US & EU trade pacts to be concluded soon: Nirmala Sitharaman
The negotiations for a bilateral trade deal with the United States and a free trade agreement with the European Union (EU) are progressing "really intensely" and should be concluded soon, finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman said Tuesday. Countering a US-led narrative that India is a "tariff king," she said the government has brought down customs duty slabs to eight "including the zero rate" and that effective rates are much lower than the tariff rate, or the maximum possible tax on imports.
India has already signed free trade agreements with the United Arab Emirates, Australia, and the four-nation EFTA (European Free Trade Association) bloc, while negotiations with the UK have been completed, Sitharaman said at a trade conclave organised by the Exim Bank here.
The emphasis now is on concluding more free trade agreements, she added.
India has deepened its participation in global value chains. Apple's iPhone contract manufacturers have crossed the 20% domestic value addition (DVA) threshold across variants, the minister said.
Citing the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) World Investment Report 2025, she said India's position has improved though the global FDI flows dropped 11%.
Export Focus
Indian exports grew at an annual rate of 6.3% between 2010 and 2023 when global exports grew at 4%, and the country's share in global exports touched 3% in 2023 from 2.2% in 2010, as per the UNCTAD report. "Exporters are swimming against tides and succeeding," Sitharaman said.
The country's total exports reached an all-time high of $825 billion in FY25, recording a 6% growth from previous year, despite global uncertainties, she noted.
"In the last few years, global growth and trade have suffered," she said. "There was Russia-Ukraine war, then it was Israel-Gaza. Every year, we have had one or the other serious challenge to do with trade."
India aims to achieve the export target of $2 trillion by 2030.
Speaking at the conclave, financial services secretary M Nagaraju said India continues to be a beacon of hope and growth amidst all the global headwinds.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
36 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Shun double standards in fight against terror: Doval
National Security Adviser Ajit Doval on Tuesday emphasised the need to abandon double standards in combating terrorism and urged members of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) to hold accountable perpetrators and sponsors of cross-border terror, an apparent swipe at Pakistan. National Security Adviser Ajit Doval with Vice President of China, Han Zheng, in Beijing on Tuesday. (ANI) Doval made the remarks while addressing a meeting of the SCO Security Council Secretaries in Beijing, which was also attended by Pakistan's NSA, Inter-Services Intelligence agency chief Lt Gen Asim Malik. Doval had also raised the issue of countering all forms of terrorism at a meeting with Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi on Monday. During the meeting of senior security officials of SCO member states, Doval conveyed India's deep concern at the continued threat from terror groups sanctioned by the UN Security Council, including Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), Al-Qaeda and Islamic State and their affiliates, and highlighted the need to shun 'double standards' in the fight against terror. Any act of terrorism, including cross-border terror, is a 'crime against humanity', Doval said, as he urged SCO member states to hold accountable the perpetrators, organisers, financiers and sponsors of acts of cross-border terror and to help bring them to justice. He sought 'decisive action' against terrorists proscribed by the UN and groups such as LeT, JeM and their proxies, as well as the dismantling of their 'terror ecosystems'. Though Doval didn't name any country, his remarks appeared to be directed against Pakistan, which is also a member of the SCO. Following the Pahalgam terror attack in April that was carried out by a front for the LeT, India conducted military strikes on terrorist infrastructure in territories controlled by Pakistan on May 7. The move triggered four days of intense clashes that ended when the two sides reached an understanding to halt military actions on May 10. Doval explained the rationale behind India's decision to launch Operation Sindoor in response to the 'barbaric terror attack' in Pahalgam on April 22, saying the military strikes were aimed at dismantling terror infrastructure and deterring terrorists who were likely to be sent across the border into India. 'India's actions were measured and non-escalatory,' he said. He noted that The Resistance Front (TRF), a proxy of the LeT, killed 26 people, including a Nepali national, and injured several more in Pahalgam after segregating them on the basis of religion. Doval also sought the support of the other delegations for important Indian proposals to combat terrorism, including an 'algorithm of joint actions' to counter challenges posed by international terrorist groups such as al-Qaeda and its affiliates, joint measures to counter radicalisation that leads to terrorism, separatism and extremism, and a 'joint information operation' to counter extremist ideology. Besides India and Pakistan, the SCO includes China, Iran, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. The meeting of the security officials was part of the preparations for the SCO Summit to be hosted by China later in the year. Defence minister Rajnath Singh, who is set to attend a two-day conclave of SCO defence ministers at Qingdao from Wednesday, too is expected to press members of the bloc to ramp up efforts to combat terrorism in line with India's diplomatic offensive against Pakistan-backed cross-border terror. While Doval had visited China last year, Singh will be the first senior Indian minister to travel to the country after the end of a four-year military standoff on the Line of Actual Control (LAC) that ended last October. Doval held a bilateral meeting with Aleksandr Venediktov, deputy secretary of Russia's security council, on the margins of the SCO meeting and discussed bilateral, regional and international issues. Both sides reiterated the importance of taking forward their bilateral cooperation based on the special and privileged strategic partnership. All the senior security officials of SCO member states also met Chinese vice president Han Zheng, who said China is ready to work with other members of the bloc to maintain security and stability in a world fraught with uncertainties and instabilities.
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Breaking News Live Updates: 'All systems looking good', says SpaceX ahead of Axiom Mission 4 to ISS
07:03 (IST) Jun 25 The Indian Embassy in Iran announced that it will be gradually winding down its evacuation exercise for Indian nationals, initiated after the escalated conflict in the region following Israel's military operations on the Islamic Republic, as a ceasefire deal was made between the two countries on Tuesday. In a post on X, the Embassy detailed the closure of the contact desk set up for registering new names of Indian nationals for evacuation, while assuring continued monitoring of the security situation. "Announcement from Embassy of India, Tehran: Since there has been an announcement of ceasefire, the Embassy is gradually winding up the evacuation exercise initiated during the military conflict in Iran. Hence the Embassy has closed the contact desk that was opened to register new names for evacuation. At the same time, Govt. of India is keeping a careful eye on the evolving situation & will reassess its strategy in case there is again a threat to the security of Indian nationals in Iran," the Embassy stated.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Feckless Europe accepts Trump's Lone Ranger diplomacy
IF EUROPE CANNOT have America as a global policeman, it will settle for Donald Trump as the Lone Ranger. That, in effect, is the message from the leaders of Britain, France and Germany. All three have come close to endorsing strikes on Iran's nuclear programme by Israel and America. Many will welcome his imposition of a ceasefire and his imperious order to Israeli warplanes to 'turn around' rather than punish an apparent Iranian breach of it. The contrast with the American-led invasion of Iraq in 2003 is jarring. Back then, the West was split by debates about international law. For a camp led by France and Germany, only the UN Security Council—the governing body of the post-1945 order—could authorise attacks on Saddam Hussein. American talk of preventive strikes was dismissed as cowboy justice. Today, though, the initial response of Sir Keir Starmer, Britain's prime minister, was as clinical as a Pentagon press release. 'Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat,' declared the man who had previously made his name as a human-rights lawyer. In post-war Europe, crafting elegant rationales for impotence is a prized skill. France's president, Emmanuel Macron, showed mastery of the form after Israel's initial raids on Iran. He told the Elysée press corps that an Iranian bomb would be an 'existential' threat to the world, and that—though France favoured a diplomatic solution—Israel's strikes had set back Iran's nuclear-enrichment and ballistic-missile capabilities, and so were steps 'in the right direction'. After America joined Israel in striking Iran, Mr Macron toughened his stance a bit. On June 23rd he spoke of the 'legitimacy' of efforts to neutralise Iran's nuclear structures, but added that America's actions lack 'a legal framework'. Winning the prize for bluntness, Germany's chancellor, Friedrich Merz, told German television that Israel is doing 'the dirty work' for 'all of us'. Geopolitics help explain European meekness. Western governments fear power vacuums in the Middle East. They were thus glad to hear Mr Trump forswear regime change in Iran. Selfishly, it is also a relief for Western governments to be spared Trumpian lectures about free-riding allies. Mr Trump is proud that only America's bombs can curb Iran. Before ordering his raid, he scoffed at European offers to engage with Iranian diplomats, saying: 'Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want to speak to us. Europe is not going to be able to help in this one.' Europe's response is rational, but revealing. In foreign policy a useful principle is: that which cannot be changed must be welcomed, says Steven Everts, the director of the EU Institute for Security Studies, an EU policy-planning agency. Even so, he concedes, Europe's response 'speaks to our weakness'. For their part, non-Western powers have demanded that America and Israel heed international law. After Israel began bombing, China's supreme leader, Xi Jinping, telephoned a counterpart to agree that: 'The use of force is not a right way to resolve international disputes.' In particular, 'the red line of protecting civilians in armed conflicts must not be crossed,' declared Mr Xi. His lofty words were undercut only by the civilian-killing record of the other president on the line, his friend Vladimir Putin of Russia. China wants regional stability and fears higher energy prices, says a Chinese scholar in Beijing. As for playing a more active role, that depends on whether warring parties want China's help and 'whether China has any real leverage over the matter'. For now neither condition applies, adds the scholar. State-funded Chinese analysts signal that China, the largest buyer of Iranian oil, would be displeased if Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz to shipping. Should Iran try a nuclear breakout, a prominent Chinese commentator suggested, China might allow the imposition of new sanctions on Iran, by abstaining at the UN rather than casting a veto. Europe could come back into the picture as a diplomatic player, suggests João Vale de Almeida, a former EU ambassador to America and the UN during the gruelling years of nuclear talks between Iran and the five permanent members of the UN Security Council (the so-called P5), plus Germany and the EU. He predicts that any new pact with Iran, even one backed by America's hard power, may rather resemble the JCPOA, the multilateral agreement generated by those talks that Mr Trump quit in 2018. He laments the past seven years as 'a big detour' of lost time and credibility. No cowboy sunsets in the real world A big change since 2018 involves the splintering of the P5, whose members—America, Britain, China, France and Russia—were remarkably unified in their opposition to an Iranian bomb, says Catherine Ashton, who as EU foreign-policy chief from 2009 to 2014 chaired nuclear negotiations with Iran. The assembled envoys felt a sense of historic common purpose, says Baroness Ashton. That survived even crises like the political protests that swept Ukraine in 2013. She recalls leaving the Iran meetings in Vienna and flying to Kyiv to denounce Russian meddling in Ukrainian politics. Russia's lead negotiator would fly to Moscow to condemn the West. Then both would return to Vienna for constructive talks. She remembers China as 'a team player' on Iran nukes, too. Today Mr Trump seems interested in bilateral dealmaking, observes Lady Ashton. That approach raises hard questions about Iran's incentives to disarm. America acting alone can apply coercion. But given Iranian distrust of Mr Trump, only an international coalition can credibly offer the reward that Iran seeks: a long-term economic reopening to the world. The Lone Ranger was not big on commitment. After dispensing vigilante justice he would ride into the sunset. Western leaders know the limits of that approach. Alas, they must deal with the American president they have. Subscribers to The Economist can sign up to our Opinion newsletter, which brings together the best of our leaders, columns, guest essays and reader correspondence.
