US undocumented farm workers feel ‘hunted like animals' amid Trump's immigration raids
Raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) have caused workers to lose hours and income, and forced them into hiding at home, according to interviews.
With many US farms reliant on undocumented workers to function, the US president and his administration have sought to reassure their owners in recent months. But Trump's pledge to put farmers 'in charge' of immigration enforcement alarmed workers' rights advocates, who suggested they were being asked to surrender 'their freedom to their employer' just to stay in the country.
'We really feel like we're being hunted, we're being hunted like animals,' said an undocumented farm worker in Ventura county, California, who requested to remain anonymous for fear of retaliation.
An Ice raid at a cannabis farm in the county last week resulted in a worker suffering severe injuries after falling from a greenhouse and later dying. The raids sparked protests, with federal agents using smoke canisters in a bid to disperse a crowd of hundreds of protesters.
'You can't go out peacefully to do things, or go to work with any peace of mind anymore. We're stressed out and our kids are stressed out. No one is the same since these raids started,' the worker added. 'We are stressed and worrying if it continues like this, what are we going to do because the rent here is very expensive and it has affected us a lot. How are we going to make ends meet if this continues?'
Abigail Jackson, a White House spokesperson, said: 'President Trump is a tireless advocate for American farmers – they keep our families fed and our country prosperous. He trusts farmers and is committed to ensuring they have the workforce needed to remain successful.'
The Department of Agriculture and Ice did not respond to requests for comment.
Most of the more than 2.6 million farm workers in the US are Hispanic, non-citizen immigrants. Around 40% of US farm workers are estimated to be undocumented.
Last month, the Trump administration called for Ice arrest quotas of 3,000 per day, up from 1,000. Following criticism of the raids, Trump claimed that changes were coming to how raids were conducted in agriculture, hospitality and food service, though a directive issued by Ice to stop targeting such sites was reversed.
Trump recently claimed the administration is looking into legislation to defer immigration enforcement on farms to farmers. 'Farmers, look, they know better. They work with them for years,' he said at a rally in Iowa on 3 July.
The US president is 'clearly' trying to give corporate leaders 'as close to slavery … that he can give to them,' claimed Rosalinda Guillen, a farm worker from Washington, community organizer and founder of the non-profit Community to Community. 'Giving workers an opportunity who are already here in this country the ability to work and support their families and stay in this country by giving up their dignity and their freedom to their employer? If that isn't a definition of slavery, I don't know what is.'
Trump has indicated that his administration could issue temporary passes to immigrant workers. 'Even Trump consumes products being produced by farm workers, without realizing who produced these for him,' Lázaro Álvarez, a member of the Workers' Center of Central New York and Alianza Agrícola, who has worked on a farm for more than a decade, said.
'They have really demonized us with the word 'criminals',' Álvarez said. 'Despite the fact we are undocumented, we pay taxes. We are invisible to the government until we pay taxes, and we don't receive any benefits.'
Teresa Romero, president of United Farm Workers, a labor union representing farm workers, said: 'Everything that he's doing to detain these workers is unconstitutional. They don't have a document signed by a judge. They don't have a court order. They want to just eliminate protections of farm workers who are currently here and have been working in the field for 20 to 30 years.
'These workers who have not committed any crime are being taken by people who are masked, are not wearing a uniform and don't have a marked vehicle, so they are essentially being kidnapped.'
The impacts of these raids on farm workers will reverberate, Romero warned, from the communities being affected to consumers who rely on the work of farm workers.
'There's a lot of fear of going to work,' said Dr Sarait Martinez, executive director of Centro Binacional para el Desarrollo Indígena Oaxaqueño (CBDIO), which works in the Central valley and on the central coast of California with Indigenous farmworkers. She added that family dynamics among farm workers have been changing due to the Ice raids, as parents will alternate between who goes to work and who stays home with the children, to ensure they aren't both arrested, and separated from their children.
'This administration is targeting and just racially profiling anyone at this point that is brown, and it's intimidating workers,' said Martinez. 'There's a broader agenda of this administration, who and how they want workers to be employed in the country, and I think we need to be aware of that, and we need to be organizing.'
Luis Jiménez, an undocumented farm worker in central New York for 21 years, said the raids have affected the mental health of many undocumented farm workers.
The best public interest journalism relies on first-hand accounts from people in the know.
If you have something to share on this subject you can contact us confidentially using the following methods.
Secure Messaging in the Guardian app
The Guardian app has a tool to send tips about stories. Messages are end to end encrypted and concealed within the routine activity that every Guardian mobile app performs. This prevents an observer from knowing that you are communicating with us at all, let alone what is being said.
If you don't already have the Guardian app, download it (iOS/Android) and go to the menu. Select 'Secure Messaging'.
SecureDrop, instant messengers, email, telephone and post
See our guide at theguardian.com/tips for alternative methods and the pros and cons of each.
'A lot of people come here to work and their families back home depend on the work and the support of them, so it would be a tragedy if they were arrested and deported,' he said. 'We don't know who is going to report us or at what moment if we go out we will be reported to Ice because of the propaganda the federal government has been carrying out against the immigrant community.'
'There are many people who are racist but do not realize it affects them, too,' added Jiménez. 'The immigrant community and migrant labor supports the agricultural industry and makes the economy grow. And if the economy is good, then those people are better off financially.
'And there are people who don't care about that because of the simple fact of wanting to get immigrants out of this country.'
Back in Ventura county, the undocumented farm worker warned of far-reaching consequences should Trump press ahead with his crackdown. 'If there are no immigrants, there is no food, there are no houses, no hotels, no people who do the work in restaurants,' they said. 'Without us, food is going to be more expensive. We're essential.
'We worked through Covid. We worked through the wildfires in Los Angeles. We get up at 4am every day. No one else is willing to work the eight-, 10-hour days the way we do. We're not criminals. We're hardworking people trying to give our kids a better life. And we contribute a lot to this country.'
Solve the daily Crossword

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Taxes on Social Security benefits were not eliminated despite what you've heard
All the misleading buzz about Social Security and tax cuts for seniors in "One Big Beautiful Bill" foreshadows one ugly scene after another at tax preparation offices next year. It's not going to be pretty when many ill-informed retirees file 2025 tax returns. "What do you mean I'm paying taxes on my Social Security benefits?" some will no doubt ask. Already in July, I've spotted social media posts by tax professionals who dread the day when they will have to say "welcome to reality" to clients. "'Yes, your Social Security is still 85% taxable. Yes, I know that's what Trump's still saying. But pay attention to what he signed, not what he says,' he yelled for the 792,682,314th time into the void," posted Adam Markowitz, an enrolled agent in Florida, on X. What's sparking confusion for retirees about taxes The White House proclaimed, once again, "NO tax on Social Security" on July 4 when President Donald Trump signed what he calls "The One Big Beautiful Bill" into law. It's not an accurate statement. He also sent a mass email on July 12 making the same point. The Social Security Administration sent a gushy, questionable email July 4 to millions of people collecting Social Security benefits and others. Soon afterward, I heard from some retirees who couldn't believe how a federal agency was doing a hard sell about the supposed benefits and creating even more confusion. "The bill ensures that nearly 90% of Social Security beneficiaries will no longer pay federal income taxes on their benefits, providing meaningful and immediate relief to seniors who have spent a lifetime contributing to our nation's economy," Social Security stated in its email and online. Ninety percent, really? More on that one later. At one point, the email seemed to suggest that retirees were getting two tax breaks. "The new law includes a provision that eliminates federal income taxes on Social Security benefits for most beneficiaries, providing relief to individuals and couples. Additionally, it provides an enhanced deduction for taxpayers aged 65 and older, ensuring that retirees can keep more of what they have earned," according to a copy of the email forwarded to me. Additionally? There is no "additionally." The tax cut is an enhanced deduction for taxpayers aged 65 and older. That's it. The law doesn't eliminate the risk that some will pay taxes on their Social Security benefits. Trump taxes in 2025: Gamblers will pay more taxes in 2026 and beyond when Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' hits The Social Security blog online now refers to a correction without saying what was wrong. "Correction Notice: This blog was updated on July 7, 2025. The second sentence of the fourth paragraph originally read, 'Additionally, it provides an enhanced deduction for taxpayers aged 65 and older, ensuring that retirees can keep more of what they have earned.'' The word "additionally" is no longer in the copy. Instead, the paragraph in the online blog at now reads: "The new law includes a provision that eliminates federal income taxes on Social Security benefits for most beneficiaries, providing relief to individuals and couples. It does so by providing an enhanced deduction for taxpayers aged 65 and older, ensuring that retirees can keep more of what they earned." Clear as mud, as one of my relatives might say. How does the 'senior bonus' work? A new, temporary "senior bonus" deduction of up to $6,000 will apply to taxpayers who are 65 and older in 2025, 2026, 2027 and 2028. It ends after that without congressional action. Tax professionals call this a "special personal exemption" that aims to reduce the tax bill for many seniors. In general, seniors with high incomes would not qualify; lower income seniors who do not pay taxes would not benefit, either. "As a deduction and not a refundable credit, it will not help seniors who already owe no income taxes," said Mark Luscombe, principal analyst for Wolters Kluwer Tax & Accounting in Riverwoods, Illinois. Luscombe explained that higher income seniors receive a smaller tax break or no tax break because the deduction starts phasing out for those with a modified adjusted gross income of $75,000 for singles and $150,000 for joint filers. And, yes, there are plenty of other rules but, oddly enough, you do not have to be receiving Social Security benefits each month to qualify. It will not pay to be young — no matter what your income. Taxpayers who are 62, 63 and 64 at the end of a tax year do not qualify for the "senior bonus" deduction. They could still pay income taxes on Social Security benefits, if they're collecting benefits and hit certain income thresholds, without any offsetting bonus deduction. Here's a breakdown of some more rules that you'll need to know when filing a 2025 return: Some married couples can get a better deal: If both spouses are 65 or older, each could receive up to $6,000 or up to $12,000 total for the senior bonus deduction in a given tax year. Married couples face another rule: Married couples must file jointly to claim the senior deduction. If you opt for "married filing separately," you will not qualify for the senior bonus deduction, according to Tom O'Saben, enrolled agent and director of tax content and government relations for the National Association of Tax Professionals. Social Security number required: To claim the deduction, the senior must have a valid Social Security number. Those with higher incomes face limits: The tax break would phase out entirely for single taxpayers 65 and older with a modified adjusted gross income at $175,000. It would phase out entirely for married taxpayers 65 and older with a modified adjusted gross income at $250,000. 6% is the phase out number. When your income climbs above the threshold, the deduction phases out at a rate of 6%. The National Association of Tax Professionals, which has 23,000 members, offered an example for a 70-year-old retiree who is single and has a modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) of $90,000. In this example, $15,000 of MAGI exceeds the $75,000 threshold for a single tax filer. Take out your calculator and multiple $15,000 by 6% to hit $900. The maximum $6,000 senior bonus deduction is then reduced by $900 in this example to reach a senior deduction of $5,100. Tax relief for parents: How the Child and Dependent Care Credit can cut summer camp costs in 2025 Taxes on Social Security were never eliminated Believe me, you're not doing your friends any favors now by insisting that there are no taxes on Social Security benefits. Some people still need to withhold taxes on their Social Security benefits, if they have other significant sources of income. At no point did the House bill or Senate version, which was later passed by the House and signed into law by Trump, ever include a provision to eliminate the tax on Social Security or provide a deduction for Social Security income, according to a summary of the massive reconciliation bill provided by Wolters Kluwer, an information services company. Trump famously proposed making Social Security income tax-free during his 2024 campaign. But such a change could not be part of the budget reconciliation process. One provision of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 prohibits Senate reconciliation bills from including any measure that changes Social Security benefits or taxes. "It's fair to frame this new deduction as an attempt to fulfill the spirit of the president's campaign proposal consistent with the limits imposed in the reconciliation process," said Garrett Watson, director of policy analysis at the nonpartisan Tax Foundation. "But selling this politically as exempting Social Security from income tax is not accurate and will confuse or upset the seniors who end up paying tax on some benefits," Watson said. The senior bonus deduction, Watson points out, applies to any source of taxable income that a taxpayer who is 65 or older has and may not necessarily eliminate all tax on Social Security benefits. Social Security benefits began being taxed at the federal level in 1984 to shore up the Social Security trust fund, which was facing insolvency. At best, the new tax break means many seniors will save some money on taxes over four years. "Despite the SSA claims, most would see their income taxes on Social Security benefits reduced, not eliminated," wrote Howard Gleckman, a senior fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. In an online report July 9, Gleckman wrote that the biggest beneficiaries are seniors making between about $80,000 and $130,000. The senior bonus deduction would for that group would amount to an average tax cut of about $1,100 or roughly 1% of their after-tax income, he said. The tax deduction of up to $6,000 would benefit fewer than half of older adults, according to the Tax Policy Center estimates. How much a senior who qualifies for the "senior bonus" will save on taxes will depend on their taxable income, which determines your marginal tax rate. At a 12% marginal tax rate, for example, the $6,000 deduction for a single taxpayer who is 65 or older would result in $720 in tax savings, according to Watson. For a single taxpayer, the 12% tax rate applied on taxable income from $11,926 through $48,475 in 2025. Annual inflation adjustments can be made to marginal tax brackets. Hype, complexities and more can get your head spinning All this begs the question: How can Trump say there will be no taxes on Social Security benefits? Well, retirees will need to treat this one as one of those Trumpisms where, maybe, you need to study the fine print first. "The president often seems to try to put as positive a spin as possible on an issue without being totally consistent with the facts," Luscombe said. The 90% number used in the email sent by the Social Security Administration appears to track a 90% figure used by the White House. It is misleading. Many people did not have to pay taxes on Social Security benefits based on their income before the mega tax bill was signed into law July 4. About 40% of people who get Social Security currently pay income taxes on their benefits, according to an earlier report issued by the Social Security Administration in 2025. Other estimates, though, suggest that a bit more than 50% currently pay taxes. The Tax Foundation did not estimate the portion of seniors who would not pay tax on benefits under the new deduction. But noted that roughly half of all Social Security beneficiaries did not pay federal income tax on their Social Security benefits before the new tax law. Gleckman, at the Tax Policy Center, told the Detroit Free Press — part of the USA TODAY Network — that the 90% figure being used by the Social Security Administration isn't close to reality. In his online blog, Gleckman said the administration apparently came up with its 90% estimate by "assuming all tax deductions, including the new senior deduction, are used only to reduce Social Security benefit taxes." "But, of course, older adults pay taxes on all their taxable income, including from sources other than Social Security," Gleckman wrote. The Tax Policy Center's estimate is that about half of all recipients will pay at least some income taxes on their Social Security benefits, Gleckman wrote. "That is, they face higher tax liability than they would if benefits were not taxable. "The Social Security system is complicated, and, in many ways, its complexity is terrifying for older adults, many of whom rely on its benefits to pay living expenses in old age. The latest SSA communication does not help and indeed may make matters worse," Gleckman wrote. How Social Security benefits are taxed will remain a complex headache for many people aged 62 and up. Based on Social Security data, nearly 23% of men and 24.5% of women who claimed retirement benefits in 2022 were age 62. The earliest age that you can claim Social Security retirement benefits is 62. By collecting as early as possible, though, you'd receive a reduced monthly retirement benefit that is cut by a small percentage for each month before your full retirement age. The full retirement age is 67 now for those born in 1960 and after. For those born earlier, the full retirement age varies and is less than 67 based on when you were born. How Social Security benefits are taxed Unfortunately, it doesn't take much extra income to get hit with some taxes because income thresholds that trigger the tax on Social Security benefits do not adjust for inflation. For single filers, the threshold for paying taxes on up to 50% of Social Security benefits applies when your combined income is between $25,000 and $34,000 a year. Once the combined income is higher, up to 85% of benefits may be taxable. Couples filing a joint return face taxes on up to 50% of their Social Security benefits if their combined income is between $32,000 and $44,000. If the couple's combined income is higher than that, up to 85% of benefits would be taxable. Combined income is your adjusted gross income, plus nontaxable interest, such as interest on certain bonds, plus half of your Social Security benefits received that year. As a result, someone who is working while collecting Social Security benefits would need to take their earnings from a job into account. The same's true for someone who is retired and taking taxable withdrawals from traditional 401(k) plans. All that tax complexity isn't going to vanish. O'Saben, of the National Association of Tax Professionals, said he's frustrated by how the senior bonus deduction is being marketed. He heard a news story on the radio that implied that Social Security benefits were no longer taxable and he found himself yelling at the radio while driving. "There is no provision making Social Security benefits tax free," O'Saben said. Contact personal finance columnist Susan Tompor: stompor@ Follow her on X @tompor. This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Trump didn't kill taxes on Social Security, despite what you've heard Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


CNN
12 minutes ago
- CNN
Key senator makes bipartisan plea to Trump to invest in weather and early warning networks
A prominent senator is calling on President Donald Trump to reverse course on his proposal to slash the budget for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, making a case for America to be a world leader in the weather forecasting space instead. Sen. Maria Cantwell, a Democrat from Washington and the ranking member of the Senate commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, is advocating that the administration work with Congress to pursue bipartisan investments and outlined her plans in a letter addressed to Trump sent Monday. The letter spells out five recommendations to improve America's weather forecasting infrastructure, such as collecting far more observations and modernizing alert systems. The letter comes in the wake of devastating flash floods in Texas on the night of July 4 that killed more than 130 people. It also is being sent at a time when the Trump administration has reduced staffing at the National Weather Service and proposed even more significant cuts, such as eliminating NOAA's research arm and shutting down its many research centers. These labs contribute to forecast, technology and warning improvements. CNN has reached out to the White House for comment. All told, the Trump White House's budget proposal would shave off about $1.7 billion from the NOAA budget, about a 27% cut from current levels. Cantwell does not push back against the cuts in the letter but rather pitches an investment plan to try to appeal to the administration's desire to make America the leading nation again in many areas. 'We have a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to create the world's best weather forecasting system that would provide Americans with much more detailed and customized alerts days instead of minutes ahead of a looming extreme weather event,' Cantwell wrote. A noteworthy omission from the letter is any reference to climate change and the relationship between climate change and extreme weather events. The administration has taken a host of actions to rollback climate regulations and stifle climate science research at multiple agencies. The Texas floods have raised questions about NWS readiness for extreme weather events in the wake of staff cuts. The agency is scrambling to hire about 150 forecasters to fill the most critical gaps left by layoffs, early retirements and other incentives the Trump administration offered people to leave government service. Even with 150 new hires, who will take time to train, the NWS will still be more thinly staffed than at the start of the Trump administration. Prev Next The letter endorses next generation weather satellites, radars and new hurricane hunter aircraft to replace the current aging fleet, along with computing capabilities to catch up with, and eventually pass, the superior accuracy of European forecast centers. It also puts an emphasis on modernizing weather alert systems — a key topic in the wake of the disaster in Texas. Notably, it also endorses putting more money, not less, into 'basic and applied research.' Cantwell is in step with her colleagues on both sides of the aisle on the Senate Commerce Committee, who rejected most of the administration's proposed cuts in an initial fiscal year 2026 spending bill. House appropriators did the same, although the Trump administration has indicated it may seek other ways to restrict funding for agencies such as NOAA. 'Americans should have the best weather system. Why not?' Cantwell said on CNN this morning.


USA Today
14 minutes ago
- USA Today
What are the best vocational schools in the US? See USA TODAY's list of the top 250.
USA TODAY partnered with the research firm Statista to create the 2025 list of America's Top Vocational Schools. For decades, the value of a four-year college degree was indisputable. In fact, it was one of the few things Republicans and Democrats seemed to agree on. In recent years, however, that bipartisan agreement about the traditional college experience has shifted toward a different type of post-high school education: trade schools. 'Our workers deserve more postsecondary pathways, career-aligned programs, apprenticeships and on-the-job learning,' Education Secretary Linda McMahon, a Republican, said during her confirmation hearing in February. A year prior, Miguel Cardona, a Democrat who served as education secretary under former President Joe Biden, made similar remarks during a visit to his old high school. "We have a 'four years or bust' mentality in this country, and a stigma around technical education," he said. "Our kids are missing out if we don't give them the full range of options." Vocational programs – in fields like welding, culinary arts and auto repair – have grown in popularity and size. Between 2020 and 2023, trade school enrollment jumped by roughly 5%, according to a 2024 report from Validated Insights, a higher education marketing firm. In an April survey of more than 2,000 adults conducted by the American Staffing Association, 33% advocated for high school graduates enrolling in trade schools, while 28% recommended a four-year college or university. By several accounts, short-term training programs that offer certificates are the fastest-growing type of postsecondary credential in the United States. However, it's difficult to determine which ones are best, because research on vocational education, especially programs that last only a few months, can be contradictory and sometimes difficult to decipher. Listen to USA TODAY's podcast: Rethinking the American dream: Trade schools vs. college degrees | The Excerpt Short-term programs can generate immediate earnings and jobs, according to a recent paper in the Economics of Education Review. However, the paper says those benefits fade over time and many certificate holders end up earning poverty-level wages, according to a 2021 study. Research from New America, a left-leaning think tank, suggests that the economic value of short-term certificate programs is often overestimated. The shorter the program, the more controversial it is, too. For-profit schools, in particular, have developed a reputation in some circles for ripping off students with relatively expensive programs that do not provide the return on investment they promise. Despite these obstacles, politicians have continued to prioritize vocational education, especially as the cost of traditional four-year degrees has become out of reach for many families in recent decades. As part of the major tax and spending bill signed into law by President Donald Trump in July, Congress expanded Pell Grants to career training programs as short as eight weeks. The legislation, which takes effect in July 2026, will make millions of taxpayer dollars available to education providers far beyond traditional colleges. To help students navigate the trade school market, USA TODAY partnered with the market research firm Statista to create our first annual ranking of "America's Top Vocational Schools." The rankings, developed by Statista in collaboration with USA TODAY, were judged on five primary metrics: graduation rate, graduates' salary, years it takes to pay off net cost, social mobility and diversity. More rankings: For Earth Day 2025, list of America's Climate Leaders has grown significantly Data on school performance was collected by Statista through publicly available federal databases. The schools were ranked on a star system and excluded if they were unaccredited, failed specific financial responsibility metrics or had a high percentage of graduates defaulting on their student loans. Here is the 2025 list of America's Top Vocational Schools: