
Losing international students could devastate many US colleges
Xiaofeng Wan, a former admissions officer at Amherst College, now works as a private consultant to international students who want to come to the United States. This week, as he held meetings in China with prospective students, he sensed a deep uncertainty among their parents.
'They don't know whether they should send their children to a country where they don't welcome Chinese students or they see China as a hostile competitor,' Wan said by telephone from Beijing. 'It's an unprecedented situation that we've never seen before.'
For years, American colleges and universities have attracted growing numbers of international students who often pay full tuition, effectively subsidizing domestic students.
But the Trump administration's recent move to deport hundreds of students here on visas, and his trade war with China, have stoked fears that the United States is no longer a welcoming place for international students. This week, the administration also asked Harvard University to hand over lists of foreign students, adding to a sense of panic on campuses.
Suzanne Ortega, president of the Council of Graduate Schools, said the chaos of visa terminations had fueled concerns among many students. 'I think it sends a powerful signal to friends and family at home that the U.S. is not a safe place to be anymore,' she said.
If the nation gains a reputation for being hostile to international students, it could be devastating for many American colleges and universities.
There were more than 1.1 million international students in the United States during the 2023-24 academic year, according to a recent report released by the Department of State's Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs and the Institute of International Education. The number includes students who remain in the country briefly after graduation to gain work experience.
The report identifies New York University, Northeastern University and Columbia University as the three largest host schools for international students. At NYU, their enrollment has increased nearly 250% over the last decade.
Losing foreign students could also be bad for the broader economy, experts say. International students pumped nearly $44 billion into the U.S. economy and generated 378,000 jobs last year alone, according to NAFSA: Association of International Educators, which promotes international education.
Moody's, the bond rating agency, downgraded the higher education outlook to 'negative' last month, citing federal policy changes as a threat.
The Trump administration has said that it is targeting international students who have broken the law or pose a threat to its foreign policy interests.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio has argued that 'no one has a right to a visa.' In remarks last month, he said that in giving and revoking visas, 'we're going to err on the side of caution.'
'We are not going to be importing activists into the United States,' he added. 'They're here to study. They're here to go to class. They're not here to lead activist movements that are disruptive and undermine our universities. I think it's lunacy to continue to allow that.'
International student enrollment had been on an upward trajectory for decades. Gaurav Khanna, an economist at the University of California, San Diego, who has studied foreign students, said the revenue they bring in helped some public universities weather the Great Recession.
Khanna's research found that schools that could attract students from abroad were often able to avoid raising in-state tuition for domestic students and major research and instructional cuts.
'To keep doors open for local students, you need to let in more international students,' he said.
Beyond the economic effects, leaders in higher education worry that decreases in international enrollment will deter the world's top minds from coming to the United States. International students accounted for nearly 6% of the total higher education population in the United States, according to the IIE report.
At the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where more than 1 in 4 students hail from abroad, the president, Sally Kornbluth, said on Monday that the university would be 'gravely diminished without the students and scholars who join us from other nations.'
'The threat of unexpected visa revocations will make it less likely that top talent from around the world will come to the U.S.,' Kornbluth said in a message to campus. 'That will damage American competitiveness and scientific leadership for years to come.'
Chris R. Glass, a professor at Boston College who studies international enrollment, estimates that 50,000 to 75,000 international graduate students in science and technology fields could be affected by federal grant cuts.
Overall, he said the number of international students could fall below 1 million for the first time since the 2014-15 academic year.
An analysis by The New York Times found that the Trump administration has canceled more than 1,500 visas at 222 schools nationwide. Immigration agents have also sought to detain and deport several students and researchers.
Some of the visa revocations appear to be related to legal infractions in students' pasts, a few are related to activism, and in some cases students do not know why they have lost their visas.
One international student from London, Patrick, who is 22, described a huge amount of fear among his fellow students. He asked that neither his last name nor his university in New York be identified for fear of repercussions.
He said that he had recently deleted all of his text messages because he was worried about surveillance when he reentered the country. Still, he said, he plans to finish his senior year in the United States and stay for a year after graduation.
President Donald Trump's first term also brought a chill to international student enrollment. In 2017, Trump banned travel from seven predominantly Muslim countries, and many colleges reported dips in foreign applicants. A larger decline occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic.
'Certain universities probably can weather the storm. But other universities don't have the resources,' Khanna said. 'If they get cut off from a lot of their funding and at the same time get cut off from revenue from international students, they're in trouble.'
Many of the students arriving from outside the United States view their degrees as paths to employment in the country.
But as the Trump administration seeks to crack down on immigration, some students could be deterred by the anxiety that studying in the U.S. and joining the domestic labor force no longer 'guarantees you the things you thought it did,' Khanna said.
It was already a particularly perilous time for American schools, which are facing a decline in students as birthrates dip.
Recent data from the National Center for Education Statistics predicts that the annual number of graduating high school seniors, which peaked this year at more than 3.8 million, will decline to 3.5 million by 2032.
During Trump's first term, some American universities tried to persuade foreign students to come in spite of concerns about a hostile administration.
Now, universities are scrambling to help the international students already enrolled who have been forced to leave.
After the State Department canceled the visas of 40 students and recent graduates of Northeastern University in Boston, the school said that it would offer some of those students remote learning opportunities or transfers to its international campuses.
Khanna said it wasn't clear what might happen long term, this time. 'There's a question of, 'Will the U.S. lose this comparative advantage?''
This article originally appeared in
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Observer
7 hours ago
- Observer
Trump says Xi agreed to let rare earth minerals flow to US
WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump said on Friday that Chinese President Xi Jinping agreed to let rare earth minerals and magnets flow to the United States, a move that could lower tensions between the world's biggest economies. Asked by a reporter aboard Air Force One whether Xi had agreed to do so, Trump replied: "Yes, he did." The Chinese Embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Trump's comment came one day after a rare call with Xi aimed at resolving trade tensions that have been brewing over the topic for weeks. At that time, Trump said there had been "a very positive conclusion" to the talks, adding that "there should no longer be any questions respecting the complexity of Rare Earth products." In another sign of easing tensions over the issue, China has granted temporary export licences to rare-earth suppliers of the top three US automakers, two sources familiar with the matter said. The US president's top aides are set to meet their Chinese counterparts in London on Monday for further talks. "We're very far advanced on the China deal," Trump told reporters on Friday. The countries struck an agreement on May 12 in Geneva, Switzerland, to roll back for 90 days most of the triple-digit, tit-for-tat tariffs they had placed on each other since Trump's January inauguration. Financial markets that had worried about trade disruptions rallied on the news. But China's decision in April to suspend exports of a wide range of critical minerals and magnets has continued to disrupt supplies needed by automakers, computer chip manufacturers and military contractors around the world. Trump had accused China of violating the Geneva agreement and ordered curbs on chip-design software and other shipments to China. Beijing rejected the claim and threatened counter measures. Rare earths and other critical minerals are a source of leverage for China as Trump could come under domestic political pressure if economic growth sags because companies cannot make mineral-powered products. Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has repeatedly threatened an array of punitive measures on trading partners, only to revoke some of them at the last minute. The on-again, off-again approach has baffled world leaders and spooked business executives. — Reuters


Observer
a day ago
- Observer
US sanctions 4 ICC judges over Israel and US cases
WASHINGTON: The United States imposed sanctions on four judges at the International Criminal Court including over an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as it ramped up pressure to neuter the court of last resort. The four judges in The Hague, all women, will be barred entry to the United States and any property or other interests in the world's largest economy will be blocked — measures more often taken against policymakers from US adversaries than against judicial officials. "The United States will take whatever actions we deem necessary to protect our sovereignty, that of Israel and any other US ally from illegitimate actions by the ICC," Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement. "I call on the countries that still support the ICC, many of whose freedom was purchased at the price of great American sacrifices, to fight this disgraceful attack on our nation and Israel," Rubio said. The court swiftly hit back, saying in a statement: "These measures are a clear attempt to undermine the independence of an international judicial institution which operates under the mandate from 125 States Parties from all corners of the globe." Israel's Netanyahu welcomed the move, thanking US President Donald Trump's administration in a social media post. "Thank you President Trump and Secretary of State Rubio for imposing sanctions against the politicised judges of the ICC. You have justly stood up for the right of Israel," he wrote on Friday. Human Rights Watch urged other nations to speak out and reaffirm the independence of the ICC, set up in 2002 to prosecute individuals responsible for the world's gravest crimes when countries are unwilling or unable to do so themselves. The sanctions "aim to deter the ICC from seeking accountability amidst grave crimes committed in Israel and Palestine; and as Israeli atrocities mount in Gaza, including with US complicity," said the rights group's international justice director, Liz Evenson. Two of the targeted judges, Beti Hohler of Slovenia and Reine Alapini-Gansou of Benin, took part in proceedings that led to an arrest warrant issued last November for Netanyahu. The court found "reasonable grounds" of criminal responsibility by Netanyahu and former Israeli defence minister Yoav Gallant for actions that include the war crime of starvation as a method of war in the massive offensive in Gaza following Hamas's unprecedented October 7, 2023 attack on Israel. Israel, alleging bias, has angrily rejected charges of war crimes as well as a separate allegation of genocide led by South Africa before the International Court of Justice. The two other judges, Luz del Carmen Ibanez Carranza of Peru and Solomy Balungi Bossa of Uganda, were part of the court proceedings that led to the authorisation of an investigation into allegations that US forces committed war crimes during the war in Afghanistan. Neither the United States nor Israel is party to the Rome Statute that established the International Criminal Court. But almost all Western allies of the United States as well as Japan and South Korea, the vast majority of Latin America and much of Africa are parties to the statute and in theory are required to arrest suspects when they land on their soil. Trump in his first term already imposed sanctions on the then ICC chief prosecutor over the Afghanistan investigation. — AFP HIGHLIGHT The four judges in The Hague, all women, will be barred entry to the United States and any property or other interests in the world's largest economy will be blocked -- measures more often taken against policymakers from US adversaries than against judicial officials.


Observer
a day ago
- Observer
Trump-Musk bromance descends into brawl over contracts, impeachment
WASHINGTON: Donald Trump threatened on Thursday to cut off government contracts to Elon Musk's companies and the world's richest man suggested the US president should be impeached, marking a stark end to an unlikely alliance and leaving onlookers wondering what was next. The hostilities between the former allies intensified when the president criticised Tesla CEO Musk in the Oval Office and the pair then lobbed verbal barbs at each other on their social media platforms: Trump's Truth Social and Musk's X. "The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts," Trump posted. Tesla shares closed down over 14 per cent on Thursday, losing about $150 billion in market value in the largest single-day decline in value in its history. Minutes after the closing bell, Musk replied, "Yes," to a post on X saying Trump should be impeached, an unthinkable move in Congress where Trump's Republicans hold majorities in both chambers. The trouble between the two started brewing days ago, when Musk denounced Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill. The president initially held his tongue while Musk campaigned to torpedo the bill, saying it would add too much to the nation's $36.2 trillion in debt. Trump broke his silence on Thursday, telling reporters he was "very disappointed" in Musk. "Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore," Trump said. As Trump spoke, Musk responded in real time on X. "Without me, Trump would have lost the election," wrote Musk, who spent nearly $300 million backing Trump and other Republicans in last year's election. In another post, Musk asserted that Trump's signature tariffs would push the US into a recession later this year. Musk's businesses also include rocket company and government contractor SpaceX and its satellite unit Starlink. Musk, whose space business plays a critical role in the US government's space programme, said that as a result of Trump's threats he would begin decommissioning SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft. Dragon is the only US spacecraft capable of sending astronauts to the International Space Station. Late on Thursday, Musk backed off the threat. And in a sign of a possible detente to come, Musk subsequently wrote: "You're not wrong," in response to billionaire investor Bill Ackman saying Trump and Musk should make peace. Trump and Musk are both political fighters with a penchant for using social media to attack their perceived enemies and many observers had predicted a falling out. Musk had become one of Trump's most visible advisers as head of the Department of Government Efficiency, which mounted a sweeping and controversial effort to downsize the federal workforce and slash spending. After leaving that role, Musk this week targeted what Trump has named his "big, beautiful bill", calling it a "disgusting abomination" that would deepen the federal deficit. His attacks amplified a rift within the Republican Party that could threaten the bill's prospects in the Senate. Nonpartisan analysts say Trump's bill could add $2.4 trillion to $5 trillion to the nation's $36.2 trillion in debt. A prolonged feud between the pair could make it harder for Republicans to keep control of Congress in next year's midterm elections if it leads to a loss of Musk's campaign spending or erodes support for Trump in Silicon Valley. "Elon really was a significant portion of the ground game this last cycle," said a Republican strategist with ties to Musk and the Trump administration who spoke to Reuters on condition of anonymity. "If he sits out the midterms, that worries me." On Tuesday, Musk posted that "in November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people." — Reuters HIGHLIGHTS The trouble between the two started brewing days ago, when Musk denounced Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill