
Maryland bill seeks to stop storage of dredged material from Baltimore Harbor near overburdened communities
Republican Sen. Bryan Simonaire is the sole sponsor of the Environmental Justice in Confined Aquatic Disposal Act.
The measure would prevent the Maryland Department of the Environment from processing or making recommendations to the Board of Public Works for applications to build confined aquatic disposal cells — underwater containment structures that store dredged material from the harbor's shipping channels in depressions at the bottom of a waterway — within 5 miles of overburdened residential communities, as well as preventing the board from approving such a project.
'I am completely supportive of our port; it's a driver of our economy, jobs. This bill has nothing to do with undermining what our port does and I appreciate their efforts,' Simonaire said at a Senate Education, Energy and the Environment Committee bill hearing this week. 'But I also appreciate communities, especially those who live in overburdened communities that have been the brunt of environmental pollution for years — for decades — and trying to protect them and come up with a balance, and that's what I think this legislation does.'
Under state law, dredged material from the Baltimore Harbor must be confined and placed only in contained areas approved by MDE. According to the Maryland Port Administration, more than 1 million cubic yards of sediment are dredged from the harbor's shipping channels yearly.
However, the agency does not have a definition for what confined means.
At a bill hearing Tuesday, Simonaire said he asked Gov. Wes Moore's administration to define a confined area, but they preferred the flexibility of the existing language, he said.
Confined aquatic disposal, also known as CAD, is a newer practice in the state. The first pilot program next to Baltimore's Masonville dredged material containment facility was completed in 2018 and has been deemed a success by state officials.
However, the bill would not completely ban the use of CAD cells in Maryland.
Casey Hunter, who testified on behalf of the League of Women Voters of Maryland, said the bill is a 'crucial step' toward addressing ongoing environmental injustices faced by those who live in overburdened communities. She said projects that pose risks to public health or safety have historically been placed in these communities, and residents often lack the resources to challenge siting.
'It's just a common-sense measure to ensure that the burden of risk for this type of project does not continue to fall on Maryland's already overburdened and underserved communities,' she said, urging a favorable report.
Stoney Beach resident John Garofolo, a retired federal scientist who has raised concerns about the concept for over a year, said he understands the importance of shipping as the harbor expands. Still, the state must 'tread lightly' on the Patapsco River.
'The existing pollution has had significant impacts to our health, employment and businesses,' he said. 'The Patapsco is not a resource to be exploited, nor are its communities.'
A lifelong Pasadena resident, Carl Treff, said the Patapsco 'is not Maryland Port Administration's landfill.'
'I cannot fathom in this era of Bay restoration, how mining and destroying the bottom of our river is a good idea,' he said. 'The MPA has yet to prove without a doubt that CAD is an environmentally safe alternative to land-based dredge storage.'
Over the past few months, the port administration has been evaluating the use of CAD to manage dredged material as existing storage sites reach capacity.
Last year, Anne Arundel County lawmakers proposed creating a task force to study the concept, its risks and its benefits during the legislative session. Their bills failed to advance, prompting MPA to convene its own group of state, federal and local officials to study the technical aspects, risks and benefits of using CAD.
The group, known as the Bay Enhancement Working Group CAD Subcommittee, has held five meetings since September, with two more scheduled for February and March.
While Sen. Mary Washington, a Democrat representing Baltimore City and Baltimore County, suggested reworking part of Simonaire's bill, she also asked whether parts of the state's environmental code should be reevaluated, noting that some portions had not been updated in more than 20 years.
'My personal opinion would be, let's keep it simple this year and pass it, and I would commit to work with you over the interim, to come up with working with the departments and revise this,' Simonaire said. 'Because I think it's complex as far as what should be there and what shouldn't be there, but I am certainly on board with working with you and would support that.'
---------
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
19 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Zelensky Returning to White House With Backup After Trump Clash
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. European leaders and the NATO Secretary General will join Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in Monday's White House meeting, offering up a coordinated show of support for Kyiv after President Donald Trump failed to reach a ceasefire deal with Russia last week. Why It Matters European officials have looked on with concern as the Trump administration placed itself as the chief negotiator between Russia and Ukraine, jockeying to stay in the loop—and influential—as the Republican appears unwilling to strongarm Russia into concessions. European countries, many of which feel their own security is at stake with an agreement for Ukraine, have repeatedly echoed Kyiv's demands for a ceasefire deal that does not gift Russia territory recognized internationally as Ukrainian, and for Kyiv to have firm security guarantees to deter future Russian attacks. Ahead of Trump's meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday, European leaders made it clear they did not support any change in borders by force. Trump had said in advance of the summit that both sides would need to cede territory. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, right, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky participate in a media conference at EU headquarters in Brussels, Belgium, on August 17, 2025. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, right, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky participate in a media conference at EU headquarters in Brussels, Belgium, on August 17, 2025. AP Photo What To Know British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and French President Emmanuel Macron will be among the leaders making the trip to Washington. Also expected to attend are Ursula von der Leyen, the head of the European Commission, and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, who has sought a tight relationship with Trump. Finnish President Alexander Stubb may attend, Politico reported on Sunday. The Finnish leader has broken the ice with Trump, bonding over a shared love of golfing while leading a country with a significant land border, and apprehension toward, Russia. Stubb is a "very good player," Trump previously said. Zelensky's previous visit to the White House in February ended in disaster, descending into a public show of fractured relations between Kyiv and Washington. "Most likely, there will be little mutual understanding between Trump and Zelensky," Oleg Dunda, a Ukrainian MP who is part of Zelensky's Servant of the People party, told Newsweek. "Zelensky has already firmly rejected any proposals regarding territories." Trump told European leaders after meeting Putin that he backed a plan in which Ukraine would cede territory it still controlled to Russia, The New York Times reported, citing two senior European officials. Reuters reported that Russia had said it would offer slivers of land it currently controls in Ukraine in exchange for Kyiv giving up chunks of land in the east that Russia does not currently control, citing sources briefed on the Kremlin's thinking. Under the proposal, Ukraine would fully withdraw from Donetsk and Luhansk, with the current front lines in the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions to the south frozen in place, according to the report. Kyiv has said it will not reward Russia's invasion with territory, and to cede these areas would go against the country's constitution. Russia has tried to frame European nations as stumbling blocks to the peace agreement the Trump administration has pledged to broker. Following the Anchorage summit, Putin urged European politicians to "not make attempts to disrupt the planned progress through provocations and behind-the-scenes intrigues," or to become "obstacles." Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, said on Sunday that despite the Alaska summit yielding no deal, Ukraine would have "Article 5-like" protections to ward off any future attempt by Russia to attack its neighbor. Article 5 is the provision in NATO's founding treaty that means that an attack on any member country in the alliance is treated as an attack on all. Moscow has insisted Ukraine cannot become a member of NATO, while Kyiv sees joining the alliance as a way to make sure Russia cannot attack the country again. "Now it is really up to President Zelensky to get it done," Trump told Fox News following the Alaska summit. "I would also say the European nations have to get involved a little bit." What People Are Saying Dominique Trinquand, a retired general who previously headed up France's military mission to the United Nations, told The Associated Press: "The Europeans are very afraid of the Oval Office scene being repeated and so they want to support Mr. Zelensky to the hilt." What Happens Next It's not clear how much concrete progress will be made in Monday's meeting, the Russian and Ukrainian demands remaining apparently irreconciliable.


Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Europe needs to treat Putin like an ‘existential threat,' Sen. Schmitt warns
Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Mo., discusses his take on the Trump-Putin summit in Alaska and more on 'Fox News Sunday.'

Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
States are trying to keep disasters apolitical in the new Trump era
'This decision was petty. This decision was partisan, and this decision was punishing.' Moore said. And after the Los Angeles wildfires in January, California Gov. Gavin Newsom was quick to propose that politics could play a role in Trump's approval or denial of funding for his state. 'He's done it in the past, not just here in California,' Newsom said on Pod Save America. 'The rhetoric is very familiar, it's increasingly acute, and obviously we all have reason to be concerned about it.' A review by Seattle-based public radio station KUOW in June found that FEMA denied six of the 10 major disaster requests that Democratic states filed between February and June, while denying just one of 15 requests from Republican states. Asked about the analysis, a White House official said that 'Democrat state requests were denied in the first six months because they were not disasters. In the past, states have abused the process. President Trump is right-sizing FEMA and ensuring it is serving its intended purpose to help the American people.' Democratic Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs became the rare governor to criticize the federal government's disaster management in mid-July when she called for an investigation following a destructive fire on federal land that burned down a beloved Grand Canyon lodge. Hobbs said that she does not intend her call for an investigation to be viewed as a criticism of the Trump administration. 'I don't, and I think it's really important,' Hobbs said in an interview, adding that good working relationships between officials managing tribal, federal and state land are key. 'This is not intended to undermine that collaboration, but … we need to look at what led to that decision being made.' Steve Ellis, former deputy director of the Bureau of Land Management who worked for the agency and the U.S. Forest Service under multiple administrations, said that any federal agency involved in managing a fire of the magnitude and destructiveness as the one in the Grand Canyon should be launching an investigation without a governor's need to call for it.