logo
Trump picked a fight against Harvard and he's already losing

Trump picked a fight against Harvard and he's already losing

The Hill14-05-2025
President Trump and his minions are operating on the assumption that Americans harbor substantial animosity toward colleges and universities. Their premise is importantly wrong.
Our institutions of higher learning are not perfect, and the public doesn't see them as faultless, but most Americans recognize their immense value and oppose Trump's attacks on them.
In an AP/NORC poll earlier this month, 14 points more disapproved than approved of Trump's performance on 'issues related to colleges and universities.' Most Americans dislike what Trump is doing to these institutions.
The rest of the data in that poll makes clear why: College costs are a real issue for the public, with 58 percent at least very concerned about tuition prices. In contrast, 'liberal bias' is not particularly salient. Just 36 percent claim to be concerned about ideological prejudice in colleges. A similar number, 32 percent, professes a complete lack of concern around liberal bias.
Conservatives have been lambasting the liberalism of colleges and universities at least since William F. Buckley skyrocketed to fame for publishing 'God and Man at Yale' in 1951.
It was less true when Buckley wrote and less true 20 years later when Seymour Martin Lipset and Everett Carl Ladd first surveyed the nation's professoriate, uncovering a liberal plurality, but not quite a majority — 46 percent described themselves as liberal, 27 percent as moderate, and 28 percent as conservative.
In this century, the 2024 FIRE Faculty Survey interviewed 6,269 faculty across 55 four-year U.S. colleges and universities and found 64 percent identified as liberals, 19 percent moderate and 18 percent conservative.
Different schools present somewhat different profiles, ranging from Harvard among the most liberal (73 percent), to Bringham Young University and University of Texas, Dallas where conservatives slightly outnumber liberals.
A survey of Harvard faculty by the student newspaper found a similar 77 percent calling themselves liberal or very liberal, 20 percent moderate and just 3 percent conservative. At Duke, a Chronicle of Higher Education poll revealed 62 percent of the faculty to be liberals, 24 percent moderate and 14 percent conservatives.
Such liberal unanimity understandably makes some people uncomfortable. Just 27 percent of Americans think universities in general do a good job of providing 'a respectful and inclusive environment'for conservatives.
Interestingly, students themselves are less clear. According to a Gallup survey of students then enrolled in a four-year college, 74 percent of Democrats and 73 percent of Republicans believe their school did a good job promoting free speech.
Nonetheless, in a country where liberals constitute a distinct minority, the professoriate does not reflect our ideological diversity and apparently never has.
Politically though, it's key that voters don't really care so much about liberal bias, oppose the Trump approach in principle and see enormous value in these institutions.
An earlier AP/NORC poll found that only 30 percent would allow state governments to restrict what is taught at state universities funded by those same governments. Sixty-eight percent would prohibit state government from exercising that level of control over their own universities. Allowing the federal government to interfere with private universities is likely to be even less popular.
At the same time, voters do perceive socially redeeming value from colleges and universities.
Seventy percent of adults without a college degree told Gallup they regarded a four-year degree as at least 'very valuable,' while 92 percent of college students felt confident a degree would help them get the kind of job they want.
Benefits go beyond personal economic advancement. Nearly two-thirds of American adults believe universities make a positive contribution to scientific and medical research, while 63 percent believe they contribute 'new ideas and innovative technology.'
So, it is no surprise that 62 percent favor 'maintaining federal funding for scientific and medical research' at universities, while a mere 11 percent are opposed. Only 27 percent favor Trump's policy of 'Withholding federal funding unless [universities] comply with requirements related to the president's goals.'
A plurality oppose removing tax exemptions from colleges and universities. This issue may be a bit esoteric as a third have no opinion.
Trump apparently perceives Harvard as an object of particular antipathy given his focus on that institution. But in a Washington Post poll, just 32 percent of Americans took Trump's side in 'trying to take a greater role in Harvard University's hiring of faculty, admission of students, and operation of its academic programs.' Sixty-six percent sided with Harvard which 'says this intrudes on its freedom as a private university.'
Further evidence comes from a YouGov poll which found just 35 percent approve of the 'the Trump administration…trying to take a greater role in Harvard University's hiring of faculty, admission of students, and operation of its academic programs.' Half disapprove.
Historically, Trump has proven politically adept in choosing his antagonists. Perhaps not this time.
Mellman is president of The Mellman Group a consultancy that has helped elect 30 U.S. senators, 12 governors and dozens of House members. Mellman served as pollster to Senate Democratic leaders for over 30 years and is a member of the American Association of Political Consultants' Hall of Fame. He holds degrees from Princeton and Yale.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Energy secretary: ‘We're going to get blamed' for rising power prices — but they're Democrats' fault
Trump Energy secretary: ‘We're going to get blamed' for rising power prices — but they're Democrats' fault

E&E News

time19 minutes ago

  • E&E News

Trump Energy secretary: ‘We're going to get blamed' for rising power prices — but they're Democrats' fault

DES MOINES, Iowa — Energy Secretary Chris Wright said he knows Republicans could suffer political pain for the electricity prices that are rising before next year's midterm elections. But he hopes voters will know to blame the Democrats instead. 'The momentum of the Obama-Biden policies, for sure that destruction is going to continue in the coming years,' Wright told POLITICO during a visit to wind- and corn-rich Iowa. Still, he said: 'That momentum is pushing prices up right now. And who's going to get blamed for it? We're going to get blamed because we're in office.' Electricity prices at the end of July averaged 5.5 percent higher than a year earlier amid surging power demand. Advertisement Wright's acknowledgment of economic reality offered a bit of a contrast to President Donald Trump's relentlessly sunny proclamations about the nation under his watch, from Trump's promises of a new 'golden age' to his predictions that 'we're going to have the greatest economic boom in history.' Wright's words also look ahead to one of the potential sleeper issues of the 2026 election, as the parties seek to own the message about how Trump's effort to thwart the development of wind and solar power is affecting electricity customers' wallets.

Ukraine and Fed in Focus; US Allies Set to Urge Trump to Back Ukraine
Ukraine and Fed in Focus; US Allies Set to Urge Trump to Back Ukraine

Bloomberg

time19 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Ukraine and Fed in Focus; US Allies Set to Urge Trump to Back Ukraine

US equity futures slip after closing last week near an all-time high. President Zelenskiy and his allies arriving in Washington to meet with President Trump to discuss security for Ukraine. The Federal Reserve's annual retreat at Jackson Hole kicks off later this week, with Chair Powell's speech being keenly watched for guidance on a September interest-rate cut. Seema Shah of Principal Asset Management says her biggest concern about Treasuries is at the long end of the curve. Mark Malek of Siebert thinks the next Fed meeting will not have any cuts. 'Bloomberg Brief' delivers the market news, data and analysis you need to set your agenda. (Source: Bloomberg)

Trump Tells Zelensky to Forgo Crimea or Joining NATO
Trump Tells Zelensky to Forgo Crimea or Joining NATO

Time​ Magazine

time20 minutes ago

  • Time​ Magazine

Trump Tells Zelensky to Forgo Crimea or Joining NATO

President Donald Trump has told Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to give up on the idea of Ukraine reclaiming Crimea or joining NATO. 'President Zelensky of Ukraine can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight,' Trump said via Truth Social on Sunday night, stating there was 'no getting back' Crimea and 'no going into NATO by Ukraine.' Trump, who is now focused on securing a peace deal rather than a cease-fire to end the Russia-Ukraine war (which was triggered when Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022), shared the advice ahead of his planned meeting with Zelensky and key European leaders at the White House on Monday. Ukraine's pursuit for NATO membership has long been documented and is a point of contention for Russia. At the annual NATO Summit earlier in June, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, an ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin, said: 'NATO has no business in Ukraine. Ukraine is not a member of NATO, neither Russia, my job is to keep it as it is.' NATO has maintained its stance on the matter. 'Ukraine is not a NATO member. Ukraine is a NATO partner country, which means that it cooperates closely with NATO but it is not covered by the security guarantee in the Alliance's founding treaty,' the organisation's website reads, specifying that 'NATO condemns in the strongest possible terms Russia's brutal and unprovoked war of aggression against Ukraine.' Meanwhile, Crimea has been under Russian occupation since 2014, when Moscow-backed forces took control of the territory. Russia initially denied direct involvement in the occupation. Read More: Why Putin Must Be Thrilled With the Result of the Alaska Summit Trump's comments on Sunday night come after he travelled to Alaska on Friday to engage in, what he referred to as, a 'high-stakes' summit with Putin. The summit, which saw the first in-person encounter between Trump and Putin since 2019, was intended to foster discussions about a path toward a potential cease-fire, but it ended earlier than expected and without any deal being reached. Trump and Putin spoke only briefly to reporters afterwards, and neither took any questions. Despite the anti-climatic event, Trump referred to the meeting as 'extremely productive' and has since lashed out at what he calls 'fake news,' insisting he had a 'great meeting' with Putin. Mapping out his reasoning behind inviting Zelensky to a White House meeting, Trump said: 'It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a peace agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere cease-fire agreement, which often times do not hold up.' Trump late-night comments on Sunday and his public direction to Zelensky re: his vision for how the war can be ended, fall in line with previous remarks he has made. In an interview with TIME in April, Trump suggested that Crimea (which he has repeatedly referred to as being 'given' by Barack Obama, who was President at the time of Russian annexation of Crimea), would remain under Russian control when asked about a path to peace in Ukraine. 'Will they [Ukraine] be able to get it back? They've had their Russians. They've had their submarines there for long before any period that we're talking about, for many years. The people speak largely Russian in Crimea,' said the U.S. President. In that same interview, Trump also said that he didn't see a future for Ukraine in NATO. 'I don't think they'll ever be able to join NATO. I think that's been—from day one, I think that's been, that's I think what caused the war to start was when they started talking about joining NATO,' he maintained. Elsewhere, Trump has also previously stated that a lasting cease-fire in the Russia-Ukraine war could likely only come through the exchange of territories 'for the betterment of both.' Zelensky and his European allies have staunchly denounced this idea, with Zelensky stating that Ukraine will not 'gift their land to the occupier.' Zelensky, who famously clashed with Trump during a disastrous Oval Office meeting in February, will this time be bolstered by the presence and support of key European leaders as he returns to the White House on Monday. Read More: The Secret White House Backchannel That Paved the Way For Trump's Summit With Putin Among those set to attend are U.K. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron, and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. Also set to be present in Washington, D.C., for the peace talks are NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte and Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission. Furthermore, Zelensky's European allies are firm in their notion that 'pressure' upon Russia can be increased moving forward. 'We do stand ready to increase pressure on Russia, particularly the economy, with sanctions and wider measures as may be necessary,' U.K. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said last week. 'It's important we all continue to work alongside Presidents Trump and Zelensky for a just and lasting peace in Ukraine.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store