Amended bill lifting lifetime ban on food aid for Nebraskans with a past drug felony advances
The Nebraska State Capitol. (Aaron Sanderford/Nebraska Examiner)
LINCOLN — A measure to remove a lifetime ban on public food assistance for Nebraskans who have served sentences for drug felonies passed another hurdle Wednesday.
An amended Legislative Bill 319, designated as a priority by Bellevue State Sen. Victor Rountree, advanced on a 31-14 vote to final reading.
Current Nebraska law offers a narrow exception to the ban for people with one or two drug possession or drug use felony convictions. They can access Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, formerly known as food stamps, if they have completed a licensed and accredited treatment program.
Rountree's bill would open the door for other felony drug offenders who currently can't access SNAP benefits, as long as they've completed their sentence or are on parole or under post-release supervision.
An amendment that passed Wednesday, on a 32-14 vote, added a requirement that those with three or more felony drug convictions undergo a substance abuse treatment program to be eligible, unless a licensed health care provider determines that treatment is not necessary.
State Sens. Mike Jacobson of North Platte and Carolyn Bosn of Lincoln worked with Rountree on the amendment. Bosn said she did not think that food should be withheld as a form of punishment.
Jacobson said he felt strongly that a treatment component be included. He believes addiction is not a choice and is a disease that requires a constant and lifelong commitment to stay clean.
'If we want to try to keep them from reoffending, we need to give them every opportunity to try to be gainfully employed. And that starts with putting food on the table,' Jacobson said.
He said 152,000 Nebraskans currently receive SNAP benefits and the proposed legislation, if enacted, could add about 1,000 more. SNAP benefits are fully paid with federal funds, though administrative costs are split between the state and federal government.
A fiscal analysis said the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services could absorb the additional workload of administering the expansion without additional cost unless demand proved larger than anticipated.
State Sens. Kathleen Kauth of Omaha and Bob Andersen of Sarpy County were among those voicing continued opposition. On first reading April 10, the measure moved forward on a 32-5 vote. Kauth said a concern was taxpayers 'being on the hook' for chronic offenders.
'At some point we have to put a barrier up that says, 'If you continue to make these choices to engage in criminal activity, the taxpayers deserve to say no more,'' she said.
Andersen said the state pays for prosecution and incarceration. He added, 'At what point do we stop feeding the beast … At what point do we quit being enablers?'
State Sen. Rob Dover of Norfolk characterized himself as a conservative who does not promote rewarding people for bad behavior. He said, however, he believes punishment should not be prolonged after a person has paid their debt.
'If you think someone should suffer longer, increase the sentence then,' he said. 'It should not just go on and on and on.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
Medicaid Cuts: New York Governor Issues Warning to Republicans
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. New York Governor Kathy Hochul on Friday issued a plea to Senate Republicans to reject the House-passed "big beautiful bill" because of concerns that it could severely impact the most vulnerable Americans as a result of changes and cuts to programs such as Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the nation's largest nutrition aid program. Why It Matters The House budget proposal, which is the centerpiece of President Donald Trump's economic agenda nicknamed "One Big Beautiful Bill," aims to trim federal spending while offering significant tax cuts. The bill calls for hundreds of billions of dollars in Medicaid reductions, expanded work requirements for health and nutrition programs, and cost shifts to states. With nearly 1.5 million New Yorkers potentially losing health coverage, safety net hospital closures on the horizon and millions at risk of increased food insecurity, the bill's fate in the Senate holds high stakes for New Yorkers and recipients of these services nationwide. The bill advanced to the Senate after passing in the House 215-214, with two Republicans siding with Democrats in voting against the bill while two others didn't vote at all and one voted "present." New York Governor Kathy Hochul holds a press conference following a roundtable discussion about federal DOGE layoffs on March 3, 2025, in New York City. New York Governor Kathy Hochul holds a press conference following a roundtable discussion about federal DOGE layoffs on March 3, 2025, in New York To Know Among her various concerns, Hochul highlighted the restriction of health care access as a result of Medicaid and Affordable Care Act (ACA) cuts and the reduction in food security because of SNAP benefit cuts as the chief concerns among her many objections to the bill. She also pointed to the risks to the "safety and reliability" of the state's power grid and the significant challenges to education with cuts to the federal loan program and the reduction of Pell Grants. "Taken together, these provisions represent a regressive shift that threatens to widen educational disparities, destabilize community colleges and minority-serving institutions and undermine national efforts to promote affordable higher education," Hochul wrote. New York's seven GOP representatives turned their backs on their constituents by passing a budget that guts Medicaid and takes a sledgehammer to our health care system. I've worked hard to expand health care access, and I'm not backing down — Kathy Hochul (@KathyHochul) June 2, 2025 Hochul also hit out at the decision to merely increase the State and Local Tax (SALT) cap rather than entirely scrap it. She said it hurts higher-income states that end up benefitting relatively less than smaller states across the country. She criticized New York Republicans in the House who voted in support of Trump's bill, saying they refused to "advocate for the best interests of their state." Among the seven Republican representatives from New York, only Andrew Garbarino did not support the bill, choosing not to vote. The bill would slash $13.5 billion annually from New York's health care sector, primarily through reductions in Medicaid and Affordable Care Act marketplace funding, according to official state figures. Nearly 1.5 million New Yorkers face the loss of health insurance, and rural and safety net hospitals may be forced to close as a result of the cuts. Representative Andrew Garbarino, a New York Republican, leaves a House Ethics Committee closed-door meeting in the Longworth House Office Building on November 20, 2024, in Washington. Representative Andrew Garbarino, a New York Republican, leaves a House Ethics Committee closed-door meeting in the Longworth House Office Building on November 20, 2024, in bill also seeks to shrink SNAP benefits by $267 billion over a decade, tightening eligibility and shifting more costs to states beginning in 2028. Nearly 3 million New Yorkers could see reduced food aid, and the administrative burden on the state could exceed $2.1 billion per year. New requirements would mandate that parents of children age 7 and older work to maintain benefits, a significant change from the previous exemption for parents of children under 18. These are also just some of the concerns a handful of Republican senators have raised as the chamber prepares to vote on the House-passed version of the bill. Senators Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Josh Hawley of Missouri have voiced opposition to Medicaid cuts. Other skeptical Republicans, such as Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, have voiced concerns about economic aspects of the bill, including the potential to increase the country's debt limit by $5 trillion, which also set off Elon Musk and inspired the tech mogul to initiate a war of words with the president on Thursday. What People Are Saying New York Governor Kathy Hochul, in a letter to Senate Republicans: "As Governor of New York, I am writing to you ahead of the Senate's consideration of the House reconciliation legislative package to underscore the detrimental impact this bill would have on my state. If enacted, the proposed bill would gut New York's healthcare system, strip families of crucial nutrition benefits, trigger billions in economic losses through the removal of clean energy tax credits, stagnate growth in education and critical technology sectors, and continue to unfairly tax hard-working New Yorkers by failing to fully repeal the SALT cap. Passage of this legislation would worsen the affordability crisis and inject further instability into an already fragile economy. "If New York Republicans in the House refuse to advocate for the best interests of their state, I will. As Governor, I must stand up for middle-class New Yorkers who cannot afford the consequences of this budget. I urge you to reject the House proposal and instead work with Leader Schumer on a bipartisan reconciliation package that delivers for working families, invests in the future, and reflects the real needs of the people we serve." Senator Josh Hawley, a Missouri Republican, in an op-ed for The New York Times: "If Congress cuts funding for Medicaid benefits, Missouri workers and their children will lose their health care. And hospitals will close. It's that simple. And that pattern will replicate in states across the country." House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, a New York Democrat: [The bill is a] "reckless, regressive and reprehensible GOP tax scam." House Speaker Mike Johnson, on the passage of the bill: "Today, the House has passed generational, nation-shaping legislation that reduces spending, permanently lowers taxes for families and job creators, secures the border, unleashes American energy dominance, restores peace through strength, and makes government work more efficiently and effectively for all Americans." What Happens Next The Senate is scheduled to debate the bill before July 4, aiming to meet that deadline at the president's insistence despite having until the end of September to pass the bill. The final legislation is expected to reflect alterations from ongoing negotiations.
Business Journals
3 hours ago
- Business Journals
The future of our region's economy depends on the power of our partnerships
As the government jobs and contracts that have long been the center of gravity in our region continue to undergo reductions and elimination, our local economy is facing profound disruption. In the next few years, this presents significant challenges for the well-being of an enormous number of our neighbors. In the longer term, it may ultimately present opportunities for creating a more inclusive economy. In both cases, the extent to which we can mitigate harm today and capitalize on the potential for future transformation depends heavily on our ability as a region to lean deeply into the power of cross-sector partnerships. Addressing the immediate need Though we're still in the early phases of this new economic reality, its effects are already evident. Many of the 400 regional nonprofits through which the Capital Area Food Bank (CAFB) distributes the food for over 60 million meals each year are seeing more people come to their doors for help. These individuals include former federal employees and contractors, and an even greater proportion of people who are economically 'downstream' — for instance, workers in service industries who have experienced cutbacks to hours or wages because of the job loss (or fear of it) of their clients and customers. As more furloughs turn into unemployment and families' savings run out, we anticipate that these impacts will continue to grow. This is all coming at a time when our region was already experiencing high levels of food insecurity: CAFB's most recent Hunger Report revealed that 37% of our neighbors – 1.5 million people – didn't always know where their next meal would come from at some point in 2023. It is also coinciding with reductions in many federal supports just when they are needed the most. The food bank has already seen nearly $1 million trimmed from some of its federal sources of food, and another $1 million-plus reduction to a program that supported its ability to purchase from local farmers. Meanwhile, looming changes to government nutrition programs like the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) stand to erode assistance further. The result is a widening gap between the need for services and the resources required to supply them that the food bank, and other nonprofit organizations doing critical work, simply cannot fill on our own. expand A staff member at one of CAFB's multiple pop-up food distributions serving federal workers, contractors, and others impacted by layoffs and funding cuts. Courtesy photo More than ever, we need the partnership and investment of the private sector, along with that of governments at the county and state levels, local and national foundations, and the broader philanthropic community. Working together, we can stave off the worst impacts of the current economic turmoil on the hundreds of thousands of people across the area who are the first and hardest hit in a shaky economy (and often, statistically, the last to recover). Supporting our neighbors now pays multiple dividends. In addition to creating positive outcomes at an individual level, it also helps to lay the groundwork for enabling the growth of the workforce our region needs to succeed — today and most certainly as we re-envision our future economy. Building a new, more inclusive economy for the future In the midst of the rapid changes happening around us, and the immediate need to respond to them, it could be easy to miss that this moment also presents an enormous opportunity to re think the longer-term economic picture of our region, and the ways it can be constructed to benefit far more people than it does today. It is an opportunity we must not ignore. In recent months, leaders from across our area have begun to accelerate discussions about what the new economic engines of the DMV might include, and how we can spur them on. Ideas include everything from enhancing infrastructure like public transit and investing in technologies like AI to growing the regional presence of the aerospace and life science industries. The potential is significant. And in every scenario, an essential component of the vision is a labor pool with the skills to do the jobs. Certainly, this new workforce should and will include those who held previous jobs as federal employees or contractors, and there are initiatives underway to stem outward migration by facilitating those kinds of sector transitions. There is also work being done to support the recruitment of talent from across the country. But this moment also provides the chance to enhance or create structures and systems that will allow people who are already living in our region, but currently on the sidelines of our economy, to more fully engage and bring their talents to bear. We know that that the desire for greater employment opportunities is there. In a survey conducted for one of our recent Hunger Reports, we saw that while 76% of those facing food insecurity in our region are working, 70% of those same individuals are looking for a job that pays higher wages, and 59% are interested in acquiring new skills and training to excel in their current job or get into a new field. expand Hunger Report found that many people facing food insecurity also have a strong desire to gain new job skills and enter new fields of employment. Capital Area Food Bank Building the pipelines that will enable this will not just happen — it will require intention, support structures, and partnerships between sectors, often among actors we may not think of as natural collaborators. Fortunately, we have existing models. For instance, we are partnering with multiple regional institutions of higher learning to provide food that enables people to remain in school or training programs. The knowledge and skills they acquire through these programs help to prepare them for the jobs of the future, fueling their own economic advancement while supplying our local talent pipeline. The food bank is also partnering with local hospitals and medical centers like the University of Maryland Medical Center, Unity Health Care, and Children's National (which serves patients up through college age) to help people get the nutrition they need to improve their health and manage diet-related illness, allowing for greater workforce readiness. expand College leaders speaking at the Regional College Hunger Conference, hosted by CAFB and the Consortium of Universities of the Metropolitan Washington Area. The food bank partners with institutions of higher learning across the region. Alyssa Schukar None of this is occurring in a silo: crafting these types of programs has required significant collaboration and support across sectors in our region. And scaling more initiatives like this to build our new regional economy in ways that benefit more people will take even more of us working together. But there has never been a more important time to lean into these kinds of partnerships. In the current environment, transformation is not optional; for our region's survival, it is now required. Fortunately, while this is a time like no other that we've faced, the COVID-pandemic has very recently shown us that we can rise to any occasion if we evolve rapidly by working together. We can make it through this moment — and emerge stronger from it — by partnering to meet the immediate needs of our neighbors and finding new ways to help all people in our region thrive. To learn more about the Capital Area Food Bank and how you can get involved in its work to provide food and opportunity for people across the DMV, visit The Capital Area Food Bank annually provides more than 60 million meals-worth of food to people in need by supplying food to hundreds of regional nonprofits. It also partners with area organizations to address hunger's root causes by pairing food with critical services such as education and health care. Radha Muthiah is the president and CEO of the Capital Area Food Bank, overseeing the organization's work to help people across greater Washington thrive by creating more equitable access to food and opportunity through community partnerships.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Senate GOP Sorts Out Which Poison Pills It Can Swallow To Pass House's ‘Big Beautiful' Bill
Senate Republicans began the work this week of deciphering what exactly House Republicans' have stuffed into President Trump's massive spending package — and what elements of it they can live with. One thing is clear: Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) and Republican leadership have their work cut out for them. And in a few key cases, senators might soon find themselves caught between what Trump demands of them, and what's good for their reelection prospects. Similar to the competing pain points that surfaced among members of the House Republican conference, several Senate Republicans have gone on the record to object in various ways to either the bill's extensive gutting of social safety net programs or — on the other end of the spectrum — the extent to which it will add to the deficit, a Republican sin many in the party have built their brands opposing. At this point, it looks almost inevitable that senators will make changes to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which House Republicans drafted after weeks of intraparty quarrels. That means the House will have to vote on the bill again. Any major shifts could backfire, breaking the delicate balance on which House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) built the bill. Thune can only lose three votes from his caucus and still pass the legislation. Here are four places in which Republicans are likely to have to cut a deal, potentially tweaking just how destructive the final bill is. Several Senate Republicans have been publicly declaring that they are opposed to the ways in which the bill currently cuts social safety net programs, while, in most cases, still suggesting there are some cuts they'd support. Several Republican senators, including Sens. Susan Collins (R-ME), Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) and Josh Hawley (R-MO), have already indicated they won't get behind certain kinds of cuts to Medicaid and other programs, which are widely utilized by their constituents. 'I am not going to vote for Medicaid benefit cuts,' Hawley told reporters in the Senate basement in March. 'Work requirements, I'm totally fine with. But 21% of Missourians either get Medicaid or CHIP so I am not going to vote for benefit cuts for people who I think are qualified.' Sen. Jim Justice (R-WV) has made similar statements, telling reporters on Wednesday that he is ok with freezing the provider taxes House Republicans took up in their bill but not cutting them back. Meanwhile Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL), who recently announced a gubernatorial bid in his state, has said he is opposed to the way in which the legislation cuts Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). The House bill includes deep cuts to that program, including a cost-sharing plan that would require states to cover a portion of SNAP benefit costs; the benefits are currently completely covered by the federal government. 'Everybody that's going to be in state government is going to be concerned about it,' Tuberville said, according to Politico. 'I don't know whether we can afford it or not.' In recent days, some Senate Republicans have also indicated that they are exploring ideas to slash what they claim is 'waste, fraud and abuse' in Medicare —- despite President Donald Trump's previous vows to 'love and cherish' the program and promises not to touch it. Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) on Thursday said that Republicans are looking at changes to Medicare, telling The Hill there are 'a number' of reforms he'd like to see to programs maintained by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. 'I think anything that can be — that's waste, fraud and abuse are open to, obviously, discussions,' Thune also told reporters of Medicare. Meanwhile Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-ND) took a stronger stance, saying Republicans shouldn't be afraid of cutting waste from the program. 'Why don't we go after that? I think we should,' Cramer told NBC. 'Some people are afraid of the topics; I'm not,' he added, noting that they would focus on waste, fraud and abuse. That phrase — 'waste, fraud and abuse' — has, of course, become the go-to terminology for Republicans who want to justify their cuts to largely popular programs, despite the fact that rooting out supposed 'waste, fraud and abuse' roughly translates to hidden, hard-for-the-public-to-understand cuts. This new proposal, too, is already stirring some pushback. 'What a terrible idea. We should not be touching Medicare,' Hawley told NBC. Sens. John Curtis (R-UT), Jerry Moran (R-KS), Tillis and Murkowski have warned leadership about provisions of the bill that would gut Biden-era clean energy tax credits passed in the Inflation Reduction Act. The House bill's cuts were largely added to the House bill at the last minute in order to appease House Freedom Caucus members who were threatening to sink the bill on the House floor unless leadership made more cuts. They include plans to repeal residential energy-focused credits and several electric vehicle-related credits — both used by individual taxpayers — as well as almost immediately phasing out the clean electricity production and investment tax credit that aims to boost zero-emission electricity production from industry, utilities and manufacturing. 'I want to make sure that we are making good on the investments that we have made with those tax credits,' Murkowski told reporters in the Senate basement on Wednesday when asked about the tax credits. Meanwhile, Tillis — one of the most vulnerable Republicans in 2026 — on Wednesday indicated he wanted to see negotiations around the requirements and duration for the programs in question. He also specifically called out the foreign entity restrictions House Republicans put in the bill, which experts described to TPM as a 'bad faith' and 'unworkable' provision that Republicans say will prevent nations like China, Iran, North Korea and Russia from having access to the tax subsidies. Tillis described them as 'a big problem.' 'As I understand it, the level of granularity proposed by the House renders the programs inoperative,' Tillis told reporters on his way up to a floor vote. While several Senate Republicans are opposing cuts to programs that are crucial for their states, others, on the other end of the spectrum, are calling for more spending cuts than what are included in the House Republican package. (These Republicans have, lately, found a surprising ally in the president's erstwhile advisor, Elon Musk.) Sens. Rand Paul (R-KY) and Ron Johnson (R-WI) are loudly asking for deeper cuts, saying they are worried about the impact of the megabill on the deficit. 'I refuse to accept $2 trillion-plus deficits as far as the eye can see as the new normal. We have to address that problem, and unfortunately this bill doesn't do so,' Johnson, a member of the Senate Finance Committee, said Wednesday during an ABC News interview. Paul has made a career of libertarian budget hawkery, and is objecting, in particular, to a provision of the bill that raises the debt ceiling, something that must happen this summer in order for the U.S. to avoid default. He has previously indicated he does not believe 'expanding the debt ceiling more than we've ever done it before' is fiscally conservative. 'This will be the greatest increase in the debt ceiling ever, and the GOP owns this now,' Paul told reporters after the House passed their version of the bill.
