fry", which is a soft, creak in the voice. It's a hand-me-down from American influencers. If children sound more like online influencers than their own parents, something has gone very badly wrong. We wonder about the rise in youth violence, we scratch our head over what could have caused the explosion in mental health problems among the young, we're bemused at the inability of children to socialise, at the loneliness which plagues them, at the self-hatred they exude, at the lack of empathy they display, at the increase in childhood obesity, at their fear, their greed, their anger. "What has damaged them?" we ask. We are the damage. That's the truth. We're allowing this to happen. We wail about "safeguarding" children, yet we buy them a bomb to hold in their hand every waking minute of every single day. The screeching moral majority – the modern-day Mary Whitehouse brigade – lose their minds over sex education policies in schools, but never speak out about the destruction of children mentally, physically and emotionally at the hands of tech companies. It's like singing hymns over your child whilst shooting heroin into their veins. There's a snowball effect now unfolding. GenZ parents in their late twenties have turned on reading. We know that reading is an empathy machine, an intelligence multiplier, a path to social and economic success. Fewer than half of GenZ parents, however, like reading to their children. Screen time has replaced story time. When I die, I know that memories of reading to my children will be among the most cherished images to flash through my mind. The sorrow and pity I feel for these parents is matched only by my contempt. Those GenZ mums and dads feel reading to their children just isn't 'fun'. What can you say to that? A third deem reading a 'subject to learn' rather than enjoy. Among their own children, only a third read frequently for pleasure. In 2012, the figure was more than 50%. GenZ was broken and mutilated through exposure to screens – thanks to their own parents, that's us, incidentally – and now they're handing on the damage. Remember Philip Larkin's famous line: "They f*** you up, your mum and dad." Professor David Wilson said recently that his new intake of 450 first year students had all watched beheading videos (Image: Tern TV/BBC Scotland) The online world is a place where kids go to learn how to kill themselves, or kill someone else. Yet what do we do? Elect politicians who suck their thumb for fear of inciting the ire of tech billionaires. A few nations show guts. Australia is to ban social media for under-16s. The hard truth, though, is that unless we adults take responsibility for our own actions, our children will never be saved. Why should your child care what you say about social media when you're glued to your phone or howling on Twitter? Did you care what your parents said about smoking when they had a fag in their mouth? The thought of confronting technology is daunting. It makes you feel tiny, it brings on a case of Cnutism: that trying to stop what's unfolding is as fruitless as a mad Danish king daring to hold back the sea. But unlike the sea, technology is human-made. It's not our god. Yet. What's the point of rescuing the economy, fighting for democracy, or saving the planet, if we fail to rescue our own children, fight for their future and save them from what's being done to them on our watch as adults? Surely even raw self-interest should make us act. Ask yourself what the adults of the future may be like when you're old, needing care. Are today's children – innocents being shorn of empathy and understanding through our carelessness and folly, rendered desocialised, self-centred and morality-free; more influencer than citizen – really the people you want in charge of you? Neil Mackay is The Herald's Writer at Large. He's a multi-award-winning investigative journalist, author of both fiction and non-fiction, and a filmmaker and broadcaster. He specialises in intelligence, security, crime, social affairs, cultural commentary, and foreign and domestic politics.
Daily Mirror
5 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Teacher boasted to pupil about her love life and encouraged him to take cannabis
Charlotte Doman, a history teacher, also sent the boy, who can't be named, sexual messages and personal pictures on Instagram - including a photo of a tattoo on her thigh A history teacher who sent messages about her sexual encounters to a pupil on Instagram and encouraged him to drink alcohol and smoke cannabis with her has been struck off. Charlotte Doman, 34, has been banned from the classroom after a Teaching Regulation Agency panel heard she called the boy - referred to as Pupil A - her "little duck" and told him she loved him. The watchdog claimed Ms Doman wanted the lad to become her "sexual partner," allegations she denied. Ms Doman was employed at a secondary school in Grays, Essex, when she sent dozens of messages to Pupil A between April and May 2023. In one, she said: "You're not even legal or an adult or anything. Like, am I taking advantage of you? Some days it feels like you're taking advantage of me lol." In messages seen by the panel, she told him: "YOU have all the control in this relationship" and also said: "Love that you're still ignoring me. I'm gonna go get f***** up". She also told Pupil A details about her sexual relationships, the panel found, saying in an Instagram message: "One night I ended up with three different guys". The 34-year-old woman admitted she encouraged Pupil A to drink alcohol and smoke cannabis with her, and said in a statement: "I am unsure why any of this occurred. I certainly don't behave like this myself. I drink alcohol less than once a month and never to excess, and I've never taken drugs." She made comments about the pupil's appearance and messaged him saying: "I literally go get waxed every eight weeks for no one to appreciate it", the hearing was told. The panel heard Ms Doman encouraged Pupil A and his friends to "pull sickies" on a day she was off school, and at least once invited Pupil A to spend time alone with her. "Are you and the boys going to be okay if I have to be off sick? You could always pull sickies and we'll all just game at mine all day," she said in an Instagram message to Pupil A. The teacher admitted she had sent Pupil A messages outside of school hours and sometimes in the early hours of the morning, and acknowledged she told the pupil to "remove all trace" of her from his phone on May 22 that year. Ms Doman denied that her conduct was sexually motivated and said she saw Pupil A as "like her child", but the panel ruled on the contrary. The panel said it did not see any other reason as to why Ms Doman discussed her past sexual experiences, problems in her relationship and a graphic sexual extract from a book "other than if it were in pursuit of sexual gratification or in pursuit of a future sexual relationship". "The context of the majority of not imply that Ms Doman just simply saw Pupil A like her child", the panel said. The panel ruled Ms Doman's behaviour had a "seriously damaging" impact on Pupil A, his parents, the school and its wider community, and that her conduct "had the potential to influence Pupil A in a harmful way". Ms Doman was facing "difficulties" in her personal life at the time, the hearing was told, but the panel ruled that she "did not show sufficient insight in respect of the impact her conduct had on others". In a written conclusion published on Wednesday, Marc Cavey, on behalf of the Secretary of State, decided Ms Doman should be banned from teaching indefinitely, subject to a five-year review period.
Scottish Sun
12 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Love Island Kyle's replacement revealed as he's axed after machete arrest
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) LOVE Island has revealed Kyle Ashman's replacement after the hunk was axed over a machete attack arrest. Kyle, 23, was sent packing from Majorca just days ahead of the series launch after it emerged he'd been quizzed by cops over a violent attack that took place in February. Sign up for the Entertainment newsletter Sign up 2 New lad Conor is looking for his perfect match Credit: ITV 2 Kyle Ashman has been axed from Love Island Credit: Instagram He was released without charge and maintains his innocence. Tonight, the show revealed professional rugby player Conor, 25, will take his place in the starting line-up. The Irishman said he's looking for "someone who is really sure of themselves, ambitious, a bit of a go-getter and good craic. I like dark eyes and I don't mind a dominant woman." When it comes to turn offs, he says: "Being too needy, or needing to do everything together. I like someone to be independent and do their own thing and then we come together and do our thing." In his official announcement pic, Conor is flanked by beauties Helena Ford and Megan Clarke. Earlier today, Kyle broke his silence on his exit and said: 'I fully co-operated with this police investigation and made it very clear that I had no involvement in this incident. 'I am not a violent person and any suggestion otherwise is a mischaracterisation.' Masked thugs stormed a wake in Stafford and hacked at a dad with a blade in February. Kyle was one of two quizzed but released with no further action. In a video uploaded to Instagram tonight, the aspiring reality star revealed he's still hopeful of having a future on the show. Love Island star sensationally axed from show after revelation he was arrested over machete attack on dad just months ago Speaking from inside a house, he said: "I'm not a bad guy, honestly. I'm a normal guy from a normal place. An opportunity arose to find love and I grabbed it with both hands, and it's been taken away from me. "I've seen the support pages and, who knows, maybe I'll get the chance to go on Casa Amor or as a bombshell, go back in and show you who I really am. Show you I'm not a bad guy. We'll see." Love Island returns Monday 9th June at 9pm on ITV2 and ITVX
