logo
Where is Brandon Moore? English Rugby star goes missing, wife issues help plea

Where is Brandon Moore? English Rugby star goes missing, wife issues help plea

Hindustan Times5 days ago

Rugby player Brandon Moore, who plays for Batley Bulldogs, has reportedly gone missing, and his wife has issued a plea for help.
The former Halifax rugby captain has been missing since Friday.
Moore's wife, Mara, took to social media to ask for help in locating him. She stated that she couldn't go hunt for him due to the responsibilities of her three kids.
"If anyone has seen Brandon Moore, can you please message me? I usually wouldn't ever post anything on here like this, but family and friends haven't seen or heard of him and hoping maybe someone's seen sightings of him and can message me?" she wrote in a Facebook post. The couple is based in Castleford, West Yorkshire, in England.
"I have a 7-week-old baby at home and two others, so I can't go hunting by myself, other than a car ride. Police contacted. Been missing approx 14 hours now. Thank you," the post added.
The Facebook post has since gone viral, amassing thousands of shares and about 100 comments.
Brandon More was supposed to play for the Batley Bulldogs at the Fox's Biscuits Stadium for the team's Championship match against table-topping French club Toulouse Olympique on Saturday.
The club even named Moore in the squad for the game. But he did not show up either to play or watch his team. The home side ended up losing against Toulouse by a 30-14 score. The Bulldogs sit 11th in the Championship table after the loss, having amassed 66 points so far.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Suspect in murder of Tunisian man to appear before French judge: Prosecutors
Suspect in murder of Tunisian man to appear before French judge: Prosecutors

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Suspect in murder of Tunisian man to appear before French judge: Prosecutors

Representative Image (AI-generated) A Frenchman accused of murdering his Tunisian neighbour in the south of France will appear before an anti-terrorism judge on Thursday, the national anti-terror prosecutor's office said. Christophe B is accused of killing Hichem Miraoui in an attack that sparked alarm over rising racism in France and Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau described as "racist" and "perhaps also a terrorist crime". Anti-terrorism prosecutors, known by their French acronym PNAT, have taken over the case -- the first time a far-right racist attack has been treated as a "terrorist" offence since the unit was created in 2019. Christophe B, a French national in his 50s, shot and killed Miraoui, a Tunisian man in his 40s, on Saturday in the southern town of Puget-sur-Argens before wounding another neighbour, a Turkish national. He posted racist videos on social media both before and after the attack, according to regional prosecutor Pierre Couttenier. A source close to the case told AFP that, unlike jihadist attacks often linked to state-designated "terrorist" organisations like the Islamic State group, far-right attacks are assessed on a case-by-case basis, as they typically lack connections to such organisations. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo The decision to refer them to the anti-terror prosecutors depends on the suspect's profile, the severity of the act, and whether there was a clear intent to seriously disrupt public order through intimidation or terror. Christophe B wanted to "disrupt public order through terror", according to a source close to the case. According to French daily Le Parisien, the suspect said he "swore allegiance to the French flag" and called on the French to "shoot" people of foreign origin in one of his videos posted on social media. Why this hatred? Political and religious leaders have sounded the alarm over growing anti-Muslim acts in France, which increased by 72 per cent in the first quarter, with 79 recorded cases, according to interior ministry figures. The shooting followed the murder of a Malian man in a mosque in April, also in southern France and the burning of a Koran near Lyon at the weekend. Retailleau said Tuesday that the killing of Miraoui was "clearly a racist crime", "probably also anti-Muslim" Chems-Eddine Hafiz, the rector of the Grand Mosque of Paris, called on French president Emmanuel Macron to speak out. "It is time to hold accountable the promoters of this hatred who, in political and media circles, act with complete impunity and incite extremely serious acts," said Hafiz. "Remind people of the reality that we are citizens of this country," he added. Tributes poured in from shocked neighbours and friends mourning the murder of Miraoui, with more than a dozen bouquets placed outside the barbershop where he worked in the quiet town of Puget-sur-Argens. "I don't understand why he was killed. Why all this hatred?", said Sylvia Elvasorre, a 65-year-old pensioner who lives next to the hair salon, tears in her eyes. France is home to the largest Muslim community in the European Union, as well as the largest Jewish population outside Israel and the United States. There has also been a rise in reported attacks against members of France's Jewish community since Palestinian militant group Hamas attacked Israel on October 7, 2023 and the Israeli military responded with a devastating military offensive on the Gaza Strip. France's Holocaust memorial and three Paris synagogues and a restaurant were vandalised with paint on Saturday.

Why Giorgia Meloni's 'anti-protest' law has divided Italy
Why Giorgia Meloni's 'anti-protest' law has divided Italy

First Post

time3 hours ago

  • First Post

Why Giorgia Meloni's 'anti-protest' law has divided Italy

Italy's new security law, pushed through by PM Giorgia Meloni's right-wing government, is stoking nationwide outrage. From harsher protest penalties and a ban on cannabis light to legal cover for police, critics warn it criminalises dissent and threatens civil liberties. Protests, international concerns and Senate drama have all followed read more Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni waits for the arrival of French President Emmanuel Macron, at Palazzo Chigi, in Rome, Italy, June 3, 2025. File Image/Reuters A new security decree introduced by Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's right-wing coalition government has divided Italy. Approved by the Senate with 109 votes in favour, 69 against, and one abstention, the legislation has sparked a backlash from opposition lawmakers, human rights bodies and legal groups, who argue that it undermines fundamental freedoms and disproportionately punishes marginalised communities. The decree expands legal authority for law enforcement, imposes stricter penalties on demonstrators, and introduces a variety of criminal provisions touching on protests, public order, cannabis regulation, and social housing. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While the government insists the law is a necessary measure to safeguard security, critics see it as a repressive attempt to criminalise dissent and curb civil liberties in one of Europe's major democracies. What the new security law in Italy comprises Among the central features of the law is the criminalisation of disruptive protest tactics, such as blocking roads and defacing public monuments—methods commonly used by environmental activists and other political movements in Italy. Participation in sit-ins, particularly when they affect transportation or public property, may now lead to criminal prosecution and even prison time. The law also introduces new criminal categories tied to unrest inside prisons and migrant detention facilities. Notably, acts that had previously been treated as non-violent expressions of dissent — such as passive resistance — now carry the risk of formal charges. Tougher sentences are introduced for individuals accused of inciting or participating in riots within detention centres. Critics say this expansion of legal definitions could lead to disproportionate punishment for migrants and incarcerated individuals, especially in situations where the use of force by the state is already under scrutiny. Evictions of people occupying vacant buildings — especially those used for informal housing — will now proceed under stricter rules. Squatting, which was earlier treated with leniency in some cases due to Italy's housing crisis, will now invite potentially severe penalties, including longer prison terms. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD According to lawyer Cesare Antetomaso from the National Association of Democratic Lawyers, 'There is a drastic increase in penalties for occupying buildings to live in,' adding that the housing crisis should be addressed through welfare policy, not criminal enforcement. One of the decree's most controversial provisions bans the sale of 'cannabis light,' a legal form of hemp that contains only trace amounts of THC and does not have psychoactive effects. This decision has enraged business owners who argue that the move will destroy an entire legal market, cost thousands of jobs, and result in major financial losses in an already fragile economy. Another provision removes a long-standing legal exemption that allowed convicted pregnant women or mothers of small children to avoid incarceration or serve sentences in alternative facilities. The government justifies the move by claiming the rule was being exploited by repeat offenders, particularly among Roma women. Gianni Berrino, a senator from the Brothers of Italy party, defended this position by stating, 'It's useless to say that this decree is inhumane, because women who have children in order to steal are not worthy of having them.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD How this law changes protection for police Under the new law, significantly enhanced protections have been granted to police and armed forces personnel. Officers under investigation or standing trial for actions committed during duty — including the use of force — will be eligible for legal assistance of up to €10,000. The legislation also establishes specific penalties for causing injury to law enforcement officers during demonstrations. An especially controversial aspect concerns the increased discretion granted to intelligence services, whose agents may now commit certain criminal acts without facing prosecution, provided these are justified on grounds of national security. Human rights watchdogs and opposition politicians have condemned this clause as a threat to democratic oversight and accountability. Meloni's government, which won power in the 2022 general election and has remained popular in polls, has described the law as part of a broader initiative to restore order and strengthen Italy's internal security. 'With the final approval of the Security Decree in the Senate, the Government takes a decisive step to strengthen the protection of citizens, the most vulnerable groups and our men and women in uniform,' Meloni said following the Senate vote. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Party leaders have frequently linked their legal reforms to public demands for tougher governance. 'Order, security and legality are at the heart of the Meloni government's actions,' said Carolina Varchi, a deputy from the Brothers of Italy party. 'Challenging this decree means, in effect, turning one's back on the demand for security that comes from citizens.' How the new security law has divided Italy The opposition, led by centre-left parties, has reacted strongly both inside and outside Parliament. During the final Senate vote, lawmakers from the Democratic Party staged a protest on the chamber floor, chanting 'shame, shame' and sitting down in defiance of protocol. Elly Schlein, the party's leader, accused the government of using the law to silence political opposition: 'It is a decree that is not about more security, but about more repression.' Francesco Boccia, a senior Democratic Party senator, condemned the criminalisation of youth activism and labour protests: 'We challenge a government that wants to imprison children, students who strike and protesters outside factories.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD On Saturday, May 31, thousands of demonstrators marched through central Rome under heavy police presence, braving intense heat to protest the law. Participants carried trade union and Palestinian flags, chanting slogans and calling for the law's repeal. Speaking at the protest, Cesare Antetomaso of the National Association of Democratic Lawyers told AFP, 'We consider this law the biggest attack on the freedom to dissent in the history of the Italian republic.' He specifically criticised its approach to housing and homelessness: 'There is a drastic increase in penalties for occupying buildings to live in. The housing crisis cannot be solved with seven-year prison sentences for those without shelter, but with various social policies.' Human rights institutions have also issued multiple warnings about the decree's compatibility with international law. The Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, Michael O'Flaherty, expressed deep concern in a letter to Senate President Ignazio La Russa, warning the law could compromise protections for protesters, migrants, and young activists under European standards. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights has earlier raised red flags, stating that several provisions in the law could 'undermine the fundamental tenets of criminal justice and the rule of law.' In two separate communications, eight United Nations Special Rapporteurs had intervened. Six of them highlighted how the decree might breach obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Meanwhile, the Special Rapporteurs on housing and poverty pointed to violations of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, particularly concerning the criminalisation of squatting and homelessness. Also Watch: With inputs from agencies

Protest in Punjab's Bathinda after death in police custody
Protest in Punjab's Bathinda after death in police custody

Hindustan Times

time3 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Protest in Punjab's Bathinda after death in police custody

Social, trader and farmer organisations held a protest outside the Bathinda district administrative complex (DAC) complex on Thursday against the alleged custodial death of Narinderjit Singh, 35, a resident of Goniana town. An instructor at an IELTS centre in Bathinda, Narinderjit, died under suspicious circumstances on May 23. The role of Punjab Police's crime investigation agency (CIA-2) is being probed and four personnel, namely assistant sub-inspector Avtar Singh, head constable Harwinder Singh and senior constables Lakhwinder Singh and Gurpal Singh, have been booked for culpable homicide not amounting to murder. The four were suspended by the Bathinda senior superintendent of police (SSP) on May 26, but they are yet to be arrested. Protesters raised slogans against the district police authorities for allegedly shielding the accused. They demanded murder charges be slapped on the entire CIA-2 staff. Police sources said Narinderjit and his friends, Gagandeep Singh and Happy Luthra, were intercepted on May 23 night by the CIA-2 team on suspicion of carrying narcotics. The three were returning from Ferozepur after an unspecified financial transaction when they were questioned by the police in Bathinda. Following a complaint by Narinderjit's father, Dr Ranjit Singh, both the friends and four CIA-2 staffers were booked at the Canal Colony police station on May 25. On May 24, Gagandeep posted a video on his Facebook page, claiming the CIA-2 staff had picked Narinderjit and he was allegedly tortured to death by the police. In his video, Gagandeep also claimed that following police pressure, he falsely informed Narinderjit's family that he had died in a road accident. The family grew suspicious about Gagandeep's statement and a case was registered against the six persons. Narinderjit's widow Nancy demanded strict and prompt action against the police for the alleged crime. The autopsy report by a board of senior doctors at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Bathinda, on May 29 found multiple injuries caused by blunt force on Narinderjit's body but none of them was stated to be fatal. The AIIMS report said that the cause of death could be ascertained after receiving the viscera report. The institute issued a statement on June 3, rubbishing claims that the doctors concluded that electric shocks caused Narinderjit's death. The chemical analysis report of the viscera from the forensic science laboratory in Kharar is awaited.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store