‘Feeding civilians, not Hamas, must be the priority,' says US envoy on rare Gaza visit
Steve Witkoff, who leads Trump's Middle East team, toured a site run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) in Rafah on Friday. He said the visit was part of efforts to develop a new aid plan for Gaza.
'The purpose of the visit was to give President Trump a clear understanding of the humanitarian situation and help craft a plan to deliver food and medical aid to the people of Gaza,' Witkoff said on social media.
At @POTUS's direction, @USAmbIsrael and I met yesterday with Israeli officials to discuss the humanitarian situation in Gaza. Today, we spent over five hours inside Gaza — level setting the facts on the ground, assessing conditions, and meeting with @GHFUpdates and other… pic.twitter.com/aCtLuMuhq1
— Special Envoy Steve Witkoff (@SEPeaceMissions) August 1, 2025
Soon after the visit, Palestinian medics reported that Israeli soldiers shot and killed three Palestinians near one of the foundation's aid points. It was not immediately clear if it was the same site Witkoff had visited. The Israeli military said it was still investigating the incident, in which troops fired warning shots at what they called a 'gathering of suspects' hundreds of metres from the aid site.
The UN has accused the GHF of delivering aid in a way that puts civilians at risk. It says more than 1,000 people have been killed while trying to get aid from GHF points since the group began operating in Gaza in May. Most were reportedly shot by Israeli forces near those sites.
'We will not partner with operations that violate humanitarian principles and put people in danger,' said the UN, which has refused to work with GHF.
GHF denies any deaths have occurred at its sites. Its spokesperson, Chapin Fay, said the foundation is 'protecting aid better than the UN' and has delivered 100 million meals. Fay added: 'President Trump understands the stakes in Gaza and that feeding civilians, not Hamas, must be the priority.'
US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee, who accompanied Witkoff, shared an image of Gazans behind razor wire near a GHF poster with the American flag.
Witkoff's visit came a day after he met Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Israel has been facing growing criticism over the humanitarian situation in Gaza, where more than 60,000 Palestinians have been killed since the war began, according to Gaza's health ministry.
The war started after Hamas fighters attacked southern Israel in October 2023, killing over 1,200 people and taking more than 250 hostages.
On Friday, in addition to the three killed near a GHF site, medics said Israeli strikes across Gaza killed at least 12 more people. The Israeli military declined to comment on those reports.
Aid groups say hunger is worsening. Medics in Gaza report dozens of recent deaths from malnutrition. The UN says the hunger crisis grew after Israel cut off supplies for nearly three months earlier this year and continues to allow only limited aid to enter.
Israel says it has increased aid entry by pausing fighting in certain areas during parts of the day and designating routes for trucks. It also began food air drops this week, though the UN says that is not enough.
'If there is political will to allow airdrops — which are costly and limited there should be will to open road crossings,' said Philippe Lazzarini, head of the UN Palestinian aid agency.
The Israeli military said 200 trucks entered Gaza with aid on Thursday. However, the UN says thousands of trucks are still waiting to be allowed in.
Some Western countries, including France, Britain and Canada, have responded to the crisis by saying they are considering recognising a Palestinian state.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
4 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Short-term hiccups, long-term rewards
That this is not a good week for India-US relations is an understatement. With 25% tariffs, threat of a 'penalty' for purchasing oil and military equipment from Russia, criticism for being a part of the Brics grouping, and sermons over an apparently 'dead economy' and 'obnoxious non-monetary trade barriers,' US President Donald Trump has made clear that India, who he still calls a 'friend', is high on his imagination. His irritation might even be personal. It's difficult to say. The conclusion of what appears to be a last-minute trade agreement with Pakistan, still with 19% tariffs, and a plan — the details of which are best known to the President — to develop untapped and 'massive oil reserves' within Pakistan is striking, if not mystifying to global oil experts. Understandably, within India, anger has dimmed the vision for promise in a relationship that has transformed in the past two decades. Well known television anchors have selflessly advised the government to 'draw a line' because, apparently, 'Trump always chickens-out'. Given that the Indian Parliament is in session, news channels have one sound bite after another on this crucial relationship, the state of the Indian economy, and much else. Friends in Washington D.C. who have spent a lifetime building trust between the two countries are appalled. 'What is lost,' argues Evan Feigenbaum, a former US official who played a key role in getting the US-India civil nuclear agreement across the line, 'is trust that took 25 years of painstaking, hard, bipartisan work and a huge lift by advocates in both countries'. Trust, the former official argues, is 'hard to build, easy to lose'. To be sure, within India, those who have remained sceptical, to put it mildly, of deepening US-India ties find themselves back in the limelight. Russian social media handles are electrified. 'We stand with India' are lines being circulated on WhatsApp groups and through unattributable handles. There is little doubt that in some office corner in China, a disinformation campaign is on the loose. Yet, whilst fully acknowledging the complexities woven into these difficult days for Indian and American interlocutors who have battled hard for a better future, this is neither the time for India to engage in grammar wars — this can be left to anchors and pundits alike — or, in fact, give-up on the functional aspects of the relationship. Understandably, there will be an impulse to pause ties across the board. Politically, it might be prudent too. But this is the time to demonstrate a version of altruism keeping the future in mind. For US experts, the term altruism refers to some strange conceptualisation of benevolence. Supporting India without asking for something in return, they would argue, was the spirit that drove American officials to go out of their way to accommodate India's civil nuclear ambitions. Currently, the verve is to turn altruism on its head, and for India to give more than it gets — to get past Trump 2.0. Many in India will disagree with this conceptualisation. I do. But that's another matter altogether. What is needed is an altruism not to react to a President who may well be negotiating for a better day or determinately pushing India where it hurts. He may hit India with 30% tariffs next week. His negotiators and their counterparts within India, who in all likelihood had agreed on terms for the first tranche of the trade deal, may still prevail. It is impossible to tell. What is clear is that no one in the US, including those within the White House can second guess Trump's next move or tweet. What is required is for India to be lingually altruistic to a President, who only in part controls the temperature and shapes the trajectory of a relationship that has proliferated well beyond government ties. This is the real success of the US-India relationship: The creation of a wide and spirited ecosystem that is fusing ties that go well beyond the government and foreign military sales. This is not to say that the drum that beats within the White House is not important. It is not necessarily all-important. The trust that has been built may not, in fact, be that easy to lose. Neither can it be taken for granted any longer. But this will require persistent engagement at the functional level and within this broader ecosystem. There are some 1,500 American Global Capabilities Centres peppered across India. Cutting-edge American defence platforms are being assembled in Hyderabad. Every major American technology firm has deep investments in India. This number is only growing. India's space companies service contracts for the US Space Force. The lists of these intersections are almost countless. For India's own economic and technological growth, a good part of the future lies with the US beyond Trump. This, of course, does not mean taking the bait for geopolitical realignments, which the government seems firm on. And rightly so. In fact, in a couple of months, the US may even strike an agreement with Russia, turning the tide on the current pressure on oil sales. If the Quad summit takes place in October or November, there is still an opportunity to functionally streamline and add substance to the myriad of working groups from cyber and infrastructure to space and critical and emerging technologies. AI infrastructure deals are unlikely, as of this moment, to stop in their tracks. India will host the Global AI Impact Summit in February 2026. Every technology company in the world wants to be involved, and all American firms want to send their top brass to Delhi. This is an opportunity to further deepen an already invested ecosystem. In sum, there is no doubt that India is in a tight spot. But not an impossible one. As of this moment, there is nothing to suggest that all is lost. It is not. Yet, at the functional level from government to industry and from technology to investment portfolios, there is a need to engage — for the sake of a relationship that has the space and dexterity, at least for a little time, to bridge ties beyond normalcy. Notwithstanding all the noise on the television channels and in Parliament, it is in India's interest to be linguistically altruistic for the sake of a relationship that has the space and dexterity, at least for some time, to bridge ties beyond immediacy. Rudra Chaudhuri is director, Carnegie India. The views expressed are personal.
Economic Times
4 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Bihar polls: INDIA bloc leaders to meet in Delhi next week, says Farooq Abdullah
National Conference president Farooq Abdullah on Saturday said the Congress has convened a meeting of the opposition leaders in New Delhi on August 7 to deliberate on the Bihar Assembly elections likely to be held in October-November. The National Conference president also expressed confidence over the restoration of statehood to Jammu and Kashmir. "We have faith in the one who is the master of all. We will get our rights," he said. Responding to a question on Rahul Gandhi claiming that his party has an "atom bomb" of an evidence to prove "vote chori" by the Election Commission for the the BJP, Abdullah stated the Congress leader "has said that they have made such an arrangement that they will win the Bihar elections". "I am going to meet him. All the leaders (of INDIA bloc) have been called for a meeting on August 7 and I will find out (the truth)," he told reporters here. Gandhi claimed on Friday that his party has an "atom bomb" of an evidence to prove "vote chori" by the Election Commission for the BJP and said that when it explodes the poll panel will have no place to hide anywhere in the country. The former chief minister of the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir reached here this afternoon to express condolences to party's provincial president Rattan Lal Gupta on the death of his wife and the family of an acquaintance, who died last month. When asked why his party is not supporting the Congress, which has announced chain hunger strike from August 9 to 21 for restoration of statehood to Jammu and Kashmir, Abdullah said the National Conference is already fighting for public cause. "We are fighting for it (restoration of statehood). When did we stop talking? Whenever (chief minister) Omar Abdullah met the prime minister (Narendra Modi), he raised this issue with him," said Abdullah. "We have faith in the one who is the master of all. We will get our rights," he added. Asked about his demand from Prime Minister Modi since Parliament is in session, the National Conference president said that people, who could not fill four seats of the Rajya Sabha and two vacant assembly seats -- Nagrota in Jammu and Budgam in Kashmir -- since the formation of the Jammu and Kashmir government than what is expected of them. On the BJP's claim about massive development post abrogation of Article 370, Abdullah said, "I will not say anything. Whatever the BJP says, it keeps on saying." "(US President Donald) Trump also keeps on shouting that I got peace done. Today they have imposed 25 per cent tariff on us and and have also imposed a penalty. The material for our destruction is being prepared. All our industrialists are running away. They will work from Dubai. Our people are already jobless and we will have more unemployment," he added. Highlighting that some countries supported Trump for a Nobel Prize, the National Conference president said, "We do not know the name of some of these (nations). What would have happened if we had also supported him? He is the master of the world." "Believe it or not, it is destruction for us, while the countries like Bangladesh and Cambodia are going to be benefitted. They will be happy because India is the major supplier and it will have to sit outside," he added. Abdullah refused to give a direct reply on former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur's claim that there was lot of pressure on her to name Prime Minister Modi in the Malegaon blast case. "Don't ask me such questions. We are already in lot of trouble. If we get out of this trouble, then we will see," he said. Nearly 17 years after the Malegaon blast claimed six lives, a special court in Mumbai on Thursday acquitted all seven accused, including Thakur and Lieutenant Colonel Prasad Purohit, noting that there was "no reliable and cogent evidence" against them.
First Post
4 minutes ago
- First Post
Elon Musk's Starlink Axed In Canada's Ontario Amid Trump's Tariff War Firstpost America
Elon Musk's Starlink Axed In Canada's Ontario Amid Trump's Tariff War | Firstpost America | N18G US-Canada trade tensions: The Canadian province of Ontario canceled a $68.12 million satellite high-speed internet contract with Elon Musk's company Starlink, following through with a vow by the province's premier, Doug Ford, to cut ties in retaliation for US tariffs imposed on Canada. Ontario's threat to block American goods first emerged after President Trump imposed tariffs on Canadian steel, aluminum and proposed a 35 per cent duty on exports. Despite urgent rural internet needs, Musk's project became collateral damage in the trade dispute. Musk, once an ally of Trump and a key figure in his administration, saw their alliance crumble over policy disagreements. As Canada and the US scramble to finalise a trade deal before the August 1 deadline, Prime Minister Mark Carney warns talks are complex and may not conclude in time. See More
