B.C. canola growers brace for new Chinese tariffs as harvest approaches
The retaliatory 75.8 per cent tariff on canola seed is the latest volley in the ongoing trade fight between the two countries.
While farmers brace for the hit, experts are asking whether Canada's own 100 per cent tariffs on Chinese-made electric vehicles (EVs) are worth the cost, and if they should be scrapped in hopes China will reverse its canola tariff.
Ernest Wiebe, who farms 800 acres of canola in Montney near Fort St. John, B.C., says producers are feeling discouraged by a recent drop in price for their crops.
The price per bushel had been $15 to $16 earlier this year, but it's since dropped to about $12.50 to $13.20 a bushel, Wiebe said. And it's a long way off from the highs of $27 a bushel seen in 2022.
"With all the uncertainty and stress of tariffs, and anti-dumping duties, we have seen a significant slide in our prices," he said.
Doing the math
A price drop by about $3 per bushel can wipe out between $120 and $180 an acre, depending on yield, according to Wiebe, who sits on the board of the Canadian Canola Growers Association. For the roughly 290 producers in the Peace Region, who seed up to 110,000 acres a year and grow 95 per cent of B.C.'s canola, that's a massive hit.
Most of the crop is bound for China, where it's crushed and processed into cooking oil.
Meanwhile, input costs keep climbing. Fertilizer alone is up $200 a metric ton this year, Wiebe said, on top of higher bills for land, fuel, equipment, and taxes.
The growing price gap could mean tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, in losses for the average farmer, and millions for B.C.'s economy."Overall, farmers [are] incredibly discouraged, and looking at it and going, 'Well, how are we going to make this all work?'" said Wiebe.
B.C. growers are hoping for an average or slightly above-average crop this year. But a very dry May followed by late June rains has delayed maturity, raising the risk that bad weather — possibly even snow — could interfere with harvest.
Pressure on Ottawa
Werner Antweiler, an associate professor at University of British Columbia's Sauder School of Business, says he is worried about farmers suffering the consequences of "arbitrary" Canadian tariffs.
The canola tariffs came after Canada's 100 per cent tariffs on Chinese EVs, and Antweiler says the EV tariffs weren't based on a proper investigation under World Trade Organization (WTO) principles.
"We should definitely revisit this issue and, in that way, also maybe reduce the countervailing duties that we now see on canola exports."
Stuart Smyth, a professor of agriculture and resource economics at the University of Saskatchewan, believes China's new tariffs are a strategic move to push down international canola prices before China buys large volumes at a discount. Similar tariffs in 2019 and 2020 cost the canola industry $2.3 billion, he said. "If this stays in for six or eight months, we could be looking at billions of dollars in costs," Smyth told CBC Radio West host Sarah Penton.
China claims Canada is dumping canola below the cost of production, which the federal government denies. Smyth says Canada doesn't subsidize crops like other countries do, nor does it promote exports with subsidies.
LISTEN | Professor says EV tariffs hurt B.C. farmers
Canada and China are challenging each other at the WTO, and while Prime Minister Mark Carney says his government is working with industry to find solutions, Smyth doesn't expect much of a response. He believes Carney is prioritizing the steel, aluminum, and auto sectors to save jobs in southern Ontario, where there's a high density of voters. "The federal government has been very reserved on reaching out to China, having consultations, or even trying to set up discussions with them," Smyth said.
Farmers running out of time
Wiebe says the federal government needs to strike a deal with China soon, even if that means walking back its EV tariffs. "If that could be resolved, and the tariffs, or the anti-dumping duty in this case, lifted, I believe our canola price would probably jump $2 to $3 a bushel probably within the next week."
Some may pivot from canola if profitability keeps sliding, Wiebe said, but planting other crops like wheat or oats has risks of its own. Flooding those markets could only end up driving down those prices too. "We're price takers," he said. "We can only sell at what the market offers."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
2 hours ago
- CNBC
OpenAI's Sam Altman sees AI bubble forming as industry spending surges
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman thinks the artificial intelligence market is in a bubble, according to a report from The Verge published Friday. "When bubbles happen, smart people get overexcited about a kernel of truth," Altman told a small group of reporters last week. "Are we in a phase where investors as a whole are overexcited about AI? My opinion is yes. Is AI the most important thing to happen in a very long time? My opinion is also yes," he was quoted as saying. Altman appeared to compare this dynamic to the infamous dot-com bubble, a stock market crash centered on internet-based companies that led to massive investor enthusiasm during the late 1990s. Between March 2000 and October 2002, the Nasdaq lost nearly 80% of its value after many of these companies failed to generate revenue or profits. His comments add to growing concern among experts and analysts that investment in AI is moving too fast. Alibaba co-founder Joe Tsai, Bridgewater Associates' Ray Dalio and Apollo Global Management chief economist Torsten Slok have all raised similar warnings. Last month, Slok stated in a report that he believed the AI bubble of today was, in fact, bigger than the internet bubble, with the top 10 companies in the S&P 500 more overvalued than they were in the 1990s. In an email to CNBC on Monday, Ray Wang, CEO of Silicon Valley-based Constellation Research, told CNBC that he thought Altman's comments carry some validity, but that the risks are company-dependent. "From the perspective of broader investment in AI and semiconductors... I don't see it as a bubble. The fundamentals across the supply chain remain strong, and the long-term trajectory of the AI trend supports continued investment," he said. However, he added that there is an increasing amount of speculative capital chasing companies with weaker fundamentals and only perceived potential, which could create pockets of overvaluation. Many fears of an AI bubble had hit a fever pitch this year when Chinese start-up DeepSeek released its open source R1 reasoning model, claiming it had achieved its generative AI large language model for just $6 million, a fraction of the billions being spent by U.S. AI market leaders, including OpenAI. Earlier this month, Altman told CNBC that OpenAI's annual recurring revenue is on track to pass $20 billion this year, but that despite that, it remains unprofitable. The release of OpenAI's latest GPT-5 AI model earlier this month had also been rocky, with some critics complaining that it had a less intuitive feel. This resulted in the company restoring access to legacy GPT-4 models for paying customers. Following the release of the model, Altman has also signaled more caution about some of the AI industry's more bullish predictions. Speaking to CNBC, he said that he thought the term artificial general intelligence, or "AGI," is losing relevance, when asked whether the GPT-5 model moves the world any closer to achieving AGI. AGI refers to the concept of a form of artificial intelligence that can perform any intellectual task that a human can — something that OpenAI has been working towards for years and that Altman previously said could be achieved in the "reasonably close-ish future." Regardless, faith in OpenAI from investors has remained strong this year. CNBC confirmed Friday that the company was preparing to sell around $6 billion in stock as part of a secondary sale that would value it at roughly $500 billion. In March, it had announced a $40 billion funding round at a $300 billion valuation, by far the largest amount ever raised by a private tech company. In The Verge article on Friday, the OpenAI CEO also discussed OpenAI's expansion into consumer hardware, brain-computer interfaces and social media. Altman also said that he expects OpenAI to spend trillions of dollars on its data center buildout in the "not very distant future," and signaled that the company would be interested in buying Chrome if the U.S. government were to force Google to sell it. Asked if he would be CEO of OpenAI in a few years, he was quoted as saying, "I mean, maybe an AI is in three years. That's a long time."
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Oil Gains as Focus Shifts to Zelenskiy Meet After Alaska Summit
(Bloomberg) -- Oil rose as investors turned their attention to Donald Trump's meeting with Volodymyr Zelenskiy on Monday, with the Ukrainian leader facing US pressure to reach a peace deal with Russia that involves ceding territory. The US-Canadian Road Safety Gap Is Getting Wider A Photographer's Pipe Dream: Capturing New York's Vast Water System Festivals and Parades Are Canceled Amid US Immigration Anxiety A London Apartment Tower With Echoes of Victorian Rail and Ancient Rome Princeton Plans New Budget Cuts as Pressure From Trump Builds Brent traded near $66 a barrel after closing 1.5% lower in the previous session, while West Texas Intermediate was above $63. In a show of support, European leaders including European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, French President Emmanuel Macron, and NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, will join the high-stakes meeting in Washington with Trump and Zelenskiy. The US president said after his talks with Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday that he'll urge Zelenskiy to make a quick deal, and sounded receptive to the Russian leader's demand that Ukraine give up large swathes of land. 'We're still a long ways off,' Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who took part in the summit, told Fox News on Sunday. 'We are not at the precipice of a peace agreement. We are not at the edge of one. But I do think progress was made.' Trump told European leaders after the meeting that the US could contribute to any security guarantees, and that Putin was prepared to accept that. However, it remains unclear what kind of guarantees are being discussed with the Russian leader, and what the Kremlin is willing to accept. In a Truth Social post late Sunday, Trump said Zelenskiy 'can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight.' He also made a reference to Crimea, without providing further details. Prior to the summit in Alaska, Trump told allies that reaching a ceasefire would be his key demand, and threatened to walk out of the talks and impose tough new measures on Moscow and countries buying its oil if it wasn't met. On Friday, the US president signaled he was in no hurry to implement penalties. So far, Trump has singled out India for buying Russian crude, slapping the South Asian nation with hefty tariffs for doing so. However, the US president said in a Fox News interview on Friday that he will hold off increasing levies on Chinese goods due to the country's purchases of Moscow's crude. 'The fact that further meetings are taking place here is a positive,' said Robert Rennie, the head of commodity and carbon research at Westpac Banking Corp. Talks around seeking a resolution to the Ukraine war have injected uncertainty into the market, and led to oil trading in a narrow range recently. Still, futures are down more than 10% this year on concerns around the fallout from Trump's trade policies and as OPEC+ rapidly returns idled barrels to the market. What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates Living With 12 Strangers to Ease a Housing Crunch Bessent on Tariffs, Deficits and Embracing Trump's Economic Plan How Syrian Immigrants Are Boosting Germany's Economy ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. 登入存取你的投資組合
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Lendlease Group (LLESF) (FY25) Earnings Call Highlights: Strong Turnaround and Strategic Growth ...
Operating Profit After Tax: $386 million. Group Operating Earnings: $0.09 per security. Distributions Per Security: $0.23, up 44% from the prior year. Statutory Profit: $225 million. Net Debt: $3.4 billion as of June 30. Operating EBITDA from IDC Segments: $662 million, a 49% increase. Funds Under Management: $48.9 billion. Co-Investment Yield: Improved to a gross yield of 4.5%. Development Completions: $2.3 billion. Construction Revenue: Down 13% from the prior year. New Work Secured in Construction: $5 billion. Segment Operating EBITDA: $1.04 billion, up from a loss of $328 million in FY24. Corporate Costs: Decreased 67% to $127 million. Net Finance Costs: $252 million. Tax Expense: $183 million. Investment Segment EBITDA: $313 million, a 69% increase. Development Segment Return on Invested Capital: 17%. Construction Segment EBITDA: $33 million, down from $60 million in FY24. Net Overheads: Reduced from $537 million to $466 million. Gearing: 26.6% as of FY25. Available Liquidity: $3 billion. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with LLESF. Release Date: August 18, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Positive Points Lendlease Group (LLESF) achieved significant progress in its business turnaround, exceeding its target of $125 million in annualized run rate savings by unlocking $141 million. The company completed or announced over $2.5 billion in capital recycling transactions, with a further $2 billion targeted for FY26, demonstrating strong capital management. The IDC segments delivered a 13.6% operating return on equity, surpassing the group's cost of equity, indicating strong core business performance. Lendlease Group (LLESF) reported a 44% increase in distributions per security, reflecting a strong payout ratio and commitment to returning capital to security holders. The company secured $5 billion in new construction work, contributing to a strong backlog revenue of $5.9 billion, positioning the business for future revenue and earnings growth. Negative Points Revenue in the construction segment declined by 13% due to the completion of several large projects and delays in new project commencements. Net debt increased to $3.4 billion, influenced by $600 million of crude transaction timing and negative $400 million from construction working capital and FX translation. The group recorded a statutory profit of $225 million, impacted by $161 million of negative investment property revaluations. Operating EBITDA from the construction segment declined to $33 million, down from $60 million in FY24, due to losses on two projects in the first half. The company faces ongoing challenges in the Chinese market, with slow progress due to the property cycle, affecting potential outcomes in that region. Q & A Highlights Q: Can you elaborate on the competitive environment for Lendlease in securing development projects, particularly with the target of double-digit returns? A: Tony Lombardo, Group CEO, explained that Lendlease is targeting a pipeline of $36 billion in active bids, with $25 billion expected to see decisions in the next 12 months. He highlighted the group's control over the Queensland athlete's village project, which is not subject to competition, and expressed confidence in securing $10 billion or more in projects due to stabilized construction sector inflation and strategic underwriting. Q: Could you provide details on the $1 billion of capital recycling at an advanced stage and its timing? A: Tony Lombardo stated that the TRX project is in the final phases of due diligence, and the retirement living segment has multiple bidders, with both expected to conclude in the coming months. The group aims to release $2 billion in capital this year, with strategies to accelerate capital release in the US and Italy. Q: What are the expectations for the Capital Recycling Unit (CRU) outcomes, and do you anticipate neutral to positive profit outcomes? A: Tony Lombardo confirmed that Lendlease is targeting $2 billion in capital recycling with neutral outcomes, balancing speed of execution with value realization. Q: How does the US credit partnership align with Lendlease's overall strategy? A: Tony Lombardo explained that the US credit partnership is part of Lendlease's strategy to maintain an international investment management platform and expand product offerings. The partnership leverages Lendlease's strengths in development and construction, aiming for returns above the group's cost of equity. Q: Can you provide an update on the athlete's village project in Brisbane and its profitability prospects? A: Tony Lombardo expressed confidence in the project's profitability, citing Lendlease's experience with similar projects like the London and Sydney athlete's villages. The group is working with the Queensland government to determine the best delivery model and expects to support government initiatives to drive market efficiency. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.