logo
It's not just Labubu dolls. Chinese brands are booming

It's not just Labubu dolls. Chinese brands are booming

Business Times9 hours ago

LABUBU dolls are hard to come by. Even at the giant flagship store of their maker, Pop Mart, in Shanghai, throngs of customers are told they need to wait a week or longer. The grimacing elvish creatures, which come in 'blind boxes' that keep buyers in suspense over which one they might get, sell for as little as US$20. But a rare variety sold for US$150,000 at an auction on Jun 10. It is not just Chinese children trying to get their hands on the dolls; celebrities including David Beckham, a British ex-football player, and Rihanna, an American pop star, have recently gone public with their appreciation.
The Labubu craze has sent Pop Mart's shares up by 170 per cent since the start of the year. It is one of a growing cohort of Chinese consumer brands whose popularity is surging. For decades Chinese shoppers tended to look overseas for the latest trends in cosmetics, fashion, hospitality and more. Now they are flocking to local luxury firms, high-end make-up brands and milk tea shops. What is more, many of these brands are gaining a devoted following abroad. Western brands should be worried.
It is an odd time for a boom among Chinese consumer products. Sputtering economic growth has caused household spending to weaken. Yet the strain on Chinese shoppers' wallets is one of the factors propelling local brands. As consumers have become more price sensitive, cheap but decent quality home-grown brands have thrived.
Many urban Chinese coffee drinkers, for example, have found local chains such as Cotti or Luckin just as good as Starbucks, an American company, but often half as expensive. Laopu Gold, a Chinese maker of luxury jewellery, has found success selling elegant bracelets and earrings that tend to be cheaper than those offered by Tiffany & Co, another American stalwart. Songmont, a local handbag brand, has launched a costly advertising campaign in airports across the country, pitting itself against foreign competitors that are often twice as expensive, or more. Part of Pop Mart's success with Labubu dolls has come from targeting frugal spenders with high-quality, 'emotive' products, says Lina Yan of HSBC.
Yet consumer downgrading is only part of the explanation for the buzz around Chinese brands. In many cases, shoppers are paying just as much or more for local equivalents. For instance, the best-selling products at Chagee, a tea chain that went public in New York in April, are tea lattes that sell for 15-20 yuan (S$2.70-3.60), on par with Starbucks' top products in China. The group has marketed itself as a premium brand, not a budget one, notes Han Zhang of Deutsche Bank, another lender. The fastest-growing segment of electric vehicles in China is not the cheapest but those priced at between 200,000 and 400,000 yuan, considered 'entry-level luxury'. Foreign carmakers have long dominated this market segment, but many popular new models in this range are from local rivals such as Nio and Li Auto.
Chinese consumers are also now far less enamoured with foreign goods simply because they are foreign. Laopu's rapid rise is proof of that. The firm, which sells intricate gold jewellery with a distinct Chinese flair, has managed to keep its sales per store above 300 million yuan, at least 50 per cent higher than most of its foreign rivals. Its share price is up by more than 2,000 per cent since it listed in Hong Kong about a year ago. It is one of only a small number of home-grown luxury brands in China. The industry has long been dominated by foreign firms. But most of them are now doing poorly in the country. Western luxury brands once filled a gap simply because there were no real local alternatives, says Amber Zhang of BigOne Lab, a research firm. However, 'that doesn't mean Chinese consumers naturally resonate with the design or cultural message of those Western brands'. Rather than trying to appear Western, both Laopu and Chagee have flaunted their Chineseness. It has worked.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Fans argue that, despite its lower prices, Laopu's materials and design are of higher quality than most foreign offerings. This points to another shift in spending habits in China: shoppers are better informed about products today than they used to be, mainly thanks to social media. Many feel that they have been fleeced by foreign companies that were able to sell at inflated prices purely by not being Chinese. Today, young women scour the labels of cosmetics brands to find local products with the same active ingredients as foreign ones but at lower prices, notes an industry analyst.
That has helped yet another hit Chinese brand, a cosmetics maker called Mao Geping, which raised US$300 million in an initial public offering in Hong Kong in December. Its share price has soared by about 250 per cent since then. Home-grown cosmetics companies have been trying to steal share from foreign firms such as L'Oreal and Estee Lauder for years, but have struggled to compete at the pricier end of the market. Mao Geping, which is named after its founder, a famous make-up artist, has become the first local company to make it onto the list of the top ten high-end make-up brands in China.
Whereas foreign firms tend to focus on the country's largest cities, local brands operate farther afield. Many got their start in smaller inland cities. Chagee opened its first store in the city of Kunming, in the south-western province of Yunnan, in 2017, and most of its shops remain outside rich coastal areas. Mixue, a cold-drink chain, started as a shaved-ice stand in one of China's poorer provinces. The country's most popular fast-food brands have mainly expanded in smaller cities before trying their luck in places such as Beijing and Shanghai.
Hoteliers are doing the same. H World, a Chinese hotel chain, will open about half of its new properties in third and fourth-tier cities over the next year, says He Jihong, its chief strategist. Foreign hotel chains are much less active in small cities. This could be one factor keeping H World's hotels fuller than those of foreign rivals. Its occupancy rate was above 80 per cent last year, while the figure for Marriott International, an American chain with a large presence in China, fell below 70 per cent, making the country one of its worst performing regions.
The focus on small cities is important because spending there appears healthier than in big cities. Purchases of fast-moving consumer goods, such as packaged food and beauty products, expanded by 5.5 per cent in 2024 in cities with fewer than one million people, whereas they shrank by 4.6 per cent in the biggest cities, according to Bain, a consultancy.
Foreign brands in China are scrambling to fend off their new competitors. Lavazza, an Italian coffee chain, has tried selling salted-duck-egg coffee, with limited success. Some Western businesses, including Starbucks and Haagen-Dazs, an ice-cream chain owned by General Mills, an American food giant, are reportedly sounding out local investors for their Chinese operations in an effort to inject new ideas.
The competitive threat is not contained to China. Pop Mart now has stores in more than 20 countries, including at least 37 in America. Mixue can be found across South-east Asia. Chagee will have more than 1,300 shops outside China by the end of the year, up from almost none four years ago. And analysts believe that the more foreign recognition these brands get, the more popular they become within China. The social media craze in the West over Labubu dolls is thought to be adding to their local cachet. For decades, retail trends swept into China from abroad. Those days may be ending.
©2025 The Economist Newspaper Limited. All rights reserved

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China vows ‘forceful measures' after Taiwan's Huawei export curb
China vows ‘forceful measures' after Taiwan's Huawei export curb

Business Times

timean hour ago

  • Business Times

China vows ‘forceful measures' after Taiwan's Huawei export curb

[BEIJING] Beijing vowed to respond to Taiwan's 'technological blockades' after the self-ruled island blacklisted Chinese companies including Huawei Technologies, limiting their ability to develop cutting-edge artificial intelligence (AI). 'We will take forceful measures to resolutely safeguard the normal order of cross-strait economic and trade exchange,' Taiwan Affairs Office spokesperson Zhu Fenglian said on Wednesday (Jun 25) at a regular briefing in Beijing. She was responding to a question about Taiwan's recent curbs on Chinese companies, and didn't elaborate on how Beijing would respond. Taiwan last week joined a yearslong US campaign to curtail China's technological ascent by adding the country's AI and chipmaking champions – Huawei and Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC) – to its entity list. That bars the island's firms from doing business with the pair without a license, the first time Taipei has used the blacklist on major Chinese companies. The new restrictions are likely to, at least partially, cut off Huawei and SMIC's access to Taiwan's plant construction technologies, materials and equipment essential to build AI chips, like those made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company for the likes of Nvidia. Zhu condemned Taiwan's decision as 'despicable' and claimed it displayed President Lai Ching-te's loyalty to the US government. US President Donald Trump's administration has urged Taipei to take more ownership over chip restrictions on China, Bloomberg News previously reported. 'Attempts to decouple will not delay the progress of industrial upgrading on the mainland,' Zhu said, adding that such actions will only damage the competitiveness of Taiwanese enterprises and the island's economy. BLOOMBERG

Tesla sales skid in Europe in May despite EV rebound
Tesla sales skid in Europe in May despite EV rebound

Business Times

timean hour ago

  • Business Times

Tesla sales skid in Europe in May despite EV rebound

[PARIS] Tesla missed out on Europe's rebounding electric vehicle (EV) sales last month as the political activities of its CEO Elon Musk appear to continue to repel customers, industry data showed on Wednesday (Jun 25). Tesla sold 40.2 per cent fewer cars in Europe in May than in the same month last year, according to data from the Acea, the trade association of European car manufacturers. Overall, sales of battery-electric vehicles jumped by 25 per cent that same month in Europe. During the first five months of 2025, Tesla sales fell 45.2 per cent from the same period last year, as European consumers have been turned off by Musk's close ties to US President Donald Trump. European consumers also increasingly have more battery-electric vehicles to choose from, including from Chinese car firms. Tesla's market share of Europe's total automobile market has fallen to 1.1 per cent from 2 per cent last year. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Tesla's slump comes as EV sales in Europe rebounded by 26.1 per cent in the first five months of the year, accounting for 15.4 per cent of all cars sold. That's 'a share still far from where it needs and was expected to be', said Acea chief Sigrid de Vries. The EU aims to end sales of new internal combustion engine cars in 2035, but high prices and a perceived lack of charging infrastructure have given consumers pause. 'Consumer reluctance is by no means a myth, and we need to incentivise a supportive ecosystem – from charging infrastructure to fiscal incentives – to ensure the uptake of battery-electric models can meaningfully accelerate,' added de Vries. Overall, car sales rose by 1.6 per cent in Europe last month, but were down by 0.6 per cent in the first five months of the year. AFP

Three Arrows founders fail in appeal for orders to disclose crypto fund dealings to be set aside
Three Arrows founders fail in appeal for orders to disclose crypto fund dealings to be set aside

Singapore Law Watch

timean hour ago

  • Singapore Law Watch

Three Arrows founders fail in appeal for orders to disclose crypto fund dealings to be set aside

Three Arrows founders fail in appeal for orders to disclose crypto fund dealings to be set aside Source: Business Times Article Date: 25 Jun 2025 Author: Tessa Oh But Court of Appeal overturns lower court decision that allows liquidators to examine co-founder Zhu Su. The Court of Appeal on Tuesday (Jun 24) dismissed an application by the founders of Three Arrows Capital (3AC) to set aside orders requiring them to disclose their dealings with their now-defunct cryptocurrency fund. Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon, however, overturned a lower court decision that allowed liquidators to examine its co-founder Zhu Su following the collapse of 3AC in 2022. In October 2022, 3AC and its two founders, Zhu and Kyle Davies, were ordered by the court to disclose their dealings with the hedge fund – including any relevant books, papers, or records – to liquidators. However, both Zhu and Davies failed to comply with the disclosure order, prompting the liquidators to file two orders initiating contempt of court proceedings against them. Both men were subsequently sentenced to four months' jail for the offence. In 2023, Zhu and Davies applied to the court to have all three orders set aside, which was dismissed. They took their appeal against that decision to the Court of Appeal, in a hearing in April. Separately, following Zhu's arrest on Sep 29, 2023, liquidators sought an examination order from the court, believing that his incarceration will give them an opportunity to obtain more information about the affairs of the cryptocurrency fund. Following this, the liquidators commenced proceedings against Zhu and Davies in the British Virgin Islands, in which they sought to recover US$66 million which Zhu allegedly owed to the hedge fund. Zhu then applied for the examination order, as well as further orders for him to provide additional answers and appear for further examination, to be set aside. This application was also dismissed. 'Deliberate decision' to evade liquidators In his judgement, the chief justice ruled that the lower court had correctly dismissed the founders' applications to set aside the disclosure order, as well as the two orders relating to the contempt of court proceedings. In the April hearing, Zhu and Davies' lawyers were under the impression that they were cooperating with the liquidators' requests for information and did not think that committal orders would be sought against them. But this is 'no answer at all', said Chief Justice Menon, who noted that the founders were aware of the disclosure order by Jan 5, 2023, but had no explanation as to why they waited 10 months before filing to have the orders set aside. Their applications were also made well after the 14-day deadline prescribed in the Rules of Court 2021. Furthermore, Zhu and Davies' argument that they thought they had been cooperating with liquidators in good faith 'said nothing about whether the setting-aside applications had been brought within time, or whether there were grounds for extending time', he added. 'We are with the inference the judge drew, which is that (Zhu and Davies) deliberately chose not to take any steps to set aside the disclosure order because they thought they could remain out of reach of its enforcement. 'In such circumstances, we see no good reason why (Zhu and Davies) should be allowed to revisit the question 10 months later of whether the disclosure order should even have been made against them in the first place.' 'A delay of this time is patently unreasonable,' he added. 'Therefore, we hold that (the founders) were out of time to bring the setting-aside applications against the disclosure order.' The chief justice also noted that Zhu and Davies, being the only directors of 3AC, chose to discharge the company's lawyers a few days before the hearing for the disclosure order was to be heard. '(This) suggested a deliberate decision by (Zhu and Davies) to evade the efforts of the liquidators to gather the necessary information pertaining to the company,' he wrote. As for the application relating to the examination order, Chief Justice Menon said the order is not an appropriate means for the liquidators to obtain information from the founders. This is given that the liquidators already intended to commence proceedings to sue Zhu and Davies in the British Virgin Islands shortly before making the order. Since the liquidators had already decided they wanted to sue the founders, they should be subject to the constraints imposed by the rules of civil procedure, he added. The court set aside the examination order, but made orders to resolve the outstanding issues arising from the lower court's earlier decision to grant it. Source: The Business Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction. Zhu Su v Three Arrows Capital Ltd and others and other appeals [2025] SGCA 31 Print

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store