‘Valorant' 10.10 Patch Notes Bring PC And Console Closer Together
A new Valorant patch is here.
Credit: Riot Games
A new set of patch notes has been released for Valorant, and while there aren't too many big balance changes, it does set things up for grater parity between the console and PC versions of Valorant.
The Valorant 10.10 patch notes have basically no real balance changes of consequence for standard play. Raze gets a visual update that will more accurately indicate hitboxes for her Boom Bot and Paint Shells, which should make playing against them a littler easier to manage. Other than that, all the balance changes come for the Swiftplay mode.
In Swiftplay, new agent Tejo gets a change that sees his Armageddon starting points increase to three from two. Although, this isn't really a change for this patch, it's actually part of his rework from the last patch that went undocumented.
Other agent changes come in the form of bug fixes, with the 10.10 patch notes featuring quite a few of them. Omen gets a change reverted from a few patches ago which should stop dead allies spectating Omen being able to see through nearsights, while the really annoying issue where Vyse could no longer use Arc Rose for the remainder of the round if it was placed too close to the spike has also been solved. You can see them all in the full patch notes.
The bigger news is mostly behind the scenes, with some UI changes coming to Valorant on console to bring it closer in line with the PC version. This will bring the two versions closer together in terms of features, and should make it easier for the dev team to implement changes across both of them at the same time in the same way. Initially this is just to do with the Collection section of the menus, but you can expect to see a lot more changes like these in the coming months.
It's also time for Pick'Ems to return, this time for Valorant Masters Toronto. From May 28th, you will be able to make your picks for the Swiss Stage in-client and on the web, with some rewards on the line if you manage to predict all the results correctly.
With Masters just around the corner, it really isn't a surprise to see such a small patch for Valorant, but that should mean we are only a few weeks away from a much bigger patch that should bring some welcome balance changes and maybe even some new content to play with.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Grupo Firme Cancel La Onda Performance in Napa Amid U.S. Visa Issues
Grupo Firme will no longer be performing at 2025's La Onda Fest this weekend in Napa due to ongoing visa issues. The Mexican band announced the news in a statement shared to Instagram Stories on Friday evening. 'Grupo Firme and Música VIP's visas are currently in an administrative process at the U.S. embassy, a situation that makes it impossible for Grupo Firme's performance at La Onda Fest to go on as planned,' wrote the band. 'We will share news soon on our return to the U.S. so we can see each other again and sing, dance, and celebrate together.' More from Rolling Stone Shakira Cancels WorldPride Concert Due to 'Complications' With Previous Boston Show Shakira Concert at Boston's Fenway Park Canceled Just Hours Before Showtime Grupo Firme Level Up With Anticipated Album 'Evolucion' The group was set to headline Sunday's lineup at La Onda, which embraces a wide range of genres, from Spanish rock and reggaetón to mariachi and Latin pop. The festival organizers announced that Tito Double P will replace Grupo Firme's appearance on the Verizon Stage. The cancellation arrives roughly two weeks after the Michelada Festival nixed its 2025 event over the escalating volatility around artist visas, which rang the alarm for several other Latin artists scheduled to perform around the country. Along with Grupo Firme, the Michelada fest lineup included Luis R. Conriquez, Los Alegres Del Barranco, and Netón Vega. After Los Alegres' visas were revoked by the State Department over their portrayal of a cartel kingpin at a show in Mexico and the group was replaced by Gabito Ballesteros, event organizers ended up cancelling the fest altogether amid uncertainty around visa statuses for both Ballesteros and Conriquez. Since taking office, President Donald Trump and his administration have made securing work visas incredibly difficult for international artists. Earlier this year, English artist FKA Twigs canceled a U.S. tour over the of Rolling Stone The 50 Greatest Eminem Songs All 274 of Taylor Swift's Songs, Ranked The 500 Greatest Albums of All Time
Forbes
38 minutes ago
- Forbes
AI Talent Pipeline: How Nations Compete In The Global AI Race
The artificial intelligence revolution is often framed as a clash of algorithms and infrastructure, but its true battleground lies in the minds shaping it – the AI talent. While nations vie for technological supremacy, the real contest revolves around human capital-who educates, retains, and ethically deploys the brightest minds. This deeper struggle, unfolding across universities, immigration offices, and corporate labs, beneath the surface of flashy model releases and geopolitical posturing, will determine whether AI becomes a force for equitable progress or a catalyst for deeper global divides. China's educational machinery is producing graduates at an unprecedented scale. In 2024, approximately 11.79 million students graduated from Chinese universities, an increase of 210,000 from the previous year, with around 1.6 million specializing in engineering and technology in 2022. By comparison, the United States produces far fewer graduates (around 4.1 million overall in 2022), with only 112,000 graduating with computer and information science degrees. This numerical advantage is reshaping the global talent landscape. According to MacroPolo's Global AI Talent Tracker, China has expanded its domestic AI talent pool significantly, with the percentage of the world's top AI researchers originating from China (based on undergraduate degrees) rising from 29% in 2019 to 47% in 2022. However, the United States remains "the top destination for top-tier AI talent to work," hosting approximately 60% of top AI institutions. Despite this, America's approach to talent faces structural challenges. The H-1B visa cap, which limits skilled foreign workers, is 'set at 65,000 per fiscal year, with an additional 20,000 visas for those with advanced U.S. degrees'. This constraint affects the tech industry's ability to recruit globally. This self-imposed constraint forces companies like Google and Microsoft to establish research centers in Toronto and London – a technological offshoring driven not by cost but by talent access. Europe's predicament completes this global triangle of talent misallocation. The continent invests heavily in AI education – ETH Zurich and Oxford produce world-class specialists-only to watch a significant number board one-way flights to California, lured by higher salaries and cutting-edge projects. This exodus potentially creates a vicious cycle: fewer AI experts means fewer competitive startups, which means fewer reasons for graduates to stay – a continental brain drain that undermines Europe's digital sovereignty. As AI permeates daily life, a quieter conflict emerges: balancing innovation with ethical guardrails. Europe's GDPR has levied huge fines since 2018 for data misuse, such as the $1.3 billion imposed on Meta for transferring EU citizens' data to the US without adequate safeguards, while China's surveillance networks track citizens through 626 million CCTV cameras. U.S. giant Apple was recently fined $95 million amid claims they were spying on users over a decade-long period. These divergent approaches reflect fundamentally different visions for AI's role in society. 'AI is a tool, and its values are human values. That means we need to be responsible developers as well as governors of this technology-which requires a framework,' argues Fei-Fei Li, Stanford AI pioneer. Her call for ethical ecosystems contrasts sharply with China's state-driven model, where AI development aligns with national objectives like social stability and economic planning. The growing capabilities of AI raise significant questions about the future of work. Andrew Ng, co-founder of Google Brain, observes: 'AI software will be in direct competition with a lot of people for a lot of jobs.' McKinsey estimates that 30% of U.S. jobs could be automated by 2030, but impacts will vary wildly. According to the WEF Future of Jobs Report 2025, 'on average, workers can expect that two-fifths (39%) of their existing skill sets will be transformed or become outdated over the 2025-2030 period.' The report goes on to state that, 'the fastest declining roles include various clerical roles, such as cashiers and ticket clerks, alongside administrative assistants and executive secretaries, printing workers, and accountants and auditors.' These changes are accelerated by AI and information processing technologies, as well as an increase in digital access for businesses. The panic that could be caused by these figures is palpable, but some are arguing that the real challenge isn't job loss – it's ensuring that displaced workers can transition to new roles. Countries investing in vocational AI training, like Germany's Industry 4.0 initiative, could potentially achieve smoother workforce transitions. By 2030, China could reverse its brain drain through initiatives like the Thousand Talents Plan, which has already repatriated over 8,000 scientists since 2008. If successful, this repatriation could supercharge domestic innovation while depriving Western labs of critical expertise. Europe's stringent AI Act may inadvertently cede ground to less regulated regions. Businesses could potentially start self-censoring AI projects to avoid EU compliance costs, with complexity, risk governance, data governance and talent listed as the 4 major challenges facing EU organisations in light of this Act, according to McKinsey. They went further to state that only 4% of their survey respondents thought that the requirements of the EU AI Act were even clear. This could create an innovation vacuum, pushing experimental AI development to jurisdictions with less stringent oversight. Breakthroughs in quantum computing could reshape talent flows. IBM's Condor and China's Jiuzhang 3.0 are vying to crack quantum supremacy, with the winner likely attracting a new wave of specialists. 'We need to make the world quantum-ready today by focusing on education and workforce development,' according to Alessandro Curioni, vice-president at IBM Research Europe. A recent WEF report on quantum technologies warns that, 'demand for experts is outpacing available talent and companies are struggling to recruit people in this increasingly competitive and strategic industry.' An IBM quantum data center dpa/picture alliance via Getty Images The focus on human talent suggests a more nuanced understanding of AI development – one that values creative problem-solving and ethical considerations alongside technical progress. "I think the future of global competition is, unambiguously, about creative talent," explains Vivienne Ming, executive chair and co-founder of Socos Labs. 'Everyone will have access to amazing AI. Your vendor on that will not be a huge differentiator. Your creative talent though-that will be who you are.' Similarly, Silvio Savarese, executive vice president and chief scientist at Salesforce AI Research, believes: 'AI is placing tools of unprecedented power, flexibility and even personalisation into everyone's hands, requiring little more than natural language to operate. They'll assist us in many parts of our lives, taking on the role of superpowered collaborators.' The employment landscape for AI talent faces complex challenges. In China, the record graduating class of 11.8 million students in 2024 confronts a difficult job market, with youth unemployment in urban areas at 18.8% in August, the highest for the year. These economic realities are forcing both countries to reconsider how they develop, attract, and retain AI talent. The competition isn't just about who can produce or attract the most talent – it's about who can create environments where that talent can thrive and innovate responsibly. The AI race transcends technical capabilities and infrastructure. While computing power, algorithms, and data remain important, human creativity, ethics, and talent ultimately determine how AI will shape our future. As nations compete for AI dominance, they must recognize that sustainable success requires nurturing not just technical expertise but also creative problem-solving and ethical judgment – skills that remain distinctly human even as AI capabilities expand. In this regard success isn't about which nation develops the smartest algorithms, but which creates environments where human AI talent can flourish alongside increasingly powerful AI systems. This human element may well be the deciding factor in who leads the next phase of the AI revolution.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Meta plans to automate many of its product risk assessments
An AI-powered system could soon take responsibility for evaluating the potential harms and privacy risks of up to 90% of updates made to Meta apps like Instagram and WhatsApp, according to internal documents reportedly viewed by NPR. NPR says a 2012 agreement between Facebook (now Meta) and the Federal Trade Commission requires the company to conduct privacy reviews of its products, evaluating the risks of any potential updates. Until now, those reviews have been largely conducted by human evaluators. Under the new system, Meta reportedly said product teams will be asked to fill out a questionaire about their work, then will usually receive an "instant decision" with AI-identified risks, along with requirements that an update or feature must meet before it launches. This AI-centric approach would allow Meta to update its products more quickly, but one former executive told NPR it also creates 'higher risks,' as 'negative externalities of product changes are less likely to be prevented before they start causing problems in the world.' In a statement, Meta seemed to confirm that it's changing its review system, but it insisted that only 'low-risk decisions' will be automated, while 'human expertise' will still be used to examine 'novel and complex issues.' This article originally appeared on TechCrunch at Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
