US strikes may delay Iran's nuclear program by just a few months, Pentagon says
A new US intelligence report claims that the airstrikes ordered by President Donald Trump on Iran's nuclear sites did not fully destroy two of the facilities. However, the strikes likely set back Iran's nuclear program by just a few months, reported The New York Times.The report, prepared by the Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA), says two of the main nuclear sites -- Fordow and Natanz -- were not completely destroyed. The DIA is the intelligence branch of the Pentagon and worked with US Central Command, which oversees US military operations in the Middle East, to assess the damage after the strikes.advertisementAccording to the report, key equipment like centrifuges -- which are used to enrich uranium -- can be restarted within a few months. This means Iran could resume its nuclear program sooner than expected.
The report also says Iran moved much of its stockpile of highly enriched uranium before the strikes. Some of this material may have been relocated to other hidden nuclear facilities that Iran maintains in secret locations.This contradicts President Trump's claim that Iran's nuclear program was completely destroyed.TRUMP CALLS OPERATION A SPECTACULAR SUCCESSAs the claims surfaced, Trump posted Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth's statement on Truth Social.
advertisement
Ealier, in his televised address on Saturday night, President Trump praised the mission as a huge success."The strikes were a spectacular military success. Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated. Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace," Trump said from the White House.He said the US had wiped out the nuclear enrichment facilities at Natanz, Fordow, and Isfahan -- three of Iran's most important nuclear sites.But the Pentagon's internal report paints a different picture. The report also claimed that Fordow, in particular, showed signs of surviving the strikes. This is one of Iran's most protected facilities, built deep beneath the Zagros mountains under about 45 to 90 meters (roughly 150 to 300 feet) of hard rock.Fordow's underground location was already a concern for the Pentagon earlier this year. In a January briefing, top Pentagon officials were warned that even the US's strongest non-nuclear bomb -- the 30,000-pound GBU-57 "bunker buster" -- might not fully destroy the facility.In last weekend's attack, B-2 bombers dropped 12 of these GBU-57 bombs on Fordow and two more on Natanz. Meanwhile, a US Navy submarine launched around 30 Tomahawk missiles at Isfahan.WHITE HOUSE PUSHES BACK AGAINST REPORTadvertisementThe White House has refuted the intelligence assessment and called the report misleading.Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, said in a statement, "The leaking of this alleged assessment is a clear attempt to demean President Trump, and discredit the brave fighter pilots who conducted a perfectly executed mission to obliterate Iran's nuclear program."
At a Sunday news conference, General Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff who helped lead the mission, offered a more cautious view.Caine said the sites had "sustained severe damage and destruction" but pointed out that the final damage assessment had not yet been completed.- EndsMust Watch
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
NATO leaders meet for what could be a historic summit or a divided one
The two-day summit has been overshadowed by Trump's decision to order the bombing of nuclear installations in Iran. In 2003, the U.S.-led war on Iraq deeply divided NATO, as France and Germany led opposition to the attack, while Britain and Spain joined the coalition. A short summit, decades of mutual security The summit in The Hague involved an informal dinner Tuesday and one working session Wednesday morning. A very short summit statement has been drafted to ensure the meeting is not derailed by fights over details and wording. Indeed, much about this NATO summit is brief, even though ripples could be felt for years. Founded in 1949, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization was formed by 12 nations to counter the threat to security in Europe posed by the Soviet Union during the Cold War, notably via a strong U.S. presence on the continent. Dealing with Moscow is in its DNA. Keeping the peace outside the Euro-Atlantic area is not. NATO's ranks have grown to 32 countries since the Washington Treaty was signed 75 years ago. Sweden joined last year, worried by an increasingly aggressive Russia. NATO's collective security guarantee — Article 5 of the treaty — underpins its credibility. It's a political commitment by all countries to come to the aid of any member whose sovereignty or territory might be under attack. Trump has suggested he is committed to that pledge, but he has also sowed doubt about his intentions. He has said the U.S. intends to remain a member of the alliance. Asked again on Tuesday whether he would abide by NATO's security guarantee, Trump said: 'There's numerous definitions of Article 5, you know that, right? But I'm committed to being their friends.' He added only that he is 'committed to life and safety.' A civilian runs NATO, but the U.S. and its military hold power The United States is NATO's most powerful member. It spends much more on defense than any other ally and far outweighs its partners in terms of military muscle. Washington has traditionally driven the agenda but has stepped back under Trump. The U.S. nuclear arsenal provides strategic deterrence against would-be adversaries. NATO's day-to-day work is led by Rutte, a former Dutch prime minister. As its top civilian official, he chairs almost weekly meetings of ambassadors in the North Atlantic Council at its Brussels headquarters. He chairs other 'NACs' at ministerial and leader levels. Rutte runs NATO headquarters, trying to foster consensus and to speak on behalf of all members. NATO's military headquarters is based nearby in Mons, Belgium. It is always run by a top U.S. officer. Ukraine's role at the summit is unclear With Trump demanding greater defense spending, Ukraine's role has been downgraded, compared to previous summits. Zelenskyy attended a royal dinner that Trump also attended Tuesday. He will not have a seat at NATO's table for its one working session. But nor will any other non-NATO leader. More broadly, NATO itself is not arming Ukraine. As an organization, it possesses no weapons of any kind. Collectively, it provides only nonlethal support — fuel, combat rations, medical supplies, body armor, and equipment to counter drones or mines.
Economic Times
34 minutes ago
- Economic Times
China's premier warns global trade tensions 'intensifying'
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tianjin: Chinese Premier Li Qiang warned on Wednesday that global trade tensions were "intensifying" as he addressed the opening ceremony of the World Economic Forum Officials including Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong are among those attending this week's gathering in the northern port city of Tianjin, known colloquially as the "Summer Davos".Li said the global economy was "undergoing profound changes" -- a thinly veiled reference to swingeing tariffs imposed by US President Donald Trump."Protectionist measures are significantly increasing and global economic and trade frictions are intensifying," Li added."The global economy is deeply integrated and no country can grow or prosper alone," Li said."In times when the global economy faces difficulties, what we need is not the law of the jungle where the weak fall prey to the strong, but cooperation and mutual success for a win-win outcome," Li number two official also painted a bullish picture of the Chinese economy, the world's second-largest, which has been beset by slowing growth and a lull in consumer spending. China 's economy continues to grow steadily, providing strong support for the accelerated recovery of the global economy," he he added, was "stepping up our efforts to implement the strategy of expanding domestic demand".This was "promoting China's growth into a major consumption powerhouse based on the solid foundation of a major manufacturing powerhouse".Beijing is eyeing growth this year of around five percent -- a target viewed as ambitious by many have since late last year rolled out a series of steps intended to boost spending, including key interest rate cuts and steps to encourage results have been varied, just as added pressure on trade from US tariffs threatens to hit the country's vast manufacturing sector."We expect the (Chinese) economy to continue to slow over the coming months," wrote Leah Fahy , China Economist at Capital Economics, in a note on speech at the WEF gathering sought to portray China as a staunch defender of a rules-based international trading system that is now under attack by the Trump comments echoed remarks Tuesday by President Xi Jinping to Singapore's Wong during a meeting in Beijing in which he called for the countries to resist a "return to hegemony" and President and CEO Borge Brende told AFP Tuesday it was "too early to say" what impact Trump's tariff blitz will have on the world economy."The traditional globalisation we saw is now changed into a different system," he said, warning of a possible "decade of lower growth".
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
42 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Donald Trump to meet Nato allies amid doubts over US defence commitment
President Donald Trump on Wednesday will meet with members of a Nato alliance that he has worked to bend to his will over the years and whose members are rattled by his latest comments casting doubt on the US commitment to its mutual defence guarantees. Trump's comments en route to the Netherlands that his fidelity to Article 5 depends on your definition" are likely to draw a spotlight at the Nato summit, as will the new and fragile Iran-Israel ceasefire that Trump helped broker after the US unloaded airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. At the same time, the alliance is poised to enact one of Trump's chief priorities for Nato: a pledge by its member countries to increase, sometimes significantly, how much they spend on their defence. Nato was broke, and I said, You're going to have to pay,' Trump said Tuesday. And we did a whole thing, and now they're paying a lot. Then I said, You're going to have to lift it to 4 or 5 per cent, and 5 per cent is better. Spending 5 per cent of a country's gross domestic product on defense is good, Trump pronounced, adding, It gives them much more power. The boost in spending follows years of Trump complaints that other countries weren't paying their fair share for membership in an alliance created as a bulwark against threats from the former Soviet Union. Most Nato countries, with the key exception of Spain, are preparing to endorse the 5 per cent pledge, motivated to bolster their own defences not just by Russian President Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine but also, perhaps, to placate Trump. As a candidate in 2016, Trump suggested that he as president would not necessarily heed the alliance's mutual defense guarantees outlined in Article 5 of the Nato treaty. In March of this year, he expressed uncertainty that Nato would come to the United States' defense if needed, though the alliance did just that after the September 11, 2001, attacks. On Tuesday, he told reporters aboard Air Force One on his way to The Hague for the summit that whether he is committed to Article 5 depends on your definition. There's numerous definitions of Article 5. You know that, right? Trump said. But I'm committed to being their friends. He signalled that he would give a more precise definition of what Article 5 means to him once he is at the summit. Trump also vented to reporters before leaving Washington about the actions by Israel and Iran after his announced ceasefire. He said, in his view, both sides had violated the nascent agreement. After Trump arrived in the Netherlands, news outlets, including The Associated Press, published stories revealing that a US intelligence report suggested in an early assessment that Iran's nuclear program had been set back only a few months by weekend strikes and was not completely and fully obliterated, as Trump had said. The White House called the report flat-out wrong," and Trump posted in all-caps on social media early Wednesday that any reporting that the strikes weren't completely destroyed was an attempt to demean one of the most successful military strikes in history. The White House has not said what other world leaders Trump would meet with one-on-one while in The Hague, but he said he was likely to cross paths with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
